Thanks Hiram!
The source is uploaded onto issue Geronimo-1623. The code is split into two
files, one for the C++ client and one for Davids source that should be pulled
from his site on a build. Please let me know how we should proceed, we need
help from James or someone to get the auto
Hi Mats,
I just finished committing the patch. I put it under activemq/
openwire-cpp.
I uploaded the smart pointer header dependencies that the code has up
to http://www.codehaus.org/~chirino/util/ifr/v1
It should be possible to cook up a build script the does a wget of
the .hpp files
Preliminary port of the OpenWire C# into C++.
-
Key: GERONIMO-1623
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1623
Project: Geronimo
Type: Improvement
Components: ActiveMQ
Reporter: Mats F
Priority:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1623?page=all ]
Mats F updated GERONIMO-1623:
-
Attachment: source_060209.zip
Main source excluding Davids SPs.
Preliminary port of the OpenWire C# into C++.
-
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1623?page=all ]
Mats F updated GERONIMO-1623:
-
Attachment: ifr_sp_060209.zip
Davids SP (IFR), should be pulled via maven or similar.
Preliminary port of the OpenWire C# into C++.
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1623?page=comments#action_12366171
]
Jacek Laskowski commented on GERONIMO-1623:
---
What's this?! I can't seem to understand why it belongs to Geronimo? Isn't
ActiveMQ JIRA at
At 05:14 PM 2/10/2006, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Sorry, you're crediting me with a lot more CORBA knowledge than I
deserve. :) In particular, I'm not sure what the right IIOP URL or
corbaname URL should be. Let me give you a more specific scenario:
Let's say I have a session bean running in
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1623?page=comments#action_12366181
]
Mats F commented on GERONIMO-1623:
--
Jacek, as a work around I was asked by Hiram Chirino to upload the files here
since the ActiveMQ JIRA is broken and does not accept
The [EMAIL PROTECTED] form is also what we use in the Trifork Server/ORB...
Andy Piper wrote:
At 03:51 PM 2/10/2006, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Just to be clear, I'm talking about GSSUP authentication (where the
client sends a token containing a username and password and an encoded
domain name) not
Project: Apache Geronimo
Status: Open
Assignee: Unassigned
Geronimo Info: Patch Available
Total: 22 items
DATE UPDATED KEY SUMMARY Dec 18 2005 - GERONIMO-1381 -
[Daytrader] Removed unused code
Dec 22 2005 - GERONIMO-1400 - modularize daytrader deployment plan
Jan 3
On 2/13/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will look at it more... I'm not familiar with the proxy gen in G
yet... but a race condition sounds likely since this problem only
shows up in multithreaded concurrency test.
I'm not convinced it's a proxy error. I mean, clearly
Hi Guys,
Can you give an indication of when you expect to go for J2EE 1.5
certification and hence require JAX-WS and JAX-B support from Axis2?
Getting some indication of the timing will help us prioritize and target
it to a specific version of Axis2. (We're not putting it into 1.0; hence
the
Hi Matts!
Awesome work! There's just so much of it! Usually it's no problem
to accept a small patch, but with larger patches Apache likes to get
a Contributor License Agreement (CLA) to make sure the IP is clear.
If you get a chance, could you fill out and fax in the following form???
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1611?page=all ]
Hernan Cunico updated GERONIMO-1611:
Attachment: sites_geronimo.06-02-13.zip
Sections updated:
- Banner
- Committers
- Mailing lists
- Powered by
Apache Geronimo Web site update
Is that really necessary in this case?? The code is a port of your C# client so
the code is _very_ similar, shouldn't be any problem with IP there. :-)
Regards,
Mats
-Original Message-
From: Hiram Chirino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: den 13 februari 2006 16:11
To:
Hi All,
I squeezed another update to the rejuvenated Geronimo Web site. Sections
updated are:
- Banner
- Committers
- Mailing lists
- Powered by
JIRA: GERONIMO-1611
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1611
The updated file is sites_geronimo.06-02-13.zip. Matt/Bruce, could you guys
Hi Bruce,
is the site.diff I am including in the zip helping at all for the site update?
I was just wondering, since it almost doubles the sz of the zip file every time I include it, if it
would be better not to include it till the final update.
Cheers!
Hernan
Original Message
On 2/13/06, Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is the site.diff I am including in the zip helping at all for the site update?
