Re: Kotlinjs has solved the circular dependency problem. Flexjs, do you have any plans?

[Alex Harui]

Are your actual code are you using both in the same file and fully
qualifying the call to flash.utils.SetTimeout?  Maybe you need more than
one file in the test.

-Alex

On 9/4/17, 7:10 PM, "lizhi"  wrote:

>no error
>
>package 
>{
>   import flash.utils.setTimeout;
>   public class TestBug
>   {
>   
>   public function TestBug()
>   {
>   
>   setTimeout(function():void{trace("se")}, 100);
>   flash.utils.setTimeout(function():void{trace("se")}, 
> 100);
>   trace(1);
>   }
>   
>   }
>
>}
>
>
>
>-
>spriteflexjs.com 
>--
>Sent from: 
>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-fle
>x-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2F=02%7C01%7C%7Cf0b61cf1f9fe45415
>de308d4f4034721%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364017423001
>32427=2VqbqFFTf%2FukaNGTblUk%2F%2FHXaE3C%2B8%2B2FV%2FV24HClV4%3D
>erved=0

Re: [FlexJS] Re: Remote object for Flex JS

[Alex Harui]

Hi Carlos,

Yes, if you look at the commits in that branch, there is a server example
in examples/amf/SampleAmfWebApp that has a ServerCustomObject.java.  In
examples/flexjs/RemoteObjectAmfTest there is a ClientCustomObject.java
with [RemoteClass] metadata that references the qualified name of
ServerCustomObject.  I'm not very knowledgable about this stuff so I may
not be following the typical pattern.

Build SampleAmfWebApp and run it (the Maven build creates a WAR file, I
don't think there is an Ant build for it).  It should set up a server on
localhost:8080.  Build RemoteObjectAmfTest and run it on SWF or JS.  Hit
the buttons and it should communicate with the server.  I have only tested
with bin/js-debug.  I haven't looked to see if the minified code works.

HTH,
-Alex

On 9/4/17, 4:03 PM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
 wrote:

>ok, I know see this is in "feature/amf"
>
>Thanks! :)
>
>2017-09-05 1:02 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira :
>
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> could you provide more about your work here?
>>
>> For what you said I could infer that the work on AMF is on a branch or
>> feature branch? could you provide what branch is?
>> And the work right now makes a successful communication with a test java
>> backend to send and receive a String and an Array of custom objects?.
>>
>> So that objects could for example a org.apache.flexjs.Product, in FlexJS
>> and in Java?
>> The java test is deployed in some url? or we could get that sample code
>> java and flexjs?
>>
>> thanks
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2017-09-04 19:12 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui :
>>
>>> Hi Folks,
>>>
>>> I just pushed changes that prove that I can get an array of custom
>>>objects
>>> from the backend.
>>>
>>> So, I'm going to declare my effort on AMF complete for now and go do
>>>other
>>> things.  Feel free to suggest what those other things are.  There is no
>>> AsyncToken API right now, so if folks have to have it, they should add
>>>it
>>> in.  It would be great to have someone try out the branch and merge it
>>> into develop.
>>>
>>> One possible "next thing" might be a similar encoder/decoder for JSON.
>>> Is
>>> this interesting to people?  Then we could test the performance of
>>>JSON vs
>>> AMF.  As a reminder, in SWF, AMF decoding is done in player code.  In
>>>JS,
>>> it is done in JS so there might be performance differences.  Having
>>>JSON
>>> encoder/decoder also allow comparison of how much data is sent from the
>>> server especially if there is compression over the network.
>>>
>>> Otherwise, I think my "next thing" will be to ponder release packaging
>>>in
>>> the new project.
>>>
>>> Thanks to everyone who helped get us to this point.
>>>
>>> -Alex
>>>
>>> On 9/3/17, 1:15 PM, "Jose Barragan" 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> >Hi Alex, Greg,
>>> >
>>> >Sounds great!!
>>> >
>>> >AMF always was my preference option for communicate the JS frontend
>>>with
>>> >the backend, as I always doing with Flex, but I haven't been cant
>>>found
>>> >any good implementation for use it.
>>> >
>>> >Sincerely, I think that a good AMF protocol implemetation (AsynToken,
>>> >RemoteObjects, etc...), as the best solution for binary comunication
>>> >(front-back) that I know, could make the difference with rest of JS
>>> >frameworks in favor of FlexJS.
>>> >
>>> >Currently, I'm working on similar concept to use on pure JS scenarios
>>> >(React, Redux, etc...), therefore I would be delighted to be able to
>>> >help/contribute to the project in this respect.
>>> >
>>> >Maybe woulds a good idea think on it, as FlexJS communications
>>>library,
>>> >to be used with or without the rest of framework in multiple and
>>> >diferents scenarios. I think this could cause a better penetration and
>>> >future adoption of FlexJS in many segments.
>>> >
>>> >Btw as Carlos says, I’ve very limited time and no guarantee too, but
>>>I'm
>>> >very interested in this new beginning in FlexJS.
>>> >
>>> >Thanks,
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >> On 3 Sep 2017, at 21:24, Piotr Zarzycki 
>>> >>wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Carlos,
>>> >>
>>> >> Any commit from was always a pleasure to read. :) I'm watching AMF
>>> >>progress
>>> >> also and happy that something is moving. I hope that we will get
>>>mature
>>> >> enough to get avant2 to FlexJS. I can say that with MDL there is
>>>been
>>> >> achieved quite a lot in some app which I helped and I think we have
>>>a
>>> >>lot
>>> >> potential there. :)
>>> >>
>>> >> Piotr
>>> >>
>>> >> 2017-09-03 20:20 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira :
>>> >>
>>> >>> Hi Alex, Greg,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> great to see some effort on bringing AMF/RemoteObject Support to
>>> >>>FlexJS.
>>> >>> Always say that this was *key* to success. Need to say that I just
>>> >>> commented with some people about this and as I expected that brings
>>> >>>lots of
>>> >>> interest, since people see this as 

Re: [FlexJS] Re: Remote object for Flex JS

[Carlos Rovira]

ok, I know see this is in "feature/amf"

Thanks! :)

2017-09-05 1:02 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira :

