+1 …good job Pierre!
Greetings, Marcel
Hello Pierre,
On 1 March 2016 at 10:01:01, Pierre De Rop (pierre.de...@gmail.com) wrote:
(I don't know if I *must* wait for 72 hours before canceling and restarting
the vote, or if I can restart it today ?)
No need to wait, just start a new vote today.
Greetings, Marcel
Hello Benson,
There is, at least, substantial apathy about git on the part of the
sub-communities that work on some of the sub-projects. In my view,
this apathy, including perhaps a bit of antipathy, sunk the discussion
of just converting as one big repo. As I see it, Felix is a bit of a
loose
On 11 Sep 2015 at 17:56:01, David Jencks (david_jen...@yahoo.com.invalid) wrote:
Similar considerations would apply to the non-gogo legacy command. Do we still
need to support this command?
For Dependency Manager 4 we have dropped support for the legacy Felix and
Equinox commands and only provid
I would be more comfortable if we first had someone volunteer to adapt all
(Maven and Ant/Gradle based builds) to work with Git and otherwise ensure that
all projects keep working. Then demonstrate all of that (with a copy of our
repository), and update our documentation to reflect the new proce
On 24 October 2015 at 11:36:03, Benson Margulies
(ben...@basistech.com(mailto:ben...@basistech.com)) wrote:
> > So I would definitely argue against getting a Git repository per bundle.
> > Per subproject sounds like the right granularity to me.
>
> If a subproject is released all at once, t
Within Felix we have “subprojects” that consist of one or more bundles and I
would argue that they are always released together. This does not mean that for
every release, every bundle needs to change, sometimes only a subset of the
released bundles change.
So I would definitely argue against g
Reviewed the report. I have nothing to add.
Greetings, Marcel
And some documentation can be found in this presentation:
http://archive.apachecon.com/eu2012/presentations/08-Thursday/RN-OSGi_FFT/aceu-2012-felix-connect.pdf
On 18 Aug 2015 at 16:21:01, Bertrand Delacretaz (bdelacre...@apache.org) wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote
Go for it!
On 29 Jul 2015 at 08:36:01, Carsten Ziegeler (cziege...@apache.org) wrote:
Hi,
we have modules for R4 of org.osgi.core, org.osgi.compendium and
org.osgi.foundation. As these are officially available in the maven
repo, I guess we can get rid of those.
If no one objects, I'll remov
Did some small corrections to the DM4 releases in the report.
On 10 Jun 2015 at 10:46:03 , Carsten Ziegeler (cziege...@apache.org) wrote:
I've created a draft for the board report at:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=53739940
Not much to report, but I'm sure I'
+1 (binding)
Checked the signatures, built the sources, ran all the tests. Thanks Pierre!
Greetings, Marcel
First of all:
+1 (binding)
After reading up on the discussion, I do not agree that there is a problem that
is big enough to cancel the release as Pierre proposes for the following
reasons:
1) At Apache, we vote on the source code of the release. The binaries are there
for convenience. I don’t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14567214#comment-14567214
]
Marcel Offermans commented on FELIX-4907:
-
I think the DM3 behaviour makes s
I tried the script before I voted, and just tried it again on another machine,
but it works for me. No such looping. Weird.
Greetings, Marcel
On 22 May 2015 at 9:51:02 , David Bosschaert (david.bosscha...@gmail.com) wrote:
It could be me, but when I run the special DM check_staged_release.sh
+1
Built the code from source, ran all the tests. Looking good! Thanks Pierre!
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14512370#comment-14512370
]
Marcel Offermans commented on FELIX-4844:
-
ConfigurationAdmin offers a metho
On 14 Apr 2015 at 15:41:01, Jan Willem Janssen (janwillem.jans...@luminis.eu)
wrote:
Any objections to cut a release for Felix Metatype?
Not at all, go for it!
Greetings, Marcel
+1 (binding)
Checked the signatures, compiled from source, ran all tests. Looking good!