I was just wondering, since it almost doubles the sz of the zip file every
time I include it, if it
would be better not to include it till the final update.
I'm
Good point.. Since it s port of the c# stuff I guess it's quite
different than brand new stuff. I'll get it checked in today.
Regards,
Hiram
On Feb 13, 2006, at 10:26 AM, Mats Forslöf wrote:
Is that really necessary in this case?? The code is a port of your
C# client so the code is
On Feb 13, 2006, at 4:43 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 2/13/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will look at it more... I'm not familiar with the proxy gen in G
yet... but a race condition sounds likely since this problem only
shows up in multithreaded concurrency test.
I'm not
Hi,
Still working on the G integration in Cargo. I need to find a way to deploy
an archive before the container is started. I read on
http://tinyurl.com/8dfxj that I should use the distribute command with the
--offline option.
I'm using G 1.0 and it's failing:
The offline option has gone away for 1.0. There are Maven tasks you
can use to start the server, deploy some stuff, and then shut the
server down again -- not sure if that would work for you. There was
talk about creating a dedicated offline development tool, but I don't
think it's been a
I could use jaxb support now. I'd like to use it instead of castor
or xmlbeans for marshalling deployment descriptors -- or rather with
castor or xmlbeans if either of them implement jaxb.
I didn't know Axis2 was going to implement jaxb. Are the xmlbeans
guys going to implement it too?
FYI, in Derby we solved this by adding a category called Regression Test
Failure, this is working well for us.
David
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On 1/25/2006 9:31 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I want to add a field that marks bugs w/ a regression flag so that we
can track tests that used to pass.
Vincent, I don't wish to hijack this thread, but I thought the Cargo
plugin doesn't yet support the containers that ships with Geronimo.
The plugin for Tomcat 5.5.x needs JDK 1.5.
I am interested in the work that you are doing with Cargo Geronimo.
On 2/13/06, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I could use jaxb support now. I'd like to use it instead of castor
or xmlbeans for marshalling deployment descriptors -- or rather with
castor or xmlbeans if either of them implement jaxb.
I didn't know Axis2 was going to implement jaxb.
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1611?page=comments#action_12366237
]
Bruce Snyder commented on GERONIMO-1611:
Added the first patch for sites_geronimo.06-02-09.zip:
Sendingsite/NOTES.txt
Sendingsite/build.xml
Hi Prasad,
-Original Message-
From: Prasad Kashyap [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: lundi 13 février 2006 20:39
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: offline deployment with deploy distribute?
Vincent, I don't wish to hijack this thread, but I thought the
On Feb 13, 2006, at 11:45 AM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
On 2/13/06, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I could use jaxb support now. I'd like to use it instead of castor
or xmlbeans for marshalling deployment descriptors -- or rather with
castor or xmlbeans if either of them implement jaxb.
I
Hi Aaron,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aaron
Mulder
Sent: lundi 13 février 2006 20:15
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: offline deployment with deploy distribute?
The offline option has gone away for 1.0. There are
2006/2/13, Sanjiva Weerawarana [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Guys,
Can you give an indication of when you expect to go for J2EE 1.5
certification and hence require JAX-WS and JAX-B support from Axis2?
Hi Sanijva,
I alone wish to know when we're going to support Java EE 1.5. I don't
remember any
On 2/13/06, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 13, 2006, at 11:45 AM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
On 2/13/06, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I could use jaxb support now. I'd like to use it instead of castor
or xmlbeans for marshalling deployment descriptors -- or rather with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
After re-reading all the discussion threads and getting
some technology education from people kind enough not to
bash me on the bonce, my strong recommendation is that
the Sybase contribution be made as a new podling proposal
to the incubator.
That's
Hi Aaron,
Thanks for your reply. You are right, it seems not to
be a CGLIB-related issue. Anyway, here is the full
code for the project I am working on:
package mytask;
import
I think ServiceMix is the perfect home for a BPEL engine. Every JBI
implementation that I am aware of has and integrated orchestration
engine exposed via the BPEL specification. I am not worried about
barriers to any committers, accidental too-tight binding or
UNrelated mail on mailing
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1623?page=comments#action_12366240
]
Jacek Laskowski commented on GERONIMO-1623:
---
Troubles? It's almost got me a heartattack while reading about C# in Geronimo's
JIRA ;) Hiram will owe a beer or
I have committed the ip-clearance for the XBean donation to Geronimo:
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?rev=377477view=rev
If there are no objections, I will commit the code with history on
Wednesday February 15th.
