Hi ...
We need a MOM that provides C++ API support (ActiveMQ does this ... but i am
a bit confused on ActiveMQ-cpp, stomp and openwire). I am running into
questions like why openwire would replace stomp, activemq-cpp says it is
swappable for both protocols.
What we intend to do in our
Many thanks! I've added your patch to svn trunk and have got the test
case working (by tweaking the wildcard slightly and adding a pause
between sending the messages and asserting they are consumed). Yay!
For now I've made the code add a VirtualTopicBroker by default -
unless its disabled. We
Right now the CPP client only supports the stomp protocol, which does
not support temporary topics. So it's a limitation of the client in the
fact that it only supports the stomp protocol right now.
You could try one of the openwire clients, which you can get to from the
C Integration page
Why not allow temporary topics in Stomp? I don't know enough about stomp to
know if this is a question worth asking.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/CPP-Client-and-Temporary-Topics-tf1992542.html#a5468388
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev forum at Nabble.com.
It's a limitation of the Stomp Protocol, which is really intended to be
used by simple clients.
-
Timothy A. Bish
Sensis Corporation
-
-Original Message-
From: kevinba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Thanks for a great answer Tim. BTW I just added a faq entry for this...
http://activemq.org/site/how-does-openwire-compare-to-stomp.html
On 7/24/06, Bish, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Comments inline:
We need a MOM that provides C++ API support (ActiveMQ does this ...
but i
am
a bit
I just got the latest for openwire-cpp and compiled it. I noticed it has a
msdev project but was created under version 8. I'm using version 7.
I can't get the following method to compile without an error.
void TraceException::buildMessage(const char* format, va_list vargs)
The error in this
Is there docs for using openwire-cpp client. I just want to be able to see
everything I can do. The examples are simple and straight forward.
Thanks,
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Openwire-CPP-Client-Documentation-tf1992880.html#a5469165
Sent from the ActiveMQ -
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-493?page=all ]
Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-493.
Fix Version/s: 3.0-M3
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
Author: gnodet
Date: Mon Jul 24 00:23:12 2006
New Revision: 424943
URL:
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-490?page=all ]
Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-490.
Fix Version/s: 3.0-M3
(was: 3.0)
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
Author: gnodet
Date: Mon Jul 24 00:45:09
I' d like to start a discussion about ServiceMix roadmap for 3.0.
IMHO, we should release a 3.0 asap, and I want to propose that
we release 3.0 at the end of August.
The main point I' d like to focus on are:
* JBI TCK (which should be available to all committers that have signed a
NDA)
* bug
Problems with JMSFlow and sendSync in start() callbacks.
Key: SM-494
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-494
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: Bug
Components:
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-477?page=all ]
Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-477.
Fix Version/s: 3.0-M3
(was: 3.0)
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
Author: gnodet
Date: Mon Jul 24 03:30:19
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-479?page=all ]
Guillaume Nodet updated SM-479:
---
Fix Version/s: 3.0-M3
Affects Version/s: 3.0-M2
(was: incubation)
Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
Add support for
I have just created a JIRA (see
http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-495).
This feature is to provide a better and consistent way to access the JBI bus
from anywhere within the JVM.
I think that JNDI is the good way to do that.
I have already discussed that a bit with Aaron Mulder at
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-491?page=all ]
Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-491.
Fix Version/s: 3.0-M3
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
Author: gnodet
Date: Mon Jul 24 06:18:41 2006
New Revision: 425040
URL:
On 7/24/06, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would be really convenient if we could get these publishing to the
apache snapshot repository. We are using the ejb3 spec in OpenEJB 3
and I know Greg is using the Servlet one.
Is there a mvn command to do it by hand? Until it's fully
CopyTransformer does not copy SecuritySubject
-
Key: SM-493
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-493
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: Bug
Components: servicemix-core
On 7/24/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI, I have an initial impl of a JDBM-based hybrid repository here:
I think it's invaluable to have and it should therefore earn its own
task issue in jira, shouldn't it? Unless it's already there, would you
add the content to the task? I worry
On 7/24/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jgenender
Date: Sun Jul 23 19:50:48 2006
New Revision: 424886
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=424886view=rev
Log:
Updated to EJB3 spec final
Hey Jeff,
I'd highly recommend that we use jira issue numbers included in svn
log
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1531?page=comments#action_12422984
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-1531:
---
GERONIMO-1531.patch cannot be used with AG1.1 source.
