Re: [RESULT][VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

[Tom Chiverton]

Done


On 20/09/17 18:29, Alex Harui wrote:

OK, well it doesn't affect the outcome, but Tom, can you forward your vote
to dev@ so the archives match the totals?

Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

[Tom Chiverton]

On 18/09/17 12:55, Tom Chiverton wrote:


Braid
Bead
Strand

Tom

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

[Dave Fisher]

Hi -

I cannot find it either. We need to remove his vote. That does not change the 
winner and only swaps the 3r and 4th place.

Regards,
Dave


> On Sep 20, 2017, at 1:02 PM, Alex Harui  wrote:
> 
> Thanks Dave for posting the summary.
> 
> I cannot find record of Tom's vote in my email or on lists.a.o.  It is 
> bugging me because that means I wasn't sending out the right totals 
> yesterday.  And we should record here where to find his vote in the archives. 
>  What day did he send it?
> 
> Thanks,
> -Alex
> 
> From: Dave Fisher >
> Reply-To: "dev@flex.apache.org" 
> >
> Date: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 at 8:45 AM
> To: "dev@flex.apache.org" 
> >
> Subject: Re: [RESULT][VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed 
> fork of FlexJS?
> 
> Here is my summary from the google doc with additional Excel analysis:
> 
> NAME:   Piotr   ErikCarlos  Chris   Harbs   Yishay  Peter   DaveOm
>   OlafMarkJeffry  AlexJustin  Tom Sum Count
> Royale  1   3   2   3   1 
>   2   3   1   16  8
> Bead (Beads)2   2 
>   1   3   2   3   2   15  7
> Braid   2   1   2   3 
>   1   2   3   14  7
> Limber (Limbr)  3   3   3 
>   2   1   1   13  6
> Arise   3   1   2 
>   3   9   4
> Boja2   1 
>   3   2   8   4
> Bend3 
>   3   1
> Crown   2 
>   2   1
> Strand
>   1   1   1
> Action  1 
>   1   1
> Total   6   6   5   6   6   6   5   6   0 
>   6   6   6   6   6   6   82  15
> Not voted   0   0   1   0   0   0   1   0 
>   6   0   0   0   0   0   0   8
> 
> 
> On Sep 20, 2017, at 9:18 AM, piotrz 
> > wrote:
> 
> As for you question. I'm not sure who was missed, but as you can see in the
> spreadsheet I did mistake, cause Royale has less votes.
> 
> If you will see anything more let me know.
> 
> Thanks,
> Piotr
> 
> 
> 
> -
> Apache Flex PMC
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> --
> Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/
> 



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

[Alex Harui]

OK, well it doesn't affect the outcome, but Tom, can you forward your vote
to dev@ so the archives match the totals?

I think we can count it even if it didn't hit the list on time.  At least,
it is close enough for me.

Thanks,
-Alex

On 9/20/17, 10:13 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:

>Alex,
>
>You are right! I just checked in the email chain and I see Tom's vote, but
>he did mistake and send it only to me!!
>
>Vote was as we see in the summary.
>
>Piotr
>
>On Wed, Sep 20, 2017, 19:02 Alex Harui  wrote:
>
>> Thanks Dave for posting the summary.
>>
>> I cannot find record of Tom's vote in my email or on lists.a.o.  It is
>> bugging me because that means I wasn't sending out the right totals
>> yesterday.  And we should record here where to find his vote in the
>> archives.  What day did he send it?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Alex
>>
>> From: Dave Fisher >
>> Reply-To: "dev@flex.apache.org" <
>> dev@flex.apache.org>
>> Date: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 at 8:45 AM
>> To: "dev@flex.apache.org"
>>> >
>> Subject: Re: [RESULT][VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for
>> Proposed fork of FlexJS?
>>
>> Here is my summary from the google doc with additional Excel analysis:
>>
>> NAME:   Piotr   ErikCarlos  Chris   Harbs   Yishay  Peter   Dave
>> Om  OlafMarkJeffry  AlexJustin  Tom Sum Count
>> Royale  1   3   2   3   1
>>  2   3   1   16  8
>> Bead (Beads)2
>>2
>>  1   3   2   3   2   15  7
>> Braid   2   1   2   3
>>  1   2   3   14  7
>> Limber (Limbr)  3   3   3
>>  2   1   1   13  6
>> Arise   3   1   2
>>  3   9   4
>> Boja2   1
>>  3   2   8   4
>> Bend3
>>  3   1
>> Crown   2
>>  2   1
>> Strand
>>   1   1   1
>> Action  1
>>  1   1
>> Total   6   6   5   6   6   6   5   6
>>0
>>  6   6   6   6   6   6   82  15
>> Not voted   0   0   1   0   0   0   1
>>0
>>  6   0   0   0   0   0   0   8
>>
>>
>> On Sep 20, 2017, at 9:18 AM, piotrz  piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> As for you question. I'm not sure who was missed, but as you can see in
>>the
>> spreadsheet I did mistake, cause Royale has less votes.
>>
>> If you will see anything more let me know.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Piotr
>>
>>
>>
>> -
>> Apache Flex PMC
>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
>> --
>> Sent from: 
>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-fl
>>ex-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2F=02%7C01%7C%7C6d955d12d64e4f3
>>df01008d5004aecbc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364152441
>>71277674=DT5XsA1ryzRZDRmdu8DiZ%2BzqIPeMvzSq8Hj7n%2FshFCU%3D
>>d=0
>>
>>

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

[Piotr Zarzycki]

Alex,

You are right! I just checked in the email chain and I see Tom's vote, but
he did mistake and send it only to me!!

Vote was as we see in the summary.

Piotr

On Wed, Sep 20, 2017, 19:02 Alex Harui  wrote:

> Thanks Dave for posting the summary.
>
> I cannot find record of Tom's vote in my email or on lists.a.o.  It is
> bugging me because that means I wasn't sending out the right totals
> yesterday.  And we should record here where to find his vote in the
> archives.  What day did he send it?
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> From: Dave Fisher >
> Reply-To: "dev@flex.apache.org" <
> dev@flex.apache.org>
> Date: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 at 8:45 AM
> To: "dev@flex.apache.org"  >
> Subject: Re: [RESULT][VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for
> Proposed fork of FlexJS?
>
> Here is my summary from the google doc with additional Excel analysis:
>
> NAME:   Piotr   ErikCarlos  Chris   Harbs   Yishay  Peter   Dave
> Om  OlafMarkJeffry  AlexJustin  Tom Sum Count
> Royale  1   3   2   3   1
>  2   3   1   16  8
> Bead (Beads)2   2
>  1   3   2   3   2   15  7
> Braid   2   1   2   3
>  1   2   3   14  7
> Limber (Limbr)  3   3   3
>  2   1   1   13  6
> Arise   3   1   2
>  3   9   4
> Boja2   1
>  3   2   8   4
> Bend3
>  3   1
> Crown   2
>  2   1
> Strand
>   1   1   1
> Action  1
>  1   1
> Total   6   6   5   6   6   6   5   6   0
>  6   6   6   6   6   6   82  15
> Not voted   0   0   1   0   0   0   1   0
>  6   0   0   0   0   0   0   8
>
>
> On Sep 20, 2017, at 9:18 AM, piotrz > wrote:
>
> As for you question. I'm not sure who was missed, but as you can see in the
> spreadsheet I did mistake, cause Royale has less votes.
>
> If you will see anything more let me know.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
>
>
> -
> Apache Flex PMC
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> --
> Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/
>
>

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

[Alex Harui]

Thanks Dave for posting the summary.

I cannot find record of Tom's vote in my email or on lists.a.o.  It is bugging 
me because that means I wasn't sending out the right totals yesterday.  And we 
should record here where to find his vote in the archives.  What day did he 
send it?

Thanks,
-Alex

From: Dave Fisher >
Reply-To: "dev@flex.apache.org" 
>
Date: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 at 8:45 AM
To: "dev@flex.apache.org" 
>
Subject: Re: [RESULT][VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed 
fork of FlexJS?

Here is my summary from the google doc with additional Excel analysis:

NAME:   Piotr   ErikCarlos  Chris   Harbs   Yishay  Peter   DaveOm  
OlafMarkJeffry  AlexJustin  Tom Sum Count
Royale  1   3   2   3   1   
2   3   1   16  8
Bead (Beads)2   2   
1   3   2   3   2   15  7
Braid   2   1   2   3   
1   2   3   14  7
Limber (Limbr)  3   3   3   
2   1   1   13  6
Arise   3   1   2   
3   9   4
Boja2   1   
3   2   8   4
Bend3   
3   1
Crown   2   
2   1
Strand  
1   1   1
Action  1   
1   1
Total   6   6   5   6   6   6   5   6   0   
6   6   6   6   6   6   82  15
Not voted   0   0   1   0   0   0   1   0   
6   0   0   0   0   0   0   8


On Sep 20, 2017, at 9:18 AM, piotrz 
> wrote:

As for you question. I'm not sure who was missed, but as you can see in the
spreadsheet I did mistake, cause Royale has less votes.

If you will see anything more let me know.

Thanks,
Piotr



-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

[Piotr Zarzycki]

Dave,

Thank you for posting that! It would be extremely hard today to me find the
time pasting here the vote.

Piotr

2017-09-20 17:45 GMT+02:00 Dave Fisher :

> Here is my summary from the google doc with additional Excel analysis:
>
> NAME: Piotr Erik Carlos Chris Harbs Yishay Peter Dave Om Olaf Mark Jeffry
> Alex Justin Tom Sum Count
> Royale 1   3 2 3 1   2 3 1   16 8
> Bead (Beads)   2   2   1   3 2 3 2 15 7
> Braid 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 14 7
> Limber (Limbr)   3   3 3 2 1 1   13 6
> Arise 3 1 2   3 9 4
> Boja   2 1 3 2 8 4
> Bend   3   3 1
> Crown 2 2 1
> Strand 1 1 1
> Action   1   1 1
> Total 6 6 5 6 6 6 5 6 0 6 6 6 6 6 6 82 15
> Not voted 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
>
>
> On Sep 20, 2017, at 9:18 AM, piotrz  wrote:
>
> As for you question. I'm not sure who was missed, but as you can see in the
> spreadsheet I did mistake, cause Royale has less votes.
>
> If you will see anything more let me know.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
>
>
> -
> Apache Flex PMC
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> --
> Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/
>
>
>


-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

mobile: +48 880 859 557
skype: zarzycki10

LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki


GitHub: https://github.com/piotrzarzycki21

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

[Dave Fisher]

Here is my summary from the google doc with additional Excel analysis:

NAME:   Piotr   ErikCarlos  Chris   Harbs   Yishay  Peter   DaveOm  
OlafMarkJeffry  AlexJustin  Tom Sum Count
Royale  1   3   2   3   1   
2   3   1   16  8
Bead (Beads)2   2   
1   3   2   3   2   15  7
Braid   2   1   2   3   
1   2   3   14  7
Limber (Limbr)  3   3   3   
2   1   1   13  6
Arise   3   1   2   
3   9   4
Boja2   1   
3   2   8   4
Bend3   
3   1
Crown   2   
2   1
Strand  
1   1   1
Action  1   
1   1
Total   6   6   5   6   6   6   5   6   0   
6   6   6   6   6   6   82  15
Not voted   0   0   1   0   0   0   1   0   
6   0   0   0   0   0   0   8


> On Sep 20, 2017, at 9:18 AM, piotrz  wrote:
> 
> As for you question. I'm not sure who was missed, but as you can see in the
> spreadsheet I did mistake, cause Royale has less votes.
> 
> If you will see anything more let me know.
> 
> Thanks,
> Piotr
> 
> 
> 
> -
> Apache Flex PMC
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> --
> Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

[Dave Fisher]

Hi Justin,

Vote now looks proper to me from the tallies.

