Hi Thomas and Konrad,
On 11/11/2016 2:59 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Thomas Monjalon
> wrote:
>> 2016-11-07 07:38, Jianfeng Tan:
>>> As some users are still using xen as the hypervisor, I suggest to
>>> continue support for xen in DPDK. And from 16.11, I
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Qiu [mailto:qdy220091330 at gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 1:49 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: Tan, Jianfeng; Michael Qiu
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] examples/tep_term: Fix packet len for multi-seg mbuf
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Qiu [mailto:qdy220091330 at gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 1:49 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: Tan, Jianfeng; Michael Qiu
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] examples/tep_term: Fix l4_len issue
>
> l4_len is not fixed, althro
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Reshma Pattan
> Sent: Monday, October 10, 2016 10:36 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: Pattan, Reshma
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pdump: fix dir permissions value in mkdir call
>
> From: Reshma Pattan
>
>
Hi Thomas,
On 10/11/2016 4:42 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Thanks Tim for the interesting inputs.
> Some of them may require a dedicated thread to continue the discussion
> based on some preliminary specifications or drafts.
[...]
>> Interrupt Mode Support in Virtio PMD: Support for interrupt
Hi Pankaj,
On 9/12/2016 6:55 PM, Pankaj Chauhan wrote:
> On 9/9/2016 2:26 PM, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
>> Hi Pankaj,
>>
>> Thanks for the massive and great work.
>
> Hi Jianfeng,
>
> Thanks for the review.
>>
>> On 9/5/2016 6:54 PM, Pankaj Chauhan wrote:
Hi Thomas,
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 12, 2016 5:36 PM
> To: Tan, Jianfeng; Yuanhan Liu
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] examples/tep_term: fix offload on
> VX
Hi Yuanhan,
> -Original Message-
> From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2016 8:09 PM
> To: Tan, Jianfeng
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Ananyev, Konstantin; Wu, Jingjing; Kavanagh, Mark B;
> Thomas Monjalon
> Subject: Re:
Hi David,
Thank you for reviewing this.
On 9/9/2016 5:06 PM, David Marchand wrote:
> Hello Jianfeng,
>
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 4:16 AM, Jianfeng Tan
> wrote:
>> Previously in igb_uio, iomem is mapped, and both ioport and io mem
>> are recorded into uio framework, which is duplicated and makes
Hi Pankaj,
Thanks for the massive and great work.
On 9/5/2016 6:54 PM, Pankaj Chauhan wrote:
> Introduce support for a generic framework for handling of switching between
> physical and vhost devices. The vswitch framework introduces the following
> concept:
>
> 1. vswitch_dev: Vswitch device is
On 9/9/2016 2:03 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
>> GET_PROTOCOL_FEATURES
>> is not supported yet. I see those features in PROTOCOL_FEATURES is for live
>> migration (right?).
> Not exactly. PROTOCOL_FEATURES was firstly introduced while MQ was
> enabled. Thus it's no wonder MQ is the first protocol
On 9/9/2016 12:19 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
>>
>>
>> Never mind, above fix on the vhost side will not take effect on
>> existing
>> vpp-vhost implementations.
>>
>> Actually, I was talking about the DPDK vhost implementation :)
>>
>>
>> This patch is talking about vpp's
On 9/8/2016 8:18 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 04:53:22PM +0800, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
>>
>> On 9/6/2016 4:20 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 03:54:30PM +0800, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
>>>> Hi Yuanhan,
>>>>
On 9/6/2016 4:20 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 03:54:30PM +0800, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
>> Hi Yuanhan,
>>
>>
>> On 9/6/2016 2:42 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:36:42AM +, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
>>>> When
Hi Yuanhan,
On 9/6/2016 2:42 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:36:42AM +, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
>> When virtio_user is used with VPP's native vhost user, it cannot
>> send/receive any packets.
>>
>> The root cause is that vpp-vhost-user translates the message
>>
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Tan, Jianfeng
> Sent: Friday, September 2, 2016 8:54 PM
> To: Kyle Larose; dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: Xie, Huawei; yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] virtio kills qemu
On 9/2/2016 8:31 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 9/1/2016 3:16 AM, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
>> Previously in igb_uio, iomem is mapped, and both ioport and io mem
>> are recorded into uio framework, which is duplicated and makes the
>> code too complex.
