Allow NetworkConnections to bi-directional
--
Key: AMQ-979
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-979
Project: ActiveMQ
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: Broker
Hi Jason,
I just created a jira for this: http://issues.apache.org/activemq/
browse/AMQ-979
On 16 Oct 2006, at 05:40, Jason Dillon wrote:
How then do I setup a hub/spoke network where the hub does not know
about all of the spokes, and where the spokes may be behind
firewalls, only
Hi Christopher,
sorry, if my response to your question concerning message expiration might
have been misleading, but expiration handling did not change from 4.0.1 to
4.0.2. You should see the behaviour I described with AMQ 4.0.1 as well.
Regards,
Holger
Christopher_Ong wrote:
Hello, is
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-979?page=comments#action_37191 ]
Jason Dillon commented on AMQ-979:
--
This is most useful when the remote broker is behind a firewall, where the
master has an open port to listen on, but the
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-847?page=all ]
Helmut Janknecht reopened AMQ-847:
--
There seems to be still some more leaks, try the following junit test with
4.0.2 RC4:
{code}
public void testCreateConnectionMemoryLeak()
The problem is the expired message won't automatically been removed from it's
specific queue if using 4.0.1 whereas 4.0.2 having d feature that the
expired msg will be removed from d queue if there is new consumer consumed
the other msg inside d queue.
hbruch wrote:
Hi Christopher,
sorry,
It'll take a week - or so - simply because I've a lot of other stuff
to do. It's not a major piece of work - but there's some fiddly
things to change in the broker to support it - so we've just got to
be careful not to break anything else.
On 16 Oct 2006, at 08:11, Jason Dillon wrote:
Any
Hermes JMS documentation improvement
Key: AMQ-981
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-981
Project: ActiveMQ
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Documentation
Affects
Authentication Example should be improved
-
Key: AMQ-982
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-982
Project: ActiveMQ
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Documentation
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-974?page=all ]
Rob Lugt updated AMQ-974:
-
Attachment: Tracer.cs
.Net client needs centralised trace facility
Key: AMQ-974
URL:
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-974?page=all ]
Rob Lugt updated AMQ-974:
-
Attachment: amq974-patch.txt
Patch to replace Console.WriteLine and System.Diagnostics.Trace with call to
common Tracer class (attached as separate file)
.Net client
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-974?page=all ]
Rob Lugt updated AMQ-974:
-
Attachment: ITrace.cs
.Net client needs centralised trace facility
Key: AMQ-974
URL:
Hi,
I just wanted to let you guys know that as the first step for ActiveMQ to
support the QPID protocol, I made a more decouple version of marshaling
generators that qpid implemented. You can find the work here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/activemq/sandbox/qpid
Major
Kim has been working on a new generator and updated framing which should
be in, in a
few days. Might be worth waiting for that to eliminate rework. He has
wiki page on it.
Carl.
Hiram Chirino wrote:
Hi,
I just wanted to let you guys know that as the first step for ActiveMQ to
support the
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-960?page=comments#action_37202 ]
Hiram Chirino commented on AMQ-960:
---
Thanks Kelly! patch applied in trunk rev 464659
Improved error reporting for SSL and transports. Changed Username for SSL
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-960?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino resolved AMQ-960.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Hiram Chirino
Improved error reporting for SSL and transports. Changed Username for SSL
cert to the DN
Thanks for your reply. Hope we can get good news from activemq soon.
James.Strachan wrote:
We've been trying to get the 4.0.2 release out the door for a while
now - the code has been done for a few weeks, we keep hitting issues
in source code formatting, missing license files or NOTICE
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-410?page=all ]
Aleksei K. Prokopchook updated SM-410:
--
Attachment: servicemix.log
I have similar problems: ServiceMix (or lwcontainer component) seems to be not
cleaning working directory if
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-708?page=all ]
Guillaume Nodet updated SM-708:
---
Priority: Major (was: Blocker)
Moving to Major as there is a simple workaround
ServiceUnitAnalyzer does not create parent spring context
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-708?page=all ]
Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-708.
Fix Version/s: 3.1
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
Author: gnodet
Date: Mon Oct 16 06:20:55 2006
New Revision: 464479
URL:
Geronimo should use the full javamail uber jar instead of just the spec jar +
provider jar.
