+0
I forgot to commit the README update last night . After that happens I'm
good. (or if anyone else wants to update it)
OS: Win 7 64bit English
-Successfully built from source (after changing path).
-Successfully installed.
-Successfully downloaded sdk using installer.
-Mark
On 6/22/15, 11:50 PM, Frédéric THOMAS webdoubl...@hotmail.com wrote:
Aha! Your cache is on! I’ll try that shortly. That usually means a
file’s URL has characters in it that are not allowed on Windows.
I just tried now with cache on and it also worked !
In case it helps, this is the log of
, so, we can carry on my +1 binding
Thanks,
Frédéric THOMAS
From: aha...@adobe.com
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 04:57:15 +
Aha! Your cache is on! I’ll try
: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 07:34:11 +0100
Aha! Your cache is on! I’ll try that shortly. That usually means a
file’s URL has characters in it that are not allowed on Windows.
I just
Frédéric THOMAS
From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 07:34:11 +0100
Aha! Your cache is on! I’ll try that shortly. That usually means a
file’s URL
Hi,
Also, Justin reported the same issue on Mac
If it helps, it was OS X and with no cache, non en_US locale (but located in
the US) and with default options in installer.
Thanks
Justin
+1 (binding)
-Mark
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Kessler CTR Mark J
mark.kessler@usmc.mil wrote:
+0
I forgot to commit the README update last night . After that happens I'm
good. (or if anyone else wants to update it)
OS: Win 7 64bit English
-Successfully built from source
+1 Binding
I hold on my previous vote until we have more clarification on the 3003
Thanks
Frédéric THOMAS
From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 16
From: bigosma...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 00:32:36 -0700
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
To: dev@flex.apache.org
+1 Binding
Source compiles fine
Signatures match
Minor issue with README, but not worth a -1
Hey guys, I am really naive when it comes to this testing release stuff. I
don't have a lot of time but what is the exact process to do it right?
Mike
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 5:14 PM, piotrz piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 (binding)
Package
+1 (binding)
Package
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/apache-fle
x-sdk-installer-3.2.0-src.zip
Java 1.7
OS: Windows 7 amd64 6.1
Source kit signatures match: y
Source kit builds: y
README is ok: y
RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y
NOTICE is ok: y
LICENSE is ok: y
No unapproved
installed before,
uninstall it first, play with the new installer and report.
Frédéric THOMAS
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 17:40:30 -0400
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com
To: dev@flex.apache.org
From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 16:01:55 +0100
+1 Binding
What a great script !
approve:
牋牋 [echo]
牋牋 [echo] +1
牋牋 [echo] Package
https
with the new
installer and report.
Frédéric THOMAS
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 17:40:30 -0400
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Hey guys, I am really
: aha...@adobe.com
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 21:59:16 +
OK, the falcon script got busted with all of the changes for the
externs.
I just got it to work for me.
-Alex
On 6/22/15, 9:59 AM, Frédéric THOMAS
.
Forgive me if I missed something though.
Frédéric THOMAS
From: aha...@adobe.com
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 21:59:16 +
OK, the falcon script got busted with all
: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 18:14:50 -0400
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com
To: dev@flex.apache.org
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 6:12 PM, Frédéric THOMAS webdoubl...@hotmail.com
wrote:
OK, the falcon script got busted with all of the changes
something though.
Frédéric THOMAS
From: aha...@adobe.com
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 21:59:16 +
OK, the falcon script got busted with all of the changes for the externs.
I
it first, play with the new
installer and report.
Frédéric THOMAS
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 17:40:30 -0400
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Hey guys, I am
/* is gitignored.
Mike
Frédéric THOMAS
From: aha...@adobe.com
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 21:59:16 +
OK, the falcon script got busted with all
+1
Despite the problems getting the source version to compile, when it does,
it works as expected. Since the Installer is mostly a binary convenience
utility, it gets my vote.
EdB
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
And this time I made sure I ran the
+1 Binding
Source compiles fine
Signatures match
Minor issue with README, but not worth a -1
Thanks,
Om
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 11:03 PM, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote:
+1
Despite the problems getting the source version to compile, when it does,
it works as expected. Since the
...@adobe.com
To: dev@flex.apache.org; webdoubl...@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 00:15:56 +
I got home and tried to install FlexJS on my home Windows computer and it
worked fine there as well. So please also provide OS
Hi,
but I don’t think there is a minimum level of scrutiny required in order to
cast a binding
vote.
As per [1] you need to:
Before voting +1 PMC members are required to download the signed source code
package, compile it as provided, and test the resulting executable on their own
On 6/22/15, 3:04 PM, Michael Schmalle teotigraphix...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, yeah, I had read that before. My time is limited and also why I asked,
i don't want to just +1 something and not follow procedure, I will stay
out
of this thread now, sorry.
While we don’t want PMC voters to “not follow
On 6/22/15, 9:57 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
Aha! Your cache is on! I’ll try that shortly. That usually means a
file’s URL has characters in it that are not allowed on Windows.
Well, it worked for me, with both cache on and cache off. I did both
twice.
I’m wondering if you are
On 6/22/15, 10:33 PM, Justin Mclean justinmcl...@me.com wrote:
Hi,
but I don’t think there is a minimum level of scrutiny required in
order to cast a binding
vote.
As per [1] you need to:
Before voting +1 PMC members are required to download the signed source
code package, compile it as
From: aha...@adobe.com
To: dev@flex.apache.org; webdoubl...@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 00:15:56 +
I got home and tried to install FlexJS on my home Windows computer and
it
worked fine there as well. So please also
And this time I made sure I ran the ApprovalScript before hitting send.
+1
Package
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/apache-flex-s
dk-installer-3.2.0-src.tar.gz
Java 1.7
OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.9.5
Source kit signatures match: y
Source kit builds: y
README is ok: y
29 matches
Mail list logo
