On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 5:09 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
> Thursday, September 14, 2017, 4:15:04 AM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
>
> [snip]
And, I'd like to ask about this example:
${user.id!}
The reason why I had to use ?string built-in was that user.id returns
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
> Wednesday, September 13, 2017, 6:48:25 PM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 5:50 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>>> Wednesday, September 13, 2017, 4:20:35 AM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
>>>
>>> [snip]
Wednesday, September 13, 2017, 6:48:25 PM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 5:50 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>> Wednesday, September 13, 2017, 4:20:35 AM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>> I've proposed a PR for tags defined in spring.tld for now:
>>>
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 5:50 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
> Wednesday, September 13, 2017, 4:20:35 AM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
>
> [snip]
>> I've proposed a PR for tags defined in spring.tld for now:
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-freemarker/pull/34
>> I'll continue to replace
Wednesday, September 13, 2017, 4:20:35 AM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
[snip]
> I've proposed a PR for tags defined in spring.tld for now:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-freemarker/pull/34
> I'll continue to replace tags in form.tld.
Thanks, looks good, I have merged it!
One day (probably when you
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 7:55 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>> Sunday, September 3, 2017, 6:29:54 AM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 7:33 PM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
On Sat,
On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 7:55 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
> Sunday, September 3, 2017, 6:29:54 AM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 7:33 PM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
>>> On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 3:36 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
Sunday, September 3, 2017, 6:29:54 AM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 7:33 PM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 3:36 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>>> Saturday, September 2, 2017, 5:24:11 AM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
>>>
On Thu, Aug 24,
On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 3:11 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
> Saturday, September 2, 2017, 5:03:51 AM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 3:53 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>>> Thursday, August 24, 2017, 6:19:29 AM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
>>>
On Mon, Aug
Saturday, September 2, 2017, 5:24:11 AM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 4:04 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>> Thursday, August 24, 2017, 9:53:11 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>>
>>> Thursday, August 24, 2017, 6:19:29 AM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
>>>
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at
Saturday, September 2, 2017, 5:03:51 AM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 3:53 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>> Thursday, August 24, 2017, 6:19:29 AM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 12:19 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
Monday,
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 4:04 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
> Thursday, August 24, 2017, 9:53:11 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>
>> Thursday, August 24, 2017, 6:19:29 AM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 12:19 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
Monday,
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 3:53 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
> Thursday, August 24, 2017, 6:19:29 AM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 12:19 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>>> Monday, August 7, 2017, 9:18:36 PM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
>>>
On Mon, Aug 7,
Tuesday, August 29, 2017, 8:48:34 PM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>> Tuesday, August 29, 2017, 3:03:02 PM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:00 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
Tuesday, August
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>> Tuesday, August 29, 2017, 3:03:02 PM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:00 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
> Tuesday, August 29, 2017, 3:03:02 PM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:00 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>>> Tuesday, August 29, 2017, 5:25:31 AM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
>>>
Hi Daniel,
Tuesday, August 29, 2017, 3:03:02 PM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:00 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>> Tuesday, August 29, 2017, 5:25:31 AM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the remarks and hints! Please see my question inline.
>>>
>>> On
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:00 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
> Tuesday, August 29, 2017, 5:25:31 AM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
>
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> Thanks for the remarks and hints! Please see my question inline.
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 4:50 AM, Daniel Dekany
Saturday, August 26, 2017, 10:44:03 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
[snip]
> <#macro foo>
> <#local status = 'blah'>
> <@spring.bind "user.name">
> ${status.value} <#-- Means 'blah'.value, won't work -->
To clarify, here I have assumed that spring.bind calls
env.setVariable("status",
Saturday, August 26, 2017, 10:17:55 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
> Saturday, August 26, 2017, 7:27:03 AM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
>
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> I've tried to write a directive to replace the spring:bind tag
>> library. But I get "IllegalStateException: Not executing macro body"
>> when invoking
Hi Daniel,
I've tried to write a directive to replace the spring:bind tag
library. But I get "IllegalStateException: Not executing macro body"
when invoking Environment#setLocalVariable(...).
<@spring.bind> is supposed to set a variable called 'status'. Could
you give me a hint on how to add a
Thursday, August 24, 2017, 9:53:11 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
> Thursday, August 24, 2017, 6:19:29 AM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 12:19 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>>> Monday, August 7, 2017, 9:18:36 PM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
>>>
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 11:03
Thursday, August 24, 2017, 6:19:29 AM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 12:19 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>> Monday, August 7, 2017, 9:18:36 PM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 11:03 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
If you are going
Monday, August 7, 2017, 9:18:36 PM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 11:03 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>> If you are going to implement these directly as
>> TemplateDirectiveModel-s and TemplateFunctionModel-s, then you better
>> wait until I merge at least the
Monday, August 7, 2017, 9:18:36 PM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 11:03 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>> If you are going to implement these directly as
>> TemplateDirectiveModel-s and TemplateFunctionModel-s, then you better
>> wait until I merge at least the
Monday, August 7, 2017, 9:18:36 PM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 11:03 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>> If you are going to implement these directly as
>> TemplateDirectiveModel-s and TemplateFunctionModel-s, then you better
>> wait until I merge at least the
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 11:03 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
> If you are going to implement these directly as
> TemplateDirectiveModel-s and TemplateFunctionModel-s, then you better
> wait until I merge at least the FREEMARKER-63 PR... probably also
> FREEMARKER-64. I will try to do
On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 6:14 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
> The big problem is that spring.ftl is copyrighted by some of the
> Spring authors (or the Spring project as a whole - it's not clear). So
> certainly we can't just copy it. It has to be reimplemented without
> looking at
28 matches
Mail list logo