Build is failing with a NullPointerException. Console output given below:
[INFO] Packaging module configuration:
C:\G1.2\configs\dojo-jetty\target\plan\pl
an.xml
[INFO]
[ERROR] BUILD ERROR
[INFO]
---
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2583?page=comments#action_12454545
]
Rakesh Midha commented on GERONIMO-2583:
David, I think I agree with your point. You are right, it is not acceptable to
include hot deployer classes i
Console output given below.
[INFO] Surefire report directory:
C:\G1.2\modules\geronimo-persistence-jpa10\tar
get\surefire-reports
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireExecutionException:
org/apache/geronimo
/persistence/CMPEntityManagerTest (Unsupported major.minor version 49.0);
nested
excep
APACHE GERONIMO STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2006-11-05 18:03:59 -0500 (Sun, 05 Nov 2006) $]
The current version of this file can be found at:
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk/STATUS
Upcoming Releases:
Geronimo 1
First off I'd like to give everyone a hearty "thank you" to everyone
that has (already) worked on 1.2, so THANK YOU.
Now that we have branched 1.2, I think we should get the code out to
our users as soon as possible, and I think this means releasing an
uncertified 1.2-beta. This will allow
Something we are doing is running close to the limit. While working
on the car-maven-plugin I had it set up to start a new kernel for
each config (and stop it when done) but consistently ran out of
permGen space. Anyone know how to investigate this?
thanks
david jencks
On Nov 29, 2006,
This seems to be a transient failure... sometimes I get the OOME,
sometimes I don't :-(
--jason
On Nov 29, 2006, at 1:12 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 11/29/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now I am seeing "OutOfMemoryError: PermGen space":
I saw it once or twice but then it d
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1078?page=comments#action_37602 ]
Hiram Chirino commented on AMQ-1078:
Fixed in trunk revision 480717
> Messages consumed with the Resource Adapter are intermittently not delivered
> --
Messages consumed with the Resource Adapter are intermittently not delivered
Key: AMQ-1078
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1078
Project: ActiveMQ
On 11/29/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now I am seeing "OutOfMemoryError: PermGen space":
I saw it once or twice but then it disappeared. I wonder whether it's
related to the change or something else. PermGen space is where
classes are loaded to so perhaps we need to increase it f
Now I am seeing "OutOfMemoryError: PermGen space":
Running org.apache.openejb.deployment.entity.cmp.cmr.onetomany.OneToManyTest
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireExecutionException:
org.apache.openejb.deployment.entity.cmp.cmr.onetomany.OneToManyTest;
nested exception is java.lang.OutOfMe
Thanks Anita
On Nov 29, 2006, at 2:25 PM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
Hi All,
The build for the trunk expects source to be 1.5 and the generated
code will be 1.5.
Thanks,
Anita
__
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone
David Jencks wrote:
We're going to have mixed assemblies for a while until we complete all
the ee 5 bits. I don't see any value in removing functionality from
our server before we have an ee5 replacement.
Is it possible to have mixed assemblies without changing components that
are commo
Without going too deep into the history of this long mail, I believe
the test framework does make it easy to setup tests like this where
you need a running server and need to deploy multiple apps. If there
is a need for more common tooling, we can definitely provide them.
I am wondering if those
On Nov 29, 2006, at 11:16 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Hi David,
I haven't seriously tried the new test jars after your added the
getName(). It failed once but I didn't give it a serious thought since
I could have been running 2.2-SNAPSHOT. I realized much later that
there is now a 2.3-SNAPSHOT.
Hi All,
The build for the trunk expects source to be 1.5 and the generated
code will be 1.5.
Thanks,
Anita
Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
http://new.mail.yahoo.com
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2603?page=comments#action_12454416
]
Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-2603:
I certainly hope not... if so... mvn is more annoying and lame than I had
thought.
When are we going to come
Hi David,
I haven't seriously tried the new test jars after your added the
getName(). It failed once but I didn't give it a serious thought since
I could have been running 2.2-SNAPSHOT. I realized much later that
there is now a 2.3-SNAPSHOT.
Thanks for putting this in. I shall give it a shot soo
Here's a problem that requires 2 apps (datasource and ear) to
demonstrate, and manifests as a deployment failure.
Does the new test framework make it easy to set up tests like this?
Is there a sample? Any volunteers for this one?
I have a few test apps kind of like this sitting around fro
+1 to make trunk Java5 only
dain
On Nov 27, 2006, at 8:18 AM, Paul McMahan wrote:
On 11/27/06, anita kulshreshtha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would like to change (at least) the target to 1.5 in the trunk.
comments?
+1 on changing the target to 1.5 in trunk. I think the branches
sho
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-114?page=all ]
Sachin Patel closed GERONIMODEVTOOLS-114.
