T. J. Frazier wrote:
Clayton wrote:
May be it's an idea to use ISO date in the documentation written in
English ?
[snip]
-MM-DD HH:MM
[snip]
My thoughts on this... if we do switch to ISO8601 date formats, then we
would need to be explicit about it - stating exactly what date format
I would like to draw to the attention of any interested members of
this list (who may not be on the CC list for the issue itself) to the
draft Installation Guide for OOo 3.x (which replaces the Setup Guide
for OOo 2.x):
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102393
In my last edit of
Clayton wrote:
May be it's an idea to use ISO date in the documentation written in
English ?
[snip]
-MM-DD HH:MM
[snip]
My thoughts on this... if we do switch to ISO8601 date formats, then we
would need to be explicit about it - stating exactly what date format is
being used.
If
> May be it's an idea to use ISO date in the documentation written in
> English ?
[snip]
>-MM-DD HH:MM
...which subsequently confuses people who use DD-MM instead of MM-DD.
Personally, after having lived in Europe for several years, and becoming
used to date conventions used here, I'd
Hi,
May be it's an idea to use ISO date in the documentation written in
English ?
Kind regards
Sophie
--- Begin Message ---
At page:
http://documentation.openoffice.org/manuals/userguide3/
The Dates are expressed in numeric + verbal notation which is
difficult for reader to read understa
Nino Novak wrote:
> On Friday 30 October 2009 21:01, Andreas Mantke wrote:
>> Hi Nino,
>>
>> Am Freitag 30 Oktober 2009 18:33:14 schrieb Nino Novak:
>>> Is it planned (e.g. by the doc project ;-) ) to document the
>>> Orvieto sessions in good quality video?
>> there are some discussions about this
On Friday 30 October 2009 21:01, Andreas Mantke wrote:
> Hi Nino,
>
> Am Freitag 30 Oktober 2009 18:33:14 schrieb Nino Novak:
> > Is it planned (e.g. by the doc project ;-) ) to document the
> > Orvieto sessions in good quality video?
>
> there are some discussions about this topic on the OOoCon l