Issue addressed in patch provided to
On 7/23/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please see this issue for details:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2219
* * *
I hope to be able to merge this work to trunk in a week or so, so
please, please, please take some time to review the branch and vote
(PMC or
On 7/22/06, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you are using the Geronimo transaction manager, you may want to
use the
org.apache.geronimo.connector.outbound.transactionlog.JDBCLog, which
stores the tx log in the database. This will allow you to support
full XA with a single non-xa jdbc
What was the SVN error specifically?
--jason
On Jul 24, 2006, at 12:30 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 7/23/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please see this issue for details:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2219
* * *
I hope to be able to merge this work to
No issue that I know of.
Still testing, need to get more details on the unpacked car files,
which are causing the longest files...
--jason
On Jul 23, 2006, at 11:28 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 7/24/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI, I have an initial impl of a JDBM-based
On 7/24/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What was the SVN error specifically?
Subversion Permission denied moving .svn/tmp/entries to .svn/entries
@see http://svn.haxx.se/users/archive-2005-08/1408.shtml
I'm experiencing it all the time (not only with the m2migration
branch).
Yikes...
Time to buy a Mac ;-)
--jason
On Jul 24, 2006, at 1:02 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 7/24/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What was the SVN error specifically?
Subversion Permission denied moving .svn/tmp/entries to .svn/entries
@see
Ahhh yes...I keep forgetting about that feature ;-)
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 7/24/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jgenender
Date: Sun Jul 23 19:50:48 2006
New Revision: 424886
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=424886view=rev
Log:
Updated to EJB3 spec final
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-485?page=comments#action_36617 ]
Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-485:
If you run ' ant setup' from the command line in the directory for the example,
all needed dependencies will be downloaded
On 7/24/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yikes...
Time to buy a Mac ;-)
Sure. Or install Linux. Yesterday, I saw a mac and that beautiful
window manager that swapped windows when you moved a mouse cursor to
the upper-left screen corner. I couldn't believe what I could see. It
was
I run across the following issue when starting from a path-lenghty
directory:
What is the lengthy path you ran under?
I think we need to resolve why we need to have CAR archives unpacked
in the repository, as unpacked wars really blows out the filename
length limit.
Though... this is a
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2221?page=all ]
Jacek Laskowski updated GERONIMO-2221:
--
Description:
http://localhost:8080/ - Servlet Examples - click here (i.e.
http://localhost:8080/servlets-examples/?install=true) -
{code}
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2221?page=all ]
Jacek Laskowski updated GERONIMO-2221:
--
Component/s: web
(was: Tomcat)
Description:
http://localhost:8080/ - Servlet Examples - click here (i.e.
On 7/24/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I run across the following issue when starting from a path-lenghty
directory:
What is the lengthy path you ran under?
Your description of the test steps suggested that a tester might
unpack a server distro from within the directory where the
Project: Apache Geronimo
Status: Open
Assignee: Unassigned
Geronimo Info: Patch Available
Total: 25 items
DATE UPDATED KEY SUMMARY
Jan 3 2006 - GERONIMO-1413 - Console needs to set JSP and Servlet
contentType to UTF-8
Jan 19 2006 - GERONIMO-1499 - Daytrader:
When parsing schemas for flattening a WSDL definition, the schemas
are loaded with the baseUri set to null.
This same problem occurs when using the Validation component to validate
against a schema with imports. Hopefully this can be fixed in the same way?
Terry
Sure.
Could you raise a JIRA and attach any test case / patch you have ?
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 7/24/06, Terry Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When parsing schemas for flattening a WSDL definition, the schemas
are loaded with the baseUri set to null.
This same problem occurs when using
Provide a jndi factory to create clients and bind it to the JNDI tree when the
container is started
---
Key: SM-495
URL:
Hi Jason,
My family was visiting. I have been busy and in and out of town. I
am catching up on my mail and apologize for not responding to all the
mail promptly.
