I think there is another problem here.
The defaultMep should not be needed, as the BC should recognized
which operation is targeted and should infer the mep automatically.
If the attribute is needed, it means:
1) the request sent is not correct
2) the operation recognition mechanism is
Freeman,
I've just noticed that the size of the two CXF based components is
very high. It seems there are lots of jars that are included but not
really needed (xalan, xerces, wsdl4j, woodstox, etc...). Lots of
these jars are already in ServiceMix container classpath or provided
by
Hi Guillaume,
I will fix it.
Best Regards
Freeman
Nodet Guillaume wrote:
Freeman,
I've just noticed that the size of the two CXF based components is
very high. It seems there are lots of jars that are included but not
really needed (xalan, xerces, wsdl4j, woodstox, etc...). Lots of
Unable to open Deployment plan editor in Eclipse
-
Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-182
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-182
Project: Geronimo-Devtools
Issue Type: Bug
Yay... much happier now :-)
Thanks!
--jason
On Aug 16, 2007, at 8:03 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
The test should be fixed now (and it also works nicely on IBM JDK
now too).
The GBeanBinding.addBinding() method only binds stuff into the JNDI
context on the first call. The way the test was
Thanks!
-Donald
Jarek Gawor wrote:
The test should be fixed now (and it also works nicely on IBM JDK now too).
The GBeanBinding.addBinding() method only binds stuff into the JNDI
context on the first call. The way the test was setup, it was called
multiple times for one binding. Therefore,
Me too. Thanks Jarek/David !!
Jason Dillon wrote:
Yay... much happier now :-)
Thanks!
--jason
On Aug 16, 2007, at 8:03 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
The test should be fixed now (and it also works nicely on IBM JDK now
too).
The GBeanBinding.addBinding() method only binds stuff into the JNDI
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12520527
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-181:
---
OK, then I guess creating a repository
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12520525
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-2567:
Are both machines using static IP addresses?
I've been able to
Hi!!
I make a change in the portOffset value in the
config-substitutions.properties. Lets suppose portOffset=1. Then I use
Eclipse to start the server. Server fails to start, but when I start the
server from Geronimo_home/bin/startup.bat it starts fine.
These are my observations for the same
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ted Kirby updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-141:
---
Attachment: GD-141.patch
Here is a patch to change the jst version from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-180?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim McConnell updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-180:
---
For reference to the unstable repo:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Paul McMahan reassigned GERONIMO-3386:
--
Assignee: Paul McMahan
Nothing returned when clicking on Save button at creating
Here's my +1 assuming TCK is still 100% (tests are still running).
Joe
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
The updated binaries are available for review. I have incorporated the
security changes provided by David Jencks, Kevan and Vamsi. Thanks gents !
I also incorporated a few additional fixes. Please
+1
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
The updated binaries are available for review. I have incorporated
the security changes provided by David Jencks, Kevan and Vamsi.
Thanks gents !
I also incorporated a few additional fixes. Please note the change
log for the changes to the release notes for more
Hernan, what you are seeing is expected and is a side effect of the
way that we test release candidates [1]. For a given geronimo
release there are three parts of the plugin system that need to be
tested:
1.) the plugin installer
2.) the plugins
3.) the plugin catalog
Right now the 2.0
Great ideas! I'm favorable on all 3.
Does unifying install and deploy directories mean you can't have them
separate? Or is that just a configuration thing? When you have a lot of
components, it's nice to be able to easily tell the SEs/BCs from the service
assemblies. And I guess there are
Sent my vote to the user list by accident.
Here is my official +1
On Aug 15, 2007, at 4:39 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
The updated binaries are available for review. I have incorporated
the security changes provided by David Jencks, Kevan and Vamsi.
Thanks gents !
I also incorporated a
Thanks Paul for such detailed explanation, I still have a lot to learn on the
plugin architecture.
Cheers!
Hernan
Paul McMahan wrote:
Hernan, what you are seeing is expected and is a side effect of the way
that we test release candidates [1]. For a given geronimo release there
are three
+1
Cheers!
Hernan
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
The updated binaries are available for review. I have incorporated the
security changes provided by David Jencks, Kevan and Vamsi. Thanks gents !
I also incorporated a few additional fixes. Please note the change log
for the changes to the release
+1 to Sachin :o
Vamsi
On 8/17/07, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello community members...
I'd thought I'd shoot of a note to explain my limited involvement in
the project as of recent. As some have you may have known, I've
taken a new job thats taken has taken away from the
Congrats on the wedding, Sachin. Good luck with the new job.
