On Oct 8, 2005, at 1:59 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Oct 8, 2005, at 8:47 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Lets cut to the root of it - Is your problem with having to work
within the guidelines from the PRC, or is there some particular
problem with the guidelines themselves? I'm sure that
On Oct 9, 2005, at 7:11 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Oct 8, 2005, at 1:59 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Oct 8, 2005, at 8:47 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Lets cut to the root of it - Is your problem with having to work
within the guidelines from the PRC, or is there some particular
I see Dain's point and I think that we do need to clarify if the PRC's
guidelines are suggestions or hard rules that they have been empowered
by the corporation to enforce. We need to clarify this because it seems
that the community really likes the contentious logo; they are aware of
other's
The PRC has made guidelines. The guidelines seem to be reasonable.
You haven't objected to any specific aspect, but just the fact that
there are guidelines. If you don't think they are reasonable, lets
be constructive and offer feedback. I'm happy to help there.
If there are questions
he.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-MMS-Smtp-Program: Macallan-Mail-Solution; Version 4.6.0.1
X-MMS-Smtp-Auth:
On Oct 9, 2005, at 12:54 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I see Dain's point and I think that we do need to clarify if the
PRC's guidelines are suggestions or hard rules that they have been
empowered by the corporation to enforce. We need to clarify this
because it seems that the community
On Oct 9, 2005, at 12:49 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
he.org [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 1A8508BB-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 9D711FD5-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
On Oct 9, 2005, at 10:03 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Oct 9, 2005, at 12:54 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I see Dain's point and I think that we do need to clarify if the
PRC's guidelines are suggestions or hard rules that they have been
empowered by the corporation to enforce. We need
On 10/9/2005 10:03 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Oct 9, 2005, at 12:54 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I see Dain's point and I think that we do need to clarify if the
PRC's guidelines are suggestions or hard rules that they have been
empowered by the corporation to enforce. We need to
On Oct 9, 2005, at 1:34 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On 10/9/2005 10:03 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Oct 9, 2005, at 12:54 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I see Dain's point and I think that we do need to clarify if the
PRC's guidelines are suggestions or hard rules that they have
been
On Oct 9, 2005, at 12:30 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
As a director last year, I voted for the resolution here :
http://www.apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/2004/
board_minutes_2004_06_23.txt
which, in part, says :
RESOLVED, that the Public Relations Committee be and hereby is
Next time, maybe consider trusting me.
geir
On Oct 9, 2005, at 4:13 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Oct 9, 2005, at 12:30 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
As a director last year, I voted for the resolution here :
http://www.apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/2004/
The problem was that you didn't sound confident that it was fact, so
I questioned it. In the past, I have found that fact quickly becomes
opinion when someone is pressed for proof, and considering the
gravity of this fact, I felt it was worth pushing for proof.
-dain
On Oct 9, 2005, at
Just a question based on all the comments on the logo contest to date.
Is voting set-up to be done where as all the logo's have a fighting
chance or just an opportunity where the contest comes down to the
2 or 3 logo's that have had the controversy over the past couple of
weeks.
In spending the
J wrote:
Now whether I have or have not created a logo for this particular
contest is irrevelant. I am just concerned about reading about this push
if you all will for 2-3 logo's that quite honestly are not good and well
just seem like they had no thought behind them.
This seems awfully
I think one needs to understand the principle of design. To look at the
issue subjectively and not emotionally. Once emotions are attached then
is no longer a design and more a personal issue.
All I was trying to do here is to educate this community to look at the logo's subjectively and not
OK, let's say I have a database pool configuration, a JMS resource
configuration, and an EAR that depends on both of them? Is there a
way to express that? You know, have the one EAR plan say that it's
parent is org/apache/geronimo/System (assuming that's still best)
but also it depends on
Session Bean, Finder, Method Permissions
--
Key: GERONIMO-1053
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1053
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Components: OpenEJB, security
Versions: 1.0-M5
Reporter: Aaron
18 matches
Mail list logo
