Nice to see your priorities :) more so config.ser-xml OSGI ones.
On Feb 11, 2008 9:50 PM, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Replace as much as possible of the gbean infrastructure with xbean-reflect
Remove the necessity of specifying gbean metadata in java code (GBeanInfo)
Replace
On Feb 11, 2008 10:12 PM, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 11, 2008, at 3:14 AM, Shiva Kumar H R wrote:
On Feb 8, 2008 2:09 PM, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3a is implemented in 2.1
Is there an admin console page for this already implemented?
yes, the bottom
Please see 11-Feb IRC chat btw djencks, shivahr mcconne
http://servlet.uwyn.com/drone/log/bevinbot/geronimo/20080211 for further
discussions on this.
As recommended by DJencks we will experiment using JAXB in GEP 2.1.
--
Thanks,
Shiva
On Feb 11, 2008 9:22 PM, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Feb 12, 2008 2:38 AM, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 11, 2008 10:57 AM, Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Back on the 5 min tutorial, I'm still having some issues deploying the
app. My latest environment is using G 2.1 RC that is currently out for a
vote (Tomcat
(Pasting DJencks reply from the other thread)
On Feb 12, 2008 2:03 AM, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My understanding is that jaxb is included in the jre starting with
java 6. IMO this is one of the arguments in its favor.
We also can't avoid it at this point. Openejb deployment is
Server may try to start modules in an order that won't work
---
Key: GERONIMO-3840
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3840
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Need a way to load config.xml customizations without a whole config.xml file
Key: GERONIMO-3841
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3841
Project: Geronimo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3841?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks resolved GERONIMO-3841.
Resolution: Fixed
I've committed my implementation in rev 620730. If no one has a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks resolved GERONIMO-3840.
Resolution: Fixed
I've committed my implementation in rev 620729. If no one has a
I've fixed a couple problems (GERONIMO-3840/41) and wouldn't mind
some other eyes looking at the solutions I've come up with.
3840: Server was trying to load modules in an essentially random
order, then start them. Some property editors (e.g. for
defaultEnvironment) are only loaded when a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12568046#action_12568046
]
Rick McGuire commented on GERONIMO-3839:
It seems like HttpRequestEncoder should
On Feb 12, 2008, at 6:47 AM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
Shiva Kumar H R wrote:
On Feb 11, 2008 10:12 PM, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 11, 2008, at 3:14 AM, Shiva Kumar H R wrote:
On Feb 8, 2008 2:09 PM, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sangjin Lee wrote:
While looking at an issue related with a form post (GERONIMO-3839), I
found an even more glaring issue. Namely, any caller-supplied request
body is ignored by HttpRequestEncoder. For example, you may want to
do a simple file upload using an octet stream. One can set the
Jarek Gawor wrote:
I like this list but I think we should first focus on features that
directly impact the end-user experience with G. For example,
considering the first three items on this list, the 3rd one has the
most impact on the end user and therefore in my mind it should have
higher
I'm getting the patch ready for this... Would a separate bug be needed or
shall we use the existing bug but modify it? A single patch will address
both issues...
Thanks,
Sangjin
On Feb 12, 2008 11:12 AM, Rick McGuire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sangjin Lee wrote:
While looking at an issue
I think dain may have something up his sleeve in xbean-reflect that
will make points 1-3 much easier if we start with 1. Time will tell.
thanks
david jencks
On Feb 11, 2008, at 9:55 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
I like this list but I think we should first focus on features that
directly impact
Just use --help
:-P
--jason
-Original Message-
From: David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:21:56
To:dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: GShell Geronimo commands documentation?
there's layout.xml and all the commands are in the command module
a lot of the
On Feb 12, 2008, at 3:36 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Feb 12, 2008, at 12:26 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
Things that I haven't seen mentioned, yet:
EE 6 -- we should be seeing an initial EE 6 spec, soon. As other
projects begin implementing EE 6 capabilities, I expect that we'll
be rolling
On Feb 11, 2008, at 4:32 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
Sounds like a good fix to go into the 2.0.3 stream, too.
