Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.6.0 RC1

On 3/28/16, 5:49 PM, "Mark Kessler" wrote: >BTW when was the last time the Falcon dev branch was merged back into the >master? Looks like a long ways down. Looks like you are right. I thought I'd done it, but I will try again after this release. -Alex

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.6.0 RC1

BTW when was the last time the Falcon dev branch was merged back into the master? Looks like a long ways down. -Mark On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > This is the discussion thread. > > > Thanks, > Alex Harui > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.6.0 RC1

I've been finding the README files - the very first thing I look at - to be very confusing for someone trying to get into this project. There are things listed as "optional" which are required and the emphasis on using git at the top of the README always makes me wonder why I would even use a

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.6.0 RC1

Some more that might be worth mentioning that I can see in the commit history: I fixed a bug where -js-output-type=jsc didn't work in IntelliJ IDEA. I added support for internal classes/interfaces/functions/variables after the package block. I added support for package-level

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.6.0 RC1

I added -js-output-type=node to this release. This is exposed in FlexJS as js/bin/asnodec. It generates an index.js that can be run with Node.js. Modules can be required with the regular Node.js require(), which is defined in node.swc. I posted a simple example here:

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.6.0 RC1

On 3/26/16, 3:27 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> Volunteers are welcome to review the commits and provide more detail. I >> would have to do the same. > >It’s likely to be something that users will asks and would be nice to >have something to go into the announcement

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.6.0 RC1

Hi, > Volunteers are welcome to review the commits and provide more detail. I > would have to do the same. It’s likely to be something that users will asks and would be nice to have something to go into the announcement email. Thanks, Justin

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.6.0 RC1

On 3/25/16, 5:53 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >Also do we know what version of CreateJS/EaselJS is being used in >FalconJX? It’s usually a good idea to mention the version in LICENSE as >well (as different versions can have different licenses). It seems to be >updated

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.6.0 RC1

On 3/25/16, 4:16 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >What are the changes from the previous release? "Lots of bug fixes and >other small improvements are included in this release.” seems a bit vague >to me. Volunteers are welcome to review the commits and provide more

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.6.0 RC1

Hi, Also do we know what version of CreateJS/EaselJS is being used in FalconJX? It’s usually a good idea to mention the version in LICENSE as well (as different versions can have different licenses). It seems to be updated reasonably frequently [1]. Are we using the latest version? Thanks,

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.6.0 RC1

Hi, After compiling I notice that swcdepends don’t work as the jar is missing. ./swcdepends Using Flex SDK: /Users/justinmclean/Documents/ApacheFlex4.15/ Error: Unable to access jarfile ./../lib/falcon-swcdepends.jar mxmlc, swfdump etc seem to work as expected. ls ../lib/ compiler.jar

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.6.0 RC1

Hi, What are the changes from the previous release? "Lots of bug fixes and other small improvements are included in this release.” seems a bit vague to me. Thanks, Justin