Should we try to merge this with shade plugin or some other ways which can
ignore conflicts about dependencies?
发送自 Windows 10 版邮件应用
发件人: Wahrmann, Helmut
发送时间: 2018年8月29日 17:30
收件人: dev@flume.apache.org
主题: RE: Merge of patch in Flume-3021?
Hi Mike,
Did you have a chance to look
Hi Mike,
Did you have a chance to look at that?
best regards,
Helmut
-Original Message-
From: Wahrmann, Helmut
Sent: Dienstag, 17. April 2018 18:53
To: 'dev@flume.apache.org'
Subject: RE: Merge of patch in Flume-3021?
Hi Mike,
Did you have a chance to look into this?
thanks
t;
> Did you have a chance to look into this?
>
> thanks,
>
> Helmut
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Percy [mailto:mpe...@apache.org]
> Sent: Montag, 26. März 2018 21:46
> To: dev@flume.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Merge of patch in Flume-3021?
Hi Mike,
Did you have a chance to look into this?
thanks,
Helmut
-Original Message-
From: Mike Percy [mailto:mpe...@apache.org]
Sent: Montag, 26. März 2018 21:46
To: dev@flume.apache.org
Subject: Re: Merge of patch in Flume-3021?
I haven't figured this out yet but I'll look
[INFO]
>
> [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
>
>
> The LuceneTestCase is extended by SolrTestCaseJ4.
> No idea, what I could do against this.
>
> best regards,
>
> Helmut
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Mike P
to
> r.
> > testGrokIfNotMatchDropEventRetain(TestMorphlineInterceptor.java:83)
> >
> >
> > The all have problems with createJetty. So it seems that I maybe
> > need a different version of jetty or something like that.
> > And for that I have too less knowled
at org.apache.flume.sink.solr.morphline.TestMorphlineIntercepto
> r.
> > build(TestMorphlineInterceptor.java:151)
> > at org.apache.flume.sink.solr.morphline.TestMorphlineIntercepto
> r.
> > testGrokIfNotMatchDropEventRetain(TestMorphlineInterceptor.java:83)
> >
> >
hing like that.
> And for that I have too less knowledge about maven.
>
> thx,
>
> Helmut
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ferenc Szabo [mailto:fsz...@cloudera.com]
> Sent: Dienstag, 6. März 2018 11:04
> To: dev@flume.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Merge of patch in Flum
it seems that I maybe need a
different version of jetty or something like that.
And for that I have too less knowledge about maven.
thx,
Helmut
-Original Message-
From: Ferenc Szabo [mailto:fsz...@cloudera.com]
Sent: Dienstag, 6. März 2018 11:04
To: dev@flume.apache.org
Subject: Re: Merge
t; -Original Message-
> From: Mike Percy [mailto:mpe...@apache.org]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 14. Februar 2018 19:19
> To: dev@flume.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Merge of patch in Flume-3021?
>
> Hi Helmut,
> As long as the integration tests still pass and the packaging issues are
-Original Message-
From: Mike Percy [mailto:mpe...@apache.org]
Sent: Mittwoch, 14. Februar 2018 19:19
To: dev@flume.apache.org
Subject: Re: Merge of patch in Flume-3021?
Hi Helmut,
As long as the integration tests still pass and the packaging issues are not
exacerbated, I don't see why we couldn't
-Original Message-
> From: Mike Percy [mailto:mpe...@apache.org]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 14. Februar 2018 00:38
> To: dev@flume.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Merge of patch in Flume-3021?
>
> OK. In the pull request, it would be nice if whoever submits or merges it
> mentions all o
[mailto:mpe...@apache.org]
Sent: Mittwoch, 14. Februar 2018 00:38
To: dev@flume.apache.org
Subject: Re: Merge of patch in Flume-3021?
OK. In the pull request, it would be nice if whoever submits or merges it
mentions all of the contributors to the patch in the commit message.
I asked Wolfgang H. about
Chinese New Year's Eve.
>
> I will then issue a Pull request for the new ES Rest client, which is
> dependent on the above work.
>
> best regards,
> Helmut
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Percy [mailto:mpe...@apache.org]
> Sent: Dienstag, 13. Februar 2018
, which is dependent
on the above work.
best regards,
Helmut
-Original Message-
From: Mike Percy [mailto:mpe...@apache.org]
Sent: Dienstag, 13. Februar 2018 04:30
To: dev@flume.apache.org
Subject: Re: Merge of patch in Flume-3021?
Hi Helmut,
I see that I neglected to follow up on the other
Hi Helmut,
I see that I neglected to follow up on the other thread on this topic after
your reply about SolrServer missing from the solrj jar. Let me ask around
w/ some folks I know that work on Solr and see if there is any way to
retain the SolrServer for our tests after upgrading to the new
Hi,
now that the blocker for FLUME-3021 is removed by committing FLUME-2957, can we
get the patch from 3021 merged to trunk?
Thanks,
Helmut
17 matches
Mail list logo