> On Sep 20, 2017, at 8:22 AM, Justin Mclean  wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
>> Spreadsheet with VOTES. Royale has a two points less, but still this is our 
>> choose [1].
>> 
>> [1]
>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1kOvPBUgkxcdIksEWOgKhzipy5EPR0eDz8JrlB2aDTCo/edit?usp=sharing
> 
> 
> So looks like there's 14 voters their not 13? Was Tom missed in the first 
> count?
> 
> The total votes (14*6 == 84) still doesn’t tally with the total votes in that 
> spreadsheet i.e. 82 with 3 people only placing 2 votes it still seems off by 
> one? Given the top 4 choices are separated by 1 vote in that spreadsheet that 
> may be important and change the result.

Om abstained which means 6 points missed from the total of 90 possible with 15 
ballots.
Adding the two who did not have a third pace gives 8 missing points and 
therefore 82 points is the correct overall total.

Royale it is in a squeaker.

Regards,
Dave

> 
> Thanks,
> Justin



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

[Harbs]

It looks like I miscounted due to Piotr changing his vote:

Votes for Royale:
piotr - 1
carlos - 3
yishay - 2
peter - 3
jeffry - 2
dave - 1
justin 1
alex - 3
Total - 16

Royale still wins.

Thanks,
Harbs

> On Sep 20, 2017, at 2:36 PM, Justin Mclean  wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
>> Even if we’re off by one, Royale is the clear winner. (I get 18 votes as 
>> well.)
> 
> I’m not seeing 18 votes for Royale would you mind listing them out.
> 
> Thanks,
> Justin

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

[piotrz]

As for you question. I'm not sure who was missed, but as you can see in the
spreadsheet I did mistake, cause Royale has less votes.

If you will see anything more let me know.

Thanks,
Piotr



-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

[Piotr Zarzycki]

Justin,

I can give you edit rights - can you put there corrections ? Cause I don't
know where I have mistake.

Let me know.

Thanks,
Piotr


2017-09-20 14:22 GMT+02:00 Justin Mclean :

> Hi,
>
> > Spreadsheet with VOTES. Royale has a two points less, but still this is
> our choose [1].
> >
> > [1]
> > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1kOvPBUgkxcdIksEWOgKhzipy5EPR0
> eDz8JrlB2aDTCo/edit?usp=sharing
>
>
> So looks like there's 14 voters their not 13? Was Tom missed in the first
> count?
>
> The total votes (14*6 == 84) still doesn’t tally with the total votes in
> that spreadsheet i.e. 82 with 3 people only placing 2 votes it still seems
> off by one? Given the top 4 choices are separated by 1 vote in that
> spreadsheet that may be important and change the result.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin




-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

mobile: +48 880 859 557
skype: zarzycki10

LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki


GitHub: https://github.com/piotrzarzycki21

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

> Spreadsheet with VOTES. Royale has a two points less, but still this is our 
> choose [1]. 
> 
> [1]
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1kOvPBUgkxcdIksEWOgKhzipy5EPR0eDz8JrlB2aDTCo/edit?usp=sharing


So looks like there's 14 voters their not 13? Was Tom missed in the first count?

The total votes (14*6 == 84) still doesn’t tally with the total votes in that 
spreadsheet i.e. 82 with 3 people only placing 2 votes it still seems off by 
one? Given the top 4 choices are separated by 1 vote in that spreadsheet that 
may be important and change the result.

Thanks,
Justin

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

[piotrz]

I will put those scores in the plain text here later today. 

Thanks,
Piotr

 



-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

[piotrz]

Spreadsheet with VOTES. Royale has a two points less, but still this is our
choose [1]. 

[1]
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1kOvPBUgkxcdIksEWOgKhzipy5EPR0eDz8JrlB2aDTCo/edit?usp=sharing

Thanks,
Piotr





-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

> Even if we’re off by one, Royale is the clear winner. (I get 18 votes as 
> well.)

I’m not seeing 18 votes for Royale would you mind listing them out.

Thanks,
Justin

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

[Harbs]

Carlos and Peter both only voted for two options.

Even if we’re off by one, Royale is the clear winner. (I get 18 votes as well.)

I don’t see a reason to be concerned or give Piotr more work. If you are 
concerned, you can double-check the tally. Make sure you get Erik’s final vote 
which might be in a separate thread in your email.

Thanks,
Harbs

> On Sep 20, 2017, at 2:16 PM, Justin Mclean  wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I think you may need to double check the count.
> 
>> Royale  18
>> Limber (Limbr)  13
>> Bead (Beads)11
>> Braid 10
>> Arise  9
>> Boja   8
>> Bend  3
>> Crown2
>> Action1
>> Strand0
>> Boinga   0
> 
> If 13 voted this should add up to 13*(3+2+1) = 78 the above only adds up to 
> 75 so there seems to be a missing vote or two. I think only one person didn’t 
> give 3 votes which would make 77?
> 
> From a quick count I’m seeing different totals to you. Do you mind putting in 
> it in a google spreadsheet so people can double check the results.
> 
> Thanks,
> Justin

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

I think you may need to double check the count.

> Royale  18
> Limber (Limbr)  13
> Bead (Beads)11
> Braid 10
> Arise  9
> Boja   8
> Bend  3
> Crown2
> Action1
> Strand0
> Boinga   0

If 13 voted this should add up to 13*(3+2+1) = 78 the above only adds up to 75 
so there seems to be a missing vote or two. I think only one person didn’t give 
3 votes which would make 77?

From a quick count I’m seeing different totals to you. Do you mind putting in 
it in a google spreadsheet so people can double check the results.

Thanks,
Justin

Re: [DISCUSS] (was Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?)

[Alex Harui]

Well, it isn't official until the board approves, hopefully tomorrow.

I updated the board resolution, and modified the board report and added
"Apache Royale will take responsibility for
what is now Apache FlexJS and related repos."

I also updated the PODLINGNAMESEARCH JIRA issue.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-132

Thanks,
-Alex

On 9/20/17, 12:29 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
 wrote:

>Thanks Piotr, just see the results and very happy to see that Royale was
>the most voted. Now is time to work the brand to make us shine.
>
>:)
>
>Carlos
>
>2017-09-20 9:00 GMT+02:00 Harbs :
>
>> Thanks Piotr.
>>
>> Looks like we’re now Royale. :-)
>>
>> Harbs
>>
>> > On Sep 20, 2017, at 12:51 AM, Piotr Zarzycki
>>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > I will end voting tomorrow 09/19/2017 6:00 - 7:00 UTC Time.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Piotr
>> >
>> > 2017-09-19 23:15 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui :
>> >
>> >> Justin voted.
>> >>
>> >> Now we have Royale and Limber tied again with 13 points.
>> >> Beads has 11, Braids as 10. Arise has 9.
>> >>
>> >> Royale has been mentioned on 7 out of 12 votes.
>> >> Limber on 6 out of 12.
>> >>
>> >> Limber still has the most first-place votes with 3.  Royale and Beads
>> have
>> >> 2.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> -Alex
>> >>
>> >> On 9/19/17, 1:11 PM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Piotr changed his vote.
>> >>>
>> >>> It dropped Royale back to 12 points, putting Limber in the lead at
>>13.
>> >>> Arise is now third at 9 points.  Beads, Boja, Braid all have 8.
>> >>>
>> >>> Royale and Limber both have been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes.
>> >>>
>> >>> Trademarks responded that, without thinking about it too much, they
>> aren't
>> >>> concerned about these small projects on GitHub, so if we end up with
>> >>> Royale, it won't be quickly blocked by Trademarks.
>> >>>
>> >>> -Alex
>> >>>
>> >>> On 9/19/17, 11:21 AM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:
>> >>>
>>  Dave changed his abstention to a vote.
>> 
>>  That tied Limber with Royale at 13 each.  Beads now has 11.
>> 
>>  Royale and Limber have now been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes.
>>  Boja and Beads have been mentioned 5 times.
>> 
>>  -Alex
>> 
>>  On 9/19/17, 11:12 AM, "Alex Harui" 
>>wrote:
>> 
>> > Erik changed his vote.  That put Limber in the lead over Royale,
>>13
>> vs
>> > 12.
>> > However, several folks are concerned about limber.com being an
>>adult
>> > site.  Limber has been mentioned on 6 votes.
>> >
>> > Beads and Boja have 9 votes each now.  Boja and Royale have been
>> > mentioned
>> > 5 times, Beads 4 times.
>> >
>> > -Alex
>> >
>> > On 9/19/17, 10:11 AM, "Alex Harui" 
>>wrote:
>> >
>> >> I did change the subject to discuss, but may be not enough for
>> Gmail.
>> >> I
>> >> changed it again.
>> >>
>> >> You can change your vote until the vote closes, but your vote
>>alone
>> can
>> >> move Bend enough to make a difference.  You could actually
>>increase
>> the
>> >> vote gap between Royale and Beads and Boja.
>> >>
>> >> -Alex
>> >>
>> >> On 9/19/17, 10:01 AM, "Erik de Bruin"  wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Sorry, that should have gone to the DISCUSS thread :-(
>> >>>
>> >>> EdB
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Erik de Bruin
>>> >
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>
>>  I really don't like Royale, because it has no connection with
>>went
>>  before
>>  it, which Beads, Boja, Bend and Limber all do.
>> 
>>  My new favorite is Limber, but I still like Bend very much. If
>>I
>> can
>>  break
>>  a tie, I'll change my vote (I can do that, before the VOTE
>>closes,
>>  right?)
>> 
>>  EdB
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Alex Harui
>>  
>>  wrote:
>> 
>> > What a dilemma!
>> >
>> > I've seen 10 votes and 2 abstentions.  I haven't voted yet.  I
>> > wanted
>> > to
>> > see what the trend was first.
>> >
>> > If you assign 3 points to first place, 2 to second, and 1 to
>> third,
>> > Royale
>> > has the lead at 12 points, but barely:  Bead, Boja and Limber
>> have
>> > 10.
>> > Boja has been mentioned more than any other name (6 times),
>>but 3
>> > of
>> > those
>> > are third place votes.  Royale and Limber have been mentioned
>>5
>> > times,
>> > Beads 4 times.  Beads has the most first place votes (3).
>> Royale,
>> > Limber
>> 

Re: [DISCUSS] (was Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?)

