Re: OSMF download fails when running 'ant'

Hi, That is a problem, but for Royale, we should stop requiring the flex-sdk > repo and just use Apache Flex release bits. > For now, it's way easier to simply make the code run and let devs get set up with a workable Royale SDK by following the steps in the READme. And since this is a Flex

Re: OSMF download fails when running 'ant'

.swc?format=raw I hesitate to change the URL in the build script as I don't know if it changed at sourceforge or if the link in the script is a workaround for e.g. a redirect at the source when running on the command line? Thanks, EdB On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Erik de Bruin &l

OSMF download fails when running 'ant'

Hi, When I run 'ant' on a fresh copy of the Flex SDK repo, I get the following error: [error] download-osmf-swc: [get] Getting: https://sourceforge.net/adobe/flexsdk/code/HEAD/tree/trunk/frameworks/libs/OSMF2_0.swc?format=raw [get] To: /Users/erik/Desktop/royale/flex-sdk/in/osmf.swc

Re: [FLEXJS] New Royale Repos available

How about the mailing lists? EdB On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 6:16 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > Hi Folks, > > Looks like the new Royale repos have been created, so I think we need to > switch over to those repos and not make more commits to flex-asjs, > flex-typedefs, and

Re: Royale is now an Apache Project

A%2F%2Fissues.a > > >>>>>>>>>>>> pache.org <http://pache.org/>%2Fjira% > > 2Fbrowse%2FINFRA-15141=02%7C01%7C% > > >>>>>>>>>> 7C2471774f2527472 > > >>>>>>>>>>>> 2046c08d501231fc8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438

Re: Royale website and domain registration

t; > > >I will verify with Trademarks@. At the worst it will have to redirect > to > > >royale.apache.org, so I don't think you have to wait. It would be nice > > to > > >have that domain no matter what. > > > > > >-Alex > > > >

Re: Royale website and domain registration

little donation. Of course I suppose > >> that > >> > >the rest of years will be down to a normal price of 5 to 10€ or > >> something > >> > >like that. > >> > > > >> > >The other (more easy option) is to go

Re: Royale website and domain registration

or, slightly better, royale.rocks, again for $12 EdB On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: > We can also be '4chan cool' and get roy4le.com for only $12, which I'll > gladly donate :-) > > EdB > > > > On Fri, Sep 22, 20

Re: Royale website and domain registration

t; > * royale.web <-- pretty generic, isn't it? > > > > * royale.dev<-- dev, I assume this stands for "development", > > > something > > > > more related to us > > > > > > > > maybe still valid,

Re: Royale website and domain registration

w > > * royale.now > > * royale.art > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > 2017-09-22 9:30 GMT+02:00 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>: > > > > > Erik, > > > > > > If it is connected (r

Re: Royale website and domain registration

will be the ones with exotic extensions (.group, .zone, etc.) or where we 'pad' the name: royalesdk.org, royaleframework.net, etc.) EdB On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 1:27 AM, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: > I'll give it a look my tomorrow morning. > > EdB > > > > On F

Re: Royale is now an Apache Project

> > Maybe we should have discussion whether we need Jira for new project? > Maybe we should use Github only? > That sound like a plan. KISS [1] all the way ;-) EdB 1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KISS_principle -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295

Re: [DISCUSS] Building the brand for Royale

> I think if we grab a domain and donate it to the ASF, that it can't be > hosted on non-ASF hardware. That would need to be verified. > Maybe it would be better for the Royale PMC to approve Royale.xx as a > third-party domain under Carlos's control. I think that's allowed. The > policy [1]

Re: [DISCUSS] Building the brand for Royale

> > * Domain: We must find a good and simple domain for Royale. I think if we > can find something short like "royale.XXX" would be great over > "apacheroyale.XXX". > .com, .org, .net, .io etc. all seem to be either in use or squatted upon. Am I forgetting memorable TLP extensions? I assume we

Re: FlexJS Customer feedback

What is this FlexJS you are talking about? I sound a lot like this "Royale" thing I'm hearing a lot about recently... Is it similar? :-P EdB On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Harbs wrote: > We are currently in a “partner preview” of our FlexJS application and > getting

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

Isn't it about time to reduce the number of names we're considering, not think of more? With the VOTE already running and such... EdB On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 10:13 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: > Gah > https://helix.apache.org/ is already taken :-(( > > On Tue, Sep 19,

Re: [DISCUSS] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

> > > You should do this on the VOTE thread. > > This is the VOTE thread. At least that is what my gmail thinks it is... > My Gmail agrees ;-) EdB -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl

Re: [DISCUSS] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

I'm changing my vote to: 1) Limb(e)r 2) Bead(s) 3) Braid Sorry for any confusion. EdB On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > What a dilemma! > > I've seen 10 votes and 2 abstentions. I haven't voted yet. I wanted to > see what the trend was first.