> Hi Alex,
>
> could you provide more about your work here?
>
> For what you said I could infer that the work on AMF is on a branch or
> feature branch? could you provide what branch is?
> And the work right now makes a successful communication with a test java
> backend to send and receive a String and an Array of custom objects?.
>
> So that objects could for example a org.apache.flexjs.Product, in FlexJS
> and in Java?
> The java test is deployed in some url? or we could get that sample code
> java and flexjs?
>
> thanks
>
>
>
>
>
> 2017-09-04 19:12 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui :
>
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> I just pushed changes that prove that I can get an array of custom objects
>> from the backend.
>>
>> So, I'm going to declare my effort on AMF complete for now and go do other
>> things.  Feel free to suggest what those other things are.  There is no
>> AsyncToken API right now, so if folks have to have it, they should add it
>> in.  It would be great to have someone try out the branch and merge it
>> into develop.
>>
>> One possible "next thing" might be a similar encoder/decoder for JSON.  Is
>> this interesting to people?  Then we could test the performance of JSON vs
>> AMF.  As a reminder, in SWF, AMF decoding is done in player code.  In JS,
>> it is done in JS so there might be performance differences.  Having JSON
>> encoder/decoder also allow comparison of how much data is sent from the
>> server especially if there is compression over the network.
>>
>> Otherwise, I think my "next thing" will be to ponder release packaging in
>> the new project.
>>
>> Thanks to everyone who helped get us to this point.
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 9/3/17, 1:15 PM, "Jose Barragan" 
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Hi Alex, Greg,
>> >
>> >Sounds great!!
>> >
>> >AMF always was my preference option for communicate the JS frontend with
>> >the backend, as I always doing with Flex, but I haven't been cant found
>> >any good implementation for use it.
>> >
>> >Sincerely, I think that a good AMF protocol implemetation (AsynToken,
>> >RemoteObjects, etc...), as the best solution for binary comunication
>> >(front-back) that I know, could make the difference with rest of JS
>> >frameworks in favor of FlexJS.
>> >
>> >Currently, I'm working on similar concept to use on pure JS scenarios
>> >(React, Redux, etc...), therefore I would be delighted to be able to
>> >help/contribute to the project in this respect.
>> >
>> >Maybe woulds a good idea think on it, as FlexJS communications library,
>> >to be used with or without the rest of framework in multiple and
>> >diferents scenarios. I think this could cause a better penetration and
>> >future adoption of FlexJS in many segments.
>> >
>> >Btw as Carlos says, I’ve very limited time and no guarantee too, but I'm
>> >very interested in this new beginning in FlexJS.
>> >
>> >Thanks,
>> >
>> >
>> >> On 3 Sep 2017, at 21:24, Piotr Zarzycki 
>> >>wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Carlos,
>> >>
>> >> Any commit from was always a pleasure to read. :) I'm watching AMF
>> >>progress
>> >> also and happy that something is moving. I hope that we will get mature
>> >> enough to get avant2 to FlexJS. I can say that with MDL there is been
>> >> achieved quite a lot in some app which I helped and I think we have a
>> >>lot
>> >> potential there. :)
>> >>
>> >> Piotr
>> >>
>> >> 2017-09-03 20:20 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira :
>> >>
>> >>> Hi Alex, Greg,
>> >>>
>> >>> great to see some effort on bringing AMF/RemoteObject Support to
>> >>>FlexJS.
>> >>> Always say that this was *key* to success. Need to say that I just
>> >>> commented with some people about this and as I expected that brings
>> >>>lots of
>> >>> interest, since people see this as a way to only redo the front in
>> >>>flexes
>> >>> without touching any java (or other backend tech) line of code.
>> >>>
>> >>> I even could propose in my company go with FlexJS to make a HTML
>> >>>client for
>> >>> our main product Avant2: http://avant2.es
>> >>>
>> >>> btw, there's some sample code that I could test in order to see if I
>> >>>can
>> >>> help. Very limited time, and no guarantee but I'm very interested in
>> >>>this
>> >>> coming as a first citizen feature in FlexJS
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks!
>> >>>
>> >>> Carlos
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> 2017-09-02 16:36 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui :
>> >>>
>>  Hi Greg,
>> 
>>  I didn't even realize the old thread was on users@ so thanks for
>> moving
>> >>> it
>>  here.
>> 
>>  I'm sure there are lots of improvements needed to make this work in
>> the
>>  general case so thanks for noticing and offering to help out.  I
>> wondered
>>  for a bit whether there already was a "collect the properties"
>> utility.
>>  Maybe we should create one that takes into 

Re: [FlexJS] Re: Remote object for Flex JS

[Carlos Rovira]

Hi Alex,

could you provide more about your work here?

For what you said I could infer that the work on AMF is on a branch or
feature branch? could you provide what branch is?
And the work right now makes a successful communication with a test java
backend to send and receive a String and an Array of custom objects?.

So that objects could for example a org.apache.flexjs.Product, in FlexJS
and in Java?
The java test is deployed in some url? or we could get that sample code
java and flexjs?

thanks





2017-09-04 19:12 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui :

> Hi Folks,
>
> I just pushed changes that prove that I can get an array of custom objects
> from the backend.
>
> So, I'm going to declare my effort on AMF complete for now and go do other
> things.  Feel free to suggest what those other things are.  There is no
> AsyncToken API right now, so if folks have to have it, they should add it
> in.  It would be great to have someone try out the branch and merge it
> into develop.
>
> One possible "next thing" might be a similar encoder/decoder for JSON.  Is
> this interesting to people?  Then we could test the performance of JSON vs
> AMF.  As a reminder, in SWF, AMF decoding is done in player code.  In JS,
> it is done in JS so there might be performance differences.  Having JSON
> encoder/decoder also allow comparison of how much data is sent from the
> server especially if there is compression over the network.
>
> Otherwise, I think my "next thing" will be to ponder release packaging in
> the new project.
>
> Thanks to everyone who helped get us to this point.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 9/3/17, 1:15 PM, "Jose Barragan"  wrote:
>
> >Hi Alex, Greg,
> >
> >Sounds great!!
> >
> >AMF always was my preference option for communicate the JS frontend with
> >the backend, as I always doing with Flex, but I haven't been cant found
> >any good implementation for use it.
> >
> >Sincerely, I think that a good AMF protocol implemetation (AsynToken,
> >RemoteObjects, etc...), as the best solution for binary comunication
> >(front-back) that I know, could make the difference with rest of JS
> >frameworks in favor of FlexJS.
> >
> >Currently, I'm working on similar concept to use on pure JS scenarios
> >(React, Redux, etc...), therefore I would be delighted to be able to
> >help/contribute to the project in this respect.
> >
> >Maybe woulds a good idea think on it, as FlexJS communications library,
> >to be used with or without the rest of framework in multiple and
> >diferents scenarios. I think this could cause a better penetration and
> >future adoption of FlexJS in many segments.
> >
> >Btw as Carlos says, I’ve very limited time and no guarantee too, but I'm
> >very interested in this new beginning in FlexJS.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >
> >> On 3 Sep 2017, at 21:24, Piotr Zarzycki 
> >>wrote:
> >>
> >> Carlos,
> >>
> >> Any commit from was always a pleasure to read. :) I'm watching AMF
> >>progress
> >> also and happy that something is moving. I hope that we will get mature
> >> enough to get avant2 to FlexJS. I can say that with MDL there is been
> >> achieved quite a lot in some app which I helped and I think we have a
> >>lot
> >> potential there. :)
> >>
> >> Piotr
> >>
> >> 2017-09-03 20:20 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira :
> >>
> >>> Hi Alex, Greg,
> >>>
> >>> great to see some effort on bringing AMF/RemoteObject Support to
> >>>FlexJS.
> >>> Always say that this was *key* to success. Need to say that I just
> >>> commented with some people about this and as I expected that brings
> >>>lots of
> >>> interest, since people see this as a way to only redo the front in
> >>>flexes
> >>> without touching any java (or other backend tech) line of code.
> >>>
> >>> I even could propose in my company go with FlexJS to make a HTML
> >>>client for
> >>> our main product Avant2: http://avant2.es
> >>>
> >>> btw, there's some sample code that I could test in order to see if I
> >>>can
> >>> help. Very limited time, and no guarantee but I'm very interested in
> >>>this
> >>> coming as a first citizen feature in FlexJS
> >>>
> >>> Thanks!
> >>>
> >>> Carlos
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 2017-09-02 16:36 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui :
> >>>
>  Hi Greg,
> 
>  I didn't even realize the old thread was on users@ so thanks for
> moving
> >>> it
>  here.
> 
>  I'm sure there are lots of improvements needed to make this work in
> the
>  general case so thanks for noticing and offering to help out.  I
> wondered
>  for a bit whether there already was a "collect the properties"
> utility.
>  Maybe we should create one that takes into account all of the issues
> you
>  raised.
> 
>  It was cool to see the reflection APIs work, so thanks for doing them.
>  BTW, you need the latest compiler to add the [RemoteClass] data to the
> >>> app
>  so the ClassAliasBead can register those 

Re: [FlexJS] Re: Remote object for Flex JS

[Alex Harui]

Hi Folks,

I just pushed changes that prove that I can get an array of custom objects
from the backend.

So, I'm going to declare my effort on AMF complete for now and go do other
things.  Feel free to suggest what those other things are.  There is no
AsyncToken API right now, so if folks have to have it, they should add it
in.  It would be great to have someone try out the branch and merge it
into develop.

One possible "next thing" might be a similar encoder/decoder for JSON.  Is
this interesting to people?  Then we could test the performance of JSON vs
AMF.  As a reminder, in SWF, AMF decoding is done in player code.  In JS,
it is done in JS so there might be performance differences.  Having JSON
encoder/decoder also allow comparison of how much data is sent from the
server especially if there is compression over the network.

Otherwise, I think my "next thing" will be to ponder release packaging in
the new project.

Thanks to everyone who helped get us to this point.

-Alex

On 9/3/17, 1:15 PM, "Jose Barragan"  wrote:

>Hi Alex, Greg,
>
>Sounds great!!
>
>AMF always was my preference option for communicate the JS frontend with
>the backend, as I always doing with Flex, but I haven't been cant found
>any good implementation for use it.
>
>Sincerely, I think that a good AMF protocol implemetation (AsynToken,
>RemoteObjects, etc...), as the best solution for binary comunication
>(front-back) that I know, could make the difference with rest of JS
>frameworks in favor of FlexJS.
>
>Currently, I'm working on similar concept to use on pure JS scenarios
>(React, Redux, etc...), therefore I would be delighted to be able to
>help/contribute to the project in this respect.
>
>Maybe woulds a good idea think on it, as FlexJS communications library,
>to be used with or without the rest of framework in multiple and
>diferents scenarios. I think this could cause a better penetration and
>future adoption of FlexJS in many segments.
>
>Btw as Carlos says, I’ve very limited time and no guarantee too, but I'm
>very interested in this new beginning in FlexJS.
>
>Thanks,
>
>
>> On 3 Sep 2017, at 21:24, Piotr Zarzycki 
>>wrote:
>> 
>> Carlos,
>> 
>> Any commit from was always a pleasure to read. :) I'm watching AMF
>>progress
>> also and happy that something is moving. I hope that we will get mature
>> enough to get avant2 to FlexJS. I can say that with MDL there is been
>> achieved quite a lot in some app which I helped and I think we have a
>>lot
>> potential there. :)
>> 
>> Piotr
>> 
>> 2017-09-03 20:20 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira :
>> 
>>> Hi Alex, Greg,
>>> 
>>> great to see some effort on bringing AMF/RemoteObject Support to
>>>FlexJS.
>>> Always say that this was *key* to success. Need to say that I just
>>> commented with some people about this and as I expected that brings
>>>lots of
>>> interest, since people see this as a way to only redo the front in
>>>flexes
>>> without touching any java (or other backend tech) line of code.
>>> 
>>> I even could propose in my company go with FlexJS to make a HTML
>>>client for
>>> our main product Avant2: http://avant2.es
>>> 
>>> btw, there's some sample code that I could test in order to see if I
>>>can
>>> help. Very limited time, and no guarantee but I'm very interested in
>>>this
>>> coming as a first citizen feature in FlexJS
>>> 
>>> Thanks!
>>> 
>>> Carlos
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 2017-09-02 16:36 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui :
>>> 
 Hi Greg,
 
 I didn't even realize the old thread was on users@ so thanks for
moving
>>> it
 here.
 