[Piotr Zarzycki]

Carlos,

If you will need any help and my time allows let me know. :)

Piotr

On Wed, Sep 20, 2017, 09:29 Carlos Rovira 
wrote:

> Thanks Piotr, just see the results and very happy to see that Royale was
> the most voted. Now is time to work the brand to make us shine.
>
> :)
>
> Carlos
>
> 2017-09-20 9:00 GMT+02:00 Harbs :
>
> > Thanks Piotr.
> >
> > Looks like we’re now Royale. :-)
> >
> > Harbs
> >
> > > On Sep 20, 2017, at 12:51 AM, Piotr Zarzycki <
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I will end voting tomorrow 09/19/2017 6:00 - 7:00 UTC Time.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Piotr
> > >
> > > 2017-09-19 23:15 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui :
> > >
> > >> Justin voted.
> > >>
> > >> Now we have Royale and Limber tied again with 13 points.
> > >> Beads has 11, Braids as 10. Arise has 9.
> > >>
> > >> Royale has been mentioned on 7 out of 12 votes.
> > >> Limber on 6 out of 12.
> > >>
> > >> Limber still has the most first-place votes with 3.  Royale and Beads
> > have
> > >> 2.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> -Alex
> > >>
> > >> On 9/19/17, 1:11 PM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Piotr changed his vote.
> > >>>
> > >>> It dropped Royale back to 12 points, putting Limber in the lead at
> 13.
> > >>> Arise is now third at 9 points.  Beads, Boja, Braid all have 8.
> > >>>
> > >>> Royale and Limber both have been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes.
> > >>>
> > >>> Trademarks responded that, without thinking about it too much, they
> > aren't
> > >>> concerned about these small projects on GitHub, so if we end up with
> > >>> Royale, it won't be quickly blocked by Trademarks.
> > >>>
> > >>> -Alex
> > >>>
> > >>> On 9/19/17, 11:21 AM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:
> > >>>
> >  Dave changed his abstention to a vote.
> > 
> >  That tied Limber with Royale at 13 each.  Beads now has 11.
> > 
> >  Royale and Limber have now been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes.
> >  Boja and Beads have been mentioned 5 times.
> > 
> >  -Alex
> > 
> >  On 9/19/17, 11:12 AM, "Alex Harui" 
> wrote:
> > 
> > > Erik changed his vote.  That put Limber in the lead over Royale, 13
> > vs
> > > 12.
> > > However, several folks are concerned about limber.com being an
> adult
> > > site.  Limber has been mentioned on 6 votes.
> > >
> > > Beads and Boja have 9 votes each now.  Boja and Royale have been
> > > mentioned
> > > 5 times, Beads 4 times.
> > >
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 9/19/17, 10:11 AM, "Alex Harui" 
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> I did change the subject to discuss, but may be not enough for
> > Gmail.
> > >> I
> > >> changed it again.
> > >>
> > >> You can change your vote until the vote closes, but your vote
> alone
> > can
> > >> move Bend enough to make a difference.  You could actually
> increase
> > the
> > >> vote gap between Royale and Beads and Boja.
> > >>
> > >> -Alex
> > >>
> > >> On 9/19/17, 10:01 AM, "Erik de Bruin"  wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Sorry, that should have gone to the DISCUSS thread :-(
> > >>>
> > >>> EdB
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Erik de Bruin <
> e...@ixsoftware.nl
> > >
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> >  I really don't like Royale, because it has no connection with
> went
> >  before
> >  it, which Beads, Boja, Bend and Limber all do.
> > 
> >  My new favorite is Limber, but I still like Bend very much. If I
> > can
> >  break
> >  a tie, I'll change my vote (I can do that, before the VOTE
> closes,
> >  right?)
> > 
> >  EdB
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Alex Harui
> >  
> >  wrote:
> > 
> > > What a dilemma!
> > >
> > > I've seen 10 votes and 2 abstentions.  I haven't voted yet.  I
> > > wanted
> > > to
> > > see what the trend was first.
> > >
> > > If you assign 3 points to first place, 2 to second, and 1 to
> > third,
> > > Royale
> > > has the lead at 12 points, but barely:  Bead, Boja and Limber
> > have
> > > 10.
> > > Boja has been mentioned more than any other name (6 times),
> but 3
> > > of
> > > those
> > > are third place votes.  Royale and Limber have been mentioned 5
> > > times,
> > > Beads 4 times.  Beads has the most first place votes (3).
> > Royale,
> > > Limber
> > > have 2 first place votes each.
> > >
> > > In short, I don't think there is a clear winner.  It will
> depend
> > on
> > > how
> > > you count the votes.  And we can't 

Re: [DISCUSS] (was Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?)

[Carlos Rovira]

Thanks Piotr, just see the results and very happy to see that Royale was
the most voted. Now is time to work the brand to make us shine.

:)

Carlos

2017-09-20 9:00 GMT+02:00 Harbs :

> Thanks Piotr.
>
> Looks like we’re now Royale. :-)
>
> Harbs
>
> > On Sep 20, 2017, at 12:51 AM, Piotr Zarzycki 
> wrote:
> >
> > I will end voting tomorrow 09/19/2017 6:00 - 7:00 UTC Time.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Piotr
> >
> > 2017-09-19 23:15 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui :
> >
> >> Justin voted.
> >>
> >> Now we have Royale and Limber tied again with 13 points.
> >> Beads has 11, Braids as 10. Arise has 9.
> >>
> >> Royale has been mentioned on 7 out of 12 votes.
> >> Limber on 6 out of 12.
> >>
> >> Limber still has the most first-place votes with 3.  Royale and Beads
> have
> >> 2.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >> On 9/19/17, 1:11 PM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:
> >>
> >>> Piotr changed his vote.
> >>>
> >>> It dropped Royale back to 12 points, putting Limber in the lead at 13.
> >>> Arise is now third at 9 points.  Beads, Boja, Braid all have 8.
> >>>
> >>> Royale and Limber both have been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes.
> >>>
> >>> Trademarks responded that, without thinking about it too much, they
> aren't
> >>> concerned about these small projects on GitHub, so if we end up with
> >>> Royale, it won't be quickly blocked by Trademarks.
> >>>
> >>> -Alex
> >>>
> >>> On 9/19/17, 11:21 AM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:
> >>>
>  Dave changed his abstention to a vote.
> 
>  That tied Limber with Royale at 13 each.  Beads now has 11.
> 
>  Royale and Limber have now been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes.
>  Boja and Beads have been mentioned 5 times.
> 
>  -Alex
> 
>  On 9/19/17, 11:12 AM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:
> 
> > Erik changed his vote.  That put Limber in the lead over Royale, 13
> vs
> > 12.
> > However, several folks are concerned about limber.com being an adult
> > site.  Limber has been mentioned on 6 votes.
> >
> > Beads and Boja have 9 votes each now.  Boja and Royale have been
> > mentioned
> > 5 times, Beads 4 times.
> >
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 9/19/17, 10:11 AM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:
> >
> >> I did change the subject to discuss, but may be not enough for
> Gmail.
> >> I
> >> changed it again.
> >>
> >> You can change your vote until the vote closes, but your vote alone
> can
> >> move Bend enough to make a difference.  You could actually increase
> the
> >> vote gap between Royale and Beads and Boja.
> >>
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >> On 9/19/17, 10:01 AM, "Erik de Bruin"  wrote:
> >>
> >>> Sorry, that should have gone to the DISCUSS thread :-(
> >>>
> >>> EdB
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Erik de Bruin  >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
>  I really don't like Royale, because it has no connection with went
>  before
>  it, which Beads, Boja, Bend and Limber all do.
> 
>  My new favorite is Limber, but I still like Bend very much. If I
> can
>  break
>  a tie, I'll change my vote (I can do that, before the VOTE closes,
>  right?)
> 
>  EdB
> 
> 
> 
>  On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Alex Harui
>  
>  wrote:
> 
> > What a dilemma!
> >
> > I've seen 10 votes and 2 abstentions.  I haven't voted yet.  I
> > wanted
> > to
> > see what the trend was first.
> >
> > If you assign 3 points to first place, 2 to second, and 1 to
> third,
> > Royale
> > has the lead at 12 points, but barely:  Bead, Boja and Limber
> have
> > 10.
> > Boja has been mentioned more than any other name (6 times), but 3
> > of
> > those
> > are third place votes.  Royale and Limber have been mentioned 5
> > times,
> > Beads 4 times.  Beads has the most first place votes (3).
> Royale,
> > Limber
> > have 2 first place votes each.
> >
> > In short, I don't think there is a clear winner.  It will depend
> on
> > how
> > you count the votes.  And we can't default back to FlexJS either
> > given
> > the
> > other vote.
> >
> > I know some folks mentioned that Royale is associated with
> > low-quality
> > foods, but does anybody think choosing Royale will be a major
> > hindrance?
> > There is a possible conflict because some other Github project is
> > already
> > using Royale [1] for a JS framework.  Does anybody see that as a
> > show
> 

Re: [DISCUSS] (was Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?)

[Harbs]

Thanks Piotr.

Looks like we’re now Royale. :-)

Harbs

> On Sep 20, 2017, at 12:51 AM, Piotr Zarzycki  
> wrote:
> 
> I will end voting tomorrow 09/19/2017 6:00 - 7:00 UTC Time.
> 
> Thanks,
> Piotr
> 
> 2017-09-19 23:15 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui :
> 
>> Justin voted.
>> 
>> Now we have Royale and Limber tied again with 13 points.
>> Beads has 11, Braids as 10. Arise has 9.
>> 
>> Royale has been mentioned on 7 out of 12 votes.
>> Limber on 6 out of 12.
>> 
>> Limber still has the most first-place votes with 3.  Royale and Beads have
>> 2.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> -Alex
>> 
>> On 9/19/17, 1:11 PM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:
>> 
>>> Piotr changed his vote.
>>> 
>>> It dropped Royale back to 12 points, putting Limber in the lead at 13.
>>> Arise is now third at 9 points.  Beads, Boja, Braid all have 8.
>>> 
>>> Royale and Limber both have been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes.
>>> 
>>> Trademarks responded that, without thinking about it too much, they aren't
>>> concerned about these small projects on GitHub, so if we end up with
>>> Royale, it won't be quickly blocked by Trademarks.
>>> 
>>> -Alex
>>> 
>>> On 9/19/17, 11:21 AM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:
>>> 
 Dave changed his abstention to a vote.
 
 That tied Limber with Royale at 13 each.  Beads now has 11.
 
 Royale and Limber have now been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes.
 Boja and Beads have been mentioned 5 times.
 
 -Alex
 
 On 9/19/17, 11:12 AM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:
 
> Erik changed his vote.  That put Limber in the lead over Royale, 13 vs
> 12.
> However, several folks are concerned about limber.com being an adult
> site.  Limber has been mentioned on 6 votes.
> 
> Beads and Boja have 9 votes each now.  Boja and Royale have been
> mentioned
> 5 times, Beads 4 times.
> 
> -Alex
> 
> On 9/19/17, 10:11 AM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:
> 
>> I did change the subject to discuss, but may be not enough for Gmail.
>> I
>> changed it again.
>> 
>> You can change your vote until the vote closes, but your vote alone can
>> move Bend enough to make a difference.  You could actually increase the
>> vote gap between Royale and Beads and Boja.
>> 
>> -Alex
>> 
>> On 9/19/17, 10:01 AM, "Erik de Bruin"  wrote:
>> 
>>> Sorry, that should have gone to the DISCUSS thread :-(
>>> 
>>> EdB
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Erik de Bruin 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
 I really don't like Royale, because it has no connection with went
 before
 it, which Beads, Boja, Bend and Limber all do.
 
 My new favorite is Limber, but I still like Bend very much. If I can
 break
 a tie, I'll change my vote (I can do that, before the VOTE closes,
 right?)
 