---
Key: GERONIMO-2498
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2498
Hi David,
Thank you very much for your reply.
Yes I took that error message from a Jetty version of G 1.1.1. It gives
the corresponding error in Tomcat version too. There was a problem in
the ejb-jar.xml file too. Now I have changed it as in the given below.
But it still give the same
On 10/14/06, Brian Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The latest Liferay portal plugins are now available on.
http://geronimo.liferay.com/plugins
It'd be great if we can add it to the default list of available plugin
repositories for Geronimo 1.2 and on.
I think it's doable ;-) I'l start a vote
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 10/14/06, Brian Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The latest Liferay portal plugins are now available on.
http://geronimo.liferay.com/plugins
It'd be great if we can add it to the default list of available plugin
repositories for Geronimo 1.2 and on.
I think
On 10/16/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
geronimoplugins.com is the same, so we should probably be consistent.
Would you explain (possibly again) why it is configured this way?
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.laskowski.net.pl
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 10/16/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
geronimoplugins.com is the same, so we should probably be consistent.
Would you explain (possibly again) why it is configured this way?
I am actually in agreement with you. I don't really know why it's
configured
On 10/16/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMHO, I think it probably should be up to the contributing organization
if they want their directories viewable...I don't think that needs to be
a requirement. Since all we care about is the plugins, we just need to
look at the top level
Hi,
I think such an API will start to be useful for people interested to
implement distributed or clustered services. At this stage, there is
not a real need for such a capability; so, this may be a little bit
premature to introduce it.
After some experiments with an API similar to the
On 10/14/06, Brian Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The latest Liferay portal plugins are now available on.
http://geronimo.liferay.com/plugins
Nice!
It'd be great if we can add it to the default list of available plugin
repositories for Geronimo 1.2 and on.
We can actually add it for 1.1.1
On 10/16/06, Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/14/06, Brian Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The latest Liferay portal plugins are now available on.
http://geronimo.liferay.com/plugins
Nice!
It'd be great if we can add it to the default list of available plugin
repositories for
Geronimo - Monday, October 16, 2006
4 Patches in RTC
[GERONIMO-2485] PersistenceUnitGBean needs a NamespaceDrivenDeployer
- Assignee: David Jencks
- Reporter: David Jencks
- Created: Wed Oct 11 14:23:29 PDT 2006
- Updated: Wed Oct 11 19:09:21 PDT 2006
-
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-110?page=all ]
Sachin Patel reassigned GERONIMODEVTOOLS-110:
-
Assignee: Sachin Patel
Exception in IModulePublishHelper.getPublishDirectory() for Geronimo
Paul McMahan wrote:
Also, I worked on a Jetty version of the plugin but encountered some
problems with classloading that I think may be due to the Jetty
assembly pulling in Spring and/or cglib differently than the Tomcat
assembly? I saw a couple of emails go by last week about issues with
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-110?page=all ]
Sachin Patel closed GERONIMODEVTOOLS-110.
-
Fix Version/s: 1.x
Resolution: Fixed
Exception in IModulePublishHelper.getPublishDirectory() for Geronimo
Hi Jason,
download of SNAPSHOT dependencies does not work at all in M2.0.4:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-1908
- Jörg
Jason Dillon wrote on Saturday, October 14, 2006 10:17 PM:
On Oct 14, 2006, at 6:58 AM, Kenney Westerhof wrote:
Running mvn with -U -cpu should fix that (or wait 24
Any initial thoughts on how we should start integrating this into the source tree?As I mentioned previously, I currently have the dojo interface module and web services proxy module in individual wars packaged in a separate ear. Do we want to keep this deployment model?
Or would it make more sense
We've been trying to get the 4.0.2 release out the door for a while
now - the code has been done for a few weeks, we keep hitting issues
in source code formatting, missing license files or NOTICE files etc.
It should be done soon I hope
On 10/13/06, Christopher_Ong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
May
Sounds good to me!
On 10/13/06, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Howdy folks. I'm planning on committing a change to the Transport Interface
soon.