-
Fix Version/s: 1.2.0
Resolution: Fixed
> New ASF Source Header
> -
>
> Key: GERONIMODEVTO
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-116?page=all ]
Sachin Patel closed GERONIMODEVTOOLS-116.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Publish command timeout values should be customizable
> -
>
On Nov 27, 2006, at 3:45 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Nov 27, 2006, at 2:16 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
On 11/27/06, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This looks like a problem with surefire. These test classes run
fine
in the released version of surefire, but looks like something
On Nov 29, 2006, at 9:47 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Personally I'd prefer to move forward with Java EE 5.0. I think
1.4 assemblies would be nice but we have existing branches for that
area and based on user feedback that isn't an area that is really
interesting to them.
We're going to hav
Personally I'd prefer to move forward with Java EE 5.0. I think 1.4
assemblies would be nice but we have existing branches for that area
and based on user feedback that isn't an area that is really
interesting to them.
On Nov 29, 2006, at 12:20 PM, Paul McMahan wrote:
I think it would b
I think it would be cool to be able to build mixed 1.4/JEE5 assemblies
but I'm not clear on how to make that happen without creating a
proliferation of modules, configs, and assemblies. So I have been
working under the assumption that trunk is strictly for EE5 and that
any references to J2EE 1.4
What are people's thoughts on annotation support we should provide in
Geronimo 2.0? I'm not referring to the spec annotations, but
container specific annotations (configuration in our g-deployment
plans). From a users perspective, our deployment plans are massive
and one of the options to
+1
Thanks
Anita
--- Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> David,
>
> I think this is a great idea. However, I'm curious about the need
> for
> the 1.4 specs in trunk. Do you envision this soon being replaced by
> a
> JavaEE5 specs car? Should we just rename this now to be JavaEE5 and
>
David,
I think this is a great idea. However, I'm curious about the need for
the 1.4 specs in trunk. Do you envision this soon being replaced by a
JavaEE5 specs car? Should we just rename this now to be JavaEE5 and
then update the individual specs contained within it? Just curious on
h
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-117?page=all ]
Sachin Patel reassigned GERONIMODEVTOOLS-117:
-
Assignee: Sachin Patel
> Geronimo deployement plan editor crashes with ArrayStoreException when adding
> dependencies
> ---
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-117?page=comments#action_12454328
]
Sachin Patel commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-117:
---
When you extracted the daily driver over the existing install, did you relaunch
eclipse w
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2603?page=comments#action_12454301
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-2603:
--
David, That is exactly where I looked for the car-maven-plugin version. After I
wrote this comemnt
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2283?page=all ]
Vamsavardhana Reddy updated GERONIMO-2283:
--
Fix Version/s: 1.2
2.0
> Common libs portlet guesses wrong group ID, gives no usage advice
> -
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-908?page=all ]
Jonas Lim resolved AMQ-908.
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.0.3)
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Ken!
patch applied to trunk: r480575
> Authorization plugin should have configurable principal classe
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-931?page=all ]
Vamsavardhana Reddy closed GERONIMO-931.
Resolution: Fixed
Administrative security realm is renamed from "geronimo-properties-realm" to
"geronimo-admin".
Fixed in rev 480571 (branch
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2283?page=comments#action_12454305
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-2283:
---
Regarding the groupId part of the issue, I am noticing on Windows that the
groupId filled in upo
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2283?page=comments#action_12454303
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-2283:
---
Each of the repository entries listed on the Common Libs page is made a link
which shows usage h
Building Geronimo Configs :: J2EE Corba Yoko ORB error
--
Key: GERONIMO-2606
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2606
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level:
Bug in STOMP transport unsubscribe
--
Key: AMQ-1077
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1077
Project: ActiveMQ
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Transport
Affects Versions: 4.0.2
On 11/29/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OpenEJB 2 (2.2 or 2.3) will not build due to test failures in
"OpenEJB :: Builder":
...
It would be really nice if someone could get this fixed... as G is
stuck in the water until these pass.
It should be fixed now. Give it a shot and repor
Geronimo deployement plan editor crashes with ArrayStoreException when adding
dependencies
--
Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-117
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTO
NPE if exporting plugin for module having dependency on module with no groupId
--
Key: GERONIMO-2605
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2605
Project: Geronimo
Unit tests should not really take to much time... and thus should not
really be turned off. Tests may need to be revisited to improve the
speed, or split them off into unit and integration tests (easy to do
with TestNG using groups).
Also, not sure what the fork mode is set to currently fo
On 11/29/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OpenEJB 2 (2.2 or 2.3) will not build due to test failures in
"OpenEJB :: Builder":
Whoops! It's probably me who broke it. I intentionally turned off the
tests to speed up the build and incidentally introduced the failures.
Dave J. has propos
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2579?page=all ]
Jason Dillon closed GERONIMO-2579.
--
Resolution: Won't Fix
TestNG with Surefire 2.3-SNAPSHOT appears to work fine with JDK 1.5
annotations. Appears that you need to use a suite.xml to get
45 matches
Mail list logo
