Hey Guys,
Gave it a try and I ended up with the same error (this was after the
maven m:fresh-checkout).
Any further idea's, or can't I build it on this machine?
Cheers,
-Ryan
On 18/01/2006, at 3:45 PM, Ryan Thomas wrote:
Thanks guys,
I'll give it a go when I get home from work (~2 hour
Thanks guys,I'll give it a go when I get home from work (~2 hours).Cheers,-RyanOn 1/18/06, David Jencks <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:We should always test first before replying :-)
You seem to be the first to discover that the build was broken aftera change at around 10:00 PM last night. Thanks for
We should always test first before replying :-)
You seem to be the first to discover that the build was broken after
a change at around 10:00 PM last night. Thanks for reporting this
and we are trying to figure out the best way to fix it.
thanks
david jencks
On Jan 17, 2006, at 2:26 AM, R
Ryan,
I discovered the problem tonight. There was a change to one of the corba spec
jars in OpenEJB that we have to sort out. I have updated OpenEJB and it builds
correctly for now. Please do an m:fresh-checkout and rebuild. You should be
good to go .
Cheers
Matt
Ryan Thomas wrote:
He
Thanks Dave for taking on the tough job of documenting this stuff. This
is awesome.
Jeff
Dave Colasurdo wrote:
> The Geronimo Tomcat clustering documentation has been updated for v1.
> The jvmRoute can now be easily set in config.xml instead of specifying
> it at server startup.
>
> http://open
I think the Portlet is the right place to do this. That way the user is
protected from broken containers (of which we currently have 2).
John Sisson wrote:
Paul McMahan wrote:
Either approach should work but I would prefer to address the
vulnerability in the log viewer portlet because it att
Thanks a lot for the info !!!
Regards,
Rajith
On 1/17/06, lichtner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
By reading selected parts of this book you can get a background on variousissues that you have asked about:
http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/birman96building.htmlOn Tue, 17 Jan 2006, Rajith Attapattu wrote
+1 for Hernans idea on organizing the content.
How are we going to do that?? move the content from confluence over here or provide a link to confluence.
Besides are we going to maintain the same structure as we have now in the confluence site?
Regards,
Rajith.
On 1/17/06, Hernan Cunico <[EMA
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1482?page=all ]
Alan Cabrera reassigned GERONIMO-1482:
--
Assign To: Alan Cabrera
> Add CORBA spec version 3.0
> --
>
> Key: GERONIMO-1482
> URL: http://issues.a
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1482?page=comments#action_12363065
]
Alan Cabrera commented on GERONIMO-1482:
Anders, why are there Java files in here as well?
> Add CORBA spec version 3.0
> --
>
> K
By reading selected parts of this book you can get a background on various
issues that you have asked about:
http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/birman96building.html
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
> > Can u guys talk more about locking mechanisms pros and cons wrt in memory
> > replicati
Count me in for the volunteers.
Cheers!
Hernan
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I think the site needs to be reorganized but I don't think the new look
and feel and reorganization are necessarily linked. Bruce, I vote to
update our site and then call for volunteers to organize. I'd volunteer
but I alre
The Geronimo Tomcat clustering documentation has been updated for v1.
The jvmRoute can now be easily set in config.xml instead of specifying
it at server startup.
http://opensource2.atlassian.com/confluence/oss/display/GERONIMO/Geronimo+Clustering+Example
Be aware that this is geronimo Tomcat
On Jan 17, 2006, at 2:34 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Jan 17, 2006, at 2:19 PM, David Jencks wrote:
There is also, I think, some openejb-specific jndi context, and
possibly the jndi-name and local-jndi-name are related to binding
into this one. I have no idea what the status of this is.
On Jan 17, 2006, at 2:19 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Jan 17, 2006, at 1:48 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
The jndi-name is supposed to be the name to which the Home
interface is bound and the local-jndi-name is the name to which
the LocalHome interface is bound. An application should be able
On Jan 17, 2006, at 1:48 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
The jndi-name is supposed to be the name to which the Home
interface is bound and the local-jndi-name is the name to which the
LocalHome interface is bound. An application should be able to
look up a home using the name at any time. Of c
Paul McMahan wrote:
Either approach should work but I would prefer to address the
vulnerability in the log viewer portlet because it attaches the
solution closest to where the specific problem is at. Also, the
logger will be called on every request and doing the extra string
manipulations cou
The jndi-name is supposed to be the name to which the Home interface
is bound and the local-jndi-name is the name to which the LocalHome
interface is bound. An application should be able to look up a home
using the name at any time. Of course remote clients can not lookup
the LocalHome, b
I'm with Aaron on this. There should be an easy common way for
someone to say "the virtual host name for my application is X". I
personally don't care how we accomplish this technically, but I feel
we must provide a trivial way for our users to do this.
