+1
2014-06-19 13:42 GMT+02:00 dav...@apache.org:
Hi,
I'm calling a vote on Felix Bundle Repository version 2.0.0.
It's been a long time since the OBR has been released, and since it
now also provides the OSGi Repository API 1.0 I think this warrants a
version of 2.0.0. Note that the
+1
2014-06-14 12:38 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net:
+1 (non binding)
Regards
JB
On 06/14/2014 11:09 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I'm calling a vote on Felix Gogo Runtime 0.12.1.
Staging repository:
+1 from me too.
David
On 20 June 2014 15:40, Jan Willem Janssen janwillem.jans...@luminis.eu wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17/06/14 13:45, dav...@apache.org wrote:
Please vote to approve this release:
[ ] +1 Approve the release [ ] -1 Veto the release (please
+1 from me too
David
On 23 June 2014 07:59, Guillaume Nodet gno...@apache.org wrote:
+1
2014-06-19 13:42 GMT+02:00 dav...@apache.org:
Hi,
I'm calling a vote on Felix Bundle Repository version 2.0.0.
It's been a long time since the OBR has been released, and since it
now also provides
Unfortunately I’m going to have to cancel this vote due to a bug involving the
new manifest writer where it doesn’t make sure the output path exists before
writing the manifest.
This affects any project that doesn’t create the “target/classes/META-INF”
folder before the plugin runs, which
Hi,
Mark found a bug in the staged maven-bundle-plugin 2.5.0 release, so I’ve
cancelled the release vote and fixed it in trunk.
I’m considering staging the next release as 2.5.1 rather than re-using 2.5.0
(and having to change the tag in svn, etc.) … any thoughts/preferences?
—
Cheers, Stuart
+1 (non-binding)
Cheers,
Jamie
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 4:47 AM, David Bosschaert
david.bosscha...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 from me too.
David
On 20 June 2014 15:40, Jan Willem Janssen janwillem.jans...@luminis.eu
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17/06/14 13:45,
I'd rather go for 2.5.1, but then, there was no real need to cancel 2.5.0
...
2014-06-23 14:13 GMT+02:00 Stuart McCulloch mccu...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Mark found a bug in the staged maven-bundle-plugin 2.5.0 release, so I’ve
cancelled the release vote and fixed it in trunk.
I’m considering
We're still missing a binding vote afaik ...
2014-06-14 11:09 GMT+02:00 Guillaume Nodet gno...@apache.org:
I'm calling a vote on Felix Gogo Runtime 0.12.1.
Staging repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1020/
You can use this UNIX script to download
On 23 Jun 2014, at 13:19, Guillaume Nodet gno...@apache.org wrote:
I'd rather go for 2.5.1, but then, there was no real need to cancel 2.5.0
There was, because any basic maven project upgrading to 2.5.0 would break so
IMHO it did not meet our release quality. It just so happened that the
On 23 Jun 2014, at 13:28, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net wrote:
Hi Stuart,
No problem, but I don't see why to cancel the 2.5.0 release. When we cancel,
it's especially to remove the tag, and redo the release with the same version
number.
Do you really want a plugin version out
On 23 June 2014 13:25, Guillaume Nodet gno...@apache.org wrote:
We're still missing a binding vote afaik ...
We're also still missing a binding vote on these two:
http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@felix.apache.org/msg33290.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@felix.apache.org/msg33322.html
I think I didn't follow you, but if you didn't promote the release on
Nexus, the artifacts won't be released, so the current staging 2.5.0
won't be promoted.
So, you can drop the staging repo, remove the tag, fix your issue and
redo the release again.
If you already promoted the staging repo,
Just to clarify, the 2.5.0 release has been cancelled due to this bug:
http://www.mail-archive.com/users@felix.apache.org/msg15423.html
which affects several use-cases (including ones that people new to OSGi would
use).
The staging repository was dropped and the tag was removed - but I
The copyright seems out of date (still points to 2011).