Basically I'm abstracting them a little more so that the transport any old
Object. That way the transport layer does not constrain you to
On 10/16/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul McMahan wrote:
Also, I worked on a Jetty version of the plugin but encountered some
problems with classloading that I think may be due to the Jetty
assembly pulling in Spring and/or cglib differently than the Tomcat
assembly? I saw
Paul,
I had the same problem in Tomcat too until I pulled the
org.springframework filter from the container level deployer. That is
very likely the problem you are running into. Remove the filter from
jetty-deployer and I suspect this will fix your problem.
Jeff
Paul McMahan wrote:
On
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-974?page=all ]
james strachan reassigned AMQ-974:
--
Assignee: james strachan
.Net client needs centralised trace facility
Key: AMQ-974
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-695?page=all ]
James Lorenzen updated SM-695:
--
Attachment: ProviderProcessor.java
I incorporated Guillaume's feedback.
Created a method variable that defaults to the endpoint.getLocationURI. This
variable's
I incorporated your feedback Guillaume. Thanks again.
I created a method variable that defaults to the endpoint.getLocationURI().
This variable's value is overridden if the property is present.
All the tests for HttpProviderTest passed.
I attached ProviderProcessor as a patch again with the
Hi All, I have been playing around! To view a snapshot of geronimo from jconsole please see:http://people.apache.org/~akulshreshtha/jconsole/geronimo.jpg please be sure to hit the zoom and scroll the image to the center.ThanksAnita
All-new Yahoo! Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2495?page=comments#action_12442649
]
Mark DeLaFranier commented on GERONIMO-2495:
In order to test your theory, I did the followin:
1. Reverted j2ee-corba-sun/src/plan/plan.xml
2.
As proposed in the earlier discussion, I start
a vote about releasing xbean-2.7 from the
current svn head. This will enable to use
maven release plugin to directly upload the
release to the maven repository.
[ ] +1 release xbean 2.7 from current snapshot
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 do not release xbean
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-855?page=comments#action_37198 ]
Vadim Pesochinskiy commented on AMQ-855:
I think you are right.
Add support for prefetchSize = 0
Key:
On 10/16/06, Christopher Blythe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any initial thoughts on how we should start integrating this into the source
tree?
As I mentioned previously, I currently have the dojo interface module and
web services proxy module in individual wars packaged in a separate ear. Do
we
+1
On 10/16/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As proposed in the earlier discussion, I start
a vote about releasing xbean-2.7 from the
current svn head. This will enable to use
maven release plugin to directly upload the
release to the maven repository.
[ ] +1 release xbean 2.7
+1
--jason
On Oct 16, 2006, at 10:32 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
As proposed in the earlier discussion, I start
a vote about releasing xbean-2.7 from the
current svn head. This will enable to use
maven release plugin to directly upload the
release to the maven repository.
[ ] +1 release
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-974?page=all ]
james strachan resolved AMQ-974.
Fix Version/s: 4.1
Resolution: Fixed
Patch applied - many thanks!
.Net client needs centralised trace facility
Nope, still problems after this...
--jason
On Oct 16, 2006, at 10:51 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jdillon
Date: Mon Oct 16 10:51:39 2006
New Revision: 464585
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=464585
Log:
Disable the tools profile for now to test crazy mvn snapshot muck
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-973?page=all ]
james strachan reassigned AMQ-973:
--
Assignee: james strachan (was: Rob Lugt)
.Net client sends message acknowledgements as synchronous requests instead of
asynchronous oneWay packets
I think I have tracked this down... looks like ${pom.version} is
getting resolved to a timestamp version instead of the value it its
parents version element.
Is this expected?
If my parent has 1.1-SNAPSHOT, and an intermediate module defines a
dependency using ${pom.version}, should this
Dain,
Could you clarify the Full Java 5 support item some more? I was
under the impression when I first read this (esp. the statement about
certification) that this was the work necessary to get to JEE5.
However, others have indicated that this is really certification (TCK at
the 1.4 spec
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-973?page=all ]
james strachan resolved AMQ-973.
Fix Version/s: 4.1
Resolution: Fixed
Patch applied - many thanks!
.Net client sends message acknowledgements as synchronous requests instead of
On 10/13/06, Sakala, Adinarayana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am planning to update CXF project to use ActiveMQ 4.0.1 release.