-dain
On Jan 16, 2006, at 9:52 AM,
On 17 Jan 2006, at 11:11, Philip Dodds wrote:
We've been working on a re-usable deployment plugin for eclipse to
try and simplify the process of create components and actually
making them re-usable. The basic idea is fairly simple, when you
build you JBI component, whether it be a bindin
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1422?page=all ]
Kevan Miller reassigned GERONIMO-1422:
--
Assign To: Kevan Miller
> Geronimo shutdown does not complete due to ActiveMQ attempting to reconnect
> endpoints to broker every 30 seconds
> -
Its a good idea, one of the reasons we didn't do this was that you can
create jar which contains more than one JBI component and therefore you can
reference different jbi.xml's for different componets, this was to allow a
situation where you might want to bundle a set of small/similar components
i
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1455?page=all ]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-1455:
--
Resolution: Fixed
After talking with Dain, he agrees the functions of the config list and
attribute store need to be kept separate. I modified the
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1455?page=all ]
David Jencks reassigned GERONIMO-1455:
--
Assign To: David Jencks (was: Dain Sundstrom)
> Start of CAR does not load and start its GBeans
> --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I found a few spare moments and added a bunch of Geronimo
swag to the part of my CafePress store that donates to
Apache:
http://cafepress.com/meepzor/1135854
There's currently nothing particularly fancy there, just
things with the Apache Geronimo log
> Can u guys talk more about locking mechanisms pros and cons wrt in memory> replication and storaged backed replication.>I don't know what you have in mind here by 'storage-backed'.
Sorry if I was not clear on that. what i meant was in memory vs serialized form, either stored in a file or databa
Ryan, I think what you're seeing is related to the mac JDK. For what its worth I see the following on windows:C:\j2sdk1.4.2_10>bin\java -version
java version "1.4.2_10"Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.2_10-b03)Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.2_10-b03, mixed mode)
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
> Can u guys talk more about locking mechanisms pros and cons wrt in memory
> replication and storaged backed replication.
I don't know what you have in mind here by 'storage-backed'.
> Also what if a node goes down while the lock is aquirred?? I ass
On 16 Jan 2006, at 13:01, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
How do you see this fitting into the scope of Geronimo?
Already xbean is the kernel of both ActiveMQ and ServiceMix; I'm sure
other parts of geronimo could find it useful too; its a nice simple
POJO based alternative to the GBean stuff.
J
Can u guys talk more about locking mechanisms pros and cons wrt in memory replication and storaged backed replication.
Also what if a node goes down while the lock is aquirred?? I assume there is a time out.
When it comes to partition (either network/power failure or vistual) or healing (same n
Dave,
By all means...go for it! ;-)
Jeff
Dave Colasurdo wrote:
> Jeff Genender wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Since Tomcat claims to fix this in v5.5.7, we may have to implement the
>>> tactical solution in our apps till we move to Tomcat 5.5.7.
>>
>>
>> We currently use 5.5.9, so I would assume this has bee
We've been working on a re-usable deployment plugin for eclipse to try and simplify the process of create components and actually making them re-usable. The basic idea is fairly simple, when you build you JBI component, whether it be a binding component or a service engine you include a
compone
More question if you don't mind.
> 2.) Assuming sombody wants to do session replication (All> Active) instead of (one Active and "n" backups) is there provision> within the WADI api to plug in this stratergy?
>I'm giving this some thought in terms of SFSB support, I'm not aware of>similar constra
Hernan, great article! I fixed a couple of minor typos that referred to server.jar instead of deployer.jar. Also, I noticed that in the application plan that the application and connector don't seem to point at each other correctly (one has a typo, "parented", and the other appends a ".1" to the
Jeff Genender wrote:
Since Tomcat claims to fix this in v5.5.7, we may have to implement the
tactical solution in our apps till we move to Tomcat 5.5.7.