The notice does say we include OSGi stuff - are we? IIrc, we are not
supposed to put stuff in the NOTICE that isn't required - hence, if we
don't include something from OSGi we should fix this (I'd be ok with fixing
it in trunk).
+1
I'd go with a 2.5.0 since it's been a canceled vote and the stage has been
dumped.
Less confusing then to skip a 2.5.0 version, which might confuse others
even more :)
regards, Achim
2014-06-23 14:46 GMT+02:00 Stuart McCulloch mccu...@gmail.com:
Just to clarify, the 2.5.0 release has been
Ah, yes. I'll keep that in mind.
David
On 23 June 2014 13:45, Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
we still don't provide source.jar for this one - it would be good to fix
that and start doing it in the future.
regards,
Karl
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Jamie G.
This one does seem to include OSGi software but doesn't mention that fact
neither in the NOTICE nor in the DEPENDENCIES... is that true?
regards,
Karl
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 9:17 AM, dav...@apache.org wrote:
+1 from me too
David
On 23 June 2014 07:59, Guillaume Nodet gno...@apache.org
You are right. This is new, since the OSGi Repository APIs are now
included as substitutable exports.
I'm cancelling this vote and will fix this.
Cheers,
David
On 23 June 2014 13:57, Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com wrote:
This one does seem to include OSGi software but doesn't mention that
Hi all,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 (binding): Jan Willem Janssen, Pierre De Rop, Karl Pauls
+1 (non binding): David Bosschaert, Jamie Goodyear, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
I've promoted the artifacts to Maven Central.
Can a PMC member please take care of copying the artifacts to
Not sure about the NOTICE, it may have been a reference to the
org.apache.felix.service.threadio / command packages which were supposed to
end up as an OSGi spec (and were originally in the org.osgi package iirc).
I'll fix that in trunk, but then, i think we may also remove the
status=provisional;
Hi,
I’ve fixed the issue reported in
http://www.mail-archive.com/users@felix.apache.org/msg15423.html and have
restaged the 2.5.0 release...
We solved 7 issues in this release, the major ones being the bndlib 2.3.0
upgrade to support Java 8 bytecode and a new baselining feature:
+1 from me.
David
On 23 June 2014 15:05, Stuart McCulloch mccu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I’ve fixed the issue reported in
http://www.mail-archive.com/users@felix.apache.org/msg15423.html and have
restaged the 2.5.0 release...
We solved 7 issues in this release, the major ones being the
+1 (non binding)
Just tested, it looks good to me.
Regards
JB
On 06/23/2014 04:05 PM, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
Hi,
I’ve fixed the issue reported in
http://www.mail-archive.com/users@felix.apache.org/msg15423.html and have
restaged the 2.5.0 release...
We solved 7 issues in this release,
I guess the consensus here is leaning towards having the sources in a
separate jar file. This is what Maven normally does anyway when you're
using the maven-source-plugin. IDEs should be able to find these
sources when you need them. I know m2e does this automatically for you
- downloads them on
Hi,
I'm calling a vote on Felix Bundle Repository version 2.0.2.
It's been a long time since the OBR has been released, and since it
now also provides the OSGi Repository API 1.0 I think this warrants a
version of 2.0.x. Note that the exported packages are semantically
versioned.
This release
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14040982#comment-14040982
]
David Humeniuk commented on FELIX-4290:
---
for clarification, the affects version is
+1 (non binding)
tested with jdk8
regards, Achim
2014-06-23 16:52 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net:
+1 (non binding)
Just tested, it looks good to me.
Regards
JB
On 06/23/2014 04:05 PM, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
Hi,
I’ve fixed the issue reported in
+1 (non binding)
Regards
JB
On 06/23/2014 04:05 PM, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
Hi,
I’ve fixed the issue reported in
http://www.mail-archive.com/users@felix.apache.org/msg15423.html and have
restaged the 2.5.0 release...
We solved 7 issues in this release, the major ones being the bndlib 2.3.0
29 matches
Mail list logo
