On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 7/7/14 12:07 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> >
> >> Either the mailing list ate it, or Adobe email ate it, but I got a box
> >> with a question mark in it. Can others see it?
On 7/7/14 12:07 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>> Either the mailing list ate it, or Adobe email ate it, but I got a box
>> with a question mark in it. Can others see it?
>>
>>
>I did not see it. But I think the issue is fixed now. Don
, 2014 11:58 AM
> To: "dev@flex.apache.org<mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>" <mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>>
> Subject: Re: Mustella issues
>
> [Inline image 1]
>
> Here you go.
>
> EdB
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 8:55 PM, Alex Harui ah
: Monday, July 7, 2014 11:58 AM
To: "dev@flex.apache.org<mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>"
mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: Mustella issues
[Inline image 1]
Here you go.
EdB
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 8:55 PM, Alex Harui
mailto:aha...@adobe.com>> wrote:
Got a &q
[image: Inline image 1]
Here you go.
EdB
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 8:55 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Got a "not found" trying to access the bad.png. Maybe a new job started
> and cleaned it? If not, can you send me the bad.png?
>
> On 7/7/14 11:43 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
> >Isn't this the test
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:56 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>> Isn't this the test that only fails on 14.0? Just changing the baseline
>> may make it fail on 11.1 and earlier. I'll take a look at it shortly.
>>
>
> Oh well, it looks like M
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Isn't this the test that only fails on 14.0? Just changing the baseline
> may make it fail on 11.1 and earlier. I'll take a look at it shortly.
>
Oh well, it looks like Mustella has passed with no failures now. This was
with FP 14.0 btw.
Le
Got a "not found" trying to access the bad.png. Maybe a new job started
and cleaned it? If not, can you send me the bad.png?
On 7/7/14 11:43 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>Isn't this the test that only fails on 14.0? Just changing the baseline
>may make it fail on 11.1 and earlier. I'll take a loo
If we escalate all issues to the original architect, no-one else will
become familiar with Mustella. Let someone make a mistake (or two), we can
always revert or redo. No harm done, and lesson learned.
EdB
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 8:43 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Isn't this the test that only fail
Isn't this the test that only fails on 14.0? Just changing the baseline
may make it fail on 11.1 and earlier. I'll take a look at it shortly.
On 7/7/14 11:37 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>Actually, my image editor can't find any difference between them... So
>from
>where I'm standing, there is n
Actually, my image editor can't find any difference between them... So from
where I'm standing, there is no harm in setting the new baseline.
EdB
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 8:06 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> I am trying to beat Mustella back into shape. There are two issues
> currently. One
I am trying to beat Mustella back into shape. There are two issues
currently. One is git related (i am trying to fix it), the other one seems
real:
In Mustella_sdk, this test is broken:
Managers/StyleManager/AdvancedCSS/descendantSelectors/AdvancedCSS_descendantSelectors_RuntimeCSS
descendantSe
12 matches
Mail list logo