>>
>> For iomem, DPDK user space code never opens
Hi Kyle,
On 9/2/2016 8:35 PM, Kyle Larose wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Tan, Jianfeng [mailto:jianfeng.tan at intel.com]
>> Sent: Friday, September 02, 2016 2:56 AM
>> To: Kyle Larose; dev at dpdk.org
>> Cc: huawei.xie at intel.com; yuanhan.liu
Hi Kyle,
On 9/2/2016 4:53 AM, Kyle Larose wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> In my own testing, I recently stumbled across an issue where I could get qemu
> to exit when sending traffic to my application. To do this, I simply needed
> to do the following:
>
> 1) Start my virtio interfaces
> 2) Send
Hi Maxime,
> -Original Message-
> From: Maxime Coquelin [mailto:maxime.coquelin at redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 3:43 PM
> To: Tan, Jianfeng; Yuanhan Liu; Pankaj Chauhan
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; hemant.agrawal at nxp.com; shreyansh.jain at nxp.com
> Subj
Hi Maxime,
On 8/17/2016 7:18 PM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> Hi Jianfeng,
>
> On 08/17/2016 04:33 AM, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please review below proposal of Pankaj and myself after an offline
>> discussion. (Pankaj, please correct me if I'm going som
Hi Maxime,
> -Original Message-
> From: Maxime Coquelin [mailto:maxime.coquelin at redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 3:52 PM
> To: Tan, Jianfeng; dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples/vhost: remove
Hi,
Please review below proposal of Pankaj and myself after an offline
discussion. (Pankaj, please correct me if I'm going somewhere wrong).
a. Remove HW dependent option, --strip-vlan, because different kinds of
NICs behave differently. It's a bug fix.
b. Abstract switching logic into a
Hi Stephen,
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen at networkplumber.org]
> Sent: Saturday, August 6, 2016 12:36 AM
> To: Tan, Jianfeng
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com; Wang, Zhihong;
> lining18 at jd.com
> Subject: Re:
Hi Stephen,
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen at networkplumber.org]
> Sent: Saturday, August 6, 2016 12:34 AM
> To: Tan, Jianfeng
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com; Wang, Zhihong;
> lining18 at jd.com
> Subject: Re:
Hi,
On 7/18/2016 7:56 PM, Zhe Tao wrote:
> Problem:
> When using the TSO + VXLAN feature in i40e, the outer UDP length fields in
> the multiple UDP segments which are TSOed by the i40e will have a
> wrong value.
>
> Fix this problem by adding the tunnel type field in the i40e descriptor
> which
> -Original Message-
> From: Ananyev, Konstantin
> Sent: Friday, July 29, 2016 4:46 PM
> To: Tan, Jianfeng; dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: Wu, Jingjing
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] i40: fix the VXLAN TSO issue
>
> Hi Jianfeng,
>
> >
> > Hi,
>
Hi Konstantin,
On 7/19/2016 6:29 PM, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
>
>> Problem:
>> When using the TSO + VXLAN feature in i40e, the outer UDP length fields in
>> the multiple UDP segments which are TSOed by the i40e will
>> have a wrong value.
>>
>> Fix this problem by adding the tunnel type
Self-Nack this patch because the commit log needs change further.