 EdB
 
 
 
 On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Alex Harui
 
 wrote:
 
> What a dilemma!
> 
> I've seen 10 votes and 2 abstentions.  I haven't voted yet.  I
> wanted
> to
> see what the trend was first.
> 
> If you assign 3 points to first place, 2 to second, and 1 to third,
> Royale
> has the lead at 12 points, but barely:  Bead, Boja and Limber have
> 10.
> Boja has been mentioned more than any other name (6 times), but 3
> of
> those
> are third place votes.  Royale and Limber have been mentioned 5
> times,
> Beads 4 times.  Beads has the most first place votes (3).  Royale,
> Limber
> have 2 first place votes each.
> 
> In short, I don't think there is a clear winner.  It will depend on
> how
> you count the votes.  And we can't default back to FlexJS either
> given
> the
> other vote.
> 
> I know some folks mentioned that Royale is associated with
> low-quality
> foods, but does anybody think choosing Royale will be a major
> hindrance?
> There is a possible conflict because some other Github project is
> already
> using Royale [1] for a JS framework.  Does anybody see that as a
> show
> stopper?  I think I will write to trademarks@ and try to get their
> opinion.
> 
> Carlos, will you help with a new website regardless of which name
> is
> chosen or only if it is Royale (or Crown)?
> 
> Is anybody adamantly against Beads, Boja or Limber?  After reading
> this
> mornings posts, I'm leaning away from limber.  The spell checker
> redirect
> issue is worrisome.

[RESULT][VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

[Piotr Zarzycki]

Hi All,

Vote pass with following results:

13 PMC has voted. One was abstain from vote.
One non community vote for Royale.

NAME:  SCORES:

Royale  18
Limber (Limbr)  13
Bead (Beads)11
Braid 10
Arise  9
Boja   8
Bend  3
Crown2
Action1
Strand0
Boinga   0

NAME:   SCORES:

Royale   3 + 2 + 3 + 2 + 2 + 1 + 1 + 1
+ 3
Limber (Limbr)   3 + 3 + 2 + 1 + 1
Bead (Beads)1 + 3 + 2 + 3 + 2
Braid  2 + 3 + 2 + 2 + 1
Arise  1 + 2 + 3 + 3
Boja   2 + 1 + 3 + 2
Bend  3
Crown2
Action1
Strand
Boinga

According to the vote our new project name is Royale! :)

Thank you for all votes!

VOTE Thread: https://goo.gl/BbT1uv
DISCUSS Thread:
1: https://goo.gl/64TUCo
2: https://goo.gl/okJCUn

Piotr

Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

[Alex Harui]

Hi Deepak,

Anyone can vote.  Only PMC member votes can be used in the result totals,
but we always want to know what non-PMC members of our community think.
It assures us to know that there is alignment between the PMC and others.

Thanks,
-Alex

On 9/19/17, 9:43 PM, "Deepak MS"  wrote:

>I'm not sure if voting is only from PMC members.
>
>Anyway, Royale is awesome name. Simple, yet rich and powerful just like
>Flex.
>
>On 20 Sep 2017 8:42 am, "Alex Harui"  wrote:
>
>> Royale
>> Beads
>> Braid
>>
>>
>> On 9/17/17, 12:19 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" 
>>wrote:
>>
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >In this thread I've gathered list of names proposition for fork of
>>FlexJS
>> >project.
>> >
>> >LIST:
>> >
>> >Royale
>> >Boja
>> >Strand
>> >Bead
>> >Limber
>> >Boinga
>> >Braid
>> >Arise
>> >
>> >HOW DO WE VOTE:
>> >1) Pick up 3 names from the list and order them from the most favorite
>> >2) We will give points for each items in the list which you have choose
>> >3) In your list you can propose your own name - others can follow it in
>> >their lists
>> >
>> >EXAMPLE:
>> >1) Name1 - 3 points
>> >2) Name2 - 2 points
>> >3) Name3 - 1 point
>> >
>> >WINNER:
>> >We will pickup winner based on gathered points by one of the name.
>> >
>> >The vote will be open until Tuesday September 19, 23:00 UTC
>> >
>> >Thanks,
>> >
>> >Piotr
>>
>>

Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

[Deepak MS]

I'm not sure if voting is only from PMC members.

Anyway, Royale is awesome name. Simple, yet rich and powerful just like
Flex.

On 20 Sep 2017 8:42 am, "Alex Harui"  wrote:

> Royale
> Beads
> Braid
>
>
> On 9/17/17, 12:19 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >In this thread I've gathered list of names proposition for fork of FlexJS
> >project.
> >
> >LIST:
> >
> >Royale
> >Boja
> >Strand
> >Bead
> >Limber
> >Boinga
> >Braid
> >Arise
> >
> >HOW DO WE VOTE:
> >1) Pick up 3 names from the list and order them from the most favorite
> >2) We will give points for each items in the list which you have choose
> >3) In your list you can propose your own name - others can follow it in
> >their lists
> >
> >EXAMPLE:
> >1) Name1 - 3 points
> >2) Name2 - 2 points
> >3) Name3 - 1 point
> >
> >WINNER:
> >We will pickup winner based on gathered points by one of the name.
> >
> >The vote will be open until Tuesday September 19, 23:00 UTC
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Piotr
>
>

Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

[Alex Harui]

Royale
Beads
Braid


On 9/17/17, 12:19 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:

>Hi,
>
>In this thread I've gathered list of names proposition for fork of FlexJS
>project.
>
>LIST:
>
>Royale
>Boja
>Strand
>Bead
>Limber
>Boinga
>Braid
>Arise
>
>HOW DO WE VOTE:
>1) Pick up 3 names from the list and order them from the most favorite
>2) We will give points for each items in the list which you have choose
>3) In your list you can propose your own name - others can follow it in
>their lists
>
>EXAMPLE:
>1) Name1 - 3 points
>2) Name2 - 2 points
>3) Name3 - 1 point
>
>WINNER:
>We will pickup winner based on gathered points by one of the name.
>
>The vote will be open until Tuesday September 19, 23:00 UTC
>
>Thanks,
>
>Piotr

Re: [DISCUSS] (was Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?)

[Piotr Zarzycki]

I'm sorry I meant 09/20/2017.

2017-09-19 23:51 GMT+02:00 Piotr Zarzycki :

> I will end voting tomorrow 09/19/2017 6:00 - 7:00 UTC Time.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> 2017-09-19 23:15 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui :
>
>> Justin voted.
>>
>> Now we have Royale and Limber tied again with 13 points.
>> Beads has 11, Braids as 10. Arise has 9.
>>
>> Royale has been mentioned on 7 out of 12 votes.
>> Limber on 6 out of 12.
>>
>> Limber still has the most first-place votes with 3.  Royale and Beads have
>> 2.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 9/19/17, 1:11 PM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:
>>
>> >Piotr changed his vote.
>> >
>> >It dropped Royale back to 12 points, putting Limber in the lead at 13.
>> >Arise is now third at 9 points.  Beads, Boja, Braid all have 8.
>> >
>> >Royale and Limber both have been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes.
>> >
>> >Trademarks responded that, without thinking about it too much, they
>> aren't
>> >concerned about these small projects on GitHub, so if we end up with
>> >Royale, it won't be quickly blocked by Trademarks.
>> >
>> >-Alex
>> >
>> >On 9/19/17, 11:21 AM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:
>> >
>> >>Dave changed his abstention to a vote.
>> >>
>> >>That tied Limber with Royale at 13 each.  Beads now has 11.
>> >>
>> >>Royale and Limber have now been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes.
>> >>Boja and Beads have been mentioned 5 times.
>> >>
>> >>-Alex
>> >>
>> >>On 9/19/17, 11:12 AM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>Erik changed his vote.  That put Limber in the lead over Royale, 13 vs
>> >>>12.
>> >>> However, several folks are concerned about limber.com being an adult
>> >>>site.  Limber has been mentioned on 6 votes.
>> >>>
>> >>>Beads and Boja have 9 votes each now.  Boja and Royale have been
>> >>>mentioned
>> >>>5 times, Beads 4 times.
>> >>>
>> >>>-Alex
>> >>>
>> >>>On 9/19/17, 10:11 AM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:
>> >>>
>> I did change the subject to discuss, but may be not enough for Gmail.
>> I
>> changed it again.
>> 
>> You can change your vote until the vote closes, but your vote alone
>> can
>> move Bend enough to make a difference.  You could actually increase
>> the
>> vote gap between Royale and Beads and Boja.
>> 
>> -Alex
>> 
>> On 9/19/17, 10:01 AM, "Erik de Bruin"  wrote:
>> 
>> >Sorry, that should have gone to the DISCUSS thread :-(
>> >
>> >EdB
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Erik de Bruin 
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> I really don't like Royale, because it has no connection with went
>> >>before
>> >> it, which Beads, Boja, Bend and Limber all do.
>> >>
>> >> My new favorite is Limber, but I still like Bend very much. If I
>> can
>> >>break
>> >> a tie, I'll change my vote (I can do that, before the VOTE closes,
>> >>right?)
>> >>
>> >> EdB
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Alex Harui
>> >>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> What a dilemma!
>> >>>
>> >>> I've seen 10 votes and 2 abstentions.  I haven't voted yet.  I
>> >>>wanted
>> >>>to
>> >>> see what the trend was first.
>> >>>
>> >>> If you assign 3 points to first place, 2 to second, and 1 to
>> third,
>> >>>Royale
>> >>> has the lead at 12 points, but barely:  Bead, Boja and Limber have
>> >>>10.
>> >>> Boja has been mentioned more than any other name (6 times), but 3
>> >>>of
>> >>>those
>> >>> are third place votes.  Royale and Limber have been mentioned 5
>> >>>times,
>> >>> Beads 4 times.  Beads has the most first place votes (3).  Royale,
>> >>>Limber
>> >>> have 2 first place votes each.
>> >>>
>> >>> In short, I don't think there is a clear winner.  It will depend
>> on
>> >>>how
>> >>> you count the votes.  And we can't default back to FlexJS either
>> >>>given
>> >>>the
>> >>> other vote.
>> >>>
>> >>> I know some folks mentioned that Royale is associated with
>> >>>low-quality
>> >>> foods, but does anybody think choosing Royale will be a major
>> >>>hindrance?
>> >>> There is a possible conflict because some other Github project is
>> >>>already
>> >>> using Royale [1] for a JS framework.  Does anybody see that as a
>> >>>show
>> >>> stopper?  I think I will write to trademarks@ and try to get
>> their
>> >>> opinion.
>> >>>
>> >>> Carlos, will you help with a new website regardless of which name
>> >>>is
>> >>> chosen or only if it is Royale (or Crown)?
>> >>>
>> >>> Is anybody adamantly against Beads, Boja or Limber?  After reading
>> >>>this
>> >>> mornings posts, I'm leaning away from limber.  The spell checker
>> >>>redirect
>> >>> issue is 

Re: [DISCUSS] (was Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?)

[Piotr Zarzycki]

I will end voting tomorrow 09/19/2017 6:00 - 7:00 UTC Time.