 I'm sure there are lots of improvements needed to make this work in
the
 general case so thanks for noticing and offering to help out.  I
wondered
 for a bit whether there already was a "collect the properties"
utility.
 Maybe we should create one that takes into account all of the issues
you
 raised.
 
 It was cool to see the reflection APIs work, so thanks for doing them.
 BTW, you need the latest compiler to add the [RemoteClass] data to the
>>> app
 so the ClassAliasBead can register those classes.
 
 Thanks,
 -Alex
 
 On 9/1/17, 4:44 PM, "Greg Dove"  wrote:
 
> Hi Alex,
> 
> 
> Nice to see this stuff progressing within the framework itself. I
>moved
> this comment to dev because of content below, and I will try to take
>a
> look
> at this, to see if I can also test things in the coming week.
> 
> I quickly looked at some of the commits, perhaps I have missed
>something
> and you may have already addressed these somewhere in the code, but
>here
> are some quick comments just in case:
> I saw some parts where you were accessing the reflection data
>directly.
> 
> Exclude static data items from variables and accessors
> for accessors and variables they 

Re: Kotlinjs has solved the circular dependency problem. Flexjs, do you have any plans?

[Alex Harui]

Try mixing in the regular JS built-in setTimeout into your simple test
case and see if you can reproduce the same error.

-Alex

On 9/3/17, 7:30 PM, "lizhi"  wrote:

>
>And I searched for flash.utils.settimeout in full text, and nowhere else
>to
>use this class. Just some places use the JS built-in setTimeout
>
>
>
>-
>spriteflexjs.com 
>--
>Sent from: 
>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-fle
>x-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2F=02%7C01%7C%7C2e638eda7d1549953
>45208d4f33ce17b%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364008903980
>27030=x9W5Mg1C%2BrGAPVE8Sy5eUTlPHK83kZxb2L9mHRiyhaM%3D=0

Re: [VOTE] Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

[Jose Barragan]

+1

> On 1 Sep 2017, at 20:44, Frédéric THOMAS  wrote:
> 
> +1 binding
> 
> Fred.
> 
> Sent from Samsung tablet.
> 
> 
>  Original message 
> From: Alex Harui 
> Date: 01/09/2017 07:28 (GMT+00:00)
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex
> 
> Hi folks,
> 
> Here is the vote thread.  Please vote on whether to submit the proposal
> below to the board.  Please use +1 for yes, -1 for no, and if you want,
> any number in-between per [1].  Only PMC member votes will be used to
> determine the results, but we are more than happy to hear from non-PMC
> members as well.
> 
> [1]
> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#expressing-votes-1-0-1-and-fr
> actions
> 
> Thanks,
> -Alex
> 
>  Proposal ---
> 
> Apache FlexJS for Apache Top-Level Project
> 
> Abstract
> 
> Apache FlexJS is a new implementation of the principles of Apache Flex but
> designed for JavaScript runtimes instead of Adobe Flash/AIR runtimes.
> Apache FlexJS was created and released as part of the Apache Flex project
> and the UI framework is a full rewrite and does not leverage the code
> bases donated by Adobe.  Only the FlexJS compiler source was donated by
> Adobe.
> 
> Over time, the set of Apache Flex committers who are working on Apache
> Flex releases have become distinct from those working on FlexJS.  Add to
> that the Adobe announcement of the end-of-life for Flash in the browser,
> it makes sense to separate FlexJS from Flex so that followers of one side
> or the other don't have to filter out emails, bugs, web pages, etc, that
> they don't need.
> 
> The proposal is to form an Apache FlexJS top-level project instead of
> creating a new Incubator Podling.   That is because all but one of the
> folks being proposed to the new Apache FlexJS PMC below have been on the
> Apache Flex PMC for months, if not years, and understand how to
> participate productively in an Apache project.  Plus, Apache FlexJS has
> already been released by the top-level Apache Flex project.
> 
> Overview of FlexJS
> 
> Apache FlexJS is designed to improve developer productivity in creating
> applications for wherever Javascript runs, including browsers as well as
> Apache Cordova applications, Node, etc.  FlexJS already has an ecosystem
> of folks creating IDEs for FlexJS, and some folks are at various points in
> the process of migrating existing Flex applications to FlexJS.
> 
> Current Status
> 
> Meritocracy
> 
> Within Apache Flex, the FlexJS development has been conducted as a
> meritocracy.  No existing FlexJS developers came with the compiler code
> base donated by Adobe nor were they on the initial committers list for
> Apache Flex other than Alex Harui.  Everyone else has earned their way in
> by contributing and earning merit.
> 
> Community
> 
> Many FlexJS users are trying to migrate an existing Apache Flex app off of
> Adobe Flash.  As their migration progresses they will become less and less
> interested in Apache Flex releases and activity.  However, the Apache Flex
> JIRA project contains some  30,000 Flex issues migrated from Adobe's bug
> base, and the team page for Flex makes it hard to determine which
> committers are active on FlexJS, and it is frequently hard to determine if
> a user's question is about regular Flex or FlexJS.   We are seeing an
> increase in user interest with the Flash end-of-life announcement and
> having separate mailing lists, web pages, and JIRA projects will help save
> everyone time and energy.
> 
> Alignment
> 
> Apache FlexJS is already being released by Apache.
> 
> Known Risks
> 
> Code Extraction
> 
> The flex-asjs, flex-tours, flex-typedefs, and flex-falcon Git repos would
> be migrated to GitBox.  Other Apache Flex repos would be treated as
> external dependencies.  This includes flex-utilities and the Apache Flex
> Installer.
> 
> Orphaned Projects
> 
> Most FlexJS PMC members are planning to remain on the Apache Flex PMC to
> help out just-in-case, but are already mostly inactive on the Flex code
> bases. However, there are at least 3 Apache Flex PMC members who have not
> contributed at all to FlexJS and participate in regular Flex releases, so
> the expectation is that Apache Flex will remain a viable project for some
> time to come.
> 
> Inexperience with Open Source
> 
> All of the initial team has been contributing to Apache Flex for months if
> not years.
> 
> Homogenous Developers
> 
> No company employs more than two of the members of the initial team.
> 
> Reliance on Salaried Developers
> 
> Until about a year ago, only 2 of the proposed PMC members were paid to
> work on FlexJS.  The rest contributed in their spare time.  Two more are
> now paid to migrate an existing application and thus contribute to add
> missing features and fix bugs.  By creating a separate project, we hope to
> attract more folks who may not want to be involved with the legacy Apache
> Flex code.
> 
> 

