7, 2013, at 10:39 AM, Carlos Rovira
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> 2013/3/27 Frédéric THOMAS
>>>
>>>> +1 too
>>>>
>>>> -Fred
>>>>
>>>> -Message d'origine- From: Erik de Brui
94 80 80
>
> On Mar 27, 2013, at 10:39 AM, Carlos Rovira
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > 2013/3/27 Frédéric THOMAS
> >
> >> +1 too
> >>
> >> -Fred
> >>
> >> -Message d'origine- From: Erik de Bruin
> >&
>>
>> -Message d'origine- From: Erik de Bruin
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 8:18 AM
>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Update about Utilities repo migration
>>
>>
>> +1
>>
>> EdB
>>
>>
>>
>&g
+1
2013/3/27 Frédéric THOMAS
> +1 too
>
> -Fred
>
> -Message d'origine- From: Erik de Bruin
> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 8:18 AM
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Update about Utilities repo migration
>
>
> +1
>
> EdB
>
&g
+1 too
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Erik de Bruin
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 8:18 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: Update about Utilities repo migration
+1
EdB
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 4:18 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
Yup, let's get it done.
On 3/26/13 7:
+1
EdB
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 4:18 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Yup, let's get it done.
>
>
> On 3/26/13 7:55 PM, "Om" wrote:
>
>> Here is David@Infra's note about the missing history in the flex-utilities
>> git repo.
>>
>> I think we should accept the repo as it is and move ahead. Any objectio
Yup, let's get it done.
On 3/26/13 7:55 PM, "Om" wrote:
> Here is David@Infra's note about the missing history in the flex-utilities
> git repo.
>
> I think we should accept the repo as it is and move ahead. Any objections?
>
> We can go back to SVN for any history that is missing. I doubt
Here is David@Infra's note about the missing history in the flex-utilities
git repo.
I think we should accept the repo as it is and move ahead. Any objections?
We can go back to SVN for any history that is missing. I doubt we would
need that because it was the early days of the Installer proje