We currently use 5.5.9, so I would assume this has been tended too. Has
anybody examined this to be the case (or not)?
Ran a quick tes
On 17 Jan 2006, at 08:31, Rajith Attapattu wrote:Can somebody familliar with AC provide me some answers to the following questions. 1. Why is the AC api tied to JMS?? We wanted a few simple APIs for a destination, a message and a message listener; so figured why not just reuse those trivial 3 int
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1489?page=all ]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-1489:
---
Attachment: Geronimo-1489_part1.patch
Geronimo-1489_part2.patch
Geronimo-1489_part3.patch
attached patches based on the
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006, Jules Gosnell wrote:
> just when you thought that this thread would die :-)
I think Jeff Genender wanted a discussion to be sparked, and it worked.
> So, I am wondering how might I use e.g. a shared disc or majority voting
> in this situation ? In order to decide which fra
Minor fixes/updates to jUDDI webapp and Tomcat config
-
Key: GERONIMO-1489
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1489
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Components: sample apps, security
Versions: 1.0
I just filed jiras 1486,1487,1488 to create secure vault, gbean-permissions and
externalize secrets out of deployment plans. Secret is saved in the vault.
Permission is granted to the gbean to read an alias in the vault. Secure vault
is referenced by the gbean in the deployment plan. Deployment
Rajith Attapattu wrote:
Hi,
Some of these questions came up after reading the thread on totem.
However I started the new thread so that searching is easy and also
want distract the intense discussions on totem with out-of-topic
questions.
Jules Gosnel wrote
>This is not something that
I've verified the problem on both Tomcat and Jetty in Geronimo 1.0 ...
so I think that means it has not yet been addressed in tomcat 5.5.9.
Joe
Jeff Genender wrote:
Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Is log record the only place where a user input param is written back to the
browser ? I'd guess not.
S
Yes, but the downside of that is that you must process the same records
over and over again each time they are viewed (by each individual user).
Making the modification when logging of the record itself makes the
change once for any potential viewer and addresses the effort to modify
the recor
Hi,
Can somebody familliar with AC provide me some answers to the following questions.
1. Why is the AC api tied to JMS?? I guess a simillar question was raised within the totem thread.
I was expecting a more abstract API independent of any platform and then the implementation to be some
Prasad Kashyap wrote:
> Is log record the only place where a user input param is written back to the
> browser ? I'd guess not.
>
> Since Tomcat claims to fix this in v5.5.7, we may have to implement the
> tactical solution in our apps till we move to Tomcat 5.5.7.
We currently use 5.5.9, so I
externalize sensitive data out of the deployment plans
--
Key: GERONIMO-1488
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1488
Project: Geronimo
Type: New Feature
Versions: 1.1
Reporter: simon godi
Hi,
Some of these questions came up after reading the thread on totem. However I started the new thread so that searching is easy and also want distract the intense discussions on totem with out-of-topic questions.
Jules Gosnel wrote
>This is not something that is really considered a sign
create gbean-permission
---
Key: GERONIMO-1487
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1487
Project: Geronimo
Type: New Feature
Versions: 1.1
Reporter: simon godik
create gbean-permission.
--
This message is automatical
create secure vault gbean
-
Key: GERONIMO-1486
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1486
Project: Geronimo
Type: New Feature
Versions: 1.1
Reporter: simon godik
Secure vault gbean is a repository for sensitive data.
Is log record the only place where a user input param is written back to the browser ? I'd guess not.
Since Tomcat claims to fix this in v5.5.7, we may have to implement the
tactical solution in our apps till we move to Tomcat 5.5.7.
What about Jetty ?
Cheers
PrasadOn 1/17/06, Joe Bohn <[EMAIL
Either approach should work but I would prefer to address the vulnerability in the log viewer portlet because it attaches the solution closest to where the specific problem is at. Also, the logger will be called on every request and doing the extra string manipulations could affect the web contain
I started refactoring login service along the lines discussed with Alan, David,
and others at the apachecon. This includes simplifying login service, and
authentication by assertion, delegation principals. David J, I know that you
want pluggable api, have you already done some work on it?
Simon
Yes, this sounds like the best way to go.
