David Crossley wrote:
> If we give people too much rope, then they can hang
> themselves.
... and we'll get caught in their noose trying to maintain the
code base ...
--
Ferdinand Soethe
Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote:
> Ross Gardler wrote:
>
> >I'm sorry that you took my original mail as being criticism of your
> >excellent work. It was not intended as personal comment, only
> >reassurance to Gregor that his concerns were, in my opinion, unfounded.
>
> it seems the community is now
Ross Gardler wrote:
Again, this is not meant as a criticism, it is an observation. I made
the observation because Gregor had clearly found himself in the middle
of one of these *seemingly* complex examples and it was ringing alarm
bells for him. He was quite rightly asking should he turn them
On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 10:04 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
> Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> > On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 21:33 -0500, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
> >
> >>On Dom, 29 de Mayo de 2005, 21:15, David Crossley dijo:
> >>
> >>>Well said Ross, you express yourself well even when drunk.
> >>
> >>+1
> >>
> >
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 21:33 -0500, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
On Dom, 29 de Mayo de 2005, 21:15, David Crossley dijo:
Well said Ross, you express yourself well even when drunk.
+1
Perhaps we need to send him more beers? ;-)
Seriously, it was a very nice answer! I lik
Sorry!
On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 11:16 +1000, David Crossley wrote:
> Thorsten, stop! We already said a while ago that we love your work
> with views. We also said that we cannot afford for our attention
> to be distracted at this stage. We agreed to work towards getting
> the 0.7 release finished bef
On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 21:33 -0500, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
> On Dom, 29 de Mayo de 2005, 21:15, David Crossley dijo:
> > Well said Ross, you express yourself well even when drunk.
>
> +1
>
> Perhaps we need to send him more beers? ;-)
>
> Seriously, it was a very nice answer! I liked it much.
>
On Dom, 29 de Mayo de 2005, 21:15, David Crossley dijo:
> Well said Ross, you express yourself well even when drunk.
+1
Perhaps we need to send him more beers? ;-)
Seriously, it was a very nice answer! I liked it much.
Best Regards,
Antonio Gallardo
Well said Ross, you express yourself well even when drunk.
Would the next poster please start a new thread for any
design issues that spring from this.
--David
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
I really thought whether or not to answer this thread.
Well I said I was going to answer this tomorrow, but there is no way I
will sleep thinking that I have left this unaddressed so here goes (I
hope the alcohol doesn't make things worse ;-)...
On Fri, 2005-05-27
Thorsten, stop! We already said a while ago that we love your work
with views. We also said that we cannot afford for our attention
to be distracted at this stage. We agreed to work towards getting
the 0.7 release finished before we can concentrate on views.
The problem is that only a few committer
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 16:02 +0200, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
...
On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 11:39 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
...
So in conclusion, I agree with Gregors concerns, but I also agree with
the direction Thorsten is trying to go in.
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
...
On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 11:39 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
...
So in conclusion, I agree with Gregors concerns, but I also agree
with the direction Thorsten is trying to go in.
Actually that is the reason why I am proposing that forrest
On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 10:25 -0500, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
> On Dom, 29 de Mayo de 2005, 8:22, Thorsten Scherler dijo:
>
>
>
> >> So in conclusion, I agree with Gregors concerns, but I also agree with
> >> the direction Thorsten is trying to go in.
> >>
> >
> > Actually that is the reason why I
On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 16:02 +0200, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> ...
> > On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 11:39 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
> ...
> >>So in conclusion, I agree with Gregors concerns, but I also agree with
> >>the direction Thorsten is trying to go in.
> >
> > Actually
> ¿? Are you talking about Diwaker Gupta? If so then what you wrote is not
> true! I added CSS support to then decide to get rid of it again.
Perfectly correct! I *was* working on another skin using views, but
I've stopped work on that since I find that problem with the id
generation for anchor ta
On Dom, 29 de Mayo de 2005, 8:22, Thorsten Scherler dijo:
>> So in conclusion, I agree with Gregors concerns, but I also agree with
>> the direction Thorsten is trying to go in.
>>
>
> Actually that is the reason why I am proposing that forrest is *not*
> officially developing views anymore. I d
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
...
On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 11:39 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
...
So in conclusion, I agree with Gregors concerns, but I also agree with
the direction Thorsten is trying to go in.
Actually that is the reason why I am proposing that forrest is *not*
officially developing
I really thought whether or not to answer this thread.
On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 11:39 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
> Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 18:20 -0400, Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote:
>
> ...
>
> >>are you suggesting that it is easier to learn and use a DSL than to use
> >>ja
19 matches
Mail list logo
