Hi,
Someone mind trying out this patch for the spark NumericSpinner?
diff --git a/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/components/NumericStepper.as
b/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/components/NumericStepper.as
index 6a45b32..02d0ebf 100644
---
Hi,
May help if you looking for something to fix or want to help out with testing.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12324867
This is the list of unresolved issues than have been raised by someone and not
imported into JIRA from the old bugbase - there's only 280 of them!
Only
On it...
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:24 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.comwrote:
Hi,
Someone mind trying out this patch for the spark NumericSpinner?
diff --git
a/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/components/NumericStepper.as
Hi,
Here's the list of the currently assign JIRA issues, I know that some are being
worked on and some may be resolved, but if you're assigned to an issue but are
no longer willing to work on it can you mark it as unassigned.
Adobe JIRA
FLEX-33580 CLONE - Ambiguous reference when using
Hi,
Thanks, much appreciated, and of course I meant NumericStepper not
NumericSpinner :-)
Justin
Hi,
Just to put it into context 380 odd issues have been resolved from that same
set which means we've resolved about 60% of issues that people have raised. We
could probably do better but I'm reasonably sure that's better than resolution
rate of issues when Flex was with Adobe.
Thanks,
I can confirm that the patch works. When I click on the stepper buttons,
it does not show the decimal point or extra digits.
Also confirmed that if I set stepSize=0.1, the expected behavior works as
well.
Thanks,
Om
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:01 AM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.comwrote:
Hi,
What I assume is the oldest outstanding bugs in JIRA is:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-369
Raised way back in the Flex 2 days, surprisingly it's still an issue in Apache
Flex 4.10!
Anyone want to have a go at fixing a bug that's been outstanding for 7 years?
:-)
Thanks,
I am looking at it now... I cant keep up with you, though. Please go take
a break :-)
Om
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:49 AM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.comwrote:
Hi,
What I assume is the oldest outstanding bugs in JIRA is:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-369
Raised way
Hi,
I can confirm that the patch works. When I click on the stepper buttons,
it does not show the decimal point or extra digits.
Also confirmed that if I set stepSize=0.1, the expected behavior works as
well.
Could you try a step size of 10 or 100? I tested this here but obviously could
Hi,
I am looking at it now... I cant keep up with you, though. Please go take
a break :-)
You're safe for a few hours, it's beer o'clock here :-)
I've actually run into that issue a few times. While not the most important
bug it is sort of funny it's been outstanding for 7 years :-)
Anybody cares if I change that line from
var columnIndicator:Sprite;
if (rowIndicators (columnIndicator = rowIndicators[columnIndex]))
{
to
var columnIndicator:Sprite = rowIndicators[columnIndex];
if (rowIndicators columnIndicator != null)
{
Cyrill
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Erik
Hi,
Just a note some of the ADG fixes I done n the last couple of weeks dramatical
improve the performance of the ADG and DG with lots of columns and rows, in
some of the testing I did it may be an order of magnitude speed increase for
some operations (eg horizontal scrolling).
Of course it
Hi,
Yep it may RTE if rowIndicators is null :-)
Justin
definitely :D.. thanks..
and change it to ..
var columnIndicator:Sprite;
if (rowIndicators)
{
columnIndicator = rowIndicators[columnIndex];
if (columnIndicator != null)
{
o = columnIndicator;
if (o.parent)
o.parent.removeChild(o);
delete rowIndicators[columnIndex];
if
Hi,
Looks much better.
Justin
I'd go with:
var rowIndicators:Object = cellSelectionIndicators[rowData.uid];
if (rowIndicators rowIndicators[columnIndex])
{
o = rowIndicators[columnIndex];
if (o.parent)
o.parent.removeChild(o);
delete rowIndicators[columnIndex];
if (!atLeastOneProperty(rowIndicators))
delete
10 and 100 works fine too.
I ran the tests under tests/components/NumericStepper. No failures
reported.