> -Original Message-
> From: Tan, Jianfeng
> Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 8:24 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com; Wang, Zhihong; Xu, Qian Q; Tan, Jianfeng
> Subject: [PATCH
On 7/20/2016 2:13 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 01:50:34PM +0800, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
>>
>> On 7/20/2016 12:38 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 01:53:11PM +, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
>>>> We find significant perferm
On 7/20/2016 12:38 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 01:53:11PM +, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
>> We find significant perfermance drop introduced by below commit,
>> when vhost example is started with --mergeable 0 and inside vm,
>> kernel virtio-net driver is used to do ip based
Hi Yuanhan,
On 7/20/2016 9:44 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 01:53:11PM +, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
>> We find significant perfermance drop introduced by below commit,
>> when vhost example is started with --mergeable 0 and inside vm,
>> kernel virtio-net driver is used to do ip
Hi Mark,
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Mark Kavanagh
> Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 11:32 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: fix vhost setup in tep-termination app
> guide
>
> - Fix vhost setup flags
> - Add minor
Hi Oliver,
> -Original Message-
> From: Olivier Matz [mailto:olivier.matz at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 10:00 PM
> To: Tan, Jianfeng; dev at dpdk.org; Xie, Huawei; yuanhan.liu at
> linux.intel.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio: fix packet corruption
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Olivier Matz [mailto:olivier.matz at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 9:11 PM
> To: Tan, Jianfeng; dev at dpdk.org; Xie, Huawei; yuanhan.liu at
> linux.intel.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio: fix packet corruption
>
> Hi
Hi Oliver,
> -Original Message-
> From: Olivier Matz [mailto:olivier.matz at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 8:32 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org; Tan, Jianfeng; Xie, Huawei; yuanhan.liu at
> linux.intel.com
> Subject: [PATCH] virtio: fix packet corruption
>
&g
Hi,
On 7/6/2016 3:54 AM, Craig, Chris A. wrote:
> We recently upgraded our environment to the 16.04 version of DPDK on a 14.04
> installation of Ubuntu. After upgrading, we noticed our code was behaving
> oddly. After further inspection, we discovered the `packet_type` attribute of
> the
Hi Yuanhan,
> -Original Message-
> From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 10:16 AM
> To: Tan, Jianfeng
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Xie, Huawei; Mcnamara, John
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] net/virtio-user: fix return value not c
Hi Thomas,
> > >
> > > Looking at your special case, if the user did set an isolcpus option
> > > for another use, with no -c/-l, I understand the dpdk application
> > > won't care too much about it.
> > > So, this seems like somehow rude to the rest of the system and
> unwanted.
> >
> > The case
Hi Yigit,
> -Original Message-
> From: Yigit, Ferruh
> Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2016 5:02 PM
> To: Tan, Jianfeng; dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: Xie, Huawei; rich.lane at bigswitch.com; yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com;
> mst at redhat.com; nakajima.yoshihiro at lab.
Hi Stephen,
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen at networkplumber.org]
> Sent: Friday, June 24, 2016 4:51 AM
> To: Tan, Jianfeng
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com; Xie, Huawei
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/virtio-
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Mahdi Moradmand
> Badie
> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2016 5:21 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] Assembly code
>
> Dear All,
>
> I used the default format of Makefile (as follow) which is
On 6/13/2016 5:21 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 02:29:42PM +, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
>> Compile DPDK with clang, below line in virtio_rxtx.c could be
>> optimized with four "VMOVAPS ymm, m256".
>>memset(>fake_mbuf, 0, sizeof(rxvq->fake_mbuf));
>>
>> This instruction
> -Original Message-
> From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 6:14 PM
> To: Tan, Jianfeng
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; rich.lane at bigswitch.com; mst at redhat.com;
> nakajima.yoshihiro at lab.ntt.co.jp; p.fe
> -Original Message-
> From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 5:52 PM
> To: Tan, Jianfeng
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Xie, Huawei
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] virtio: fix allocating virtnet_rx not mem
> aligned
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 4:58 PM
> To: Tan, Jianfeng
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Xie, Huawei
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] virito: fix reuse index in nested loop
>
> On Sun, Jun 12,
Hi,
On 6/6/2016 5:30 PM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> On 2016/06/06 17:49, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 05:33:31PM +0900, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> [My solution]
> - Pros
> Basic principle of my implementation is not to reinvent the wheel.
Yes, that's a good point.
Hi,
On 6/6/2016 5:28 PM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> On 2016/06/06 17:03, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> On 6/6/2016 1:10 PM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
>>> Hi Yuanhan,
>>>
>>> Sorry for late replying.
>>>
>>> On 2016/06/03
Hi Yuanhan,
On 6/6/2016 4:01 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 09:54:36AM +, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
>> +
>> +desc_addr = (uint64_t)vq->mz->addr;
>> +avail_addr = desc_addr + vq->vq_nentries * sizeof(struct vring_desc);
>> +used_addr = RTE_ALIGN_CEIL(avail_addr +
Hi,
On 6/6/2016 1:10 PM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> Hi Yuanhan,
>
> Sorry for late replying.
>
> On 2016/06/03 13:17, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 06:30:18PM +0900, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
>>> Hi Yuanhan,
>>>
>>> On 2016/06/02 16:31, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
But still, I'd ask do we
Hi Yuanhan,
On 6/1/2016 4:26 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 10:55:38AM +, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.c
>> b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.c
>> index 41d8ad1..5e4f60b 100644
>> ---
Hi Yuanhan,
> -Original Message-
> From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2016 3:38 PM
> To: Tan, Jianfeng
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Xie, Huawei; rich.lane at bigswitch.com; mst at
> redhat.com;
> nakajima.yoshihiro at l
Hi,
On 5/30/2016 8:24 PM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 30.05.2016 15:00, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Ilya Maximets [mailto:i.maximets at samsung.com]
>>> Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 8:50 PM
>>> To: dev a
Hi Oliver,
On 5/30/2016 11:26 PM, Olivier Matz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm planning to add the support for offloads in virtio-net pmd.