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

[Jose Barragan]

Sorry

Thanks Erik

> On 4 Sep 2017, at 09:49, Erik de Bruin  wrote:
> 
> Remember to vote in the [VOTE] thread.
> 
> EdB
> 
> 
> 
> 2017-09-04 9:29 GMT+02:00 Jose Barragan  >:
> 
>> I think is the best option.
>> Hope I could be part of this.
>> 
>> +1
>> __
>> *Jose Barragan*
>> *Senior Software Engineer*
>> Codeoscopic
>> +34 912 94 80 80 <+34%20912%2094%2080%2080>
>> http://www.codeoscopic.com 
>> 
>> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
>> información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
>> error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
>> proceda a su destrucción.
>> De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le
>> comunicamos que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es
>> CODEOSCOPIC S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la
>> prestación del servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho
>> de acceso, rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose
>> a nuestras oficinas Avda. Manoteras, nº 30, B109, 28050 de Madrid (Madrid)
>> con la documentación necesaria.
>> 
>> On 1 Sep 2017, at 01:56, Carlos Rovira > >
>> wrote:
>> 
>> I think this is a very good idea, thanks for proposing a fork
>> 
>> I'l be voting +1 to this
>> 
>> C.
>> 
>> 2017-08-31 23:43 GMT+02:00 Piotr Zarzycki > >:
>> 
>> Let's wait for the VOTE thread and focus on Fork.
>> 
>> Agree with Michael that talking about the name should be in a separate
>> thread.
>> 
>> Piotr
>> 
>> 2017-08-31 23:39 GMT+02:00 Michael Schmalle > >:
>> 
>> I think the name thing should be in a separate thread.
>> 
>> Mike
>> 
>> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Dave Fisher > >
>> wrote:
>> 
>> That's a conflict. We would want a nonconflicting name that will not
>> confuse our users.
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>> On Aug 31, 2017, at 2:25 PM, Harbs > > wrote:
>> 
>> Well, Phoenix is already a thing:
>> http://phoenixframework.org/  
>> >
>> 
>> Not sure about trademark issues…
>> 
>> On Aug 31, 2017, at 11:55 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <
>> 
>> bigosma...@gmail.com >
>> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> I want to throw in the name FenixJS for the fork.
>> Its a play on the words Flex + Phoenix.  You know what that means
>> 
>> :-)
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Om
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> Piotr Zarzycki
>> 
>> mobile: +48 880 859 557 <+48%20880%20859%20557>
>> skype: zarzycki10
>> 
>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki 
>> 
>> > >
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> >
>> 
>> Carlos Rovira
>> 
>> Director General
>> 
>> M: +34 607 22 60 05 <+34%20607%2022%2060%2005>
>> 
>> http://www.codeoscopic.com
>> 
>> http://www.avant2.es
>> 
>> 
>> Conocenos en 1 minuto! 
>> 
>> 
>> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
>> información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
>> error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
>> proceda a su destrucción.
>> 
>> De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
>> que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
>> S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
>> servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
>> rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
>> oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
>> necesaria.
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> --
> Ix Multimedia Software
> 
> Jan Luykenstraat 27
> 3521 VB Utrecht
> 
> T. 06-51952295
> I. www.ixsoftware.nl 


signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

[Erik de Bruin]

Remember to vote in the [VOTE] thread.

EdB



2017-09-04 9:29 GMT+02:00 Jose Barragan :

> I think is the best option.
> Hope I could be part of this.
>
> +1
> __
> *Jose Barragan*
> *Senior Software Engineer*
> Codeoscopic
> +34 912 94 80 80 <+34%20912%2094%2080%2080>
> http://www.codeoscopic.com
>
> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
> información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
> error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
> proceda a su destrucción.
> De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le
> comunicamos que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es
> CODEOSCOPIC S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la
> prestación del servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho
> de acceso, rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose
> a nuestras oficinas Avda. Manoteras, nº 30, B109, 28050 de Madrid (Madrid)
> con la documentación necesaria.
>
> On 1 Sep 2017, at 01:56, Carlos Rovira 
> wrote:
>
> I think this is a very good idea, thanks for proposing a fork
>
> I'l be voting +1 to this
>
> C.
>
> 2017-08-31 23:43 GMT+02:00 Piotr Zarzycki :
>
> Let's wait for the VOTE thread and focus on Fork.
>
> Agree with Michael that talking about the name should be in a separate
> thread.
>
> Piotr
>
> 2017-08-31 23:39 GMT+02:00 Michael Schmalle :
>
> I think the name thing should be in a separate thread.
>
> Mike
>
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Dave Fisher 
> wrote:
>
> That's a conflict. We would want a nonconflicting name that will not
> confuse our users.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Aug 31, 2017, at 2:25 PM, Harbs  wrote:
>
> Well, Phoenix is already a thing:
> http://phoenixframework.org/ 
>
> Not sure about trademark issues…
>
> On Aug 31, 2017, at 11:55 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <
>
> bigosma...@gmail.com>
>
> wrote:
>
>
> I want to throw in the name FenixJS for the fork.
> Its a play on the words Flex + Phoenix.  You know what that means
>
> :-)
>
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> mobile: +48 880 859 557 <+48%20880%20859%20557>
> skype: zarzycki10
>
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki
> 
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> 
>
> Carlos Rovira
>
> Director General
>
> M: +34 607 22 60 05 <+34%20607%2022%2060%2005>
>
> http://www.codeoscopic.com
>
> http://www.avant2.es
>
>
> Conocenos en 1 minuto! 
>
>
> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
> información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
> error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
> proceda a su destrucción.
>
> De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
> que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
> S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
> servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
> rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
> oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
> necesaria.
>
>
>


-- 
Ix Multimedia Software

Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht

T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

[Jose Barragan]

I think is the best option.
Hope I could be part of this.