Thanks,
Piotr

2017-09-19 23:15 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui :

> Justin voted.
>
> Now we have Royale and Limber tied again with 13 points.
> Beads has 11, Braids as 10. Arise has 9.
>
> Royale has been mentioned on 7 out of 12 votes.
> Limber on 6 out of 12.
>
> Limber still has the most first-place votes with 3.  Royale and Beads have
> 2.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 9/19/17, 1:11 PM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:
>
> >Piotr changed his vote.
> >
> >It dropped Royale back to 12 points, putting Limber in the lead at 13.
> >Arise is now third at 9 points.  Beads, Boja, Braid all have 8.
> >
> >Royale and Limber both have been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes.
> >
> >Trademarks responded that, without thinking about it too much, they aren't
> >concerned about these small projects on GitHub, so if we end up with
> >Royale, it won't be quickly blocked by Trademarks.
> >
> >-Alex
> >
> >On 9/19/17, 11:21 AM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:
> >
> >>Dave changed his abstention to a vote.
> >>
> >>That tied Limber with Royale at 13 each.  Beads now has 11.
> >>
> >>Royale and Limber have now been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes.
> >>Boja and Beads have been mentioned 5 times.
> >>
> >>-Alex
> >>
> >>On 9/19/17, 11:12 AM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:
> >>
> >>>Erik changed his vote.  That put Limber in the lead over Royale, 13 vs
> >>>12.
> >>> However, several folks are concerned about limber.com being an adult
> >>>site.  Limber has been mentioned on 6 votes.
> >>>
> >>>Beads and Boja have 9 votes each now.  Boja and Royale have been
> >>>mentioned
> >>>5 times, Beads 4 times.
> >>>
> >>>-Alex
> >>>
> >>>On 9/19/17, 10:11 AM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:
> >>>
> I did change the subject to discuss, but may be not enough for Gmail.
> I
> changed it again.
> 
> You can change your vote until the vote closes, but your vote alone can
> move Bend enough to make a difference.  You could actually increase the
> vote gap between Royale and Beads and Boja.
> 
> -Alex
> 
> On 9/19/17, 10:01 AM, "Erik de Bruin"  wrote:
> 
> >Sorry, that should have gone to the DISCUSS thread :-(
> >
> >EdB
> >
> >
> >
> >On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Erik de Bruin 
> >wrote:
> >
> >> I really don't like Royale, because it has no connection with went
> >>before
> >> it, which Beads, Boja, Bend and Limber all do.
> >>
> >> My new favorite is Limber, but I still like Bend very much. If I can
> >>break
> >> a tie, I'll change my vote (I can do that, before the VOTE closes,
> >>right?)
> >>
> >> EdB
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Alex Harui
> >>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> What a dilemma!
> >>>
> >>> I've seen 10 votes and 2 abstentions.  I haven't voted yet.  I
> >>>wanted
> >>>to
> >>> see what the trend was first.
> >>>
> >>> If you assign 3 points to first place, 2 to second, and 1 to third,
> >>>Royale
> >>> has the lead at 12 points, but barely:  Bead, Boja and Limber have
> >>>10.
> >>> Boja has been mentioned more than any other name (6 times), but 3
> >>>of
> >>>those
> >>> are third place votes.  Royale and Limber have been mentioned 5
> >>>times,
> >>> Beads 4 times.  Beads has the most first place votes (3).  Royale,
> >>>Limber
> >>> have 2 first place votes each.
> >>>
> >>> In short, I don't think there is a clear winner.  It will depend on
> >>>how
> >>> you count the votes.  And we can't default back to FlexJS either
> >>>given
> >>>the
> >>> other vote.
> >>>
> >>> I know some folks mentioned that Royale is associated with
> >>>low-quality
> >>> foods, but does anybody think choosing Royale will be a major
> >>>hindrance?
> >>> There is a possible conflict because some other Github project is
> >>>already
> >>> using Royale [1] for a JS framework.  Does anybody see that as a
> >>>show
> >>> stopper?  I think I will write to trademarks@ and try to get their
> >>> opinion.
> >>>
> >>> Carlos, will you help with a new website regardless of which name
> >>>is
> >>> chosen or only if it is Royale (or Crown)?
> >>>
> >>> Is anybody adamantly against Beads, Boja or Limber?  After reading
> >>>this
> >>> mornings posts, I'm leaning away from limber.  The spell checker
> >>>redirect
> >>> issue is worrisome.
> >>>
> >>> Thoughts?
> >>> -Alex
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> [1]
> >>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fgit
> >>>h
> >>>u
> >>>b
> >>>.
> >>>com%2Fian-culleton%2Froyale=02%7C01%7C%
> 

Re: [DISCUSS] (was Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?)

[Alex Harui]

Justin voted.

Now we have Royale and Limber tied again with 13 points.
Beads has 11, Braids as 10. Arise has 9.

Royale has been mentioned on 7 out of 12 votes.
Limber on 6 out of 12.

Limber still has the most first-place votes with 3.  Royale and Beads have
2.

Thanks,
-Alex

On 9/19/17, 1:11 PM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:

>Piotr changed his vote.
>
>It dropped Royale back to 12 points, putting Limber in the lead at 13.
>Arise is now third at 9 points.  Beads, Boja, Braid all have 8.
>
>Royale and Limber both have been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes.
>
>Trademarks responded that, without thinking about it too much, they aren't
>concerned about these small projects on GitHub, so if we end up with
>Royale, it won't be quickly blocked by Trademarks.
>
>-Alex
>
>On 9/19/17, 11:21 AM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:
>
>>Dave changed his abstention to a vote.
>>
>>That tied Limber with Royale at 13 each.  Beads now has 11.
>>
>>Royale and Limber have now been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes.
>>Boja and Beads have been mentioned 5 times.
>>
>>-Alex
>>
>>On 9/19/17, 11:12 AM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:
>>
>>>Erik changed his vote.  That put Limber in the lead over Royale, 13 vs
>>>12.
>>> However, several folks are concerned about limber.com being an adult
>>>site.  Limber has been mentioned on 6 votes.
>>>
>>>Beads and Boja have 9 votes each now.  Boja and Royale have been
>>>mentioned
>>>5 times, Beads 4 times.
>>>
>>>-Alex
>>>
>>>On 9/19/17, 10:11 AM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:
>>>
I did change the subject to discuss, but may be not enough for Gmail.
I
changed it again.

You can change your vote until the vote closes, but your vote alone can
move Bend enough to make a difference.  You could actually increase the
vote gap between Royale and Beads and Boja.

-Alex

On 9/19/17, 10:01 AM, "Erik de Bruin"  wrote:

>Sorry, that should have gone to the DISCUSS thread :-(
>
>EdB
>
>
>
>On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Erik de Bruin 
>wrote:
>
>> I really don't like Royale, because it has no connection with went
>>before
>> it, which Beads, Boja, Bend and Limber all do.
>>
>> My new favorite is Limber, but I still like Bend very much. If I can
>>break
>> a tie, I'll change my vote (I can do that, before the VOTE closes,
>>right?)
>>
>> EdB
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Alex Harui
>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> What a dilemma!
>>>
>>> I've seen 10 votes and 2 abstentions.  I haven't voted yet.  I
>>>wanted
>>>to
>>> see what the trend was first.
>>>
>>> If you assign 3 points to first place, 2 to second, and 1 to third,
>>>Royale
>>> has the lead at 12 points, but barely:  Bead, Boja and Limber have
>>>10.
>>> Boja has been mentioned more than any other name (6 times), but 3
>>>of
>>>those
>>> are third place votes.  Royale and Limber have been mentioned 5
>>>times,
>>> Beads 4 times.  Beads has the most first place votes (3).  Royale,
>>>Limber
>>> have 2 first place votes each.
>>>
>>> In short, I don't think there is a clear winner.  It will depend on
>>>how
>>> you count the votes.  And we can't default back to FlexJS either
>>>given
>>>the
>>> other vote.
>>>
>>> I know some folks mentioned that Royale is associated with
>>>low-quality
>>> foods, but does anybody think choosing Royale will be a major
>>>hindrance?
>>> There is a possible conflict because some other Github project is
>>>already
>>> using Royale [1] for a JS framework.  Does anybody see that as a
>>>show
>>> stopper?  I think I will write to trademarks@ and try to get their
>>> opinion.
>>>
>>> Carlos, will you help with a new website regardless of which name
>>>is
>>> chosen or only if it is Royale (or Crown)?
>>>
>>> Is anybody adamantly against Beads, Boja or Limber?  After reading
>>>this
>>> mornings posts, I'm leaning away from limber.  The spell checker
>>>redirect
>>> issue is worrisome.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>> -Alex
>>>
>>>
>>> [1] 
>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgit
>>>h
>>>u
>>>b
>>>.
>>>com%2Fian-culleton%2Froyale=02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08
>>>d
>>>4
>>>f
>>>f
>>>8024b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364143732119862
>>>8
>>>8
>>>&
>>>s
>>>data=LJJ2CXVQIkKbdqguqcQFfKFfeXx%2FAem5Zs3UTcE7W8M%3D=0
>>>
>>> On 9/18/17, 10:48 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
>>> Muppirala"
>>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> >Abstain (binding)
>>> >
>>> >On 

Re: [DISCUSS] (was Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?)

[Carlos Rovira]

Hi Alex,

about your question in the other thread if I would help in logo and website
work: I commented that I need to be "connected" and "inspired" with the new
name, since is a huge task and effort just in the same way I was when I
contributed to MDL UI set.

I didn't want to comment too much about the other options (just when I
though I had some valuable opinión a side from my subjective inclinations),
but I must say that I don't see our project with a brand like Beads, Limber
or other options exposed, I feel more damage than benefits (but again this
is totally subjective).

But as well I think that should not incline the balance in favor of my
proposal. I'm completely done for it, but I think others should buy it and
believe in it. I even prefer to stick with "FlexJS" since when I first
started proposing a name change, it was for something that was a huge
meaning, and sorry, but can't find that in other proposals.

As I said, is a significant task to design website, logo, and so on and to
make that, due to the creative nature of the task, you need to be
completely trapped by the name, the meaning and the rest to get the most of
it, or we'll end with something worst.



2017-09-19 22:11 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui :

> Piotr changed his vote.
>
> It dropped Royale back to 12 points, putting Limber in the lead at 13.
> Arise is now third at 9 points.  Beads, Boja, Braid all have 8.
>
> Royale and Limber both have been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes.
>
> Trademarks responded that, without thinking about it too much, they aren't
> concerned about these small projects on GitHub, so if we end up with
> Royale, it won't be quickly blocked by Trademarks.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 9/19/17, 11:21 AM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:
>
> >Dave changed his abstention to a vote.
> >
> >That tied Limber with Royale at 13 each.  Beads now has 11.
> >
> >Royale and Limber have now been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes.
> >Boja and Beads have been mentioned 5 times.
> >
> >-Alex
> >
> >On 9/19/17, 11:12 AM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:
> >
> >>Erik changed his vote.  That put Limber in the lead over Royale, 13 vs
> >>12.
> >> However, several folks are concerned about limber.com being an adult
> >>site.  Limber has been mentioned on 6 votes.
> >>
> >>Beads and Boja have 9 votes each now.  Boja and Royale have been
> >>mentioned
> >>5 times, Beads 4 times.
> >>
> >>-Alex
> >>
> >>On 9/19/17, 10:11 AM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:
> >>
> >>>I did change the subject to discuss, but may be not enough for Gmail.  I
> >>>changed it again.
> >>>
> >>>You can change your vote until the vote closes, but your vote alone can
> >>>move Bend enough to make a difference.  You could actually increase the
> >>>vote gap between Royale and Beads and Boja.
> >>>
> >>>-Alex
> >>>
> >>>On 9/19/17, 10:01 AM, "Erik de Bruin"  wrote:
> >>>
> Sorry, that should have gone to the DISCUSS thread :-(
> 
> EdB
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Erik de Bruin 
> wrote:
> 
> > I really don't like Royale, because it has no connection with went
> >before
> > it, which Beads, Boja, Bend and Limber all do.
> >
> > My new favorite is Limber, but I still like Bend very much. If I can
> >break
> > a tie, I'll change my vote (I can do that, before the VOTE closes,
> >right?)
> >
> > EdB
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Alex Harui
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> What a dilemma!
> >>
> >> I've seen 10 votes and 2 abstentions.  I haven't voted yet.  I
> >>wanted
> >>to
> >> see what the trend was first.
> >>
> >> If you assign 3 points to first place, 2 to second, and 1 to third,
> >>Royale
> >> has the lead at 12 points, but barely:  Bead, Boja and Limber have
> >>10.
> >> Boja has been mentioned more than any other name (6 times), but 3 of
> >>those
> >> are third place votes.  Royale and Limber have been mentioned 5
> >>times,
> >> Beads 4 times.  Beads has the most first place votes (3).  Royale,
> >>Limber
> >> have 2 first place votes each.
> >>
> >> In short, I don't think there is a clear winner.  It will depend on
> >>how
> >> you count the votes.  And we can't default back to FlexJS either
> >>given
> >>the
> >> other vote.
> >>
> >> I know some folks mentioned that Royale is associated with
> >>low-quality
> >> foods, but does anybody think choosing Royale will be a major
> >>hindrance?
> >> There is a possible conflict because some other Github project is
> >>already
> >> using Royale [1] for a JS framework.  Does anybody see that as a
> >>show
> >> stopper?  I think I will write to trademarks@ and try to get their
> >> opinion.
> >>
> >> Carlos, will you 

Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

1. Bead
2. Braid
3.Royale

Thanks,
Justin

Re: [DISCUSS] (was Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?)

