Thorsten Scherler wrote:
...
> BTW forrest is for me as well only hobby.
Same here.
> It seems anything that I say is taken differently then I indented, I am
> quite tiered of this and will try not to get involved in any such
> discussions anymore. It is to frustrating.
Same here.
PS: I have no
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> I never tried to produce pressure! I only said (with other words then
> Ross) if it is your itch to release then scratch it by helping to do the
> work involved.
>
> BTW forrest is for me as well only hobby.
>
> It seems anything that I say is taken differently then I i
- Original Message -
From: "Ferdinand Soethe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2005 11:55 AM
Subject: Re: A 0.8 release? (was Re: [Proposal] rollback)
| What is different about a feature development in a branch
| that I (for lack of time or interest)
- Original Message -
From: "Thorsten Scherler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2005 7:23 PM
Subject: Re: A 0.8 release? (was Re: [Proposal] rollback)
|I never tried to produce pressure! I only said (with other words then
| Ross) if it is your itch
I never tried to produce pressure! I only said (with other words then
Ross) if it is your itch to release then scratch it by helping to do the
work involved.
BTW forrest is for me as well only hobby.
It seems anything that I say is taken differently then I indented, I am
quite tiered of this and
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
>> This was confirmed in response to my recent suggestions to create all
>> new features in separate branches that can be integrated (and
>> released) as soon as they are stable.
> Merging different branches that are have to go to the core are *not*
> possible, merging
You are correct. People need to do the work if they
have the energy to initiate a release. Other people
will follow and help. Same in every open source project.
And no-one needs to feel guilty for not helping.
When it happens it happens. If not then we will continue
on until the momentum gains.
-D
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> Ross Gardler escribi??:
> > Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> > > Why do we want to release 0.8, now?
> >
> > release early, release often. This was discussed and agreed a month or
> > so ago.
>
> +1
>
> e.g. views reached their first stable version as prototype. Everything
>
Ross Gardler wrote:
> I am making no cuts and no inline comments, it would be a crime to mess
> with the message Diwaker is sending here. Thank you, Diwaker, you are
> right on target.
>
> Ross
>
>
> Diwaker Gupta wrote:
> >>No offense to anyone but if s
I am making no cuts and no inline comments, it would be a crime to mess
with the message Diwaker is sending here. Thank you, Diwaker, you are
right on target.
Ross
Diwaker Gupta wrote:
No offense to anyone but if somebody wants to release 0.8 as -
refactored sitemaps to utilise locationmap, t
> No offense to anyone but if somebody wants to release 0.8 as -
> refactored sitemaps to utilise locationmap, then we (or better this
> somebody) has to put some more work into it. It cannot be that we expect
> from the usual suspects that they now as well put more work into that
> part of forrest
El vie, 30-09-2005 a las 16:40 +0200, Ferdinand Soethe escribió:
...
> This was confirmed in response to my recent suggestions to create all
> new features in separate branches that can be integrated (and
> released) as soon as they are stable.
Merging different branches that are have to go to the
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
El vie, 30-09-2005 a las 17:08 +0100, Ross Gardler escribió:
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
Why do we want to release 0.8, now?
release early, release often. This was discussed and agreed a month or
so ago.
+1
...
Besides, the locationmap is, in itself, a very powe
El vie, 30-09-2005 a las 17:08 +0100, Ross Gardler escribió:
> Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> > Why do we want to release 0.8, now?
>
> release early, release often. This was discussed and agreed a month or
> so ago.
+1
e.g. views reached their first stable version as prototype. Everything
that is c
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
Why do we want to release 0.8, now?
release early, release often. This was discussed and agreed a month or
so ago.
I thought we said we need to refactor the whole lot but now we want
again release partial work?
Refactor the whole lot for a 1.0 release, yes, but the
Ferdinand Soethe wrote:
I agree with everything you say re release early, release often (I have
a mail in my drafts folder I will send in a moment, I wanted to hear a
couple of other opinions before sending it).
Btw: Please also re-consider Tim's excellent mail about doing the
refactori
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
>
> Why do we want to release 0.8, now?
One reason is that we agreed a while ago that
we should release more often. We also have an
improved Cocoon underneath. Features are easier
for users to grasp in small stages.
> I thought we said we need to refactor the whole lot bu
David Crossley wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
...
We should do parallel development on the 0.8/0.9 releases and the
views/xhtml2 work (done in plugins, yes I changed my mind).
What caused you to change your mind?
You almost had me convinced that doing the work
in a development branch was the
Ross Gardler wrote:
> Ferdinand Soethe wrote:
> >Ross Gardler wrote:
> >
> >>>Are you gonna suggest the new release or should I?
> >
> >>http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=forrest-dev&m=111986901417286&w=2
> >
> >Sorry, I was a bit terse.
> >
> >What I meant to say is exactly along the lines that Ross
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> Why do we want to release 0.8, now?
> I thought we said we need to refactor the whole lot but now we want
> again release partial work? We have ongoing discussions about opening
> new branches, doing the work in plugins, ...
We already have an agreement to do small re
Why do we want to release 0.8, now?
I thought we said we need to refactor the whole lot but now we want
again release partial work? We have ongoing discussions about opening
new branches, doing the work in plugins, ...
Sorry, but it is starting to get real confusing.
We need a final decision ba
Ferdinand Soethe wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
Are you gonna suggest the new release or should I?
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=forrest-dev&m=111986901417286&w=2
Sorry, I was a bit terse.
What I meant to say is exactly along the lines that Ross quoted here
(thanks, I'll add the title of
22 matches
Mail list logo