Greetings, Marcel
affects a little over 200
pages).
I also removed all references that referred to the transition from the
Confluence CMS to Apache CMS from the home page.
Greetings, Marcel
On 12 Mar 2015 at 11:46:01 , Carsten Ziegeler (cziege...@apache.org) wrote:
Am 11.03.15 um 19:49 schrieb Marcel Offermans
Hey all,
We still have a lot of old files hosted at /site/… and I would propose we
remove all of them as it is confusing to our users to even find these old pages.
WDYT?
Greetings, Marcel
Hello Guillaume,
On 11 Mar 2015 at 10:11:01, Guillaume Nodet (gno...@apache.org) wrote:
2015-03-11 9:51 GMT+01:00 Marcel Offermans :
> Guillaume, all, I am a bit confused here.
>
> First of all, I doubt that you are allowed to “modify” a vote that is
> ongoing. People voted
Guillaume, all, I am a bit confused here.
First of all, I doubt that you are allowed to “modify” a vote that is ongoing.
People voted on a set of artifacts, if you modify that set, you need to start a
new vote. Also, the subject and this message still refers to the gogo-runtime
0.16.0, so you d
-1
Seeing the same issue as Pierre and Jan Willem reported.
Small note: the copyright message (at least the one that ends up in the
META-INF/NOTICE) still says 2014, not a showstopper but nevertheless something
we should fix.
Greetings, Marcel
+1 (binding)
Built the code from source and ran all the different tests. Also took the
bundles and tried them in some simple projects. That works too.
Greetings, Marcel
Hello Pierre,
On 4 Mar 2015 at 10:56:00, Pierre De Rop (pierre.de...@gmail.com) wrote:
some progress: while re-reading the Felix release guide, the download page
can be changed from content/downloads.list (see [1]) , and this file seems
to contain some macros which are interpreted by another do
+1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4720?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14239584#comment-14239584
]
Marcel Offermans commented on FELIX-4720:
-
The discussion is about whether or
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4720?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14239111#comment-14239111
]
Marcel Offermans commented on FELIX-4720:
-
The specification does not explic
Hello Christian,
On 13 Nov 2014 at 14:16:01 , Christian Schneider (ch...@die-schneider.net)
wrote:
I very much like the idea of a separate builder class. It will make the
transition very smooth. We can also package it in an extra bundle but I
do not think there is a technical need for it. So I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14209950#comment-14209950
]
Marcel Offermans commented on FELIX-4697:
-
Should we re-open that issue
Hello Pierre,
> On 12 Nov 2014, at 9:13 am, Pierre De Rop wrote:
>
> Regarding your suggestion, adding specific builder classes could also be an
> interesting way to go.
> I would even consider to make some specific API bundles, like:
>
> org.apache.felix.dependencymanager -> the current 4.0 AP
Hello Christian,
> On 11 Nov 2014, at 9:22 am, Christian Schneider
> wrote:
>
> About auto adding. How about this:
> Inside component() we add the component to a separate list of pending
> components in dependency manager.
> Then after init we call a method in the manager to finally add all pe
Hey Paul,
> On 11 Nov 2014, at 8:55 am, Paul Bakker wrote:
>
> One thing to consider is that although DM 4 is a major version bump, it so
> far seems to be very close to a drop-in replacement of DM 3. Changing the
> API itself would break all existing code. This is technically ok for a
> major v
Hey all,
> On 11 Nov 2014, at 0:39 am, Pierre De Rop wrote:
>
> The improvements you are proposing would require a major version bump since
> it's an incompatible API change. But I personally like what you are
> suggesting, and I could quickly do it in the upcoming Dependency Manager
> 4.0.0, wh
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2875?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14181505#comment-14181505
]
Marcel Offermans commented on FELIX-2875:
-
I agree with your analysis
Welcome, great to have you on our team, Bob! I’m sure we’ll run into each other
again soon. :)
Greetings, Marcel
On 17 Oct 2014 at 11:06:01 , Carsten Ziegeler (cziege...@apache.org) wrote:
Hi
it's my pleasure to announce that the Apache Felix PMC has invited
Bob Paulin as a new Felix commi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14173626#comment-14173626
]
Marcel Offermans commented on FELIX-4673:
-
Yes, that is fine!