I looked at the code and saw this in the top level pom :
parent
groupIdorg.apache.geronimo.genesis.config/groupId
Thanks for the response... worked like a champ!On 7/20/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I dunno about Eclipse, I'd recommend just using `svn diff` to createa patch.Generally from the root of the tree is desired.So, if you
are working in DayTrader, you would: svn co daytrader/trunk
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-?page=all ]
John Sisson updated GERONIMO-:
--
Attachment: jira-g-.zip
Test application attached that prints out the TCCL during static initialization
in an EJB. If you deploy the EAR you will
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1986?page=all ]
Krishnakumar B updated GERONIMO-1986:
-
Attachment: tranql-1986.patch
Check in ConnectorModuleBuilder if Driver class id there in ClassLoader ( cl ).
If not throw a Deployment
+1 for getting a roadmap in place, though until we have a clear set of stuf
that we want in place should be set a release date?
P
On 7/24/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I' d like to start a discussion about ServiceMix roadmap for 3.0.
IMHO, we should release a 3.0 asap, and I
Comments inline:
We need a MOM that provides C++ API support (ActiveMQ does this ...
but i
am
a bit confused on ActiveMQ-cpp, stomp and openwire). I am running into
questions like why openwire would replace stomp, activemq-cpp says it
is
swappable for both protocols.
Openwire is the
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-?page=all ]
John Sisson updated GERONIMO-:
--
Attachment: GERONIMO--v1.patch
Proposed patch attached. Has been tested using the application previously
attached to this JIRA.
Application
I guess it mainly depends if we want a timed-box release or a featured-box
release ;)
But we must first agree on that...
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 7/24/06, Philip Dodds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 for getting a roadmap in place, though until we have a clear set of
stuf
that we want in place
I think this query needs to be modified to just all open jira's containing patches. As "unassigned" filters many out.On Jul 24, 2006, at 7:00 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Project: Apache GeronimoStatus: OpenAssignee: UnassignedGeronimo Info: Patch AvailableTotal: 25 items DATE UPDATED KEY
Before pushing 3.0 out of the door I think we need to address :
1/ The project structure so that we can build core/components and tooling
independently
2/ The packaging so we can create clean packages
3/ Documentation - I don't think producing a release with re-visting the
documentation is going
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
The main point I' d like to focus on are:
* JBI TCK (which should be available to all committers that have
signed a
NDA)
* bug fixes
* documentation
+1 from me on the list.
I would add 1 extra.
* Complete working test cases. (no -Dmaven.test.skip=true)
My other
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1986?page=all ]
Krishnakumar B updated GERONIMO-1986:
-
Attachment: tranql-1986-updated.patch
Check if Driver attribute has a value. Not all tranql plans have Driver
attribute
TranQL Connector
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2073?page=all ]
Hernan Cunico reassigned GERONIMO-2073:
---
Assignee: Hernan Cunico
Copyright date in the console needs to be updated
-
Hi,
I am currently look at this issue with a mind to fixing it.
(im sure the fix will be easy)
I'm working the true test driven by writing the testcase first.
And the case is actually to launch an FTP server into the test case.
Now this is actually easier than it would seem because of
I plan to commit the patch attached to this JIRA soon for 1.1.1, as it
is a bug fix and trunk if there aren't any objections.
Regards,
John
John Sisson (JIRA) wrote:
Application errors in static initialization blocks during serialization of
configuration during deployment due to incorrect
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1451?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom closed GERONIMO-1451.
---
Fix Version/s: 1.0
(was: 1.1.1)
Resolution: Fixed
According to Vamsavardhana Reddy's e-mail on 7/20 this issue seems to
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1695?page=comments#action_12423080
]
Matt Hogstrom commented on GERONIMO-1695:
-
Rick, what is the state of this JIRA?
CORBA for EJB with Local interface only causes NPE
Allows the soap-binding example to run in FireFox.
--
Key: SM-496
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-496
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: Improvement
Components:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAYTRADER-8?page=all ]
Christopher James Blythe updated DAYTRADER-8:
-
Attachment: orderPatch.diff
Sorry for the delay in posting this... I wanted to make sure I used the proper
procedure for creating
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1037?page=all ]
Sachin Patel reassigned GERONIMO-1037:
--
Assignee: Sachin Patel
Clicking on uninstall link in Applications management pages deletes the
configuration without any confirmation from
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2208?page=all ]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-2208:
---
Fix Version/s: 1.1.x
1.2
bad classpath in geronimo-deploy-jsr88-1.1.jar
--
I think we should upgrade to
xbean 2.5
xfire 1.1.2
spring 2.0-rc2
jencks 1.2 -- with maven2 poms :)
Who want to deal with that ?