I see that there is a test_changes.sh script. How would I run that?
Thanks,
Om
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:52 AM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.comwrote:
Hi,
I can confirm that
Hi,
I ran the tests under tests/components/NumericStepper. No failures
reported.
Think they are the mx ones you want to run:
./mini_run.sh tests/gumbo/components/NumericStepper
All pass btw and I've checked the code in.
I see that there is a test_changes.sh script. How would I run that?
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 1:59 AM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.comwrote:
Hi,
I ran the tests under tests/components/NumericStepper. No failures
reported.
Think they are the mx ones you want to run:
./mini_run.sh tests/gumbo/components/NumericStepper
Ah sorry, got confused. Its
I'm afraid I'll get lost in the code and will spend too much time in
there. I currently don't have the cycles available to do a FalconJx
style drive, sorry.
EdB
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
I might have time. You sure you don't want to try to fix it
Shouldn't there be an additional null check?
o = rowIndicators[columnIndex];
if (o != null o.parent)
o.parent.removeChild(o);
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote:
I'd go with:
var rowIndicators:Object = cellSelectionIndicators[rowData.uid];
if
That null check is already in the first if-statement:
rowIndicators[columnIndex]. If 'rowIndicators[columnIndex]' is null it
will never enter the block with the assignment to 'o', therefor 'o'
can't be null.
EdB
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Cyrill Zadra cyrill.za...@gmail.com wrote:
@Eric ... to your initial question.
For rapid prototyping try to consider using FlashBuilder 4.6 with Design
View or Flash Catalyst CS5.5 to generate your
visual SkinnableContainers or SkinnableComponents. Upgrading your visual
prototype to Apache Flex 4.10 can be done thereafter. At least, this
Oh right.. cool! And ./mini_run.sh tests/components/AdvancedDataGrid/
passes with 0 fails :). Thanks.
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote:
That null check is already in the first if-statement:
rowIndicators[columnIndex]. If 'rowIndicators[columnIndex]'
The local variable saves two lookups in rowIndicators. That would be
enough for me.
-Darrell
On 9/12/13 4:34 AM, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote:
I'd go with:
var rowIndicators:Object = cellSelectionIndicators[rowData.uid];
if (rowIndicators rowIndicators[columnIndex])
{
o =
I'm looking for my next falcon bug. I could look at this one if you'd like.
-Darrell
On 9/11/13 8:36 AM, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote:
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Cyrill Zadra cyrill.za...@gmail.com
wrote:
For this I already raised a JIRA -
I was leaving it open a few days to see if any interface issues would present
itself. But It's fine I suppose. I'll fill out the information on it tonight.
I'll take a look at the ADG to see if it does and just add it to this issue
later on.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Justin
Cyrill,
How did you get this to work? I'm currently trying to run all SWCs
through Falcon, but 'advancedgrids' gives me 2 errors and 3
warnings...
EdB
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Cyrill Zadra (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote:
[
Oh, hold on, I missed your last commits... re-checking.
EdB
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote:
Cyrill,
How did you get this to work? I'm currently trying to run all SWCs
through Falcon, but 'advancedgrids' gives me 2 errors and 3
warnings...
EdB
Actually, it saves only one compared to the original code. It also
save the declaration and possible assignment to a local variable, for
what it's worth.
EdB
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Darrell Loverin dlove...@adobe.com wrote:
The local variable saves two lookups in rowIndicators. That
Yes, please!
:-)
EdB
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Darrell Loverin dlove...@adobe.com wrote:
I'm looking for my next falcon bug. I could look at this one if you'd like.
-Darrell
On 9/11/13 8:36 AM, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote:
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Cyrill
Yeah ... but in Flexmojos you can have a dependency of type swc, rsl and
caching. Depending on the type of dependency it loads different files from
maven swc, swf or swz. The test-cases utilizing the signed rsls have
dependencies of type Caching and therefore maven Looks for swz files, which
Eric are you trying to reach this
https://github.com/igorcosta/ApacheFlexUIBuilder ?
