>
> >At this point we need to have only pseudo-header checksum for TSO. Maybe
> there will be new requirements, but that's something I cannot predict at
> this point.
>
> Ok great, then we'll add a patch for ENA for v14, unless you guys would
> like to do it yourself.
>
That'd be great!
>We
Hi Jan,
>Hello,
>>Is there any update on that subject?
>At this point we need to have only pseudo-header checksum for TSO. Maybe
there will be new requirements, but that's something I cannot predict at this
point.
Ok great, then we'll add a patch for ENA for v14, unless you guys would li
Hello,
> Is there any update on that subject?
>
At this point we need to have only pseudo-header checksum for TSO. Maybe
there will be new requirements, but that's something I cannot predict at
this point.
> So it seems that standard pseudo-header checksum calculation should be
> enough.
Hi Jan,
>
> Hi Jan,
>
> >Hello,
>
> >Sorry for late response.
>
> >From ENA perspective, we need to dig deeper about the requirements and use
> >cases, but I'm pretty confident (95%) that ena will
> need to implement tx_prep() API. There is at least one >scenario, when HW
> relay on partial
On 12/6/2016 3:53 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 11/28/2016 11:03 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>> We need attention of every PMD developers on this thread.
>>
>> Reminder of what Konstantin suggested:
>> "
>> - if the PMD supports TX offloads AND
>> - if to be able use any of these offloads the upper l
> > > This means vmxnet3 PMD also should be updated, right?
> >
> > Yes, that's right.
> >
> > >Should that update
> > > be part of tx_prep patchset? Or separate patch?
> >
> > Another question I suppose is who will do the actual patch for vmxnet3.
> > Yong, are you ok to do the patch for vmxnet3
Hi Jan,
>Hello,
>Sorry for late response.
>From ENA perspective, we need to dig deeper about the requirements and use
>cases, but I'm pretty confident (95%) that ena will need to implement
>tx_prep() API. There is at least one >scenario, when HW relay on partial
>checksum.
Could you let us k
Hello,
Sorry for late response.
>From ENA perspective, we need to dig deeper about the requirements and use
cases, but I'm pretty confident (95%) that ena will need to implement
tx_prep() API. There is at least one scenario, when HW relay on partial
checksum.
Jan
an Medala ; Jakub
> Palider ; John Daley ; Adrien
> Mazarguil ; Alejandro Lucero
> ; Rasesh Mody
> ; Jacob, Jerin ;
> Yuanhan Liu ; Kulasek, TomaszX
> ; olivier.m...@6wind.com
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 0/6] add Tx preparation
>
>
> Hi Ferruh,
>
> &g
Lucero
> > >> ; Rasesh Mody
> > >> ; Jacob, Jerin ;
> > >> Yuanhan Liu ; Kulasek, TomaszX
> > >> ; olivier.m...@6wind.com
> > >> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 0/6] add Tx preparation
> > >>
> > >> Hi
> >
etanel Belgazal ; Evgeny
> Schemeilin ; Alejandro Lucero
> ; Yong Wang ;
> Andrew Rybchenko ; Hemant Agrawal
> ; Kulasek, TomaszX
>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 0/6] add Tx preparation
>
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 10:13:14AM +, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> >
&
On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 10:13:14AM +, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
>
> Hi Yliu,
>
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 03:53:42PM +, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> > > > Please, we need a comment for each driver saying
> > > > "it is OK, we do not need any checksum preparation for TSO"
> > > > or
> > >
Hi Yliu,
>
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 03:53:42PM +, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> > > Please, we need a comment for each driver saying
> > > "it is OK, we do not need any checksum preparation for TSO"
> > > or
> > > "yes we have to implement tx_prepare or TSO will not work in this mode"
> > >
>
> So
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 08:31:35PM +, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> > Hi Konstantin,
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 10:56:26AM +, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Adrien,
> > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 04:43:52PM +, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> > > > [...]