--
Erik B. Craig
+1.
A bad plan (the service-ref specifies a wrong endpoint address) is
causing two jax-ws tests to fail in the webservices testsuite (it's my
fault for including a version number in the endpoint address - this
has been addressed in trunk and 2.0 branches).
This is definitely not a critical issue
Congrats on the wedding, way to go !!!
Cheers!
Hernan
Sachin Patel wrote:
Hello community members...
I'd thought I'd shoot of a note to explain my limited involvement in the
project as of recent. As some have you may have known, I've taken a new
job thats taken has taken away from the Java
Hello community members...
I'd thought I'd shoot of a note to explain my limited involvement in
the project as of recent. As some have you may have known, I've
taken a new job thats taken has taken away from the Java enterprise
space. As we all know what starting a new job is like, I've
Congrats on the marriage!
Sachin Patel wrote:
Hello community members...
I'd thought I'd shoot of a note to explain my limited involvement in the
project as of recent. As some have you may have known, I've taken a new
job thats taken has taken away from the Java enterprise space. As we
Sachin, congrats to you on the new job and on the marriage! You
have made some tremendous contributions to this project in many
different areas and I think this community will always appreciate and
benefit from your involvement at whatever level your circumstances
allow :-)
Best
Sachin,
Congrats on the marriage and good luck with your new job!
Jarek
On 8/17/07, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello community members...
I'd thought I'd shoot of a note to explain my limited involvement in
the project as of recent. As some have you may have known, I've
taken a
Congrats on both counts Sachin (but especially on your upcoming
wedding)! Thanks for all your contributions to Geronimo. You've helped
the project immensely. Hopefully you will still have some cycles to
throw our way. :-)
Joe
Sachin Patel wrote:
Hello community members...
I'd thought
Wow, good luck on all counts !!!
Sachin Patel wrote:
Hello community members...
I'd thought I'd shoot of a note to explain my limited involvement in the
project as of recent. As some have you may have known, I've taken a new
job thats taken has taken away from the Java enterprise space. As
I did a bit of tinkering around with the tomcat and jetty jee5, as well as
minimal assemblies, and failed to find anything slap-me-in-the-face obvious,
while I did pay some close attention to trying to break the various security
mechanisms in it, and it seemed to withstand what I threw against it,
+1
On Aug 15, 2007, at 4:39 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
The updated binaries are available for review. I have incorporated
the security changes provided by David Jencks, Kevan and Vamsi.
Thanks gents !
I also incorporated a few additional fixes. Please note the change
log for the
On 8/17/07, Nodet Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everybody !
I'm wondering if we should change a few things to the distribution so
that it is easier to use:
* keep a single hot deploy folder instead of install / deploy
* put components inside the hot deploy folder so that users
Congratulations on your new job! And most importantly congratulations
on your incoming wedding!!!
Lin
Sachin Patel wrote:
Hello community members...
I'd thought I'd shoot of a note to explain my limited involvement in the
project as of recent. As some have you may have known, I've taken a
I'm just thinking about a configuration change.
We just need to make a few changes in the configuration:
smx:container ...
monitorDeploymentDirectory=false
monitorInstallationDirectory=true
installationDirPath=./hotdeploy
Congrats on the new job and the especially the wedding. At some
point there will the pitter pat of new developers running around at
the Patel household :)
Here is wishing you the best on your new projects at work and personal.
On Aug 17, 2007, at 11:35 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:
Hello
Perfect! I think it's a nice simplification.
alex
On 8/17/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm just thinking about a configuration change.
We just need to make a few changes in the configuration:
smx:container ...
monitorDeploymentDirectory=false
Very much true. Congrats Sachin on your new Job and Wedding!
- Shiva
On 8/17/07, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sachin, congrats to you on the new job and on the marriage! You
have made some tremendous contributions to this project in many
different areas and I think this community
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3161?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erik B. Craig closed GERONIMO-3161.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Erik B. Craig
This issue has been resolved through a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erik B. Craig closed GERONIMO-3381.
---
Patch is effective
Error launching jsrc2g from within eclipse if no jsp sources are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erik B. Craig closed GERONIMO-3342.
---
Provide a way to launch J2G components from within Eclipse IDE environment
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3200?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erik B. Craig closed GERONIMO-3200.
---
Windows .bat files have hard coded assumptious paths, with no error checks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erik B. Craig closed GERONIMO-3298.