-dain
Hi,
Is there any chance to make JIRA item numbers references? The first
JIRA item is on the line with the header.
BTW, Where (i.e. server, login, etc.) could that be changed? I could
make the changes yourself (I hope it won't take more than a quarter or
so ;)).
Jacek
2006/2/13, [EMAIL
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-973?page=comments#action_12366241
]
Paul McMahan commented on GERONIMO-973:
---
verified that patch works OK on HEAD
Add security to /console-standard
-
Key:
On Feb 13, 2006, at 4:17 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
Hi,
Is there any chance to make JIRA item numbers references? The first
JIRA item is on the line with the header.
BTW, Where (i.e. server, login, etc.) could that be changed? I could
make the changes yourself (I hope it won't take more than
I think I have fixed this as of yesterday. You will need to check out
specs/trunk and build. The default should install a j2ee uber jar into the
repository, as well as jars for each spec as one might expect.
You may need to 'mvn -U install' in specs/trunk to get the latest maven-one
SNAPSHOT
Well, I should mention that you can dump the module in the hot deploy
directory, which may be good enoguh to get you going for now.
Currently we don't notice if you dumped a *newer* copy of the file in
there while the server was down, but if it's a new deployment it'll
get deployed next time the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1613?page=comments#action_12366253
]
Joe Bohn commented on GERONIMO-1613:
H perhaps we should wait to apply this patch. My initial tests with a
simple application worked just fine on all
Vincent,
That's excellent. I guess the Container support on the Cargo home site
is not updated yet. That's fine.
So similar to Tomcat 5.5.x container support, does v0.8 impose a
requirement of JDK 1.5 while using goals for Jetty 5.x ?
Cheers
Prasad
On 2/13/06, Vincent Massol [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I agree with Dain; let's get the code running in ServiceMix, and then
we can break it off when it's ready to stand alone.
Thanks,
Aaron
On 2/13/06, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think ServiceMix is the perfect home for a BPEL engine. Every JBI
implementation that I am aware of
Can you try adding an empty constructor to each class? I think I
recall an issue where a GBean class needs either an empty constructor
or a management interface under some circumstances.
Thanks,
Aaron
On 2/13/06, Nelson A. Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Aaron,
Thanks for your reply.
After a quick chat with Dims, I think I need to make a quick
correction to this email
On Feb 13, 2006, at 12:42 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I think ServiceMix is the perfect home for a BPEL engine. Every
JBI implementation that I am aware of has and integrated
orchestration engine
Jason,
Here's a gist of our conversation this morning. Please refer to this
thread for a further background
http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@geronimo.apache.org/msg17578.html
So we agreed that the following structure of the itests subproject
with m2 would be good.
- geronimo
- itests
-Original Message-
From: Prasad Kashyap [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: lundi 13 février 2006 23:40
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: itests subproject using M2
[snip]
For now we can't use the maven-cargo-plugin (v0.7) because it doesn't
support Jetty
-Original Message-
From: Prasad Kashyap [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: lundi 13 février 2006 23:08
To: Vincent Massol
Cc: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Cargo and G (was RE: offline deployment with deploy
distribute?)
Vincent,
That's excellent. I guess the Container
Aaron,
Is the Jsr88 implementation binded to deploy using only the
LocalConfigStore? If not, how could it be programatically be
configured to deploy to a different one?
Thanks.
- sachin
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1611?page=all ]
Hernan Cunico updated GERONIMO-1611:
Attachment: site.diff.06-02-13.zip
site.images.06-02-13.zip
I added the new images to the repo (svn add). Extract the images from
Hi Bruce,
I just updated the svn diff and the images. I added the files to the repo (svn add) but I'm still
having some issues with the site.hc.xml when I run an update.
Let me know if you have any problems with the diff.
Cheers!
Hernan
Sorry Vincent. I wasn't more clear there. v0.7 does support Jetty but
not 5.x version of Jetty that Geronimo needs.
But it is good to know that v0.8 does support Jetty 5.x and doesn't
have a requirement on JDK 1.5 either. Awesome, I'll play with the
snapshot now.