Actually I'm still working on a more polish version later this summer in
southern hemisphere. I think it will fit on the next release of FalconJS
Best Regards
Igor Costa
So, found the problem, actually was on the library that encode images, took
so much time to render and break the app.
the built-in encoding is a safer.
Igor Costa
www.igorcosta.com
www.igorcosta.org
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Igor Costa igorco...@gmail.com
Hi Group,
I have few skins for Iphone 5 and now i want to target for all ios
devices. Is there any way to do that or else i have to manually calculate
dpi, resolutions and do the scaling stuff?
--
Thanks and Regards,
JJain,
If you have knowledge, let others light their candles in it
Clever idea. I didn't try it but from looking at this diff, I wonder if
it is ok to tie the number of decimal places to the step size. Couldn't
there be a difference like stepping by whole dollars but wanting to show
cents, or maybe starting at some fractional value but stepping by whole
Hi Erik
Some of them are already raised as JIRA [1].
regards
Cyrill
[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20FLEX%20AND%20component%20%3D%20Falcon%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl
Well actually FM should build your application with any mavenized FDK you throw
at it. Unless something has changed in more recent Versions of Apache Flex. FM
automatically uses the Compiler Version it was compiled agains, if you don't
explicitly fix a Version by using the plugin dependency.
Thanks for the link.
On 9/12/13 1:15 PM, Dasa Paddock dpadd...@esri.com wrote:
Falcon likely has this same Logical OR Assignment bug:
https://bugbase.adobe.com/index.cfm?event=bugid=3617792
--Dasa
On Sep 12, 2013, at 3:39 AM, Darrell Loverin dlove...@adobe.com wrote:
I'm looking for my next
Thanks for the responses Chris. Yeah, FM is a beast to build. I can't say
enough Thank Yous for taking over the project.
So, my understanding was that FM had to be built against the version of the FDK
you wanted to use. I'm assuming this is incorrect. Has anyone tried using FM
6.0.1 with
Falcon likely has this same Logical OR Assignment bug:
https://bugbase.adobe.com/index.cfm?event=bugid=3617792
--Dasa
On Sep 12, 2013, at 3:39 AM, Darrell Loverin dlove...@adobe.com wrote:
I'm looking for my next falcon bug. I could look at this one if you'd like.
-Darrell
Hi,
While trying to get the mx components to compile using Falcon, I ran
into this error:
In List.as, line 1515 reads 'rowInfo.pop()', where rowInfo is an Array
defined in ListBase.as. Falcon complains call to possibly undefined
method 'pop'. Further investigation shows that the problem comes
Go for it, clearly it won't be the last error of this kind and glad that
Falcon is stricter than mxmlc.
BTW, are there plans to make Falcon nightly builds available? I could try
to compile our large app and report issues.
On 12 September 2013 15:49, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
After playing around with the command line arguments a bit, I was able
to compile nearly all framework SWCs using the Falcon compiler! Only
'spark' and 'experimental' don't compile and it looks like that has
mostly the same problems as 'spark', so I think we can safely say that
we're only the
Hi,
Clever idea. I didn't try it but from looking at this diff, I wonder if
it is ok to tie the number of decimal places to the step size.
In most cases (that I can think of) it is. It certainly better than what it's
currently doing.
Couldn't there be a difference like stepping by whole
HI,
BTW, are there plans to make Falcon nightly builds available? I could try
to compile our large app and report issues.
It's available here:
https://builds.apache.org/job/flex-falcon/ws/compiler/commandline/
Thanks,
Justin
I've updated my projects to start building with your 6.0.1 version of FM. I
haven't had a chance to really get into it yet, but the first things I'm seeing
are these warnings. Any idea why, as I'm building against 4.10.0.20130801?
[WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flex:compiler:pom:4.6.0.23201
48 matches
Mail list logo