> It appears that the current rx flags in mbuf are not sufficient to
> describe the state of a packet received from a virtual driver.
> I think we need a way to say
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Ilya Maximets [mailto:i.maximets at samsung.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 8:50 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org; Xie, Huawei; Yuanhan Liu
> Cc: Dyasly Sergey; Heetae Ahn; Tan, Jianfeng; Ilya Maximets
> Subject: [PATCH] vhost: fix segfault
Hi David,
On 5/18/2016 8:46 PM, David Marchand wrote:
> Hello Jianfeng,
>
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Panu Matilainen
> wrote:
>> On 03/08/2016 07:38 PM, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
>>> Hi Panu,
>>>
>>> On 3/8/2016 4:54 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
&g
Hi Thomas & Sergio,
On 5/18/2016 4:06 PM, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy wrote:
> On 17/05/2016 17:40, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>> 2016-05-12 00:44, Jianfeng Tan:
>>> This patch adds an option, --huge-trybest, to use a recover
>>> mechanism to
>>> the case that there are not so many hugepages (declared
Hi David,
On 5/18/2016 12:39 AM, David Marchand wrote:
> Hello Jianfeng,
>
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 2:44 AM, Jianfeng Tan
> wrote:
>> This patch adds an option, --huge-trybest, to use a recover mechanism to
>> the case that there are not so many hugepages (declared in sysfs), which
>> can be
Hi Yuanhan,
> -Original Message-
> From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 12:45 PM
> To: Tan, Jianfeng
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Xie, Huawei; rich.lane at bigswitch.com; mst at
> redhat.com;
> nakajima.yoshihiro at l
Hi Michael,
On 5/13/2016 1:02 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 03:08:05PM +0800, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
>> (2) It's more aligned to previous logic to hide the detail to differentiate
>> modern/legacy device.
> Why is there a need to support legacy interf
On 5/13/2016 12:40 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 03:08:05PM +0800, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
>>>> +static int
>>>> +vdev_setup_queue(struct virtio_hw *hw __rte_unused, struct virtqueue *vq)
>>>> +{
>>>> + /* Changed to use virtua
Hi yuanhan,
On 5/12/2016 10:12 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 01:18:34AM +, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
>> +static void
>> +vdev_read_dev_config(struct virtio_hw *hw, uint64_t offset,
>> + void *dst, int length)
>> +{
>> +int i;
>> +struct virtio_user_hw
Hi Sergio,
> -Original Message-
> From: Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio
> Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 4:55 PM
> To: Tan, Jianfeng; dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: david.marchand at 6wind.com; nhorman at tuxdriver.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] eal: make hugetlb initialization more robust
&
Hi David and Yuanhan,
> -Original Message-
> From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 5, 2016 7:18 AM
> To: Tan, Jianfeng
> Cc: David Marchand; dev at dpdk.org; Xie, Huawei
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] virtio: fix modify drv_flags f
Hi Yuanhan,
> -Original Message-
> From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 5, 2016 11:20 AM
> To: Tan, Jianfeng
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Xie, Huawei
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] virtio: cleanup virtio_dev_queue_setup()
>
> On
Hi David,
On 5/6/2016 2:29 AM, David Hunt wrote:
> This patch set adds a fifo stack handler to the external mempool
> manager.
Just a minor confusion for me. Usually, we refer stack as LIFO and queue
as FIFO. So is there any particular reason why we call "stack (fifo)" here?
Thanks,
Jianfeng
Hi Yuanhan,
> -Original Message-
> From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 5, 2016 11:28 AM
> To: Tan, Jianfeng
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Xie, Huawei
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] virtio: fix memory leak of virtqueue
&g
Hi Sergio,
On 5/4/2016 7:07 PM, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy wrote:
> On 08/03/2016 01:42, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
>> This patch adds an option, --huge-trybest, to use a recover mechanism to
>> the case that there are not so many hugepages (declared in sysfs), which
>> can be used. It relys on a mem
Sorry, forget to mention, this patchset depends on:
- [PATCH v2] virtio: fix modify drv_flags for specific device
- [PATCH v3 0/2] virtio: fix memory leak of virtqueue memzones
Thanks,
Jianfeng
> -Original Message-
> From: Tan, Jianfeng
> Sent: Friday, April 29, 201
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Tan, Jianfeng
> Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 3:05 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: Xie, Huawei; yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] virtio: fix memory
Self NACK.