Re: [DISCUSS] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

Sorry, that should have gone to the DISCUSS thread :-( EdB On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: > I really don't like Royale, because it has no connection with went before > it, which Beads, Boja, Bend and Limber all do. > > My new

Re: [DISCUSS] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

I really don't like Royale, because it has no connection with went before it, which Beads, Boja, Bend and Limber all do. My new favorite is Limber, but I still like Bend very much. If I can break a tie, I'll change my vote (I can do that, before the VOTE closes, right?) EdB On Tue, Sep 19,

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

Royale: 710 repos match Royale on Github. One, https://github.com/ian-culleton/royale is a "React-esque framework for Javascript" That is a little close to home... EdB On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 7:29 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > A quick "suitable name search" on some other

Re: [OT] Unsubscribed and offline for a few weeks

Olaf, Have a great vacation! EdB On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Olaf Krueger wrote: > Hi, > I'd just like to let you know that this my last day at work before I'll > start a holiday trip over a few weeks. > Hence I've been unsubscribed from the list. Probably I will

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

BendForward... (just kidding!) EdB On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Mihai Chira wrote: > How about FlexForward? Maybe better for the project name. > > On Thu, 14 Sep 2017 11:48 Harbs wrote: > > > Here’s a list of other options which came up

Re: [VOTE] Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?

No (binding) EdB On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 5:37 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > VOTE Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS? > > [ ] Yes - The forked project should be Apache FlexJS. > [ ] No - The forked project should have another name which will be >

Re: [FLEXJS][Marketing] why should a web dev choose FlexJS?

Piotr, I'm not subscribed, would you mind doing this for me? EdB On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Erik, > > I think this should be also forwarded to users group. > > Thanks, > Piotr > > > 2017-09-14

[FLEXJS][Marketing] why should a web dev choose FlexJS?

Hi, With the upcoming fork and renewed focus and most likely some publicity, I want to ask the community to answer this question: Why should a web dev choose FlexJS to write JS applications, and not go with a more mainstream option like e.g. TypeScript/Angular? I think that if we can answer

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

> > [...] so my preference stays with Blend > Bend, Erik, not BLend. Wow. EdB -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

t; ;) > > > > 2017-09-14 9:29 GMT+02:00 Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl>: > > > Royale > > > > makes me think of French hamburgers :-) > > > > I do like > > > > Bend > > > > To keep things simple, my prime ca

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

Royale makes me think of French hamburgers :-) I do like Bend To keep things simple, my prime candidate is still simply FlexJS EdB On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 7:01 AM, Piotr Zarzycki wrote: > Don't you think guys that is too much references, regarding what Alex >

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

For an Apache project, I think FlexJS would be the best name. EdB On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Olaf Krueger wrote: > I would stick with the name "FlexJS" for now. > I do not think that people associate negative vibes with it. > So many other JS frameworks are born

> 5000 video calls / day!

Hi, This morning my eye fell on this encouraging statistic: the splicers for the first time had to process more than 5000 video calls a day last week. This is up from < 2000 this time last year. Go Homewav! EdB -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I.

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

Remember to vote in the [VOTE] thread. EdB 2017-09-04 9:29 GMT+02:00 Jose Barragan : > I think is the best option. > Hope I could be part of this. > > +1 > __ > *Jose Barragan* > *Senior Software Engineer* > Codeoscopic > +34 912 94 80 80

Re: [VOTE] Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

on tools. > > Issue Tracking > > If GitBox allows us to use GitHub issues, we will use that, otherwise, we > will request a new JIRA project from Infra. > > Other Resources > > We would like to try using Git for our website version control and > whatever the publishing proc

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

OK, if we're throwing names out there, here is one: BendJS EdB On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 10:55 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: > I want to throw in the name FenixJS for the fork. > Its a play on the words Flex + Phoenix. You know what that means :-) > > Thanks, > Om >

Tweaks.php and the upcoming release

Hi, With another release around the corner, I want to make sure that everyone understands the new database change paradigm: 1) When you create a JIRA stack, it's database (a fresh copy of production) is brought up to date with the recent changes made earlier in the dev process by automatically

Request: is someone still using the Mustella VM?