Cheers
Prasad
On 2/13/06,
The Target you pass to JSR-88 is supposed to identify the config store
to deploy to. The default behavior for the command-line deploy tool
is to select all available targets, unless you specify one, in which
case it will use only the specified one. There are a few problems
that need to be
MerchantViewServiceBean does not have its own ejbRemote(), it picks it
up from AbstractStatelessSessionBean (from app), which picks it up
from AbstractStatelessSessionBean (from spring).
Could be a CL problem... the application is using Spring 1.1.4, which
is included in the EAR.
In my plan I
It may be the inheritance causing problems rather than the CL, as
well. You know, maybe we try calling ejbRemove on your bean class
even though it's declared on the superclass or something. If the CL
manipulations don't work out, we can follow that path.
As far as the hidden classes, we
Jason, can you try adding an ejbRemove method directly to the class
and see if the problem goes away?
-dain
On Feb 13, 2006, at 4:56 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
It may be the inheritance causing problems rather than the CL, as
well. You know, maybe we try calling ejbRemove on your bean class
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 12:42:58PM -0800, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
...
Sybase wants to donate to the service-mix community and the
ServiceMix community wants to work with the code. Any contributor
It should be donate to APACHE. The various people can come to it.
To be frank, some communities
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I think ServiceMix is the perfect home for a BPEL engine. Every
JBI implementation that I am aware of has and integrated orchestration
engine exposed via the BPEL specification.
If every JBI implementation has an integrated orchestration engine, then we
should factor
After being nervous for quite a while I have come to think that the
sybase bpel engine should go in as part of servicemix and if further
uses outside servicemix develop we can see about splitting it off.
more comments inline.
On Feb 13, 2006, at 5:25 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Dain
On 2/12/2006 1:04 PM, John Sisson wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On 1/25/2006 9:31 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I want to add a field that marks bugs w/ a regression flag so that
we can track tests that used to pass. Currently people just exclude
the tests or, worse, comment them out in the
Do you mean component? If so, please read my reply to John Sisson.
Regards,
Alan
On 2/13/2006 10:19 AM, David Van Couvering wrote:
FYI, in Derby we solved this by adding a category called Regression
Test Failure, this is working well for us.
David
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On 1/25/2006
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I think ServiceMix is the perfect home for a BPEL engine. Every JBI
implementation that I am aware of has and integrated orchestration
engine exposed via the BPEL specification. I am not worried about
barriers to any
What would folks think of (in principle, not right now) splitting out
the core Geronimo components from anything that wraps a 3rd-party
product/project? So have one area for modules like kernel, security,
core, system, etc. and a separate area for modules like Jetty, Tomcat,
ActiveMQ, Directory,
I think this is a good idea.
--jason
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:15:07
To:Geronimo Dev dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Thoughts on splitting out core from, well, products other stuff
What would folks think of (in principle, not
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1613?page=all ]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-1613:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: David Jencks
Patch applied. The derby problems are because daytrader needs to import
system database config or
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1613?page=comments#action_12366301
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-1613:
To be a little clearer, I fixed the derby problems in daytrader also. r377628
Eliminate unncessary dependencies to
This did appear to fix the problem No more IAE.
--jason
-Original Message-
From: Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:04:01
To:dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Strange IllegalAccessError w/FastClassByCGLIB class
Jason, can you try adding an ejbRemove
I'd like to retract this email. I have doubts on both sides of this
and may try to explain them in a clearer way in another message.
My apologies
david jencks
On Feb 13, 2006, at 6:26 PM, David Jencks wrote:
After being nervous for quite a while I have come to think that the
sybase bpel
On 2/13/2006 7:15 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
What would folks think of (in principle, not right now) splitting out
the core Geronimo components from anything that wraps a 3rd-party
product/project? So have one area for modules like kernel, security,
core, system, etc. and a separate area for
On 2/13/2006 6:43 PM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Sybase wants to donate to the service-mix community
In other words, they *don't* want to contribute it to Apache.
They want it to go into a specific and particular niche *at*
Apache. Why the
On 2/13/06, Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What would folks think of (in principle, not right now) splitting out
the core Geronimo components from anything that wraps a 3rd-party
product/project? So have one area for modules like kernel, security,
core, system, etc. and a separate area
Ok. Here's the proposal http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OdeProposal.
Please feel free to comment.
Bill Flood, can you provide us with the list of Sybase developers that
wish to work on this project? Can you get the Software Grant paperwork
faxed in?
Any other ASF committers want to
74 matches
Mail list logo