> Log an
Marcel Offermans created FELIX-4673:
---
Summary: Log any error thrown when trying to create a null object.
Key: FELIX-4673
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4673
Project: Felix
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4426?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14166720#comment-14166720
]
Marcel Offermans commented on FELIX-4426:
-
I'm not sure if it will affec
Are you turning off blacklisting of event handlers and making sure that all
events are actually received by someone as well?
On 21 Aug 2014, at 17:15 pm, Bob Paulin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got some things in progress but nothing that should hold up the release.
> I'm seeing a significant varia
I agree with the general sentiment that we need to keep moving forward,
supporting the latest version of Jetty.
Personally, I'm not sure if an open source project should keep maintaining
releases that run on Java versions that are no longer supported themselves, but
this is a broader discussion
You might want to try and contact Jan Rellermeyer about this. Last time I
talked to him at an OSGi meeting he was looking into doing multi-tenancy based
on codepage sharing. He might have further insights into this.
Greetings, Marcel
From: Rob Walker
Se
+1 (binding)
Greetings, Marcel
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4557?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14060072#comment-14060072
]
Marcel Offermans commented on FELIX-4557:
-
If it's not broke, don
Hello Pierre,
On 07 Jul 2014, at 15:46 pm, Pierre De Rop wrote:
> Just to say that this week I will (try to) release the DependencyManager
> from the trunk;
Sounds like a good idea to do another release! +1 on that...
Greetings, Marcel
API from 1.7 to 1.8 for Core R6. Thought anyone?
This policy already applies to new versions of an existing API, right?
Greetings, Marcel
>
> Cheers,
>
> David
>
> On 19 May 2014 10:05, Marcel Offermans wrote:
>> I did not read David’s proposal that way. I think he is sayi
I did not read David’s proposal that way. I think he is saying:
YES, you can code against an API that is under development, as long as you do
not do any releases (before the API is finalized).
So only if you want to do a release before the API is finalized do you need to
package it under the Fe
The problem here is that file install cannot dictate the framework what to
refresh. The refresh method takes an initial set of bundles, but the framework
calculates a "dependency closure" (see 7.6.1 of the spec for example). If that
closure includes file install, then this issue occurs. The only
+1
Checked the signatures, performed some basic testing in Apache ACE. Looks good
to me.
Greetings, Marcel
On 25 Mar 2014, at 15:34 , Grzegorz Grzybek wrote:
> Thanks for replies!
>
> That's what I thought - that Felix modules are more _loosely coupled_ than
> [maven] modules of for example CXF or Karaf.
> So maybe you get rid of this Ant build?
We probably should. Let’s wait and see a bit if anybod
I agree, subprojects evolve at their own rate. We could encourage everybody to
move to the latest plugin and parent though. Maybe we should remove the top
level build that tries to build all subprojects completely, and just explain to
everybody to go into the subproject of choice to build it.
G
+1
On Mar 5, 2014 3:49 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Karl Pauls is willing to donate PojoSR (https://code.google.com/p/pojosr/)
to Felix.
This vote is about officially accepting the donation.
[ ] +1 Accept PojoSR code into Felix
[ ] -1 Do not
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13923684#comment-13923684
]
Marcel Offermans commented on FELIX-4446:
-
I think that adding such a mecha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13922554#comment-13922554
]
Marcel Offermans commented on FELIX-4446:
-
I still think these two properties
On 06 Mar 2014, at 14:58 , David Bosschaert wrote:
> It can be quite useful for people who like to use OSGi Services or
> migrate to OSGi for other reasons, but don't want to handle the
> modularity on the classloader level just yet.