Hi, I'm rounding off my involvement in the project and want to (somehow) hand over the Mustella VM, if anyone is interested - if it's still used. Any takers? EdB -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl

Re: [DISCUSS] How about bringing Falcon and ASJS together?

At one point I had the entire SDK cross-compiling to Javascript. Look at VF2JS, I think it is still in the repo. It didn't run, but it was up to the point where "all" that was needed was a lot of bootstrapping ;-) EdB On Monday, 28 March 2016, Alex Harui wrote: > AFAIK,

Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Release Apache FlexJS 0.5.0

> > Oh ... is VF2JS still valid? I thought this approach was dropped? > Both can be true, I'm afraid. I created VF2JS to leverage the power of the Flex SDK but allow for publication to JS in case Flash wasn't an option. I delayed work on it to help out with the development of FlexJS. And I think

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache FlexJS 0.5.0

right place? They are building for > me. Post some console logs and I’ll try to take a look but I’ll be off > the grid for the next several hours. > > -Alex > > On 9/27/15, 8:26 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: > > >Alex, > > > >I dow

Re: AW: Giving the ASF Jenkins some love ...

> > Well but isn't that what the Infra guys are for? > > If something doesn't work, they'll help us fix it ... at least every time > I contacted them they were more than willing to help. It's just that from > our side there didn't seem to be much interest in them helping us. > That is not

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache FlexJS 0.5.0

Alex, I downloaded the nightly and after fixing all my dependencies (it's been a while), I was able to build the project from source. However, when trying to build the examples, no go. I think there may be some references to the old .jar names (jsc.jar instead of asjsc.jar) perhaps? Thanks, EdB

Re: Jenkins builds

OK, I've manually started the Jenkins server, reset the Java security permissions and reverted the Jenkins update and that has (so far) done the trick... Mustella is now running. We'll see. EdB On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: > Well, that

Re: Jenkins builds

> > What about flex-mustella.cloudapp.net ? >> > > I wasn't aware there was an issue here. I'll look into it. > That was one ignored VM ;-) I've updated the test script, the various debug players, Windows, Jenkins, Chrome and the VM (increased size, will sponsor the cost). I'll monitor for the

Re: Jenkins builds

a nice weekend! EdB On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: > What about flex-mustella.cloudapp.net ? >>> >> >> I wasn't aware there was an issue here. I'll look into it. >> > > That was one ignored VM ;-) > >

Re: Jenkins builds

> > What about flex-mustella.cloudapp.net ? > I wasn't aware there was an issue here. I'll look into it. EdB -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl

Re: [FlexJS] Stub for Video Component

Yishay, I'll be happy to work with you to finish and donate this code to Apache Flex. I can help you familiarize yourself with the Wiki, JIRA and other Apache Flex procedures, and I can commit your code for review by myself and others. Let me know, EdB On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 11:17 PM,

Re: [FlexJS] SVGElement warning

I looked into this a while ago. It seemed related to the 'externs' that are fed into the GCC. The SVG externs are bunched in with the 'regular' JS.SWC externs, but there are some issues with the SVG externs such that they cause trouble :-( I (obviously) wasn't able to fix it. Also, the SVG stuff

[FlexJS] jsc doesn't follow typical compiler naming convention...

I would prefer left to right naming: source to target: mxml-jsc, as-jsc, etc. EdB On Thursday, August 20, 2015, Josh Tynjala joshtynj...@gmail.com javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','joshtynj...@gmail.com'); wrote: These are pretty straightforward options: js-mxmlc jsmxmlc I'd lean more

Re: Mustella server stuck?

That'd be me ;-) I'm AFK until Monday, then I'll do a hard reboot and update some stuff as well. OK? EdB On Tuesday, August 18, 2015, Tom Chiverton t...@extravision.com wrote: On 18/08/15 00:20, Mark Kessler wrote: I think for doing a hard reboot it has to be done by the instance

Re: [FalconJX jsc] Compiler error when using classes in packages.

Hmm. I think I’ll stop what I’m doing (which is trying to make UI widgets handle more CSS) and make the switch back to “.” I didn’t realize it would get messy with the Language class. Yes, please. EdB -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I.