Yes. Once txmanager/connector component is released. We can update the
dependency.
--kevan
Thanks, Donald. I'll keep on making my contribution to
Geronimo.
Thanks
--YunFeng
Donald Woods wrote:
YunFeng, due to your recent work to help
internationalize the Admin
Console and for the other JIRAs and patches you've
contributed to
Geronimo over the past year, I just added you
Mea culpa! I didn't copy the user list when I sent out this vote notice.
Please checkout our Geronimo 2.1 release candidate and let us know
what you think.
--kevan
On Feb 10, 2008, at 10:46 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
All,
I've prepared a 2.1 release candidate for your review and vote. I've
I just submitted a patch that includes Rick's fixes as well as the fix that
addresses the content issue. Please review and apply the patch if you're OK
with it... Thanks!
Sangjin
On Feb 12, 2008 1:01 PM, Rick McGuire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sangjin Lee wrote:
I'm getting the patch ready
Since most of the discussion on these two threads has moved to this
thread, I'm going to reiterate, here:
I'm going to be against a page like:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxSITE/Powered+by+Geronimo
Your intentions may be good, but I don't think it's appropriate to
link
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sangjin Lee updated GERONIMO-3839:
--
Priority: Major (was: Minor)
Summary: caller supplied content is ignored, and some
On Feb 12, 2008, at 5:21 PM, David Jencks wrote:
there's layout.xml and all the commands are in the command
module a lot of the commands have some help although I've had
some problems figuring out how to access it.
probably not telling you anything you didn't know :-/
david jencks
there's layout.xml and all the commands are in the command module
a lot of the commands have some help although I've had some problems
figuring out how to access it.
probably not telling you anything you didn't know :-/
david jencks
On Feb 12, 2008, at 1:55 PM, Jason Warner wrote:
Hey all,
I've been doing some work on the wiki page for Gshell, providing information
on the available commands that can be used. The only incarnation of GShell
I've been using, though, is what can be built and used standalone. This
means that I have zero experience with the Geronimo specific
On Feb 12, 2008, at 12:26 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
Things that I haven't seen mentioned, yet:
EE 6 -- we should be seeing an initial EE 6 spec, soon. As other
projects begin implementing EE 6 capabilities, I expect that we'll
be rolling them into Geronimo. There are also new specifications
On Feb 12, 2008, at 12:49 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Kevan Miller wrote:
Server assembly -- We could look at simplifying this process. You
currently must have application plugins in order to include
application capabilities in a server assembly. Why not export
based on one or more installed
On Feb 13, 2008 1:56 AM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Things that I haven't seen mentioned, yet:
EE 6 -- we should be seeing an initial EE 6 spec, soon. As other
projects begin implementing EE 6 capabilities, I expect that we'll be
rolling them into Geronimo. There are also new
Kevan Miller wrote:
Server assembly -- We could look at simplifying this process. You
currently must have application plugins in order to include application
capabilities in a server assembly. Why not export based on one or more
installed applications? Also, in addition to our current,
Sangjin Lee wrote:
I'm getting the patch ready for this... Would a separate bug be
needed or shall we use the existing bug but modify it? A single patch
will address both issues...
I think we can use the already existing one. That patch has not been
committed to the codebase yet.
Rick
Things that I haven't seen mentioned, yet:
EE 6 -- we should be seeing an initial EE 6 spec, soon. As other
projects begin implementing EE 6 capabilities, I expect that we'll be
rolling them into Geronimo. There are also new specifications which we
may need to implement ourselves. I know
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12568300#action_12568300
]
Joe Bohn commented on GERONIMO-3728:
I basically used the org.apache.geronimo prefix
David Jencks wrote:
On Feb 12, 2008, at 6:47 AM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
Shiva Kumar H R wrote:
On Feb 11, 2008 10:12 PM, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 11, 2008, at 3:14 AM, Shiva Kumar H R wrote:
On Feb 8, 2008 2:09 PM, David Jencks [EMAIL
Here is what I think is the correct behavior:
- If the method is POST and the parameters are not empty, then content
should be ignored (as content and form post are mutually exclusive) and the
request should be considered a form post.