+1
__
Jose Barragan
Senior Software Engineer
Codeoscopic
+34 912 94 80 80
http://www.codeoscopic.com 

Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener 
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, 
le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a 
su destrucción.
De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos que 
sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC S.A. La 
finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del servicio o 
información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso, rectificación, 
cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras oficinas Avda. 
Manoteras, nº 30, B109, 28050 de Madrid (Madrid) con la documentación necesaria.

> On 1 Sep 2017, at 01:56, Carlos Rovira  wrote:
> 
> I think this is a very good idea, thanks for proposing a fork
> 
> I'l be voting +1 to this
> 
> C.
> 
> 2017-08-31 23:43 GMT+02:00 Piotr Zarzycki :
> 
>> Let's wait for the VOTE thread and focus on Fork.
>> 
>> Agree with Michael that talking about the name should be in a separate
>> thread.
>> 
>> Piotr
>> 
>> 2017-08-31 23:39 GMT+02:00 Michael Schmalle :
>> 
>>> I think the name thing should be in a separate thread.
>>> 
>>> Mike
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Dave Fisher 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
 That's a conflict. We would want a nonconflicting name that will not
 confuse our users.
 
 Sent from my iPhone
 
> On Aug 31, 2017, at 2:25 PM, Harbs  wrote:
> 
> Well, Phoenix is already a thing:
> http://phoenixframework.org/ 
> 
> Not sure about trademark issues…
> 
>> On Aug 31, 2017, at 11:55 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <
>>> bigosma...@gmail.com>
 wrote:
>> 
>> I want to throw in the name FenixJS for the fork.
>> Its a play on the words Flex + Phoenix.  You know what that means
>> :-)
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Om
> 
 
 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> Piotr Zarzycki
>> 
>> mobile: +48 880 859 557
>> skype: zarzycki10
>> 
>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> 
> 
> 
> Carlos Rovira
> 
> Director General
> 
> M: +34 607 22 60 05
> 
> http://www.codeoscopic.com
> 
> http://www.avant2.es
> 
> 
> Conocenos en 1 minuto! 
> 
> 
> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
> información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
> error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
> proceda a su destrucción.
> 
> De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
> que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
> S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
> servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
> rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
> oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
> necesaria.



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Re: [Flex JS] Flex SDK Installer always get stuck at "Finish uncompressing"

[Piotr Zarzycki]

I'm not sure whether it is even matter what version we have in case where
we have SDK for pure JS development. For sure we cannot have specify in
"library-path" and "external-library-path" paths to player.

Piotr

2017-09-04 8:38 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui :

> OK.  That's what I hoped.  So the goal should be for the installer to set
> target-player to something like 11.1?
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 9/3/17, 11:19 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:
>
> >Once I get back "target-player" to flex-config, but still left commented
> >out external-library-path and library-path everything has build without
> >the
> >problem.
> >
> >Piotr
> >
> >2017-09-04 2:18 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui :
> >
> >> OK, but if you specify a legitimate target-player but only specify
> >>JSFlex
> >> output, I'm still wondering what part of the compiler is going to
> >>verify a
> >> playerglobal.swc exists since playerglobal.swc shouldn’t be specified in
> >> any external-library-path.
> >>
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >> On 9/3/17, 1:51 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:
> >>
> >> >Hi Alex,
> >> >
> >> >I get back to this and look closer into compiler code regarding point
> >>#1.
> >> >I
> >> >see following comments in Configuration.java:
> >> >
> >> >"The major_version is required while minor_version and revision are
> >> >optional. The minimum value is 10.0.0. If you do not specify the
> >> >minor_version or revision, then the compiler uses zeros."
> >> >
> >> >In code I see that if I don't have in flex-config.xml 
> >>at
> >> >all I have exception reported by this line [1]. That is why I'm seeing
> >> >this
> >> >one:
> >> >
> >> >0.0.0
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >[1]
> >> >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >> https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apa
> >> >che.org%2FBB2R=02%7C01%7C%7Ce185e651110c4c41e85908d4f30d
> >> 81d6%7Cfa7b1b
> >> >5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636400686724171224&
> >> sdata=ifbA81a5a5vw
> >> >bE4yej1Ej4mzM4JkfTH3KtBzC95wvK8%3D=0
> >> >
> >> >Thanks,
> >> >Piotr
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >2017-08-29 6:36 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui :
> >> >
> >> >> Hmm.  It isn't obvious to me:
> >> >>
> >> >> 1) if you only have target=JSFlex, why does the compiler care about
> >> >> target-player?
> >> >> 2) Why did -htmlTemplate option not work?
> >> >>
> >> >> Maybe the console output would tell us more, or try putting
> >> >> System.out.println calls into MXMLFlexJSPublisher.java to see why the
> >> >> template wasn’t generated.
> >> >>
> >> >> HTH,
> >> >> -Alex
> >> >>
> >> >> On 8/28/17, 3:20 PM, "piotrz"  wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >Hi Alex,
> >> >> >
> >> >> >I just did build using console. It look like there is a bug in
> >> >>Moonshine
> >> >> >partially.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Build in Moonshine:
> >> >> >Basically when I run build it has failed with same error in
> >>Moonshine,
> >> >> >cause
> >> >> >every build generates custom configuration [1] which contains
> >> >> >0.0.0 - if there is no player
> version
> >> in
> >> >> >frameworks/flex-config.xml (since I have commented out each line
> >> >>related
> >> >> >to
> >> >> >target-player).
> >> >> >
> >> >> >I will probably raise issue for Moonshine.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Build in console:
> >> >> >Once I removed target-player from [2] build has been successful from
> >> >> >console. Unfortunately -html-template was completely omitted, so MDL
> >> >> >example
> >> >> >do not have any styles.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > >> >> http%3A%2F%2Fapache-fl
> >> >> >ex-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2Ffile%2Fn64004%
> >> >> 2Fmdl_table_without_S
> >> >> >tyle.png=02%7C01%7C%7C284e644bff584ab1b7d708d4ee62
> >> >> f776%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34
> >> >> >438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636395556215578840=
> >> >> ZRxcO%2B%2Bn2wULt4
> >> >> >kn53d6ZZutOxqguNTjBteVF59TYrA%3D=0>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >[1]
> >> >> >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >> >> https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apa
> >> >> >che.org%2FFbUb=02%7C01%7C%7C284e644bff584ab1b7d708d4ee62
> >> >> f776%7Cfa7b1b
> >> >> >5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636395556215578840&
> >> >> sdata=dhOREax1nh33
> >> >> >zGhlaqo9%2B0FD8g5YLY7B0yuRGd3kVKY%3D=0
> >> >> >[2]
> >> >> >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >> >> https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apa
> >> >> >che.org%2Fl0mh=02%7C01%7C%7C284e644bff584ab1b7d708d4ee62
> >> >> f776%7Cfa7b1b
> >> >> >5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636395556215578840&
> >> >> sdata=w2vD2jcJMjoi
> >> >> >9LYCR7z8ppgwHqe9J40G5G2fbl6uB40%3D=0
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Thanks,
> >> >> >Piotr
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >-
> >> >> >Apache Flex PMC
> >> >> >piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> >> >> >--
> >> >> >View this message in context:
> >> >> >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >> >> http%3A%2F%2Fapache-fle
> >> >> >x-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2FFlex-JS-Flex-SDK-
> >> >> Installer-always-ge
> >> >> 

