Github user ssriniva123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/518
I updated the pull request with more changes requested by the reviewers.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Aman Sinha
wrote:
> Yes, it does in fact
Github user amansinha100 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/519#discussion_r67289117
--- Diff:
exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/store/parquet/ParquetFormatPlugin.java
---
@@ -208,8 +209,18 @@ public DrillTable
Github user ssriniva123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/518
For some reason the build terminated- What needs to be done to fire it
again?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Also when I query hbase, its throw exception :
2016-06-16 10:29:51,788 [289df0e3-05dc-f882-8c51-20dd0f98235b:frag:0:0]
ERROR o.a.drill.exec.compile.MergeAdapter - Failure while merging classes.
java.lang.RuntimeException: Error at instruction 370: Expected an object
reference, but found .
Github user parthchandra commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/519#discussion_r67272839
--- Diff:
exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/store/parquet/ParquetFormatPlugin.java
---
@@ -208,8 +209,18 @@ public DrillTable
Github user ssriniva123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/518
I have added support so that it prints the offending file/line nos.
Error parsing JSON in DRILL-4653.json : line nos :13
Error parsing JSON in DRILL-4653.json : line nos :14
---
If
Github user jinfengni commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/512
I did the following small changes to this PR, and I'm going to rebase and
re-run the regression suite before merge this PR.
1) fix one bug which causes regression failure (IOBE).
2) add
Github user ssriniva123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/518
Yes, I looked at DRILL-3764. The changes made to JSONProcessing do not
conflict with my changes.
The only conflict I see is these two constants, I have defined my own.
String
Github user amansinha100 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/518
Yes, it does in fact have a conflict with DRILL-3764 which has changes to
the JsonRecordReader, although this issue is still in progress. I noticed
that @adeneche mentioned this in the JIRA.
Please disregard this. I’ve figured out how to get it working. Once I realized
that error logging for Hadoop Filesystem drivers wasn’t enabled by logback by
default, then everything clicked into place. I’ll be back to ask more questions.
Thank you for your time,
Elijah Zupancic
> On May 6,
Github user amansinha100 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/518#discussion_r67267511
--- Diff:
exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/store/easy/json/JSONRecordReader.java
---
@@ -217,11 +228,11 @@ public int next() {
Github user parthchandra commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/518
Does this conflict with Drill 3764 (see
https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/497)?. I think there was a broader
discussion around this as part of enabling the functionality of
skipping/logging
Github user amansinha100 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/518#discussion_r67267273
--- Diff:
exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/store/easy/json/JSONRecordReader.java
---
@@ -64,6 +64,8 @@
private final boolean
Github user ssriniva123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/518
Do u anticipate this to be logged using log4j?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user amansinha100 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/518
A high level comment I have about this PR is that keeping the number of
'malformed' records in the json file may not be sufficient..I would expect the
user would want to know the file name and
Github user parthchandra commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/522
+1 Looks good.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
I can take a look at DRILL-4653.
Could someone familiar with the Decimal type take a look at DRILL-4704 ?
Agree with Dave that it is a simple case that should be fixed (note,
however, that decimal is disabled by default currently).
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Subbu Srinivasan
Who can review https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4653 ?
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Parth Chandra
wrote:
> +1 on the 1.7 release
>
> I'm reviewing the following and hope to get them in the release before
> cutoff:
>
Github user parthchandra commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/501
+1 LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
+1 on the 1.7 release
I'm reviewing the following and hope to get them in the release before
cutoff:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-2593
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4309
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Jinfeng Ni wrote:
> I'm reviewing a
I'm reviewing a follow-up PR [1] for DRILL-4573. I think we need get
it merged in, since it's a regression in terms of query correctness
from release 1.6.
[1] https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/512
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Dave Oshinsky wrote:
> This is a
This is a pretty basic bug affecting decimal values, with a simple fix:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4704
It would be great if it could be reviewed.
-Original Message-
From: Aman Sinha [mailto:amansi...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 3:15 PM
To: dev
Subject:
Can https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4653 be reviewed?
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Aman Sinha wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> A 1.7 release is quite overdue ! I would like to get the ball rolling...
>
> In preparation, could developers please close the
Hello everyone,
A 1.7 release is quite overdue ! I would like to get the ball rolling...
In preparation, could developers please close the pull requests that have
already been merged into master ? This will give me a better sense of what
is in progress.
Can all the folks working on open
GitHub user vkorukanti opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/524
DRILL-4724: Improvements to InfoSchema RecordGenerator needed for DRILL-4714
1. Add support for pushing the filter on following fields into
InfoSchemaRecordGenerator:
- CATALOG_NAME
Venki Korukanti created DRILL-4725:
--
Summary: Improvements to InfoSchema RecordGenerator needed for
DRILL-4714
Key: DRILL-4725
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4725
Project: Apache
Github user parthchandra commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/500
+1 looks good. Can you squash and rebase ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Khurram Faraaz created DRILL-4724:
-
Summary: convert_from(binary_string(expression),'INT_BE') results
in Exception
Key: DRILL-4724
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4724
Project:
Github user arina-ielchiieva commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/436
@jinfengni
PR is updated, physical_location is removed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
29 matches
Mail list logo