Regarding the specific problem with the web console displaying the web
access log I'd like to get some consensus. Is this something that the
containers should modify when storing the URL as part of a message in
the appropriate web log? (I have confir
The simplest solution to this problem would be to process the strings
before they are written out by the jsp by replacing any occurrences of with <script> This will ensure that the string will be rendered as is on the browser and won't be execu
Allow both jetty and tomcat servers to be defined
-
Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-48
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-48
Project: Geronimo-Devtools
Type: New Feature
Components: eclipse-plugin
Greg Wilkins wrote:
> Jeff Genender wrote:
>> Greg Wilkins wrote:
>>> I think it is important for us not to encourage this by treating
>>> virtual host names as network addresssed.
>>
>> I don't agree as the VH is still a network name, and unfortunately this
>> is supplied by the Tomcat folks, n
On Jan 17, 2006, at 9:37 AM, Dave Colasurdo wrote:
I've confirmed that the cross-site scripting problem also occurs in
jsp-examples in pure Tomcat 5.5.12 without Geronimo.
-Dave-
The following discussion thread on tomcat-user gives some additional
information regarding Tomcat and Cross-S
I've confirmed that the cross-site scripting problem also occurs in
jsp-examples in pure Tomcat 5.5.12 without Geronimo.
-Dave-
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
2006/1/17, oliver karow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi Oliver,
I think it belongs to dev now.
The first one is a classical cross-site scripting i
Create an Apache licensed IDL compiler
--
Key: GERONIMO-1485
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1485
Project: Geronimo
Type: New Feature
Components: CORBA
Versions: Wish List
Reporter: Anders Hessell
I agree that we should get this implemented as soon as possible and then
continue to tweak things to clean it up.
I also agree with Hernan that we need some better organization of
content. Here are some comments that I included in the thread back in
early December when we first began to dis
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1449?page=comments#action_12362971
]
Machiel Groeneveld commented on GERONIMO-1449:
--
I also get the 'uri org.apache.geronimo.specs/geronimo-corba_2.3_spec
/1.0/jar not found in repository' error.
I think the site needs to be reorganized but I don't think the new look and feel
and reorganization are necessarily linked. Bruce, I vote to update our site and
then call for volunteers to organize. I'd volunteer but I already had to move
to a larger house to keep all my unfinished projects :)
Jeff Genender wrote:
>
> Greg Wilkins wrote:
>>I think it is important for us not to encourage this by treating
>>virtual host names as network addresssed.
>
>
> I don't agree as the VH is still a network name, and unfortunately this
> is supplied by the Tomcat folks, not us.
>
If you are say
2006/1/17, oliver karow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi Oliver,
I think it belongs to dev now.
> > > The first one is a classical cross-site scripting in the
> > > jsp-examples:
> > >
> > > http://10.10.10.10:8080/jsp-examples/cal/cal2.jsp?time="/>alert('Gotcha')
> >
> > Is it us or is it a general and
On 1/17/06, Jacek Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2006/1/17, Bruce Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > The Epiq team has offered up a new look and feel for the Geronimo
> > website and I have the prototype running here:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~bsnyder/site/
> >
> > What would everyone
Display username who is logged into the Webconsole
--
Key: GERONIMO-1484
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1484
Project: Geronimo
Type: Improvement
Components: console
Versions: 1.0, 1.0.1, 1.1,
I was tired of seeing all the BUILD FAILED errors so I disabled it
temorarily due to the one svn issue that keeps on appearing stating a
resource already exists when it updates.
I know what exactly scenario triggers the error, and I'll probably
need your help debugging it.
The problem is
During Undeploy entry in config.xml is not removed
--
Key: GERONIMO-1483
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1483
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Environment: WinXP, JDK1.4.2_09 X86 Intel
Reporter: Manu
Greg Wilkins wrote:
> David Jencks wrote:
>> On Jan 16, 2006, at 12:39 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
>
>>> I don't agree here. According to the Tomcat doc, the Host name is
>>> "Network name of this virtual host, as registered in your Domain Name
>>> Service server." So it is a virtual host name.
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
2006/1/16, Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Under CTR, any change can get committed at any time, although
major ones are supposed to follow the RTC model. Committers
need to ask themselves whether the commit will spark controversy;
if so, they should follo
Jeff Genender wrote:
>
> Aaron Mulder wrote:
>
>>All right, hang on.