[Alex Harui]

Piotr changed his vote.

It dropped Royale back to 12 points, putting Limber in the lead at 13.
Arise is now third at 9 points.  Beads, Boja, Braid all have 8.

Royale and Limber both have been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes.

Trademarks responded that, without thinking about it too much, they aren't
concerned about these small projects on GitHub, so if we end up with
Royale, it won't be quickly blocked by Trademarks.

-Alex

On 9/19/17, 11:21 AM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:

>Dave changed his abstention to a vote.
>
>That tied Limber with Royale at 13 each.  Beads now has 11.
>
>Royale and Limber have now been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes.
>Boja and Beads have been mentioned 5 times.
>
>-Alex
>
>On 9/19/17, 11:12 AM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:
>
>>Erik changed his vote.  That put Limber in the lead over Royale, 13 vs
>>12.
>> However, several folks are concerned about limber.com being an adult
>>site.  Limber has been mentioned on 6 votes.
>>
>>Beads and Boja have 9 votes each now.  Boja and Royale have been
>>mentioned
>>5 times, Beads 4 times.
>>
>>-Alex
>>
>>On 9/19/17, 10:11 AM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:
>>
>>>I did change the subject to discuss, but may be not enough for Gmail.  I
>>>changed it again.
>>>
>>>You can change your vote until the vote closes, but your vote alone can
>>>move Bend enough to make a difference.  You could actually increase the
>>>vote gap between Royale and Beads and Boja.
>>>
>>>-Alex
>>>
>>>On 9/19/17, 10:01 AM, "Erik de Bruin"  wrote:
>>>
Sorry, that should have gone to the DISCUSS thread :-(

EdB



On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Erik de Bruin 
wrote:

> I really don't like Royale, because it has no connection with went
>before
> it, which Beads, Boja, Bend and Limber all do.
>
> My new favorite is Limber, but I still like Bend very much. If I can
>break
> a tie, I'll change my vote (I can do that, before the VOTE closes,
>right?)
>
> EdB
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Alex Harui
>
> wrote:
>
>> What a dilemma!
>>
>> I've seen 10 votes and 2 abstentions.  I haven't voted yet.  I
>>wanted
>>to
>> see what the trend was first.
>>
>> If you assign 3 points to first place, 2 to second, and 1 to third,
>>Royale
>> has the lead at 12 points, but barely:  Bead, Boja and Limber have
>>10.
>> Boja has been mentioned more than any other name (6 times), but 3 of
>>those
>> are third place votes.  Royale and Limber have been mentioned 5
>>times,
>> Beads 4 times.  Beads has the most first place votes (3).  Royale,
>>Limber
>> have 2 first place votes each.
>>
>> In short, I don't think there is a clear winner.  It will depend on
>>how
>> you count the votes.  And we can't default back to FlexJS either
>>given
>>the
>> other vote.
>>
>> I know some folks mentioned that Royale is associated with
>>low-quality
>> foods, but does anybody think choosing Royale will be a major
>>hindrance?
>> There is a possible conflict because some other Github project is
>>already
>> using Royale [1] for a JS framework.  Does anybody see that as a
>>show
>> stopper?  I think I will write to trademarks@ and try to get their
>> opinion.
>>
>> Carlos, will you help with a new website regardless of which name is
>> chosen or only if it is Royale (or Crown)?
>>
>> Is anybody adamantly against Beads, Boja or Limber?  After reading
>>this
>> mornings posts, I'm leaning away from limber.  The spell checker
>>redirect
>> issue is worrisome.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>> -Alex
>>
>>
>> [1] 
>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgith
>>u
>>b
>>.
>>com%2Fian-culleton%2Froyale=02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d
>>4
>>f
>>f
>>8024b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C63641437321198628
>>8
>>&
>>s
>>data=LJJ2CXVQIkKbdqguqcQFfKFfeXx%2FAem5Zs3UTcE7W8M%3D=0
>>
>> On 9/18/17, 10:48 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
>> Muppirala"
>>  wrote:
>>
>> >Abstain (binding)
>> >
>> >On Sep 18, 2017 10:47 AM, "Dave Fisher" 
>>wrote:
>> >
>> >> I am abstaining for now.
>> >>
>> >> > On Sep 17, 2017, at 3:19 PM, Piotr Zarzycki
>> >>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> > In this thread I've gathered list of names proposition for fork
>>of
>> >>FlexJS
>> >> > project.
>> >> >
>> >> > LIST:
>> >> >
>> >> > Royale
>> >> > Boja
>> >> > Strand
>> >> > Bead
>> >> > Limber
>> 

Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

[piotrz]

I'm changing my VOTE to:

1) Arise
2) Braid
3) Royale 

Thanks,
Piotr




-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: [DISCUSS] (was Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?)

[Alex Harui]

Dave changed his abstention to a vote.

That tied Limber with Royale at 13 each.  Beads now has 11.

Royale and Limber have now been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes.
Boja and Beads have been mentioned 5 times.

-Alex

On 9/19/17, 11:12 AM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:

>Erik changed his vote.  That put Limber in the lead over Royale, 13 vs 12.
> However, several folks are concerned about limber.com being an adult
>site.  Limber has been mentioned on 6 votes.
>
>Beads and Boja have 9 votes each now.  Boja and Royale have been mentioned
>5 times, Beads 4 times.
>
>-Alex
>
>On 9/19/17, 10:11 AM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:
>
>>I did change the subject to discuss, but may be not enough for Gmail.  I
>>changed it again.
>>
>>You can change your vote until the vote closes, but your vote alone can
>>move Bend enough to make a difference.  You could actually increase the
>>vote gap between Royale and Beads and Boja.
>>
>>-Alex
>>
>>On 9/19/17, 10:01 AM, "Erik de Bruin"  wrote:
>>
>>>Sorry, that should have gone to the DISCUSS thread :-(
>>>
>>>EdB
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Erik de Bruin 
>>>wrote:
>>>
 I really don't like Royale, because it has no connection with went
before
 it, which Beads, Boja, Bend and Limber all do.

 My new favorite is Limber, but I still like Bend very much. If I can
break
 a tie, I'll change my vote (I can do that, before the VOTE closes,
right?)

 EdB



 On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Alex Harui 
 wrote:

> What a dilemma!
>
> I've seen 10 votes and 2 abstentions.  I haven't voted yet.  I wanted
>to
> see what the trend was first.
>
> If you assign 3 points to first place, 2 to second, and 1 to third,
>Royale
> has the lead at 12 points, but barely:  Bead, Boja and Limber have
>10.
> Boja has been mentioned more than any other name (6 times), but 3 of
>those
> are third place votes.  Royale and Limber have been mentioned 5
>times,
> Beads 4 times.  Beads has the most first place votes (3).  Royale,
>Limber
> have 2 first place votes each.
>
> In short, I don't think there is a clear winner.  It will depend on
>how
> you count the votes.  And we can't default back to FlexJS either
>given
>the
> other vote.
>
> I know some folks mentioned that Royale is associated with
>low-quality
> foods, but does anybody think choosing Royale will be a major
>hindrance?
> There is a possible conflict because some other Github project is
>already
> using Royale [1] for a JS framework.  Does anybody see that as a show
> stopper?  I think I will write to trademarks@ and try to get their
> opinion.
>
> Carlos, will you help with a new website regardless of which name is
> chosen or only if it is Royale (or Crown)?
>
> Is anybody adamantly against Beads, Boja or Limber?  After reading
>this
> mornings posts, I'm leaning away from limber.  The spell checker
>redirect
> issue is worrisome.
>
> Thoughts?
> -Alex
>
>
> [1] 
>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithu
>b
>.
>com%2Fian-culleton%2Froyale=02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4
>f
>f
>8024b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288
>&
>s
>data=LJJ2CXVQIkKbdqguqcQFfKFfeXx%2FAem5Zs3UTcE7W8M%3D=0
>
> On 9/18/17, 10:48 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
> Muppirala"
>  wrote:
>
> >Abstain (binding)
> >
> >On Sep 18, 2017 10:47 AM, "Dave Fisher" 
>wrote:
> >
> >> I am abstaining for now.
> >>
> >> > On Sep 17, 2017, at 3:19 PM, Piotr Zarzycki
> >>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > In this thread I've gathered list of names proposition for fork
>of
> >>FlexJS
> >> > project.
> >> >
> >> > LIST:
> >> >
> >> > Royale
> >> > Boja
> >> > Strand
> >> > Bead
> >> > Limber
> >> > Boinga
> >> > Braid
> >> > Arise
> >> >
> >> > HOW DO WE VOTE:
> >> > 1) Pick up 3 names from the list and order them from the most
> favorite
> >> > 2) We will give points for each items in the list which you have
> >>choose
> >> > 3) In your list you can propose your own name - others can
>follow
>it
> >>in
> >> > their lists
> >> >
> >> > EXAMPLE:
> >> > 1) Name1 - 3 points
> >> > 2) Name2 - 2 points
> >> > 3) Name3 - 1 point
> >> >
> >> > WINNER:
> >> > We will pickup winner based on gathered points by one of the
>name.
> >> >
> >> > The vote will be open until Tuesday 

Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

[Dave Fisher]

Here is my vote:

1. Braid
2. Beads
3. Royale

Sent from my iPhone

> On Sep 18, 2017, at 1:46 PM, Dave Fisher  wrote:
> 
> I am abstaining for now.
> 
>> On Sep 17, 2017, at 3:19 PM, Piotr Zarzycki  
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> In this thread I've gathered list of names proposition for fork of FlexJS
>> project.
>> 
>> LIST:
>> 
>> Royale
>> Boja
>> Strand
>> Bead
>> Limber
>> Boinga
>> Braid
>> Arise
>> 
>> HOW DO WE VOTE:
>> 1) Pick up 3 names from the list and order them from the most favorite
>> 2) We will give points for each items in the list which you have choose
>> 3) In your list you can propose your own name - others can follow it in
>> their lists
>> 
>> EXAMPLE:
>> 1) Name1 - 3 points
>> 2) Name2 - 2 points
>> 3) Name3 - 1 point
>> 
>> WINNER:
>> We will pickup winner based on gathered points by one of the name.
>> 
>> The vote will be open until Tuesday September 19, 23:00 UTC
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Piotr
> 

Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

[Alex Harui]

Renaming subject for those of us who don't use Gmail.

