[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shiva Kumar H R closed GERONIMO-4189.
-
Resolution: Invalid
> Enable Geronimo Eclipse Plug-in (GEP) to get dynamic information
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12614243#action_12614243
]
Shiva Kumar H R commented on GERONIMO-4189:
---
GERONIMODEVTOOLS-434 shows how GE
On 14/07/2008, at 5:17 PM, Peter Petersson wrote:
Gianny Damour wrote:
Hello Peter,
This is great news for Liferay developers!
IMHO, one of the pain points with Liferay development is the time
it takes to build, pack and deploy a WAR to Liferay. Even if
Liferay is not so bad on this front
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12614209#action_12614209
]
Delos Dai commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-402:
Hi,
I have two questions
Thanks for the input David ... answers inline.
David Jencks wrote:
On Jul 16, 2008, at 12:52 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
David,
Can this change be merged into samples/branches/2.1 or is it dependent
on changes in server/trunk that are not included in server/branches/2.1?
These changes definitely
On Jul 16, 2008, at 12:52 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
David,
Can this change be merged into samples/branches/2.1 or is it
dependent on changes in server/trunk that are not included in server/
branches/2.1?
These changes definitely depend on those in rev 664198. I'm of two
minds about porting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12614126#action_12614126
]
Tim McConnell commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-442:
Update these web
Documentation updates
-
Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-442
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-442
Project: Geronimo-Devtools
Issue Type: Sub-task
Reporter: Tim McConnell
Assignee: T
I can test it for you if you put the binary build to somewhere I can pick it
up. Or let me know how to build 2.1.2. This is a critical bug preventing
us going forward with Geronimo.
JIRA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4131?page=com.atla
David,
Can this change be merged into samples/branches/2.1 or is it dependent
on changes in server/trunk that are not included in server/branches/2.1?
Somewhere along the way the app-per-port sample started failing install
in branches/2.1 and I was wondering if these changes (particularly th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4187?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Warner resolved GERONIMO-4187.
Resolution: Fixed
fix committed to trunk in revision 677382
> setManagerClassName has b
On Jul 16, 2008, at 11:10 AM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jul 16, 2008, at 10:43 AM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jul 16, 2008, at 3:39 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
David Blevins wrote:
On Jul 15, 2008, at 10:55 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
I just committed this change. It doesn't look like this is
ca
On Jul 16, 2008, at 10:43 AM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jul 16, 2008, at 3:39 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
David Blevins wrote:
On Jul 15, 2008, at 10:55 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
I just committed this change. It doesn't look like this is
causing any tck issues.
Guessing a lot of those places
That is an interesting article. It seems to have come out when
features were new, but still has good explanatory material. GEP has
several features, site.xml and updatesite.zip built by maven, and an
update site. In my view, the question is do we have features for 2.1,
2.1.1 and 2.1.2 versions o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12614037#action_12614037
]
Ted Kirby commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-235:
See GERONIMODEVTOOLS-353
On Jul 16, 2008, at 3:39 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
David Blevins wrote:
On Jul 15, 2008, at 10:55 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
I just committed this change. It doesn't look like this is
causing any tck issues.
Guessing a lot of those places you added the 3.1 api were more or
less "just in ca
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim McConnell updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-441:
---
Assignee: Tim McConnell
> Retrieving Metadata complete Deployment D
Hi Sainath, thanks very much for working on this. I'll review your patch later
today or tomorrow...
Sainath Chowdary wrote:
Hi,
I completed the part of obtaining metadata complete information from
Deployment Descriptors of Web Projects. I have attached a patch to the
following JIRA for the s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jarek Gawor updated GERONIMO-4131:
--
Attachment: (was: GERONIMO-4131.patch)
> Problems with WebSphere MQ RA deployment
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jarek Gawor updated GERONIMO-4131:
--
Attachment: GERONIMO-4131.patch
Updated the patch to handle the port property (the port prop
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4082?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller reassigned GERONIMO-4082:
--
Assignee: Kevan Miller
> ignored for certain classes that are loaded by system clas
Hi,
I completed the part of obtaining metadata complete information from
Deployment Descriptors of Web Projects. I have attached a patch to the
following JIRA for the same.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-441
The new deployment descriptor classes are designed in such a way
Hi Ted,
Thanks for your comments! Yes the license does not pop up now. I had a look
at one of the tutorial on eclipse.org
http://www.eclipse.org/articles/Article-Update/keeping-up-to-date.html which
is on creating a update site. Just wondering if this can somehow fit in
GERONIMODEVTOOLS-416 not sur
Geronimo Revision: 677247 built with tests included
See the full build-0800.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20080716/build-0800.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20080716
[INFO] BUILD
Thanks Keven for your comments!
A good start point on accessibility is here [1]. W3C has released a
guideline years ago [2]. And a newer version is under development (for a
long time) [3].
I understand that might be lengthy. So I extracted the most relavent
guidelines to Geronimo below. I suggest
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sainath Chowdary updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-441:
--
Assignee: Tim McConnell (was: Sainath Chowdary)
Patch I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sainath Chowdary reassigned GERONIMODEVTOOLS-441:
-
Assignee: (was: Tim McConnell)
> Retrieving Metadat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sainath Chowdary updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-441:
--
Attachment: DeploymentDescriptor.patch
This patch allows GEP
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12613913#action_12613913
]
Ted Kirby commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-275:
The current design is th
David Blevins wrote:
On Jul 15, 2008, at 10:55 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
I just committed this change. It doesn't look like this is causing
any tck issues.
Guessing a lot of those places you added the 3.1 api were more or less
"just in case". You definitely shouldn't need it in any modules
Retrieving Metadata complete Deployment Descriptor for Web Projects
---
Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-441
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-441
Project: Geronimo-Devtool
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12613863#action_12613863
]
YunFeng Ma commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-340:
-
The above sample deplo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
YunFeng Ma updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-440:
Attachment: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-440.patch
We've had a method unmarshalFilter
Convert the old deployment plan to the current version using NamespaceFilter
Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-440
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-440
Project
I had earlier replied to Kevan's mail. Looks like some problem with my
mailbox and it didn't get through. I will be reverting these changes and
committing Sainath's patch today.
And thanks very much Sainath for your awesome work on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-434.
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Sainath C
35 matches
Mail list logo