>>
>>Let's say you have App A that wants virtual hosts 1, 2, and 3 and App
>>B that wants virtual hosts 2, 3, and 4.
>>
>>Tomcat can have Host123 listening on 1, 2, and 3 and Host234 listening
>>on 2, 3, and 4, and App A bound t
Aaron Mulder wrote:
> Well, yes and no. It would be saying something like, there must be a
> GBean to represent a virtual host, and that GBean must have a set of
> host names associated with it, and any application can be associated
> with that "defined virtual host". For Tomcat, this would be
>
David Jencks wrote:
>
> On Jan 16, 2006, at 12:39 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
>> I don't agree here. According to the Tomcat doc, the Host name is
>> "Network name of this virtual host, as registered in your Domain Name
>> Service server." So it is a virtual host name. Where I think where the
>>
Hey,
I've seen this in the archives and on google but I couldn't find a
solution for it.
When building on my powerbook (jdk 1.4.2) I get the following error
(from the 'maven new' command).
Anyone got any ideas?
Maven Output:
[javac] Compiling 638 source files to /Users/ryan/dev/geron
2006/1/16, Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Under CTR, any change can get committed at any time, although
> major ones are supposed to follow the RTC model. Committers
> need to ask themselves whether the commit will spark controversy;
> if so, they should follow RTC and get support
2006/1/16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Author: adc
> Date: Sun Jan 15 16:57:35 2006
> New Revision: 369295
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=369295&view=rev
> Log:
> Moved sandbox to a better place.
>
> Added:
> geronimo/sandbox/
> - copied from r369294, geronimo/tru
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1481?page=comments#action_12362942
]
Jacek Laskowski commented on GERONIMO-1481:
---
I'll await others comments to find out how they feel with the current
structure. I think we can move the dirs and re
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1482?page=all ]
Anders Hessellund Jensen updated GERONIMO-1482:
---
Attachment: geronimo-spec-corba-3.0.zip
> Add CORBA spec version 3.0
> --
>
> Key: GERONIMO-14
Add CORBA spec version 3.0
--
Key: GERONIMO-1482
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1482
Project: Geronimo
Type: Task
Components: CORBA
Reporter: Anders Hessellund Jensen
Attachments: geronimo-spec-corba-3.0.zip
I hav
2006/1/17, John Sisson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Author: adc
> > Date: Sun Jan 15 19:04:41 2006
> > New Revision: 369321
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=369321&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Moved sandbox to a better place.
> >
> > Removed:
> > geronimo/trunk/san
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1481?page=comments#action_12362941
]
Anders Hessellund Jensen commented on GERONIMO-1481:
Well, it's not that it is of high importance, but generally, using the standard
directory layout w
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1480?page=comments#action_12362938
]
James Liao commented on GERONIMO-1480:
--
I think this could be fixed by hook a InstanceListener to handle the
InstanceEvent.BEFORE_DISPATCH_EVENT and InstanceEvent.AFT
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1481?page=comments#action_12362936
]
Jacek Laskowski commented on GERONIMO-1481:
---
Why would we want to do it? What benefits would it bring to us?
> Use default Maven 2 layout for specs
> ---
2006/1/17, Bruce Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The Epiq team has offered up a new look and feel for the Geronimo
> website and I have the prototype running here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bsnyder/site/
>
> What would everyone think of using this new look and feel on the
> website? Opinions, sug
Use default Maven 2 layout for specs
Key: GERONIMO-1481
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1481
Project: Geronimo
Type: Task
Components: specs
Reporter: Anders Hessellund Jensen
Priority: Trivial
Sinc
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1480?page=comments#action_12362933
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-1480:
I forgot to mention that this problem was found by Jian Liao.
> Cross context include does not set jacc contextID for 2nd
Cross context include does not set jacc contextID for 2nd web app. (Tomcat only)
Key: GERONIMO-1480
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1480
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
just when you thought that this thread would die :-)
So, Guglielmo,
in an earlier posting on this thread you said "BTW, how does AC defend
against the problem of a split-brain cluster?
Shared scsi disk? Majority voting? Curious."
So, I am wondering how might I use e.g. a shared disc or major
88 matches
Mail list logo
