Hi!
Currently our Jenkins is a bit wonky/wacky. Currently clarifying the issue with
infra.
LieGrue,
strub
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13684587#comment-13684587
]
Mark Struberg commented on DELTASPIKE-382:
--
Logging the configured values is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13684601#comment-13684601
]
John D. Ament commented on DELTASPIKE-382:
--
What if it were even simpler?
Hi Thomas,
Great work so far. I just browsed through the doc and add two minor
corrections (see my pull request).
Will take a look at the code now.
Also I have some suggestions for features, but I guess I can add them
myself, once we have added this to deltaspike
Cheers,
Arne
Am 14.06.13
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13684609#comment-13684609
]
Gerhard Petracek commented on DELTASPIKE-382:
-
@mark:
in config-sources
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13684626#comment-13684626
]
Mark Struberg commented on DELTASPIKE-382:
--
[~gpetracek]
checking logs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13684635#comment-13684635
]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-382:
---
An alternative would be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13684641#comment-13684641
]
Gerhard Petracek commented on DELTASPIKE-382:
-
@mark:
so far i haven't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13684643#comment-13684643
]
Gerhard Petracek commented on DELTASPIKE-382:
-
@romain:
yes - if we change
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13684641#comment-13684641
]
Gerhard Petracek edited comment on DELTASPIKE-382 at 6/16/13 1:04 PM:
Hi all
One of the comments in the introduction of a Bean Validation module is that
the name I gave it isn't descriptive/useful. I chose the name beanval
since it was a shortened version of Bean Validation that could easily be
read via maven. To me, it's descriptive of being related to JSR303
gerhard/thomas
The problem I have with bv is that no one refers to BeanValidation as bv
(in fact, Bean Validation is the shortened form of JavaBeans Validation).
Doing a quick google search on bv shows me some STDs. Since google is
typically stalking me and knows I ask lots of programming
whatever the list is IMO, the point was already mentionned: how many times
did you use bv to say bean validation? You never say Java Persistence
API but always jpa, for bval that's the opposite IMO.
I commonly see bval or beanvalidation but not others.
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau
even when speaking?
Then the point is who should understand the name, the EG or users.
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
we never had an issue with that in codi where we use bv since 2010.
regards,
gerhard
2013/6/16 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
even when speaking?
Then the point is who should understand the name, the EG or users.
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau
codi is not that used, and not sure bv is explicit enough in all languages.
hibernate uses validator, other can use jsr330/jsr349. Since this module
can be an in between 330 and 349 maybe using jsr330 is good but IMO has the
same drawback as bv. If you don't follow specs and/or dev them you don't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13684702#comment-13684702
]
Gerhard Petracek edited comment on DELTASPIKE-382 at 6/16/13 6:28 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13684728#comment-13684728
]
Mark Struberg commented on DELTASPIKE-382:
--
parsing ALL log output in
[+1] beanval
BTW, I'll leave this open for about 72 hours.
John
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 8:42 PM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.comwrote:
All
Based on the thread thus far, I'd like to call a vote. These are the two
names the seem to have the least angst:
beanval
bean-validation
+1
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com
To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Monday, 17 June 2013, 2:42
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Bean Validation Module Name
[+1] beanval
BTW, I'll leave this open for about 72 hours.
John
On
20 matches
Mail list logo