Currently it uses 3.2.
Where can I find the Maven 2 snapshots for 4.0.1 release?
4.0.x uses Maven 1 for its building distribution. It might be worth
going
I agree and would also suggest keeping the dojo based web app in the
separate EAR for now. Thus the dojo ear can be updated/developed on a
base DayTrader version.
Stan.
Paul McMahan wrote:
On 10/16/06, Christopher Blythe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any initial thoughts on how we should start
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-855?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino resolved AMQ-855.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix for 'sendPullCommand(0)' issue applied to trunk revision 464643
Add support for prefetchSize = 0
On Oct 16, 2006, at 11:28 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Dain,
Could you clarify the Full Java 5 support item some more? I was
under the impression when I first read this (esp. the statement
about certification) that this was the work necessary to get to
JEE5. However, others have indicated that
+1
Jacek
On 10/16/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As proposed in the earlier discussion, I start
a vote about releasing xbean-2.7 from the
current svn head. This will enable to use
maven release plugin to directly upload the
release to the maven repository.
[ ] +1 release xbean
+1
-dain
On Oct 16, 2006, at 10:32 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
As proposed in the earlier discussion, I start
a vote about releasing xbean-2.7 from the
current svn head. This will enable to use
maven release plugin to directly upload the
release to the maven repository.
[ ] +1 release xbean
I'd like to start the release process for 3.0.1.
The list of bugs fixed in 3.0.1 is available at
http://issues.apache.org/activemq/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?view=decorator=printablestart=0fixfor=11716mode=hidereset=truepid=10950tempMax=1000
[ ] +1 Release servicemix 3.0.1
[ ] 0 Abstain
[ ] -1
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Oct 16, 2006, at 10:32 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
As proposed in the earlier discussion, I start
a vote about releasing xbean-2.7 from the
current svn head. This will enable to use
maven release plugin to directly upload the
release to the maven repository.
[ ] +1
+1 from me
On Tue, 2006-10-17 at 00:43 +0200, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I'd like to start the release process for 3.0.1.
The list of bugs fixed in 3.0.1 is available at
+1 from me too
-Original Message-
From: Ramon Buckland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 17 October 2006 9:54 AM
To: servicemix-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Servicemix 3.0.1
+1 from me
On Tue, 2006-10-17 at 00:43 +0200, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I'd like to
Ok. Made the dir browseable.Will be happy to share the PPTs with you once I finish them.--Brian ChanChief Software ArchitectLiferay, Inc.Enterprise. Open Source. For Life.On 10/16/06 5:10 AM,Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:On 10/14/06, Brian Chan wrote:
The latest Liferay portal plugins
Brian Chan wrote:
Paul, that stacktrace looks very very similar.
I am pretty certain it is the deployer filter...I am willing to bet some
large quantity of beers that if Paul removes the Spring filter from the
jetty deployer plan file, it will work ;-) I remember that error pretty
well when
Paul, that stacktrace looks very very similar.I believe I actually had to do a fix on the Liferay code itself. Are you using Liferay trunk?--Brian ChanChief Software ArchitectLiferay, Inc.Enterprise. Open Source. For Life.On 10/16/06 9:08 AM,Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:On 10/16/06, Jeff
Sure thing Paul. Just let me know what to do for the Jetty and 1.2.x plugin.--Brian ChanChief Software ArchitectLiferay, Inc.Enterprise. Open Source. For Life.On 10/16/06 8:08 AM,Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:On 10/16/06, Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 10/14/06, Brian Chan wrote:
The latest
Jeff,I hope you're right... cause I'd like to buy you a beer anyways (just one though).--Brian ChanChief Software ArchitectLiferay, Inc.Enterprise. Open Source. For Life.On 10/16/06 8:51 PM,Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Brian Chan wrote:
Paul, that stacktrace looks very very similar.
I
Thanks Aaron David Jencks,I would go ahead and create a GUI that requires exactly one pattern for now.-- Thx,ShivaOn 10/13/06,
Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/13/06, Shiva Kumar H R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My query now is: 1) Why is pattern element listed as a choice? Isn't it
72 matches
Mail list logo
