+1 for 1.4.0
2015-05-04 22:05 GMT+02:00 Rafael Benevides benevi...@redhat.com:
I though more about it and considering that we had some APIs change I'm
doing a
+1 to 1.4.0
On 5/4/15 12:37, Rafael Benevides wrote:
I'm ok with either 1.3.1 or 1.4.0.
On 5/4/15 12:14, Jason Porter wrote:
Fine by me
+1
On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
+1
LieGrue,
strub
Am 01.05.2015 um 18:51 schrieb Gerhard Petracek
gerhard.petra...@gmail.com:
hi @ all,
if there are no objections, i'll change the version number to 1.4.0
before the next
+1
On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com
wrote:
finally this mail arrived twice...
in the other thread we already have 3x +1 for v1.4.0 - i'll add your
opinions their once i send the conclusion.
regards,
gerhard
2015-05-02 23:27 GMT+02:00 John D.
I'm ok with either 1.3.1 or 1.4.0.
On 5/4/15 12:14, Jason Porter wrote:
+1
On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com
wrote:
finally this mail arrived twice...
in the other thread we already have 3x +1 for v1.4.0 - i'll add your
opinions their once i send the
I though more about it and considering that we had some APIs change I'm
doing a
+1 to 1.4.0
On 5/4/15 12:37, Rafael Benevides wrote:
I'm ok with either 1.3.1 or 1.4.0.
On 5/4/15 12:14, Jason Porter wrote:
+1
On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Gerhard Petracek
gerhard.petra...@gmail.com
+1
2015-05-02 20:16 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek gpetra...@apache.org:
it looks like the mail never arrived - once again:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com
Date: 2015-05-01 18:51 GMT+02:00
hi @ all,
if there are no objections, i'll
it looks like the mail never arrived - once again:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com
Date: 2015-05-01 18:51 GMT+02:00
hi @ all,
if there are no objections, i'll change the version number to 1.4.0
before the next release.
reasons:
- the
+1
On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Gerhard Petracek
gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote:
hi @ all,
if there are no objections, i'll change the version number to 1.4.0
before the next release.
reasons:
- the release will contain a new module (the proxy-module)
- we added several new features
Yep didnt see sthg justifying an upgrade for me. What would justify it for
a user - ie not for us.
Le 2 mai 2015 23:03, Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com a
écrit :
@romain:
see e.g.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312820version=12327249
regards,
hi @ all,
if there are no objections, i'll change the version number to 1.4.0
before the next release.
reasons:
- the release will contain a new module (the proxy-module)
- we added several new features
regards,
gerhard
Hi Gerhard, can you highlight some new features? Not sure proxy module is
enough by itself so would be +0 ATM for me.
hi @ all,
if there are no objections, i'll change the version number to 1.4.0
before the next release.
reasons:
- the release will contain a new module (the proxy-module)
- we
@romain:
see e.g.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312820version=12327249
regards,
gerhard
2015-05-02 22:48 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com:
Hi Gerhard, can you highlight some new features? Not sure proxy module is
enough by itself so
hi @ all,
if there are no objections, i'll change the version number to 1.4.0
before the next release.
reasons:
- the release will contain a new module (the proxy-module)
- we added several new features
regards,
gerhard
13 matches
Mail list logo