On 9/19/17, 10:40 AM, "Erik de Bruin"  wrote:

>I'm changing my vote to:
>
>1) Limb(e)r
>2) Bead(s)
>3) Braid
>
>Sorry for any confusion.
>
>EdB
>
>
>
>On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Alex Harui 
>wrote:
>
>> What a dilemma!
>>
>> I've seen 10 votes and 2 abstentions.  I haven't voted yet.  I wanted to
>> see what the trend was first.
>>
>> If you assign 3 points to first place, 2 to second, and 1 to third,
>>Royale
>> has the lead at 12 points, but barely:  Bead, Boja and Limber have 10.
>> Boja has been mentioned more than any other name (6 times), but 3 of
>>those
>> are third place votes.  Royale and Limber have been mentioned 5 times,
>> Beads 4 times.  Beads has the most first place votes (3).  Royale,
>>Limber
>> have 2 first place votes each.
>>
>> In short, I don't think there is a clear winner.  It will depend on how
>> you count the votes.  And we can't default back to FlexJS either given
>>the
>> other vote.
>>
>> I know some folks mentioned that Royale is associated with low-quality
>> foods, but does anybody think choosing Royale will be a major hindrance?
>> There is a possible conflict because some other Github project is
>>already
>> using Royale [1] for a JS framework.  Does anybody see that as a show
>> stopper?  I think I will write to trademarks@ and try to get their
>> opinion.
>>
>> Carlos, will you help with a new website regardless of which name is
>> chosen or only if it is Royale (or Crown)?
>>
>> Is anybody adamantly against Beads, Boja or Limber?  After reading this
>> mornings posts, I'm leaning away from limber.  The spell checker
>>redirect
>> issue is worrisome.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>> -Alex
>>
>>
>> [1] 
>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c
>>om%2Fian-culleton%2Froyale=02%7C01%7C%7Ccb2a628826b4499d4bad08d4ff85
>>a3ec%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414396824375330
>>a=w3B2QHG54MLbkbCTJtgVMBDGksL6%2BqQpsGdHrKto4qU%3D=0
>>
>> On 9/18/17, 10:48 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
>>Muppirala"
>>  wrote:
>>
>> >Abstain (binding)
>> >
>> >On Sep 18, 2017 10:47 AM, "Dave Fisher"  wrote:
>> >
>> >> I am abstaining for now.
>> >>
>> >> > On Sep 17, 2017, at 3:19 PM, Piotr Zarzycki
>> >>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> > In this thread I've gathered list of names proposition for fork of
>> >>FlexJS
>> >> > project.
>> >> >
>> >> > LIST:
>> >> >
>> >> > Royale
>> >> > Boja
>> >> > Strand
>> >> > Bead
>> >> > Limber
>> >> > Boinga
>> >> > Braid
>> >> > Arise
>> >> >
>> >> > HOW DO WE VOTE:
>> >> > 1) Pick up 3 names from the list and order them from the most
>>favorite
>> >> > 2) We will give points for each items in the list which you have
>> >>choose
>> >> > 3) In your list you can propose your own name - others can follow
>>it
>> >>in
>> >> > their lists
>> >> >
>> >> > EXAMPLE:
>> >> > 1) Name1 - 3 points
>> >> > 2) Name2 - 2 points
>> >> > 3) Name3 - 1 point
>> >> >
>> >> > WINNER:
>> >> > We will pickup winner based on gathered points by one of the name.
>> >> >
>> >> > The vote will be open until Tuesday September 19, 23:00 UTC
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks,
>> >> >
>> >> > Piotr
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>
>
>-- 
>Ix Multimedia Software
>
>Jan Luykenstraat 27
>3521 VB Utrecht
>
>T. 06-51952295
>I. 
>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.ixsoftware.nl=
>02%7C01%7C%7Ccb2a628826b4499d4bad08d4ff85a3ec%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178
>decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414396824375330=Wozk8p2W%2ByjeY30ou2i6BS5zvFMWOE
>dnSBhoDmqXrhg%3D=0

Re: [DISCUSS] (was Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?)

[Alex Harui]

Erik changed his vote.  That put Limber in the lead over Royale, 13 vs 12.
 However, several folks are concerned about limber.com being an adult
site.  Limber has been mentioned on 6 votes.

Beads and Boja have 9 votes each now.  Boja and Royale have been mentioned
5 times, Beads 4 times.

-Alex

On 9/19/17, 10:11 AM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:

>I did change the subject to discuss, but may be not enough for Gmail.  I
>changed it again.
>
>You can change your vote until the vote closes, but your vote alone can
>move Bend enough to make a difference.  You could actually increase the
>vote gap between Royale and Beads and Boja.
>
>-Alex
>
>On 9/19/17, 10:01 AM, "Erik de Bruin"  wrote:
>
>>Sorry, that should have gone to the DISCUSS thread :-(
>>
>>EdB
>>
>>
>>
>>On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Erik de Bruin 
>>wrote:
>>
>>> I really don't like Royale, because it has no connection with went
>>>before
>>> it, which Beads, Boja, Bend and Limber all do.
>>>
>>> My new favorite is Limber, but I still like Bend very much. If I can
>>>break
>>> a tie, I'll change my vote (I can do that, before the VOTE closes,
>>>right?)
>>>
>>> EdB
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Alex Harui 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 What a dilemma!

 I've seen 10 votes and 2 abstentions.  I haven't voted yet.  I wanted
to
 see what the trend was first.

 If you assign 3 points to first place, 2 to second, and 1 to third,
Royale
 has the lead at 12 points, but barely:  Bead, Boja and Limber have 10.
 Boja has been mentioned more than any other name (6 times), but 3 of
those
 are third place votes.  Royale and Limber have been mentioned 5 times,
 Beads 4 times.  Beads has the most first place votes (3).  Royale,
Limber
 have 2 first place votes each.

 In short, I don't think there is a clear winner.  It will depend on
how
 you count the votes.  And we can't default back to FlexJS either given
the
 other vote.

 I know some folks mentioned that Royale is associated with low-quality
 foods, but does anybody think choosing Royale will be a major
hindrance?
 There is a possible conflict because some other Github project is
already
 using Royale [1] for a JS framework.  Does anybody see that as a show
 stopper?  I think I will write to trademarks@ and try to get their
 opinion.

 Carlos, will you help with a new website regardless of which name is
 chosen or only if it is Royale (or Crown)?

 Is anybody adamantly against Beads, Boja or Limber?  After reading
this
 mornings posts, I'm leaning away from limber.  The spell checker
redirect
 issue is worrisome.

 Thoughts?
 -Alex


 [1] 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub
.
com%2Fian-culleton%2Froyale=02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4f
f
8024b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288&
s
data=LJJ2CXVQIkKbdqguqcQFfKFfeXx%2FAem5Zs3UTcE7W8M%3D=0

 On 9/18/17, 10:48 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
 Muppirala"
  wrote:

 >Abstain (binding)
 >
 >On Sep 18, 2017 10:47 AM, "Dave Fisher" 
wrote:
 >
 >> I am abstaining for now.
 >>
 >> > On Sep 17, 2017, at 3:19 PM, Piotr Zarzycki
 >>
 >> wrote:
 >> >
 >> > Hi,
 >> >
 >> > In this thread I've gathered list of names proposition for fork
of
 >>FlexJS
 >> > project.
 >> >
 >> > LIST:
 >> >
 >> > Royale
 >> > Boja
 >> > Strand
 >> > Bead
 >> > Limber
 >> > Boinga
 >> > Braid
 >> > Arise
 >> >
 >> > HOW DO WE VOTE:
 >> > 1) Pick up 3 names from the list and order them from the most
 favorite
 >> > 2) We will give points for each items in the list which you have
 >>choose
 >> > 3) In your list you can propose your own name - others can follow
it
 >>in
 >> > their lists
 >> >
 >> > EXAMPLE:
 >> > 1) Name1 - 3 points
 >> > 2) Name2 - 2 points
 >> > 3) Name3 - 1 point
 >> >
 >> > WINNER:
 >> > We will pickup winner based on gathered points by one of the
name.
 >> >
 >> > The vote will be open until Tuesday September 19, 23:00 UTC
 >> >
 >> > Thanks,
 >> >
 >> > Piotr
 >>
 >>


>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ix Multimedia Software
>>>
>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27
>>> 3521 VB Utrecht
>>>
>>> T. 06-51952295 <06%2051952295>
>>> I. 
>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.ixsoftware.nl
>>>a
>>>=02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4ff8024b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c
>>>1
>>>78decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288=Jb7%2FW8rthM4HeMiHnsQLtTu%2B
>>>U

[DISCUSS] (was Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?)

[Alex Harui]

I did change the subject to discuss, but may be not enough for Gmail.  I
changed it again.

You can change your vote until the vote closes, but your vote alone can
move Bend enough to make a difference.  You could actually increase the
vote gap between Royale and Beads and Boja.

-Alex

On 9/19/17, 10:01 AM, "Erik de Bruin"  wrote:

>Sorry, that should have gone to the DISCUSS thread :-(
>
>EdB
>
>
>
>On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Erik de Bruin  wrote:
>
>> I really don't like Royale, because it has no connection with went
>>before
>> it, which Beads, Boja, Bend and Limber all do.
>>
>> My new favorite is Limber, but I still like Bend very much. If I can
>>break
>> a tie, I'll change my vote (I can do that, before the VOTE closes,
>>right?)
>>
>> EdB
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Alex Harui 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> What a dilemma!
>>>
>>> I've seen 10 votes and 2 abstentions.  I haven't voted yet.  I wanted
>>>to
>>> see what the trend was first.
>>>
>>> If you assign 3 points to first place, 2 to second, and 1 to third,
>>>Royale
>>> has the lead at 12 points, but barely:  Bead, Boja and Limber have 10.
>>> Boja has been mentioned more than any other name (6 times), but 3 of
>>>those
>>> are third place votes.  Royale and Limber have been mentioned 5 times,
>>> Beads 4 times.  Beads has the most first place votes (3).  Royale,
>>>Limber
>>> have 2 first place votes each.
>>>
>>> In short, I don't think there is a clear winner.  It will depend on how
>>> you count the votes.  And we can't default back to FlexJS either given
>>>the
>>> other vote.
>>>
>>> I know some folks mentioned that Royale is associated with low-quality
>>> foods, but does anybody think choosing Royale will be a major
>>>hindrance?
>>> There is a possible conflict because some other Github project is
>>>already
>>> using Royale [1] for a JS framework.  Does anybody see that as a show
>>> stopper?  I think I will write to trademarks@ and try to get their
>>> opinion.
>>>
>>> Carlos, will you help with a new website regardless of which name is
>>> chosen or only if it is Royale (or Crown)?
>>>
>>> Is anybody adamantly against Beads, Boja or Limber?  After reading this
>>> mornings posts, I'm leaning away from limber.  The spell checker
>>>redirect
>>> issue is worrisome.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>> -Alex
>>>
>>>
>>> [1] 
>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.
>>>com%2Fian-culleton%2Froyale=02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4ff
>>>8024b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288
>>>data=LJJ2CXVQIkKbdqguqcQFfKFfeXx%2FAem5Zs3UTcE7W8M%3D=0
>>>
>>> On 9/18/17, 10:48 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
>>> Muppirala"
>>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> >Abstain (binding)
>>> >
>>> >On Sep 18, 2017 10:47 AM, "Dave Fisher"  wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> I am abstaining for now.
>>> >>
>>> >> > On Sep 17, 2017, at 3:19 PM, Piotr Zarzycki
>>> >>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Hi,
>>> >> >
>>> >> > In this thread I've gathered list of names proposition for fork of
>>> >>FlexJS
>>> >> > project.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > LIST:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Royale
>>> >> > Boja
>>> >> > Strand
>>> >> > Bead
>>> >> > Limber
>>> >> > Boinga
>>> >> > Braid
>>> >> > Arise
>>> >> >
>>> >> > HOW DO WE VOTE:
>>> >> > 1) Pick up 3 names from the list and order them from the most
>>> favorite
>>> >> > 2) We will give points for each items in the list which you have
>>> >>choose
>>> >> > 3) In your list you can propose your own name - others can follow
>>>it
>>> >>in
>>> >> > their lists
>>> >> >
>>> >> > EXAMPLE:
>>> >> > 1) Name1 - 3 points
>>> >> > 2) Name2 - 2 points
>>> >> > 3) Name3 - 1 point
>>> >> >
>>> >> > WINNER:
>>> >> > We will pickup winner based on gathered points by one of the name.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > The vote will be open until Tuesday September 19, 23:00 UTC
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Thanks,
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Piotr
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ix Multimedia Software
>>
>> Jan Luykenstraat 27
>> 3521 VB Utrecht
>>
>> T. 06-51952295 <06%2051952295>
>> I. 
>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.ixsoftware.nl
>>=02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4ff8024b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c1
>>78decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288=Jb7%2FW8rthM4HeMiHnsQLtTu%2BU
>>tflEL8g4B1Tw%2BkLrxw%3D=0
>>
>
>
>
>-- 
>Ix Multimedia Software
>
>Jan Luykenstraat 27
>3521 VB Utrecht
>
>T. 06-51952295
>I. 
>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.ixsoftware.nl=
>02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4ff8024b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178
>decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288=Jb7%2FW8rthM4HeMiHnsQLtTu%2BUtfl
>EL8g4B1Tw%2BkLrxw%3D=0

Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

[Jeffry Houser]

Bead

Royale

Limber


On 9/17/2017 3:19 PM, Piotr Zarzycki wrote:

Hi,

In this thread I've gathered list of names proposition for fork of FlexJS
project.

LIST:

Royale
Boja
Strand
Bead
Limber
Boinga
Braid
Arise

HOW DO WE VOTE:
1) Pick up 3 names from the list and order them from the most favorite
2) We will give points for each items in the list which you have choose
3) In your list you can propose your own name - others can follow it in
their lists

EXAMPLE:
1) Name1 - 3 points
2) Name2 - 2 points
3) Name3 - 1 point

WINNER:
We will pickup winner based on gathered points by one of the name.

The vote will be open until Tuesday September 19, 23:00 UTC

Thanks,

Piotr



--
Jeffry Houser
Technical Entrepreneur
http://www.jeffryhouser.com
203-379-0773

RE: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

[Kessler CTR Mark J]

1. Arise
2. Boja
3. Limber

(Binding)


-Mark K

-Original Message-
From: Piotr Zarzycki [mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2017 3:19 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for 
Proposed fork of FlexJS?

Hi,

In this thread I've gathered list of names proposition for fork of FlexJS
project.

LIST:

Royale
Boja
Strand
Bead
Limber
Boinga
Braid
Arise

HOW DO WE VOTE:
1) Pick up 3 names from the list and order them from the most favorite
2) We will give points for each items in the list which you have choose
3) In your list you can propose your own name - others can follow it in
their lists

EXAMPLE:
1) Name1 - 3 points
2) Name2 - 2 points
3) Name3 - 1 point

WINNER:
We will pickup winner based on gathered points by one of the name.

The vote will be open until Tuesday September 19, 23:00 UTC

Thanks,

Piotr

Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

[Olaf Krueger]

1. Boja
2. Limber (Limbr)
3. Beads

Thanks,
Olaf



--
Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

[OmPrakash Muppirala]

Abstain (binding)

On Sep 18, 2017 10:47 AM, "Dave Fisher"  wrote:

> I am abstaining for now.
>
> > On Sep 17, 2017, at 3:19 PM, Piotr Zarzycki 
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > In this thread I've gathered list of names proposition for fork of FlexJS
> > project.
> >
> > LIST:
> >
> > Royale
> > Boja
> > Strand
> > Bead
> > Limber
> > Boinga
> > Braid
> > Arise
> >
> > HOW DO WE VOTE:
> > 1) Pick up 3 names from the list and order them from the most favorite
> > 2) We will give points for each items in the list which you have choose
> > 3) In your list you can propose your own name - others can follow it in
> > their lists
> >
> > EXAMPLE:
> > 1) Name1 - 3 points
> > 2) Name2 - 2 points
> > 3) Name3 - 1 point
> >
> > WINNER:
> > We will pickup winner based on gathered points by one of the name.
> >
> > The vote will be open until Tuesday September 19, 23:00 UTC
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Piotr
>
>

Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

[Dave Fisher]

I am abstaining for now.

> On Sep 17, 2017, at 3:19 PM, Piotr Zarzycki  wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> In this thread I've gathered list of names proposition for fork of FlexJS
> project.
> 
> LIST:
> 
> Royale
> Boja
> Strand
> Bead
> Limber
> Boinga
> Braid
> Arise
> 
> HOW DO WE VOTE:
> 1) Pick up 3 names from the list and order them from the most favorite
> 2) We will give points for each items in the list which you have choose
> 3) In your list you can propose your own name - others can follow it in
> their lists
> 
> EXAMPLE:
> 1) Name1 - 3 points
> 2) Name2 - 2 points
> 3) Name3 - 1 point
> 
> WINNER:
> We will pickup winner based on gathered points by one of the name.
> 
> The vote will be open until Tuesday September 19, 23:00 UTC
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Piotr



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

[Peter Ent]

1) Royale (binding)
2) Braid

‹peter ent

On 9/17/17, 3:19 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:

>Hi,
>
>In this thread I've gathered list of names proposition for fork of FlexJS
>project.
>
>LIST:
>
>Royale
>Boja
>Strand
>Bead
>Limber
>Boinga
>Braid
>Arise
>
>HOW DO WE VOTE:
>1) Pick up 3 names from the list and order them from the most favorite
>2) We will give points for each items in the list which you have choose
>3) In your list you can propose your own name - others can follow it in
>their lists
>
>EXAMPLE:
>1) Name1 - 3 points
>2) Name2 - 2 points
>3) Name3 - 1 point
>
>WINNER:
>We will pickup winner based on gathered points by one of the name.
>
>The vote will be open until Tuesday September 19, 23:00 UTC
>
>Thanks,
>
>Piotr

RE: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

[Yishay Weiss]

  1.  Bend
  2.  Roayle
  3.  Action

From: Harbs
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2017 10:21 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of 
FlexJS?

1. Limber
2. Arise
3. Boja

Harbs

> On Sep 17, 2017, at 10:19 PM, Piotr Zarzycki  
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In this thread I've gathered list of names proposition for fork of FlexJS
> project.
>
> LIST:
>
> Royale
> Boja
> Strand
> Bead
> Limber
> Boinga
> Braid
> Arise
>
> HOW DO WE VOTE:
> 1) Pick up 3 names from the list and order them from the most favorite
> 2) We will give points for each items in the list which you have choose
> 3) In your list you can propose your own name - others can follow it in
> their lists
>
> EXAMPLE:
> 1) Name1 - 3 points
> 2) Name2 - 2 points
> 3) Name3 - 1 point
>
> WINNER:
> We will pickup winner based on gathered points by one of the name.
>
> The vote will be open until Tuesday September 19, 23:00 UTC
>
> Thanks,
>
> Piotr

Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

[Harbs]

1. Limber
2. Arise
3. Boja

Harbs

> On Sep 17, 2017, at 10:19 PM, Piotr Zarzycki  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> In this thread I've gathered list of names proposition for fork of FlexJS
> project.
> 
> LIST:
> 
> Royale
> Boja
> Strand
> Bead
> Limber
> Boinga
> Braid
> Arise
> 
> HOW DO WE VOTE:
> 1) Pick up 3 names from the list and order them from the most favorite
> 2) We will give points for each items in the list which you have choose
> 3) In your list you can propose your own name - others can follow it in
> their lists
> 
> EXAMPLE:
> 1) Name1 - 3 points
> 2) Name2 - 2 points
> 3) Name3 - 1 point
> 
> WINNER:
> We will pickup winner based on gathered points by one of the name.
> 
> The vote will be open until Tuesday September 19, 23:00 UTC
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Piotr

RE: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

[Chris Martin]

Limber

Boja

Arise



Cheers,



Chrsmrtn



Sent from my Windows 10 phone



From: Piotr Zarzycki
Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2017 12:19 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?



Hi,

In this thread I've gathered list of names proposition for fork of FlexJS
project.

LIST:

Royale
Boja
Strand
Bead
Limber
Boinga
Braid
Arise

HOW DO WE VOTE:
1) Pick up 3 names from the list and order them from the most favorite
2) We will give points for each items in the list which you have choose
3) In your list you can propose your own name - others can follow it in
their lists

EXAMPLE:
1) Name1 - 3 points
2) Name2 - 2 points
3) Name3 - 1 point

WINNER:
We will pickup winner based on gathered points by one of the name.

The vote will be open until Tuesday September 19, 23:00 UTC

Thanks,

Piotr

Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

[Carlos Rovira]

1) Royale
2) Crown
3) ---

Thanks

Carlos



2017-09-17 22:25 GMT+02:00 piotrz :

> My vote:
>
> 1) Beads (Binding)
> 2) Royale
> 3) Boja
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
>
>
> -
> Apache Flex PMC
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> --
> Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/
>



-- 



Carlos Rovira

Director General

M: +34 607 22 60 05

http://www.codeoscopic.com

http://www.avant2.es


Conocenos en 1 minuto! 


Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
proceda a su destrucción.

De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
necesaria.

Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

[piotrz]

My vote:

1) Beads (Binding)
2) Royale
3) Boja

Thanks,
Piotr



-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

[VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

[Piotr Zarzycki]

Hi,

In this thread I've gathered list of names proposition for fork of FlexJS
project.

LIST:

Royale
Boja
Strand
Bead
Limber
Boinga
Braid
Arise

HOW DO WE VOTE:
1) Pick up 3 names from the list and order them from the most favorite
2) We will give points for each items in the list which you have choose
3) In your list you can propose your own name - others can follow it in
their lists

EXAMPLE:
1) Name1 - 3 points
2) Name2 - 2 points
3) Name3 - 1 point

WINNER:
We will pickup winner based on gathered points by one of the name.

The vote will be open until Tuesday September 19, 23:00 UTC

Thanks,

Piotr