Other applications are to deploy OSGi bundles to environments
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13922527#comment-13922527
]
Marcel Offermans commented on FELIX-4446:
-
Using Event Admin as an audit trai
On 05 Mar 2014, at 14:55 pm, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> 2014-03-05 13:43 GMT+01:00 Karl Pauls :
> * we need a formal agreement from the contributors (karlpauls and AngelovdS
> from the pojosr commit log) to give copyright to the ASF (a CLA would do it
> afaik)
For the record, Angelo van der Sijpt
Hello Nick,
From your description I cannot determine if you first installed, resolved and
started the host and then installed the fragment or if the fragment was already
installed at the point where the host resolved. I’m asking because that’s a
common pitfall when dealing with fragments: if yo
+1
One minor comment: NOTICE and DEPENDENCIES have an old copyright statement
(2010).
Greetings, Marcel
On 26 Feb 2014, at 12:12 pm, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I'm calling a vote on Felix Utils.
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1007/
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13903076#comment-13903076
]
Marcel Offermans commented on FELIX-4384:
-
I stand corrected, for some reas
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13901448#comment-13901448
]
Marcel Offermans commented on FELIX-4384:
-
A patch for this would be nice
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marcel Offermans closed FELIX-4226.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Closing the issue, as it has already been implemented and we received no
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marcel Offermans closed FELIX-2946.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Forgot to close this issue, it has been implemented some time ago.
>
Marcel Offermans created FELIX-4410:
---
Summary: Exceptions during rollback are not always properly handled
Key: FELIX-4410
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4410
Project: Felix
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4409?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marcel Offermans updated FELIX-4409:
Issue Type: Improvement (was: Bug)
> Improve exception messages to be more explicit
Marcel Offermans created FELIX-4409:
---
Summary: Improve exception messages to be more explicit and helpful
Key: FELIX-4409
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4409
Project: Felix
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13871835#comment-13871835
]
Marcel Offermans commented on FELIX-4384:
-
When reproducing the scenario u
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marcel Offermans closed FELIX-4361.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Applied the patch.
> Possible ConcurrentModificationException
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marcel Offermans closed FELIX-4357.
---
Resolution: Fixed
That's an excellent solution. Thanks Pierre!
> Support type
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marcel Offermans reassigned FELIX-4361:
---
Assignee: Marcel Offermans
> Possible ConcurrentModificationException
Marcel Offermans created FELIX-4357:
---
Summary: Support types beside String/String[] in @Property
annotation.
Key: FELIX-4357
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4357
Project: Felix
+1
Validated the signatures.
Tested in Apache ACE, played around with it a bit.
Greetings, Marcel
+1
Checked the signatures. Used both bundles in Apache ACE and found no functional
issues.
Greetings, Marcel
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marcel Offermans resolved FELIX-4184.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Added test and fix for the issue.
> Temporary resolver errors wh
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marcel Offermans reassigned FELIX-4184:
---
Assignee: Marcel Offermans
> Temporary resolver errors while updating bundles w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13823702#comment-13823702
]
Marcel Offermans commented on FELIX-4184:
-
Following up. Jan Willem corre
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marcel Offermans resolved FELIX-3355.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Committed a fix.
> Autoconf can't find Metatype
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marcel Offermans reassigned FELIX-3355:
---
Assignee: Marcel Offermans
> Autoconf can't find Metatype
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4314?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marcel Offermans resolved FELIX-4314.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Implemented.