Note that jencks migration is the most complex one i think, because
we have to take care of the switch from m1 to m2 and inclusion of
transitive deps.
Cheers,
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1037?page=all ]
Sachin Patel closed GERONIMO-1037.
--
Resolution: Fixed
p applied.
Clicking on uninstall link in Applications management pages deletes the
configuration without any confirmation from
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-496?page=all ]
Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-496.
Fix Version/s: 3.0-M3
(was: 3.0-M2)
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
Awesome, thx a lot for this fix.
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1716?page=comments#action_12423085
]
Sachin Patel commented on GERONIMO-1716:
Could you provide an updated patch as the current patch fails...
patching file
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1182?page=all ]
Sachin Patel reassigned GERONIMO-1182:
--
Assignee: Joe Bohn
Connector portlet delete challenge
--
Key: GERONIMO-1182
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2007?page=all ]
Sachin Patel reassigned GERONIMO-2007:
--
Assignee: Joe Bohn
Avoid Classloader warnings generated by BasicProxyManager
-
Jacek,
I added those entries there and commented them as we still don't have the final text to describe
those subprojects. I personally could not find the right wording but hope somebody else can :)
Pls feel free to update the text and uncomment that entry. Make sure you add the link in the
+1
FWIW I upgraded ActiveMQ to xbean 2.5 and spring 2.0-rc2 and it
generally worked fine (once I remembered to also upgrade the
maven-xbean-plugin version :).
I'll try make some time tomorrow to look into migrating jencks if
noone else dives in before me
On 7/24/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL
I think the best way (until the project release something) is to put it in
servicemix
m2 repository. When you have a patch available, please attach the jar you
use,
and we will upload it before applying the patch.
In the meantime, just put it in your local repository.
Thanks for your
James-
I think people would also like to know what state Openwire is into and
whether they can proceed on openwire rather than stomp. If you could add a
little of that too it would be great.
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1163?page=all ]
Sachin Patel closed GERONIMO-1163.
--
Resolution: Won't Fix
The debug console has been removed from Geronimo.
improve jmx debug console
-
Key:
FYI, I have raised an issue on INFRA (
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-896)
to request a mailing list and svn repo for TCK related stuff.
I think these list and repo will only be available to servicemix committers
that have
signed the NDA.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 7/24/06, Lalit Nagpal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James-
I think people would also like to know what state Openwire is into and
whether they can proceed on openwire rather than stomp. If you could add a
little of that too it would be great.
OpenWire is complete and has been stable since
Ramon, I can give you karma to assign issue to yourself on JIRA if you want.
What' s your JIRA id ?
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 7/24/06, Ramon Buckland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am currently look at this issue with a mind to fixing it.
(im sure the fix will be easy)
I'm working the true
The EJB and Direct modes in Daytrader provide a good measure of how a pure EJB (Session/CMP Entity) application stacks up against a pure JDBC based app. However, one of the things I have felt Trade/Daytrader has always lacked is a middle ground. In my experience, I have neither seen nor heard of
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1035?page=comments#action_12423092
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-1035:
Anita, how do these Tomcat stats relate to those being provided by a Geronimo
server using Jetty?
It seems
Cool idea. I look forward to seeing the results.
Jeff
Christopher Blythe wrote:
The EJB and Direct modes in Daytrader provide a good measure of how a
pure EJB (Session/CMP Entity) application stacks up against a pure JDBC
based app. However, one of the things I have felt Trade/Daytrader has
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-357?page=all ]
Guillaume Nodet closed SM-357.
--
Resolution: Duplicate
Allow dynamic attachment of a servlet to allow integration inside an existing
http server
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-494?page=comments#action_36623 ]
Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-494:
If you send an exchange to another component which is not started, no endpoint
should be activated by this component, so
Allow wsdl first generation for jsr181 component without having soap binding
infos in the wsdl
--
Key: SM-497
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-497
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-497?page=all ]
Guillaume Nodet updated SM-497:
---
Description: Depends on http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/XFIRE-549
Allow wsdl first generation for jsr181 component without having soap binding
infos in the
On Jul 24, 2006, at 7:47 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I think we should upgrade to
xbean 2.5
xfire 1.1.2
spring 2.0-rc2
jencks 1.2 -- with maven2 poms :)
Who want to deal with that ?