Re: [Flex JS] Flex SDK Installer always get stuck at "Finish uncompressing"

[Alex Harui]

OK.  That's what I hoped.  So the goal should be for the installer to set
target-player to something like 11.1?

Thanks,
-Alex

On 9/3/17, 11:19 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:

>Once I get back "target-player" to flex-config, but still left commented
>out external-library-path and library-path everything has build without
>the
>problem.
>
>Piotr
>
>2017-09-04 2:18 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui :
>
>> OK, but if you specify a legitimate target-player but only specify
>>JSFlex
>> output, I'm still wondering what part of the compiler is going to
>>verify a
>> playerglobal.swc exists since playerglobal.swc shouldn’t be specified in
>> any external-library-path.
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 9/3/17, 1:51 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:
>>
>> >Hi Alex,
>> >
>> >I get back to this and look closer into compiler code regarding point
>>#1.
>> >I
>> >see following comments in Configuration.java:
>> >
>> >"The major_version is required while minor_version and revision are
>> >optional. The minimum value is 10.0.0. If you do not specify the
>> >minor_version or revision, then the compiler uses zeros."
>> >
>> >In code I see that if I don't have in flex-config.xml 
>>at
>> >all I have exception reported by this line [1]. That is why I'm seeing
>> >this
>> >one:
>> >
>> >0.0.0
>> >
>> >
>> >[1]
>> >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apa
>> >che.org%2FBB2R=02%7C01%7C%7Ce185e651110c4c41e85908d4f30d
>> 81d6%7Cfa7b1b
>> >5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636400686724171224&
>> sdata=ifbA81a5a5vw
>> >bE4yej1Ej4mzM4JkfTH3KtBzC95wvK8%3D=0
>> >
>> >Thanks,
>> >Piotr
>> >
>> >
>> >2017-08-29 6:36 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui :
>> >
>> >> Hmm.  It isn't obvious to me:
>> >>
>> >> 1) if you only have target=JSFlex, why does the compiler care about
>> >> target-player?
>> >> 2) Why did -htmlTemplate option not work?
>> >>
>> >> Maybe the console output would tell us more, or try putting
>> >> System.out.println calls into MXMLFlexJSPublisher.java to see why the
>> >> template wasn’t generated.
>> >>
>> >> HTH,
>> >> -Alex
>> >>
>> >> On 8/28/17, 3:20 PM, "piotrz"  wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Hi Alex,
>> >> >
>> >> >I just did build using console. It look like there is a bug in
>> >>Moonshine
>> >> >partially.
>> >> >
>> >> >Build in Moonshine:
>> >> >Basically when I run build it has failed with same error in
>>Moonshine,
>> >> >cause
>> >> >every build generates custom configuration [1] which contains
>> >> >0.0.0 - if there is no player version
>> in
>> >> >frameworks/flex-config.xml (since I have commented out each line
>> >>related
>> >> >to
>> >> >target-player).
>> >> >
>> >> >I will probably raise issue for Moonshine.
>> >> >
>> >> >Build in console:
>> >> >Once I removed target-player from [2] build has been successful from
>> >> >console. Unfortunately -html-template was completely omitted, so MDL
>> >> >example
>> >> >do not have any styles.
>> >> >
>> >> >> >> http%3A%2F%2Fapache-fl
>> >> >ex-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2Ffile%2Fn64004%
>> >> 2Fmdl_table_without_S
>> >> >tyle.png=02%7C01%7C%7C284e644bff584ab1b7d708d4ee62
>> >> f776%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34
>> >> >438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636395556215578840=
>> >> ZRxcO%2B%2Bn2wULt4
>> >> >kn53d6ZZutOxqguNTjBteVF59TYrA%3D=0>
>> >> >
>> >> >[1]
>> >> >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> >> https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apa
>> >> >che.org%2FFbUb=02%7C01%7C%7C284e644bff584ab1b7d708d4ee62
>> >> f776%7Cfa7b1b
>> >> >5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636395556215578840&
>> >> sdata=dhOREax1nh33
>> >> >zGhlaqo9%2B0FD8g5YLY7B0yuRGd3kVKY%3D=0
>> >> >[2]
>> >> >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> >> https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apa
>> >> >che.org%2Fl0mh=02%7C01%7C%7C284e644bff584ab1b7d708d4ee62
>> >> f776%7Cfa7b1b
>> >> >5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636395556215578840&
>> >> sdata=w2vD2jcJMjoi
>> >> >9LYCR7z8ppgwHqe9J40G5G2fbl6uB40%3D=0
>> >> >
>> >> >Thanks,
>> >> >Piotr
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >-
>> >> >Apache Flex PMC
>> >> >piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
>> >> >--
>> >> >View this message in context:
>> >> >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> >> http%3A%2F%2Fapache-fle
>> >> >x-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2FFlex-JS-Flex-SDK-
>> >> Installer-always-ge
>> >> >t-stuck-at-Finish-uncompressing-tp63989p64004.
>> >> html=02%7C01%7C%7C284e6
>> >> >44bff584ab1b7d708d4ee62f776%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>> >> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6
>> >> >36395556215578840=gd1LmXTytYAQOab3zLaTzWbAufOzK6
>> >> e%2BfPf56%2FTeCIM%3D
>> >> >=0
>> >> >Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at
>> >>Nabble.com.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >--
>> >
>> >Piotr Zarzycki
>> >
>> >mobile: +48 880 859 557
>> >skype: zarzycki10
>> >
>> >LinkedIn:
>> >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linked
>> 

