Re: Kotlinjs has solved the circular dependency problem. Flexjs, do you have any plans?

Are your actual code are you using both in the same file and fully qualifying the call to flash.utils.SetTimeout? Maybe you need more than one file in the test. -Alex On 9/4/17, 7:10 PM, "lizhi" wrote: >no error > >package >{ > import flash.utils.setTimeout; > public

Re: [FlexJS] Re: Remote object for Flex JS

Hi Carlos, Yes, if you look at the commits in that branch, there is a server example in examples/amf/SampleAmfWebApp that has a ServerCustomObject.java. In examples/flexjs/RemoteObjectAmfTest there is a ClientCustomObject.java with [RemoteClass] metadata that references the qualified name of

Re: [FlexJS] Re: Remote object for Flex JS

ok, I know see this is in "feature/amf" Thanks! :) 2017-09-05 1:02 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira : > Hi Alex, > > could you provide more about your work here? > > For what you said I could infer that the work on AMF is on a branch or > feature branch? could you provide

Re: [FlexJS] Re: Remote object for Flex JS

Hi Alex, could you provide more about your work here? For what you said I could infer that the work on AMF is on a branch or feature branch? could you provide what branch is? And the work right now makes a successful communication with a test java backend to send and receive a String and an

Re: [FlexJS] Re: Remote object for Flex JS

Hi Folks, I just pushed changes that prove that I can get an array of custom objects from the backend. So, I'm going to declare my effort on AMF complete for now and go do other things. Feel free to suggest what those other things are. There is no AsyncToken API right now, so if folks have to

Re: Kotlinjs has solved the circular dependency problem. Flexjs, do you have any plans?

Try mixing in the regular JS built-in setTimeout into your simple test case and see if you can reproduce the same error. -Alex On 9/3/17, 7:30 PM, "lizhi" wrote: > >And I searched for flash.utils.settimeout in full text, and nowhere else >to >use this class. Just some places use

Re: [VOTE] Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

+1 > On 1 Sep 2017, at 20:44, Frédéric THOMAS wrote: > > +1 binding > > Fred. > > Sent from Samsung tablet. > > > Original message > From: Alex Harui > Date: 01/09/2017 07:28 (GMT+00:00) > To: dev@flex.apache.org >

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

Sorry Thanks Erik > On 4 Sep 2017, at 09:49, Erik de Bruin wrote: > > Remember to vote in the [VOTE] thread. > > EdB > > > > 2017-09-04 9:29 GMT+02:00 Jose Barragan >: > >> I think is the best

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

Remember to vote in the [VOTE] thread. EdB 2017-09-04 9:29 GMT+02:00 Jose Barragan : > I think is the best option. > Hope I could be part of this. > > +1 > __ > *Jose Barragan* > *Senior Software Engineer* > Codeoscopic > +34 912 94 80 80

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

I think is the best option. Hope I could be part of this. +1 __ Jose Barragan Senior Software Engineer Codeoscopic +34 912 94 80 80 http://www.codeoscopic.com Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener información

Re: [Flex JS] Flex SDK Installer always get stuck at "Finish uncompressing"

I'm not sure whether it is even matter what version we have in case where we have SDK for pure JS development. For sure we cannot have specify in "library-path" and "external-library-path" paths to player. Piotr 2017-09-04 8:38 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui : > OK. That's what

Re: [Flex JS] Flex SDK Installer always get stuck at "Finish uncompressing"

OK. That's what I hoped. So the goal should be for the installer to set target-player to something like 11.1? Thanks, -Alex On 9/3/17, 11:19 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote: >Once I get back "target-player" to flex-config, but still left commented >out

Re: [Flex JS] Flex SDK Installer always get stuck at "Finish uncompressing"

Once I get back "target-player" to flex-config, but still left commented out external-library-path and library-path everything has build without the problem. Piotr 2017-09-04 2:18 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui : > OK, but if you specify a legitimate target-player but only