Missed to reset vq->started.
> -Original Message-
> From: Tan, Jianfeng
> Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 3:04 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: Xie, Huawei; yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com; Tan, Jianfeng
> Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] virtio: fix memory leak
Hi Yuanhan,
On 4/28/2016 6:37 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 12:32:12PM +, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
>> Issue: When virtio was proposed in DPDK, there is no API to free memzones.
>> But this has changed since rte_memzone_free() has been implemented by
>> commit ff909fe21f.
> The
Hi,
On 4/26/2016 7:53 PM, David Marchand wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 4:24 AM, Jianfeng Tan
> wrote:
>> Issue: virtio's drv_flags are decided by devices types (modern vs legacy),
>> and which kernel driver is used, and the negotiated features (especially
>> VIRTIO_NET_STATUS) with backend,
Hi,
Since some guys are asking about the status of this patch, I'd like to
ping if anyone still has concerns.
Current conclusion is: with option --avail-cores.
Thanks,
Jianfeng
On 3/4/2016 6:05 PM, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
> This patch adds option, --avail-cores, to use lcores which are available
>
Hi Stephen,
On 4/26/2016 12:48 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 12:36:10 +
> Jianfeng Tan wrote:
>
>> Issue: when using virtio nic to transmit pkts, it causes segment fault.
>>
>> How to reproduce:
>> a. start testpmd with vhost.
>> $testpmd -c 0x3 -n 4 --socket-mem 1024,0
Hi Yuanhan,
> -Original Message-
> From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 11:43 AM
> To: Tan, Jianfeng
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Xie, Huawei
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] virtio: fix segfault when transmit pkts
>
> On Mo
Hi Yuanhan & Huawei,
On 4/22/2016 10:23 PM, Xie, Huawei wrote:
> On 4/22/2016 6:43 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 12:36:10PM +, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
>>> Issue: when using virtio nic to transmit pkts, it causes segment fault.
>> Jianfeng,
>>
>> It's good to describe the
Hi,
On 4/22/2016 3:36 PM, David Marchand wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 7:15 AM, Tan, Jianfeng
> wrote:
>> On 4/21/2016 4:51 PM, David Marchand wrote:
>>> virtio code relies on drv_flags (even updating it while this should be
>>> per-devic
Hi Yuanhan,
On 4/22/2016 6:14 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 02:56:36AM +, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
>> Add a new virtual device named eth_cvio, it can be used just like
>> eth_ring, eth_null, etc.
>>
>> Configured parameters include:
>>- rx (optional, 1 by default), number of
Hi Yuanhan,
On 4/22/2016 6:01 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 02:56:35AM +, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
>> Background: Previously, we usually use a virtio device in QEMU/VM's
>> context as below pic shows. Virtio nic is emulated in QEMU, and usually
>> presented in VM as a PCI
Hi Thomas,
On 4/21/2016 6:05 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-04-21 02:56, Jianfeng Tan:
>> Add a new virtual device named eth_cvio, it can be used just like
>> eth_ring, eth_null, etc.
> Why this name eth_cvio?
> Why the prefix eth_?
> The virtio-net driver uses a kernel device. Here it is a
Hi,
On 4/21/2016 4:51 PM, David Marchand wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 4:56 AM, Jianfeng Tan
> wrote:
>> Add a new virtual device named eth_cvio, it can be used just like
>> eth_ring, eth_null, etc.
>>
>> Configured parameters include:
>>- rx (optional, 1 by default), number
Hi Nissim,
On 4/20/2016 2:10 PM, Nissim Nisimov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I see some additions in dpdk 16.04 to support TSO for vhost-user dpdk driver
> with vanilla linux virtio VM.
>
> Does dpdk Virtio driver support TSO with the current code?
Virtio pmd driver does not support TSO for now.
> if
Hi Thomas,
On 4/14/2016 12:14 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Hi Jianfeng,
>
> Thanks for raising the container issues and proposing some solutions.
> General comments below.