Note that jencks migration is the most complex one i think, because
we have to take care of the switch from
On Jul 24, 2006, at 6:34 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:
I think this query needs to be modified to just all open jira's
containing patches. As unassigned filters many out.
Right, that was very intentional as to make it super clear what
contributions have not yet found a committer to love and
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-494?page=comments#action_36624 ]
Michael Studman commented on SM-494:
So here's what was going on when it wasn't working for me:
JBIContainer.start {
Registry.start() {
A.start() {
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-494?page=comments#action_36625 ]
Michael Studman commented on SM-494:
Oh, and in the first scenario, B sending a message to A does actually hit
JMSFlow.doRouting before it is started (which
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-24?page=comments#action_12423119 ]
Guillaume Nodet commented on XBEAN-24:
--
+1 for me
[RTC] Support mixed nested properties and complex elements
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-26?page=comments#action_12423121 ]
Guillaume Nodet commented on XBEAN-26:
--
+1 (if it needs RTC)
[RTC] Nested properties not evaluated for named constructor args
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1906?page=all ]
Sachin Patel reassigned GERONIMO-1906:
--
Assignee: Paul McMahan
Paul, can you verify that this problem still exists?
Cannot add a new connector using ActiveMQManagerGBean
Hi, When i deploy a standalone ejb web service in Geronimo 1.1 it gives an error00:11:04,238 ERROR [Servlet] Exception caught:javax.portlet.PortletException: Exception at org.apache.geronimo.console.configmanager.ConfigManagerPortlet.proces
sAction(ConfigManagerPortlet.java:107) at
What do I need to put in a POM to use a working Geronimo Packaging
Plugin for Maven 2? Is there such a thing available on the Maven
repos? Do I need specific configuration directives in the POM or in
my Maven config to pull it down?
Thanks,
Aaron
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-22?page=comments#action_12423124 ]
Dain Sundstrom commented on XBEAN-22:
-
+1 Looks good
I think we should eventually split this off into another module
[RTC] Support for inverse class loading,
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1035?page=comments#action_12423127
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-1035:
Also, the AbstractTomcatModuleBuilder.java part of the tomcat-builder.patch
will not compile.
Seems that the
Why do we need the subprojects page at all? Each of the subprojects
should have its own home page that describes what it is.
This extra page is a waste... and is another chance to get the site
out of sync as people forget to update in both locations.
Lets remove this page.
--jason
On
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1716?page=all ]
Donald Woods reassigned GERONIMO-1716:
--
Assignee: Donald Woods
Add usage of SimpleEncryption to PropertiesFileLoginModule and Admin Console
Thanks James,
looks good. Now I see what was wrong with the wildcard :)
Is there a rough release date for the 4.1 codebase?
Glad things could come together,
Brian Madigan
--
View this message in context:
On 7/24/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I run across the following issue when starting from a path-lenghty
directory:
What is the lengthy path you ran under?
Your description of the test steps suggested that a tester might
unpack a server distro from within the directory where the
Do not comment that out. PERIOD.
--jason
On Jul 24, 2006, at 5:40 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
Hi Jason,
My family was visiting. I have been busy and in and out of town. I
am catching up on my mail and apologize for not responding to all the
mail promptly.
I looked at the code and saw
I guess I have a few more questions, now that I think about it:
* Must you put the plan at src/plan/plan.xml or is there some way to
point it to a different file or use an embedded plan?
* Must you put the plugin descriptor at src/conf/geronimo-plugin.xml
if geronimoPlugin is set to true? Is
Jeff and Matt -- you are each twice the man I am!
At least, according to the committer page:
http://geronimo.apache.org/contributors.html
Thanks,
Aaron
P.S. It also has SVN merge errors in the HTML!!! Looks like maybe
someone updated the site by hand and then the next run of the update
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2053?page=comments#action_12423141
]
Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-2053:
This is done... why is this issue still opened?
Restting Geronimo Build Tree for 1.2 Development for post
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-611?page=comments#action_12423145
]
Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-611:
---
FYI UGLI is SLF4J:
* http://www.slf4j.org/
I'm not convinced it is any better than JCL, especially with JCL
1 - 100 of 227 matches
Mail list logo