- Otherwise, if the content is not null and the method is not
David Jencks wrote:
On Feb 12, 2008, at 6:47 AM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
Shiva Kumar H R wrote:
On Feb 11, 2008 10:12 PM, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 11, 2008, at 3:14 AM, Shiva Kumar H R wrote:
On Feb 8, 2008 2:09 PM, David Jencks [EMAIL
Ok, so I'll start updating the tutorial then.
I'll put it in a new home under Tutorials - EJB applications.
Cheers!
Hernan
Hernan Cunico wrote:
ahhh, that's the spirit !!!
I forgot we already had it listed this under Building Geronimo, just
changed the name to match it with the release
While looking at an issue related with a form post (GERONIMO-3839), I found
an even more glaring issue. Namely, any caller-supplied request body is
ignored by HttpRequestEncoder. For example, you may want to do a simple
file upload using an octet stream. One can set the content using
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12568228#action_12568228
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-3840:
Previous commit broke the build. Rev
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sangjin Lee updated GERONIMO-3839:
--
Attachment: GERONIMO-3839-v2.patch
a suggested (and combined) patch based on Rick's first
I like the idea of a tree. The headings for each category are descriptive
enough that I
don't think we'd lose usability by hiding what's under each category until
needed.
On Feb 12, 2008 11:35 AM, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 12, 2008, at 6:47 AM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
On Feb 8, 2008, at 11:56 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
To foster more projects to test and support Geronimo, I'd like to
float the idea of creating a new page under the Community navigation
section on our home page called -
Ready for Geronimo
Thoughts?
I always have a hard time with
On another stream of thought, relating to the logo and 'catch phrases',
rather then going with something uncommon/unique.. something that might
actually obscure the meaning of what we're trying to convey - any thoughts
on staying with something universally recognizable, keeping it simple?
For
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12568174#action_12568174
]
Shiva Kumar H R commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-279:
--
Followed
I'm hoping it's just configuration options that need to be exposed in
Geronimo.
For DataSources, it's just an updated TranQL code that supports db
clusters and connection failovers.
For ActiveMQ, no idea, as I haven't played around with it yet.
Just throwing out thoughts
-Donald
Geronimo Revision: 620808 built with tests included
See the full build-0900.log file at
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/trunk/20080212/build-0900.log
See the unit test reports at
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/trunk/20080212/unit-test-reports
[INFO
Shiva Kumar H R wrote:
On Feb 11, 2008 10:12 PM, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 11, 2008, at 3:14 AM, Shiva Kumar H R wrote:
On Feb 8, 2008 2:09 PM, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3a is
No, the tested/supported level of JDKs should be in the User Docs for
each release. The Ready/Partner idea is to promote those people who are
extending the Geronimo experience by providing applications or unique
assemblies
-Donald
Alexey Petrenko wrote:
2008/2/8, Donald Woods [EMAIL
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12568138#action_12568138
]
Hernan Cunico commented on GERONIMO-3728:
-
I would think that most of
Inplement command context
-
Key: GSHELL-101
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-101
Project: GShell
Issue Type: New Feature
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: Support -
Geronimo Revision: 620787 built with tests included
See the full build-0800.log file at
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/2.1/20080212/build-0800.log
Download the binaries from
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/2.1/20080212
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
[INFO
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3841?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12568149#action_12568149
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-3841:
Do you have time to also get this into
Figure out how to compile Geronimo schemas using JAXB
-
Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-279
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-279
Project: Geronimo-Devtools
Issue Type:
Model framework for G deployment plans - Change from existing EMF to JAXB
-
Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-278
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-278
Project:
2008/2/8, Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
To foster more projects to test and support Geronimo, I'd like to float
the idea of creating a new page under the Community navigation section
on our home page called -
Ready for Geronimo
The content of this page would be -
- known
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12568148#action_12568148
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-3840:
Do you have time to also get this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rick McGuire updated GERONIMO-3839:
---
Attachment: GERONIMO-3839.patch
Not sure if this is what you had in mind or not, but it
58 matches
Mail list logo