>
> 2016-02-05 19:20, Jianfeng Tan:
>> This patchset is to provide high performance networking interface (virtio)
>> for
On 4/7/2016 11:29 PM, Loftus, Ciara wrote:
>> On 4/7/2016 8:29 AM, Rich Lane wrote:
>>> If the vhost PMD were configured with more queues than the guest, the
>> old
>>> code would segfault in rte_vhost_enable_guest_notification due to a NULL
>>> virtqueue pointer.
>>>
>>> Fixes: ee584e9710b9
Hi,
On 4/7/2016 8:29 AM, Rich Lane wrote:
> If the vhost PMD were configured with more queues than the guest, the old
> code would segfault in rte_vhost_enable_guest_notification due to a NULL
> virtqueue pointer.
>
> Fixes: ee584e9710b9 ("vhost: add driver on top of the library")
>
On 4/6/2016 2:17 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 02:05:51PM +0800, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
>>
>> On 4/6/2016 1:44 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 01:32:12PM +0800, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>&g
On 4/6/2016 1:44 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 01:32:12PM +0800, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just out of interest, seems that the message handling thread which runs
>> new_device() is pthread_create() from the thread which calls the
>> d
Hi,
Just out of interest, seems that the message handling thread which runs
new_device() is pthread_create() from the thread which calls the
dev_start(), usually master thread, right? But it's not necessary to be
the master thread to poll pkts from this vhost port, right? So what's
the
Hi,
On 4/5/2016 4:20 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-04-05 03:58, Jianfeng Tan:
>> - ethertype filter X X
>> + ethertype filter X X
>> X X
> Are you sure about ethertype filter in virtio? I do not see it.
Sorry,
Hi,
On 4/5/2016 12:26 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 11:20:05AM +0800, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 4/5/2016 10:11 AM, Rich Lane wrote:
>>> For simple TX the virtio-net header must be zeroed, but it was using memory
>>> that had be
Hi,
On 4/5/2016 10:11 AM, Rich Lane wrote:
> For simple TX the virtio-net header must be zeroed, but it was using memory
> that had been initialized with indirect descriptor tables. This resulted in
> "unsupported gso type" errors from librte_vhost.
>
> We can use the same memory for every
Hi,
On 3/31/2016 7:00 PM, Adrien Mazarguil wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 06:55:41PM +0800, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 3/31/2016 6:22 PM, Adrien Mazarguil wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Adrien Mazarguil
>>> ---
Hi,
On 3/31/2016 6:22 PM, Adrien Mazarguil wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Adrien Mazarguil
> ---
> doc/guides/nics/overview.rst | 56
> ++--
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/doc/guides/nics/overview.rst
Hi Bruce,
On 3/25/2016 10:21 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 11:15:36AM +0800, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Jianfeng Tan
>> ---
>> doc/guides/nics/overview.rst | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git
NACK.
I'll send an independent patchset for this.
Thanks,
Jianfeng
> -Original Message-
> From: Tan, Jianfeng
> Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016 8:48 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: Tan, Jianfeng; Ananyev, Konstantin; Zhang, Helin; Richardson, Bruce
> Subject: [PATCH v4 1
On 3/24/2016 9:45 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 11:10:50AM +0800, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
>> Hi Neil,
>>
>> On 3/24/2016 3:17 AM, Neil Horman wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 07:20:23PM +0800, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
>>>> v1->v2:
dev/hugepages:/dev/hugepages \
>> dpdk-app-l2fwd l2fwd -c 0x4 -n 4 -m 1024 --no-pci \
>> --vdev=eth_cvio0,path=/var/run/usvhost -- -p 0x1
>>
>> f. Used with vhost-net
>> $: modprobe vhost
>> $: modprobe vhost-net
>> $: docker run -i -t --privile
Hi Thomas,
On 3/15/2016 4:50 AM, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
> Add a new API rte_eth_dev_get_supported_ptypes to query what packet types
> can be filled by given already started device (or its pmd rx burst function
> has already been decided).
>
> Signed-off-by: Jianfeng Tan
> Acked-by: Konstantin
On 3/18/2016 6:41 AM, John Wei wrote:
> I am setting up OVS inside a Linux container. This OVS is built using DPDK
> library.
> During the startup of ovs-vswitchd, it core dumped due to fail to mmap.
>in eal_memory.c
> virtaddr = mmap(vma_addr, hugepage_sz, PROT_READ |
1 - 100 of 205 matches
Mail list logo
