gt; Best Regards,
> > > Shouwei
> > >
> > >
> > > --原始邮件--
> > > 发件人:
> "dev"
> <
> godfre...@gmail
t;
> >
> > > 发送时间:2022年1月10日(星期一) 晚上11:06
> > 收件人:"dev" > 抄送:"Jark Wu" > Visser" > 主题:Re: [VOTE] Create a separate sub project for FLIP-188: flink-store
> &
> 发送时间:2022年1月10日(星期一) 晚上11:06
> 收件人:"dev" 抄送:"Jark Wu" Visser" 主题:Re: [VOTE] Create a separate sub project for FLIP-188: flink-store
>
>
>
> +1 for the separate repository, and the name "flink-table
Thanks for driving this, Jingsong.
+1 (non-binding) for separate repository.
Best Regards,
Shouwei
----
??:
"dev"
+1 for the separate repository, and the name "flink-table-store".
Best,
Godfrey
Becket Qin 于2022年1月10日周一 22:22写道：
>
> Thanks for the FLIP, Jingsong.
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Naming wise, I am also slightly leaning towards calling it
> "flink-table-store".
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
>
>
Thanks for the FLIP, Jingsong.
+1 (binding)
Naming wise, I am also slightly leaning towards calling it
"flink-table-store".
Thanks,
Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 7:39 PM Fabian Paul wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just wanted to give my two cents for the build system discussion. In
>
Hi all,
I just wanted to give my two cents for the build system discussion. In
general, I agree with David's opinion to start new projects with
Gradle but during the development of the external connector
repository, we found some difficulties that still need to be solved. I
do not want to force
I'm also in favour of "flink-table-store".
Best,
Jark
On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 at 16:18, David Morávek wrote:
> Hi Jingsong,
>
> the connector repository prototype I've seen is being built on top of
> Gradle [1], that's why I was referring to it (I think one idea was also to
> migrate the main
Hi Jingsong,
the connector repository prototype I've seen is being built on top of
Gradle [1], that's why I was referring to it (I think one idea was also to
migrate the main repository to Gradle eventually). I think Martijn / Fabian
may be bit more familiar with the connectors repository effort
+1 for a separate repository and release pipeline in the same way as
flink-statefun [1], flink-ml [2] and the coming flink-connectors [3].
+1 for naming it as "flink-table-store" (I'm also ok with
"flink-table-storage", but slightly prefer "flink-table-store" because it's
shorter)
Thanks for
+1 for the name of `flink-table-store`.
Best
Yun Tang
From: Jingsong Li
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2022 10:46
To: dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Create a separate sub project for FLIP-188: flink-store
Hi David, thanks for your suggestion.
I think we should re-use
Hi David, thanks for your suggestion.
I think we should re-use as many common components with connectors as
possible. I don't fully understand what you mean, but for this project
I prefer to use Maven rather than Gradle.
Best,
Jingsong
On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 11:59 PM David Morávek wrote:
>
>
+1 for the separate repository under the Flink umbrella
as we've already started creating more repositories with connectors, would
it be possible to re-use the same build infrastructure for this one? (eg.
shared set of Gradle plugins that unify the build experience)?
Best,
D.
On Fri, Jan 7,
For more references on `store` and `storage`:
For example,
Rocksdb is a library that provides an embeddable, persistent key-value
store for fast storage. [1]
Apache HBase [1] is an open-source, distributed, versioned,
column-oriented store modeled after Google' Bigtable. [2]
[1]
Thanks all,
Combining everyone's comments, I recommend using `flink-table-store`:
## table
something to do with table storage (From Till). Not only flink-table,
but also for user-oriented tables.
## store vs storage
- The first point I think, store is better pronounced, storage is
three
+1 to a separate repository assuming this repository will still be part of
Apache Flink (same PMC, Committers). I am not aware we have something like
"sub-projects" officially.
I share Till and Timo's concerns regarding "store".
On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 9:59 AM Till Rohrmann wrote:
> +1 for the
+1 for the separate project.
I would agree that flink-store is not the best name. flink-storage >
flink-store but I would even more prefer a name that conveys that it has
something to do with table storage.
Cheers,
Till
On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 9:14 AM Timo Walther wrote:
> +1 for the separate
+1 for the separate project
But maybe use `flink-storage` instead of `flink-store`?
I'm not a native speaker but store is defined as "A place where items
may be purchased.". It almost sounds like the `flink-packages` project.
Regards,
Timo
On 07.01.22 08:37, Jingsong Li wrote:
Hi
Hi everyone,
I'd like to start a vote for create a separate sub project for
FLIP-188 [1]: `flink-store`.
- If you agree with the name `flink-store`, please just +1
- If you have a better suggestion, please write your suggestion,
followed by a reply that can +1 to the name that has appeared
- If
19 matches
Mail list logo