Re: apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net offline

I had to 'manually' renew mine the first time, since then they automatically renew me... EdB On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote: Hmm. It says my subscription expired. I got notices in May and submitted the form. The notices said things would stop on June

Re: apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net offline

how to tell they’ve seen my request for renewal. -Alex On 7/10/15, 7:08 AM, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote: I had to 'manually' renew mine the first time, since then they automatically renew me... EdB On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote

Re: [FlexJS] js.release issue (was:RE: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we now have)

Fixed some issues that were preventing the release code to work. It still doesn't, but we're closer ;-) Will look further into this tonight. Any progress on that ? Unfortunately not, maybe I'll be able to spend a few hours on it on Wednesday. EdB -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan

Re: [FLEXJS][FALCONJX] Now using @export instead of @expose

Nice! I'm starting to see the light at the end of the tunnel again, so if you have some grunt work that I can spend a couple of hours on, I'll be glad to help out. EdB On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote: Hi, I think I got all the changes required to stop

Re: [2/2] git commit: [flex-falcon] [refs/heads/develop] - GCC and externs: add the 'externs.js' files to the SWCs; tell GCC to use those to prevent renaming

needed to include the original extern files in their respective SWCs so we can later present them to the GCC. Signed-off-by: Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-falcon/repo Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-falcon/commit

Re: [2/2] git commit: [flex-falcon] [refs/heads/develop] - GCC and externs: add the 'externs.js' files to the SWCs; tell GCC to use those to prevent renaming

, but for 'js.swc', I need to generically check if there are any files in the 'externs' directory in the SWC so I can include them in the procedure I wrote. Thanks, EdB On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote: On 7/2/15, 6:19 AM, Erik de Bruin erikdebr...@apache.org wrote

Re: [2/2] git commit: [flex-falcon] [refs/heads/develop] - GCC and externs: add the 'externs.js' files to the SWCs; tell GCC to use those to prevent renaming

to include the original extern files in their respective SWCs so we can later present them to the GCC. Signed-off-by: Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-falcon/repo Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-falcon/commit

Re: [2/2] git commit: [flex-falcon] [refs/heads/develop] - GCC and externs: add the 'externs.js' files to the SWCs; tell GCC to use those to prevent renaming

Can you check in the 'js-debug' if the Main.js has an 'exportSymbol' statement at the bottom? EdB On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote: Are you using IntelliJ? Then you're on your own :-P I'll post my command line script, if that might help? EdB

Re: [FlexJS] js.release issue (was:RE: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we now have)

OK, got it working well enough to have a look at both the debug and release code (nice example, Fred!). Fixed some issues that were preventing the release code to work. It still doesn't, but we're closer ;-) Will look further into this tonight. EdB On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 7:08 AM, Frédéric

Re: [4/5] git commit: [flex-falcon] [refs/heads/develop] - Fix uncaught exception

enlightened folks can trace this back to the root cause, that would be lovely :-) Signed-off-by: Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-falcon/repo Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-falcon/commit/fe8d7046 Tree: http://git-wip

Re: [4/5] git commit: [flex-falcon] [refs/heads/develop] - Fix uncaught exception

this back to the root cause, that would be lovely :-) Signed-off-by: Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-falcon/repo Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-falcon/commit/fe8d7046 Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos

Re: [3/5] git commit: [flex-falcon] [refs/heads/develop] - Fix NPE

This time such that the diff looks nicer ;-) Signed-off-by: Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-falcon/repo Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-falcon/commit/099263d4 Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex

Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we now have 1.9 in AS

. That and the js.swc and jquery.swc should be all the ingredients. -Alex On 6/30/15, 7:44 AM, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote: I was hoping to get my hands on Fred's AS project. I want to run that through the new compiler and have a long look at the output JS - debug and release - to see if that looks

Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we now have 1.9 in AS

his .AS in one of the four links. That and the js.swc and jquery.swc should be all the ingredients. -Alex On 6/30/15, 7:44 AM, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote: I was hoping to get my hands on Fred's AS project. I want to run that through the new compiler and have a long look

Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we now have 1.9 in AS

Is there a handwritten or transpiled HTMLContainer.js to go with that? Or am I missing something? EdB On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Frédéric THOMAS webdoubl...@hotmail.com wrote: OK, maybe I didn’t understand you earlier, but yes, the above is what I see in the output. Yes, it was a

Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we now have 1.9 in AS

, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote: Is there a handwritten or transpiled HTMLContainer.js to go with that? Or am I missing something? EdB On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Frédéric THOMAS webdoubl...@hotmail.com wrote: OK, maybe I didn’t understand you earlier, but yes

Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we now have 1.9 in AS

...@adobe.com wrote: On 6/30/15, 7:28 AM, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote: GCC no likey ;-) Can I maybe have a look at the example project? I've been gone for a while, but if I'm correct I should be able to get the latest stuff from Git, build and then compile this AS project from

Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we now have 1.9 in AS

emails compile (or download?) these famous SWCs? EdB On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote: He posted his .AS in one of the four links. That and the js.swc and jquery.swc should be all the ingredients. -Alex On 6/30/15, 7:44 AM, Erik de Bruin e

Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we now have 1.9 in AS

, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote: I was hoping to get my hands on Fred's AS project. I want to run that through the new compiler and have a long look at the output JS - debug and release - to see if that looks like something that still makes sense from a GCC point of view. EdB

Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we now have 1.9 in AS

Ah, Nasty Fred ;-) your instructions say: -define+=CONFIG::AS but in the .as file, it says: COMPILE::AS3 The devil is in the details, as always, I guess. EdB On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 8:44 PM, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote: Nope, nothing. Still

Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we now have 1.9 in AS

Ah, Nasty Fred ;-) your instructions say: -define+=CONFIG::AS but in the .as file, it says: COMPILE::AS3 The devil is in the details, as always, I guess. EdB On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 8:44 PM, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote: Nope, nothing. Still no compiler defines recognized

Re: [FalconJX] Code formatting

Mike, I wholeheartedly agree with the need for a uniform formatting, and I think it doesn't really matter which rules are used, as long as they are used. A matter of procedure though: what you are doing with the '3 days till armageddon' is actually called a lazy vote. Normally we do prefix the

Re: [FalconJX jsc] Stop renaming of packages using underscore when compiling with jsc

Actually, I just studied the code more and it's subclass hell(I didn't work on this part of the framework). Thanks, mate ;-) That should teach you to always do everything yourself! EdB P.S. In case you missed it, I'm just kidding. There are (many) parts of the code that deserve the

Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we now have 1.9 in AS

Yeah, but that is a very, very different design pattern and would require substantial work on the transpiler to make that output possible. It would also, I believe, be incompatible with the way the GCC optimizes (not minimize, mind you) the code, so that advantage would be lost as well. As our JS

Re: [3/5] git commit: [flex-falcon] [refs/heads/develop] - copy-o

It's the little things ;-) EdB On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Michael Schmalle teotigraphix...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Alex! Mike On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 9:42 AM, aha...@apache.org wrote: copy-o Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-falcon/repo Commit:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2

+1 Despite the problems getting the source version to compile, when it does, it works as expected. Since the Installer is mostly a binary convenience utility, it gets my vote. EdB On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote: And this time I made sure I ran the

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2

Alex, You're right. Let's count the votes and move on. Contributions in the form of actual patches or even constructive comments are always welcome and will certainly be part of the next release (which everyone is free to create and put to a vote, btw). Just let's not let them interfere with the

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2

Alex, I'm very sorry for the delay in my repsonse, but this time I get: /Users/erik/Desktop/flex/apache-flex-sdk-installer-3.2.0-src/installer/src/InstallApacheFlex-app.xml: error 305: Intial window content SWF version 28 exceeds namespace version http://ns.adobe.com/air/application/4.0 when

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC1

build.number=0 Ignoring the incorrect dates, should the build.number be 0? ? EdB -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC1

Anyone else seeing this or have I done something wrong? I reported this about an hour ago. EdB -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC1

Hi, Just trying to run the approve script. I get a failure while building. The 'packageair' step is looking for NOTICE in the 'installer' subdirectory, where it isn't. It seems to be in the root. Also I noticed that running the approve script that it doesn't check the PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME variable

Re: Closure Compiler; ES6_TYPED!

So Erik, are you saying that since it soon will fully support ES6, the FalconJX compiler should be able to emit ES6? Most certainly. The combination of ES6 and 'TypeScript typing' (ES6_TYPED) support should make the life of FalconJX much easier. To me it seems that there is lot's less

Re: flex-mustella jenkins machine locked up

I've rebooted through the Azure Portal. I'm now letting it run Windows Update, if you check back in about an hour (give or take), it should be purring along nicely... EdB On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Tom Chiverton t...@extravision.com wrote: I can't access the flex-mustella remote

Re: please remove me from mailing list

Is this a sudden exodus - with all the same erroneous subject - or a new kind of spam? EdB On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Sesiom nyllor rollynmoi...@gmail.com wrote: -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl

Re: Closure Compiler; ES6_TYPED!