Re: [Flex JS] Flex SDK Installer always get stuck at "Finish uncompressing"

[Piotr Zarzycki]

Once I get back "target-player" to flex-config, but still left commented
out external-library-path and library-path everything has build without the
problem.

Piotr

2017-09-04 2:18 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui :

> OK, but if you specify a legitimate target-player but only specify JSFlex
> output, I'm still wondering what part of the compiler is going to verify a
> playerglobal.swc exists since playerglobal.swc shouldn’t be specified in
> any external-library-path.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 9/3/17, 1:51 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:
>
> >Hi Alex,
> >
> >I get back to this and look closer into compiler code regarding point #1.
> >I
> >see following comments in Configuration.java:
> >
> >"The major_version is required while minor_version and revision are
> >optional. The minimum value is 10.0.0. If you do not specify the
> >minor_version or revision, then the compiler uses zeros."
> >
> >In code I see that if I don't have in flex-config.xml  at
> >all I have exception reported by this line [1]. That is why I'm seeing
> >this
> >one:
> >
> >0.0.0
> >
> >
> >[1]
> >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apa
> >che.org%2FBB2R=02%7C01%7C%7Ce185e651110c4c41e85908d4f30d
> 81d6%7Cfa7b1b
> >5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636400686724171224&
> sdata=ifbA81a5a5vw
> >bE4yej1Ej4mzM4JkfTH3KtBzC95wvK8%3D=0
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Piotr
> >
> >
> >2017-08-29 6:36 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui :
> >
> >> Hmm.  It isn't obvious to me:
> >>
> >> 1) if you only have target=JSFlex, why does the compiler care about
> >> target-player?
> >> 2) Why did -htmlTemplate option not work?
> >>
> >> Maybe the console output would tell us more, or try putting
> >> System.out.println calls into MXMLFlexJSPublisher.java to see why the
> >> template wasn’t generated.
> >>
> >> HTH,
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >> On 8/28/17, 3:20 PM, "piotrz"  wrote:
> >>
> >> >Hi Alex,
> >> >
> >> >I just did build using console. It look like there is a bug in
> >>Moonshine
> >> >partially.
> >> >
> >> >Build in Moonshine:
> >> >Basically when I run build it has failed with same error in Moonshine,
> >> >cause
> >> >every build generates custom configuration [1] which contains
> >> >0.0.0 - if there is no player version
> in
> >> >frameworks/flex-config.xml (since I have commented out each line
> >>related
> >> >to
> >> >target-player).
> >> >
> >> >I will probably raise issue for Moonshine.
> >> >
> >> >Build in console:
> >> >Once I removed target-player from [2] build has been successful from
> >> >console. Unfortunately -html-template was completely omitted, so MDL
> >> >example
> >> >do not have any styles.
> >> >
> >> > >> http%3A%2F%2Fapache-fl
> >> >ex-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2Ffile%2Fn64004%
> >> 2Fmdl_table_without_S
> >> >tyle.png=02%7C01%7C%7C284e644bff584ab1b7d708d4ee62
> >> f776%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34
> >> >438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636395556215578840=
> >> ZRxcO%2B%2Bn2wULt4
> >> >kn53d6ZZutOxqguNTjBteVF59TYrA%3D=0>
> >> >
> >> >[1]
> >> >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >> https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apa
> >> >che.org%2FFbUb=02%7C01%7C%7C284e644bff584ab1b7d708d4ee62
> >> f776%7Cfa7b1b
> >> >5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636395556215578840&
> >> sdata=dhOREax1nh33
> >> >zGhlaqo9%2B0FD8g5YLY7B0yuRGd3kVKY%3D=0
> >> >[2]
> >> >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >> https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apa
> >> >che.org%2Fl0mh=02%7C01%7C%7C284e644bff584ab1b7d708d4ee62
> >> f776%7Cfa7b1b
> >> >5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636395556215578840&
> >> sdata=w2vD2jcJMjoi
> >> >9LYCR7z8ppgwHqe9J40G5G2fbl6uB40%3D=0
> >> >
> >> >Thanks,
> >> >Piotr
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >-
> >> >Apache Flex PMC
> >> >piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> >> >--
> >> >View this message in context:
> >> >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >> http%3A%2F%2Fapache-fle
> >> >x-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2FFlex-JS-Flex-SDK-
> >> Installer-always-ge
> >> >t-stuck-at-Finish-uncompressing-tp63989p64004.
> >> html=02%7C01%7C%7C284e6
> >> >44bff584ab1b7d708d4ee62f776%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C6
> >> >36395556215578840=gd1LmXTytYAQOab3zLaTzWbAufOzK6
> >> e%2BfPf56%2FTeCIM%3D
> >> >=0
> >> >Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at
> >>Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >--
> >
> >Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> >mobile: +48 880 859 557
> >skype: zarzycki10
> >
> >LinkedIn:
> >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linked
> >in.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki=02%7C01%7C%7Ce185e651110c4c41e85908d4f30d
> 81d6%
> >7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636400686724171224=
> 2G5u
> >oQ%2F1AYn846xrab%2BaOsFvp4VCLVgXzQgOXqhicqA%3D=0
> > https%3A%2F%2Fpl.linke
> >din.com%2Fin%2Fpiotr-zarzycki-92a53552=02%
> 7C01%7C%7Ce185e651110c4c41e
>