> > >
t;>
> >> Cc: Harish Patil ; dev@dpdk.org; Rahul Lakkireddy
> >> ; Stephen Hurd
> >> ; Jan Medala ; Jakub
> >> Palider ; John Daley ; Adrien
> >> Mazarguil ; Alejandro Lucero
> >> ; Rasesh Mody
> >> ; Jacob, Jerin ;
> >> Yuanhan Liu ;
akkireddy
>> ; Stephen Hurd
>> ; Jan Medala ; Jakub
>> Palider ; John Daley ; Adrien
>> Mazarguil ; Alejandro Lucero
>> ; Rasesh Mody
>> ; Jacob, Jerin ;
>> Yuanhan Liu ; Kulasek, TomaszX
>> ; olivier.m...@6wind.com
>> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 03:53:42PM +, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> > Please, we need a comment for each driver saying
> > "it is OK, we do not need any checksum preparation for TSO"
> > or
> > "yes we have to implement tx_prepare or TSO will not work in this mode"
> >
Sorry for late. For virtio, I th
On 12/06/2016 06:53 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
On 11/28/2016 11:03 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
We need attention of every PMD developers on this thread.
Reminder of what Konstantin suggested:
"
- if the PMD supports TX offloads AND
- if to be able use any of these offloads the upper layer SW would
> Hi Konstantin,
>
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 10:56:26AM +, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> >
> > Hi Adrien,
> >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 04:43:52PM +, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > > On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 01:00:55AM +, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> > > > > [
lider ; John Daley ; Adrien
> Mazarguil ; Alejandro Lucero
> ; Rasesh Mody
> ; Jacob, Jerin ;
> Yuanhan Liu ; Kulasek, TomaszX
> ; olivier.m...@6wind.com
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 0/6] add Tx preparation
>
> Hi
>
>
>
> > >
>
> > > 2
On 11/28/2016 11:03 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> We need attention of every PMD developers on this thread.
>
> Reminder of what Konstantin suggested:
> "
> - if the PMD supports TX offloads AND
> - if to be able use any of these offloads the upper layer SW would have to:
> * modify the content
Hi Konstantin,
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 10:56:26AM +, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
>
> Hi Adrien,
>
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 04:43:52PM +, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 01:00:55AM +, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> > > > [...]
> > > > > > On W
Hi Adrien,
>
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 04:43:52PM +, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> [...]
> > > On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 01:00:55AM +, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:54:50AM +, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> > > > > [...]
> > > > > > Do you hav
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 04:43:52PM +, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
[...]
> > On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 01:00:55AM +, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:54:50AM +, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> > > > [...]
> > > > > Do you have anything particular in mind
Hi Adrien,
>
> Hi Konstantin,
>
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 01:00:55AM +, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> [...]
> > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:54:50AM +, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > > Something is definitely needed here, and only PMDs can provide it. I
> > > > > think
>
Hi Konstantin,
On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 01:00:55AM +, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
[...]
> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:54:50AM +, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > Something is definitely needed here, and only PMDs can provide it. I
> > > > think
> > > > applications should not h
Hi
> >
> > 2016-11-30 17:42, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> > > > >Please, we need a comment for each driver saying
> > > > >"it is OK, we do not need any checksum preparation for TSO"
> > > > >or
> > > > >"yes we have to implement tx_prepare or TSO will not work in this
> > mode"
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
ley ; Adrien
> Mazarguil ; Alejandro Lucero
> ; Rasesh Mody
> ; Jacob, Jerin ;
> Yuanhan Liu ; Yong Wang
> ; Kulasek, TomaszX
> ; olivier.m...@6wind.com
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 0/6] add Tx preparation
>
> 2016-11-30 17:42, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> > >
Hi Adrien,
>
> Hi Konstantin,
>
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:54:50AM +, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> [...]
> > > Something is definitely needed here, and only PMDs can provide it. I think
> > > applications should not have to clear checksum fields or initialize them
> > > to
> > > some mag
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 09:58:31AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-12-01 08:15, Adrien Mazarguil:
> > I'm perhaps a bit pessimistic mind you, but I do not think tx_prepare() will
> > remain optional for long. Sure, PMDs that do not implement it do not care,
> > I'm focusing on applications, fo
30 matches
Mail list logo