> Split service registration to solve visibility is
Marcel Offermans created FELIX-4314:
---
Summary: Split service registration to solve visibility issue in
autoconf
Key: FELIX-4314
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4314
Project: Felix
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13812321#comment-13812321
]
Marcel Offermans commented on FELIX-4282:
-
Out of curiosity, how do you deter
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13806445#comment-13806445
]
Marcel Offermans commented on FELIX-4294:
-
You're welcome. I remember th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13806434#comment-13806434
]
Marcel Offermans commented on FELIX-4294:
-
Three comments:
# Why not use
Hello David,
Sit down first, this is a long mail. :)
On Oct 16, 2013, at 1:06 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> On Oct 15, 2013, at 1:33 PM, Marcel Offermans
> wrote:
>> On Oct 15, 2013, at 19:51 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>> DS still can't do dynamic dependencies, nor is it ex
Hello David,
On Oct 15, 2013, at 19:51 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> After seeing a lot of commit activity on DependencyManager I decided to try
> to understand what it's for, and after looking at the documentation I'm still
> not sure. It looks to me like the main feature is a fluent api that pr
I've tested the snapshot, both in a personal project and in Apache ACE, and it
works nicely, so no objections from me.
Greetings, Marcel
On Sep 12, 2013, at 15:50 PM, Jan Willem Janssen
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> I think it's time for a new release
Thanks!
Crossposting to dev@ for follow up. I took a quick look but I'm not quite sure
how to fix this. Felix (Meschberger), could you take a quick look, since I'm
guessing you came up with the code to generate the downloads page?
Greetings, Marcel
On Aug 22, 2013, at 16:37 , jacgec wrote:
ys.
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
> On Aug 12, 2013, at 12:34 AM, Felix Meschberger wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Am 12.08.2013 um 08:16 schrieb Marcel Offermans:
>>
>>> Hello Felix,
>>>
>>> On Aug 12, 2013, at 7:52 AM, Felix Meschber
Hello Felix,
On Aug 12, 2013, at 7:52 AM, Felix Meschberger wrote:
> Currently our Declarative Services implementation statically binds
> configuration to the using bundle when such configuration is used to
> configure a component. The intent was to follow the Configuration Admin
> specificat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13719605#comment-13719605
]
Marcel Offermans commented on FELIX-4184:
-
I'm hesitant to go that way
Marcel Offermans created FELIX-4184:
---
Summary: Temporary resolver errors while updating bundles with
deploymentadmin
Key: FELIX-4184
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4184
Project
Marcel Offermans created FELIX-4184:
---
Summary: Temporary resolver errors while updating bundles with
deploymentadmin
Key: FELIX-4184
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4184
Project
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result :
+1 (binding): Carsten Ziegeler, Karl Pauls, Marcel Offermans
+1 (non binding): Bram de Kruijff, Pierre De Rop, Jan Willem Janssen
I will copy this release to the Felix dist directory and promote the artifacts
to the central Maven
+1
On Jun 3, 2013, at 12:32 PM, Pierre De Rop wrote:
> A minor remark regarding the DP webconsole plugin (not concerned by this
> candidate release), I see that DP is located in the "Main" tab instead of
> the "OSGi" tab.
> May be I should open a jira issue for moving DP in the "OSGi" webconsole
> t
Hi all,
After cancelling the previous release, I've fixed the issue and I'd like to
announce the new vote for two Felix bundles. These are the changelogs:
DeploymentAdmin Release 0.9.4
-
FELIX-3336 Exceptions related to the pipe used in deployment admin
FELIX-3272 Add property to al
After Bram discovered an issue in the AutoConf manifest, I cancelled the vote
an I will fix the issue. Then I will start a new vote.
Hmm, you're right, Bram. I will cancel this vote, fix it, and start a new vote
later today.
Greetings, Marcel
On May 31, 2013, at 15:21 PM, Bram de Kruijff wrote:
> -1 (non-binding)
>
> It looks like the autoconf rp now has an import constraint
> "managmentagent=true" for cmpn packages that
Hi all,
I'd like to announce the vote for two Felix bundles. These are the changelogs:
DeploymentAdmin Release 0.9.2
-
FELIX-3336 Exceptions related to the pipe used in deployment admin
FELIX-3272 Add property to allow foreign resource processors
FELIX-3515 DeploymentAdmin triggers I
1 - 100 of 697 matches
Mail list logo
