Re: Docker image

Would be great to have the Docker image merged into the main repo. I'll prepare a PR to bump it to Druid 0.15.1 somewhere this week. I would be in favor as well to get rid of https://github.com/druid-io/docker-druid and point it to the main repo. The current image isn't building and it is rather o

Re: Docker image

sounds good to me as the old image is not maintained anymore. -- Himanshu On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 1:28 AM Gian Merlino wrote: > What do you all think about replacing > https://github.com/druid-io/docker-druid, then, with a link to the > Dockerfile in the main Druid repo (and to our dockerhub pa

Re: Docker image

What do you all think about replacing https://github.com/druid-io/docker-druid, then, with a link to the Dockerfile in the main Druid repo (and to our dockerhub page once it is published), then? It is confusing to have the old repo still there, when it's not being kept up to date. On Thu, Aug 22,

Re: Docker image

there is work done to publish it in dockerhub in next release https://github.com/apache/incubator-druid/issues/8103 -- Himanshu On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 8:23 AM Don Bowman wrote: > On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 10:20 AM Driesprong, Fokko > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > For the development of the Druid

Re: Docker image

On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 10:20 AM Driesprong, Fokko wrote: > Hi all, > > For the development of the Druid Scala client library called Scruid > , we're using a Docker image to run CI > tests. The container that we're using in a fork >

Re: Docker image

On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 at 08:19, Don Bowman wrote: > > So I have a Dockerfile which i think will work well. Before I commit and > create the PR can I ask for some direction? > Would we use this as > > a: the Dockerfile is in the source tree, and does a 'COPY .' into the > container to build? This is

Re: Docker image

So I have a Dockerfile which i think will work well. Before I commit and create the PR can I ask for some direction? Would we use this as a: the Dockerfile is in the source tree, and does a 'COPY .' into the container to build? This is what I did for https://github.com/fluent/fluent-bit. It makes

Re: Docker image

expectation? that I would never see maven :) so given how the plugins work, it would either need to be batteries-included (which is what I did), or would need to be a 'small'/'medium'/'large' w/ various sets of them. given that i'm deploying in k8s, I would want the have the GCS/S3/Azure blob sto

Re: Docker image

The idea has been toyed around with internally here. What would your expectations be of such an image? On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 2:35 PM Don Bowman wrote: > Is anyone working on a docker image? I mean, there are quite a few out > there but they have some various issues, usually security based as