As far as subclassing, it handles it fine, it's properties that they don't support right now. As I said previously, they say call Java like mutator methods. So if you wrote an emitter, all properties would be converted to setFoo(), getFoo() but that could be a conflict as some AS code could

Closure Compiler; ES6_TYPED!

Hi, While I'm sorry to say that I'm still knee deep in a work project and won't have time to contribute for some time yet, this weekend I ran across something that might be helpful for the project: The Closure Compiler has made large improvements over the past few releases. One area is ECMASript

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex Installer 3.2

Sounds like a convoluted way to do this. I think we are overthinking this. Ya think? This is what happens when you let loose the lawyers ;-) EdB -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl

Re: [GitHub] flex-sdk pull request: Fix FLEX-15159 by making ArrayList extend P...

Yes, double bump. Can someone please take a look at this? EdB On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Dretch g...@git.apache.org wrote: Github user Dretch commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flex-sdk/pull/18#issuecomment-110656554 Bump. Could this pull request be

Re: [GitHub] flex-sdk pull request: Update DateTimeFormatterEx.as

Can someone please take a look a this? Thanks, EdB On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 1:09 PM, adpg g...@git.apache.org wrote: GitHub user adpg opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/flex-sdk/pull/19 Update DateTimeFormatterEx.as Proposing patch for bug Apache Flex /

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex Installer 3.2

we’ll get an answer by then otherwise I think I’ll just rename the “Disclaimer” link button to “Legal Stuff” and add the L N to the web page it points to. That absolutely makes the most sense of anything I've read on the thread. + 1 Just do it ;-) EdB -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan

Re: [FalconJX] FlexJS as to js work

in AS, the array is not shared. So I think Mike has two choices: 1) initialize everything in the constructor 2) be smart about what can be initialized in the constructor vs the prototype. I’ll leave it up to Mike to decide. We can always be smarter later. -Alex On 6/2/15, 11:36 AM, Erik de Bruin e

Re: [FalconJX] FlexJS as to js work

We’ll have to see if Erik or others with more JS and Goog experience can answer that. IIRC, in just vanilla JS, a private member would be on the prototype and some other thing like an annotation would try to keep people from using it outside the class via some compile-time checking.

Re: [FalconJX] FlexJS as to js work

Then all instances share the one array... That sounds not right. I'll have to do some experimenting to disprove that, but it just doesn't ring true. Oh. Well, I guess you learn every day :-) A quick 'JSFiddle' shows that they indeed seem to share the same array :-( No more time to look

Re: [FalconJX] FlexJS as to js work

1. It doesn't look like you have private fields implemented to be emitted in the constructor? private fileds are going to the prototype. For instance; private var explicitWidth:Number = NaN; to /** * @private * @type {number} */ this.explicitWidth_ = NaN; Is this something that

Re: [FalconJX] FlexJS as to js work

type declarations in the constructor. Mike On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote: 1. It doesn't look like you have private fields implemented to be emitted in the constructor? private fileds are going to the prototype. For instance; private var

Re: [FalconJX] FlexJS as to js work

On 6/2/15, 11:45 AM, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote: I think the best solution, 'goog' safe, would be to define the field on the prototype (with all the proper JSDoc annotations) and then initialize it in the constructor. Works for me as well. Can you confirm that Google Closure

Re: Git Push Summary

Hi, sorry about that. I accidentally pushed those changes to the develop branch instead of the vf2js branch. I've immediately reverted them. Never mind me, carry on. EdB On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 7:41 PM, erikdebr...@apache.org wrote: Repository: flex-falcon Updated Branches:

Re: [FalconJX] FlexJS refactoring

Hi Mike, I was just kidding with that commit message, and it was supposed to go into the VF2JS branch ;-) I have reverted the commits I accidentally made to develop. I'm afraid I barely have time to keep up with what you guys are doing, let alone contribute. I wanted to get my uncommitted

Re: makeApacheFlexForIDE.sh failing

I would suggest you try to use the 'installer.xml' ant build file. See the README in the SDK repo on how to use that to build the SDK and prepare it for use in an IDE. EdB On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Hubert Czerpak hubert.czer...@gmail.com wrote: I'm now very good at bash scripting but I

Re: [GitHub] flex-sdk pull request: Fix FLEX-15159 by making ArrayList extend P...

Me? I generally tried to avoid being on the naming committees. Naming committees? I lol'ed at the idea, and then at the multiple... And the best they could come up with was frameworks/projects/framework? No wonder FB cost so much! :-P EdB -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >