Re: Proposal for moving dubbo-rpc-xxx dubbo-serialization-xxx dubbo-remoting-xxx and dubbo-registry-xxx to dubbo ecosystem

> And also, there are a lot of sub modules have never been modified almost, > such as: Strongly +1 for that. I have found many sub modules increase version number in every release cycle while most of them have no content changed. Best regards, Jun > On 16 Aug 2018, at 16:00, Jerrick Zhu

Re: Proposal for moving dubbo-rpc-xxx dubbo-serialization-xxx dubbo-remoting-xxx and dubbo-registry-xxx to dubbo ecosystem

On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 2:44 PM Zonghai Shang wrote: > By the way Dubbo-all.jar should be provided after splitting, which is > How do other people think about this? BTW, this action will be performed on 2.7.x, which is master branch, does this action needs to be on 2.6.x ? > convenient for

Re: Proposal for moving dubbo-rpc-xxx dubbo-serialization-xxx dubbo-remoting-xxx and dubbo-registry-xxx to dubbo ecosystem

By the way Dubbo-all.jar should be provided after splitting, which is convenient for low-level version upgrades. 凝雨 于2018年8月20日周一 上午10:26写道： > +1，dubbo It should be streamlined. > I agree with keeping the following modules: > * dubbo-registry-multicast, > * dubbo-rpc-injvm, > *

Re: Proposal for moving dubbo-rpc-xxx dubbo-serialization-xxx dubbo-remoting-xxx and dubbo-registry-xxx to dubbo ecosystem

Hi, On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 5:47 PM Jerrick Zhu wrote: > > Another question, do we need to add these sub modules' binary classes to > dubbo.jar , as the previous hessian-lite module? I am supposing this happens to 2.7.x and keep 2.6.x unchanged. Based on my assumption I think it is unnecessary

Re:Re: Proposal for moving dubbo-rpc-xxx dubbo-serialization-xxx dubbo-remoting-xxx and dubbo-registry-xxx to dubbo ecosystem

I think need not At 2018-08-17 17:47:08, "Jerrick Zhu" wrote: >Another question, do we need to add these sub modules' binary classes to >dubbo.jar , as the previous hessian-lite module? > >Or we also remove all of them from dubbo.jar? > >On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 5:36 PM Jerrick Zhu wrote: > >>

Re: Proposal for moving dubbo-rpc-xxx dubbo-serialization-xxx dubbo-remoting-xxx and dubbo-registry-xxx to dubbo ecosystem

Another question, do we need to add these sub modules' binary classes to dubbo.jar , as the previous hessian-lite module? Or we also remove all of them from dubbo.jar? On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 5:36 PM Jerrick Zhu wrote: > Great. Let's do it. I'll start an issue to track this proposal. > > On

Re: Proposal for moving dubbo-rpc-xxx dubbo-serialization-xxx dubbo-remoting-xxx and dubbo-registry-xxx to dubbo ecosystem

Great. Let's do it. I'll start an issue to track this proposal. On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 5:11 PM G C wrote: > +1 Deep agree > -- > Best Regards！ > > cgfork > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 4:53 PM yuhang xiu wrote: > > > > Deep agree with this proposal > > :) > > > > Jerrick Zhu 于2018年8月17日周五

Re: Proposal for moving dubbo-rpc-xxx dubbo-serialization-xxx dubbo-remoting-xxx and dubbo-registry-xxx to dubbo ecosystem

+1 for remove [https://mail-online.nosdn.127.net/qiyelogo/defaultAvatar.png] yokka

Re: Proposal for moving dubbo-rpc-xxx dubbo-serialization-xxx dubbo-remoting-xxx and dubbo-registry-xxx to dubbo ecosystem

+1 Deep agree -- Best Regards！ cgfork On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 4:53 PM yuhang xiu wrote: > > Deep agree with this proposal > :) > > Jerrick Zhu 于2018年8月17日周五 下午1:39写道： > > > I agree with keeping the following modules: > > * dubbo-registry-multicast, > > * dubbo-rpc-injvm, > > *

Re: Proposal for moving dubbo-rpc-xxx dubbo-serialization-xxx dubbo-remoting-xxx and dubbo-registry-xxx to dubbo ecosystem

Deep agree with this proposal :) Jerrick Zhu 于2018年8月17日周五 下午1:39写道： > I agree with keeping the following modules: > * dubbo-registry-multicast, > * dubbo-rpc-injvm, > * dubbo-serialization-fastjson > * dubbo-serialization-jdk > > They're useful for new users and develop experience. > > On Fri,

Re: Proposal for moving dubbo-rpc-xxx dubbo-serialization-xxx dubbo-remoting-xxx and dubbo-registry-xxx to dubbo ecosystem

I agree with keeping the following modules: * dubbo-registry-multicast, * dubbo-rpc-injvm, * dubbo-serialization-fastjson * dubbo-serialization-jdk They're useful for new users and develop experience. On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 11:10 AM Ian Luo wrote: > wow, this is a big step but I have somewhat

Re: Proposal for moving dubbo-rpc-xxx dubbo-serialization-xxx dubbo-remoting-xxx and dubbo-registry-xxx to dubbo ecosystem

wow, this is a big step but I have somewhat opposite opinion against Jerrick's proposal. Instead of keeping recommended extensions only but moving out others into eco system, I would like to revise it to keeping most used extensions, use Jerrick's list as an example: * dubbo-registry-multicast <-

Re: Proposal for moving dubbo-rpc-xxx dubbo-serialization-xxx dubbo-remoting-xxx and dubbo-registry-xxx to dubbo ecosystem

+1, Looking forward to the dubbo framework after refactored. Minxuan Zhuang 于2018年8月16日周四 下午5:18写道： > +1 dubbo ecosystem has more and more components, so dubbo core can keep > simple and focus > > On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 4:58 PM wu tianbiao wrote: > > > +1, UT is really time-consuming > > > >

Re: Proposal for moving dubbo-rpc-xxx dubbo-serialization-xxx dubbo-remoting-xxx and dubbo-registry-xxx to dubbo ecosystem

+1 dubbo ecosystem has more and more components, so dubbo core can keep simple and focus On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 4:58 PM wu tianbiao wrote: > +1, UT is really time-consuming > > +1, Dubbo should be modular, like “Extension Loader” maybe very popular. > > > > Consider “git submodule” > > > >

Re: Proposal for moving dubbo-rpc-xxx dubbo-serialization-xxx dubbo-remoting-xxx and dubbo-registry-xxx to dubbo ecosystem

Good idea. Jerrick Zhu 于2018年8月16日周四 下午4:01写道： > Hi, community > > As you can see, Dubbo now has an ecosystem: https://github.com/dubbo > .There > has a lot of interesting projects there, such as: > > * node, go, python and php implementations > * dubbo rpc, serialization and registry

答复: Proposal for moving dubbo-rpc-xxx dubbo-serialization-xxx dubbo-remoting-xxx and dubbo-registry-xxx to dubbo ecosystem

+1, UT is really time-consuming +1, Dubbo should be modular, like “Extension Loader” maybe very popular. Consider “git submodule” 发送自 Windows 10 版邮件应用 发件人: Mercy 发送时间: Thursday, August 16, 2018 4:28:26 PM

Re:Re: Proposal for moving dubbo-rpc-xxx dubbo-serialization-xxx dubbo-remoting-xxx and dubbo-registry-xxx to dubbo ecosystem

Absolutely agree +1 Until now, Dubbo core repo contains too much contents, many components look like unnecessary in this repo. In my opinion: "Micro Kernel, Rich Ecosystem" should be a key principle to design, improve, maintain this project. After separate these components（never been modified

Re: Proposal for moving dubbo-rpc-xxx dubbo-serialization-xxx dubbo-remoting-xxx and dubbo-registry-xxx to dubbo ecosystem

+1,Totally agree, Dubbo should be modular, and some features could be re-used by other projects, like Spring Cloud LoadBalance. Kind regards, Mercy Ma 在 2018/8/16 下午4:00, Jerrick Zhu 写道: Hi, community As you can see, Dubbo now has an ecosystem: https://github.com/dubbo .There has a lot of

Re: Proposal for moving dubbo-rpc-xxx dubbo-serialization-xxx dubbo-remoting-xxx and dubbo-registry-xxx to dubbo ecosystem

Dubbo core only keeps the api and recommended extension. Keep the core minimum. On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 4:00 PM Jerrick Zhu wrote: > Hi, community > > As you can see, Dubbo now has an ecosystem: https://github.com/dubbo > .There has a lot of interesting projects there, such as: > > * node, go,

Proposal for moving dubbo-rpc-xxx dubbo-serialization-xxx dubbo-remoting-xxx and dubbo-registry-xxx to dubbo ecosystem

Hi, community As you can see, Dubbo now has an ecosystem: https://github.com/dubbo .There has a lot of interesting projects there, such as: * node, go, python and php implementations * dubbo rpc, serialization and registry extensions * dubbo samples and dubbo useful plugins and tools Now Dubbo