---
J2G scripts don't have execute permission by default
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods reassigned GERONIMO-3420:
--
Assignee: Donald Woods
Remote deploy of an EAR without an application.xml plan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12520624
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-3420:
Updating the datastream to include a leading version number as
+1. Thanks for pulling the artifacts together for vote!
Lin
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
The updated binaries are available for review. I have incorporated the
security changes provided by David Jencks, Kevan and Vamsi. Thanks gents !
I also incorporated a few additional fixes. Please note the
My +1 too.
All my sample web-apps (in GERONIMO-3254) work successfully except for the
problem that was reported in GERONIMO-3380, but that's a non-blocker.
- Shiva
On 8/17/07, Lin Sun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1. Thanks for pulling the artifacts together for vote!
Lin
Matt Hogstrom
+1
--kevan
On Aug 15, 2007, at 4:39 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
The updated binaries are available for review. I have incorporated
the security changes provided by David Jencks, Kevan and Vamsi.
Thanks gents !
I also incorporated a few additional fixes. Please note the change
log for the
Thanks for all your help. Congrats, good luck and best wishes on your
future endeavors!
Ted Kirby
On 8/17/07, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello community members...
I'd thought I'd shoot of a note to explain my limited involvement in
the project as of recent. As some have you may
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12520677
]
Paul McMahan commented on GERONIMO-3386:
it seems that internet explorer has a strange bug where it
+1
Vamsi
On 8/16/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The updated binaries are available for review. I have incorporated
the security changes provided by David Jencks, Kevan and Vamsi.
Thanks gents !
I also incorporated a few additional fixes. Please note the change
log for the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim McConnell reassigned GERONIMODEVTOOLS-145:
--
Assignee: Tim McConnell (was: Sachin Patel)
Provide
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-3415.
--
Resolution: Fixed
A lot of work for this was done for GERONIMO-3416. The final bits are in
I've noticed that sometimes when people merge bug fixes/changes from
one branch to another they don't include the jira number from the
original commit. This makes it exceedingly hard to figure out which
branches something has been fixed in from the jira issue or the
commit logs.
In the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-3407.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Kevan merged this into 2.0.1 in rev 565912 and 2.0-SNAPSHOT in rev 565936
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-3404.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0
Kevan merged this into 2.0.1 in rev 565912 and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-3406.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Kevan merged this into 2.0.1 in rev 565912 and 2.0-SNAPSHOT in rev 565936
On 8/17/07, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd thought I'd shoot of a note to explain my limited involvement in
the project as of recent. As some have you may have known, I've
taken a new job thats taken has taken away from the Java enterprise
space. As we all know what starting a
ClassFinder classloader problems cause deployer to hang
---
Key: GERONIMO-3421
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3421
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3421?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
toby cabot updated GERONIMO-3421:
-
Attachment: deployer-message-patch.txt
Here's a patch...
ClassFinder classloader problems
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ted Kirby updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-141:
---
Attachment: GD-141-2.patch
Here is a second patch that includes the jst
Provide per-db filtering of artifacts in the console database wizard
Key: GERONIMO-3422
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3422
Project: Geronimo
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3422?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-3422.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Implemented in trunk in rev 567194. I added filters for the dbs listed
I finally got sufficiently annoyed at the list of almost all the jars
in the repo in the db pool wizard to implement per-db filtering
(GERONIMO-3422). I put in filters for the dbs listed in http://
geronimo.apache.org/driver-downloads.properties except for the sybase
jconnect drivers (I
I'd like to distribute the tranql rars for db2, mysql, and oracle
with geronimo. These rars need access to the proprietary drivers in
order to compile (or work) but all the code in them is asl2
licensed. Are there any problems doing this?
thanks
david jencks
+1
david jencks
On Aug 15, 2007, at 1:39 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
The updated binaries are available for review. I have incorporated
the security changes provided by David Jencks, Kevan and Vamsi.
Thanks gents !
I also incorporated a few additional fixes. Please note the change
log
+1
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
The updated binaries are available for review. I have incorporated the
security changes provided by David Jencks, Kevan and Vamsi. Thanks gents !
I also incorporated a few additional fixes. Please note the change log
for the changes to the release notes for more
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods closed GERONIMO-3420.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 567215 in branches/2.0 (2.0.2-SNAPSHOT)
Committed
I don't think there is anything wrong with including them. We
compile them against the jdbc drivers provided by the vendors but
don't include the jars themselves.
+1 to the idea.
I'll package up the DB2 one.
On Aug 17, 2007, at 8:57 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I'd like to distribute the
69 matches
Mail list logo
