For the handler improvement, I think WarConverterService returning
InputStream is more common for user to use. If we need, we can make use of
it and write the bytes from inputStream into a file in Geronimo. What's
your opinion?
For the importing bug, is it
+1
On 1/25/2010 12:52 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
Hi, I'd like to release v1.0 of the Bean Validation Spec API, now that
we have it passing the Bean Validation 1.0 TCK signature tests.
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-065/
The svn location is
Good to see David and Kevan voted :-) To make it release, we need one more
vote from PMC member.
Thanks!
Forrest
+1
2010/1/28 Forrest Xia forres...@gmail.com
Good to see David and Kevan voted :-) To make it release, we need one more
vote from PMC member.
Thanks!
Forrest
--
Ivan
+1
2010/1/28 Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com
On Jan 28, 2010, at 12:27 AM, Delos wrote:
Hi Kevan,
Thanks for your comment.
Now, I have uploaded the newly signed files, could you try it again?
There is no other change.
It's my fault. I should have checked all the remote
+1
Was able to install in Eclipse 3.5.1 from update site, define a 2.2
server, start/stop server and perform a simple deploy.
Maven RAT check only flagged a few files, which should not have headers
(like MANIFEST.MF) and one exsd file in the testsuite which is not part
of the distribution.
BTW - Don't forget to update the versions in trunk before releasing the
artifacts, as trunk is still using version=2.2.0 (and really, the
versions should have been updated right after the 2.2.0 branch was
created)
-Donald
On 1/25/10 8:19 AM, Delos wrote:
Hi everyone,
Please review and
+1
Built the samples locally from the tag.
Maven RAT passed, with only some built time files flagged
(dependencies.xml).
-Donald
On 1/25/10 8:13 AM, Delos wrote:
Hi All,
Forrest and I work together and prepared a release candidate of Geronimo
Samples 2.2 for your
review and vote.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 5:36 AM, Delos dait...@gmail.com wrote:
For the handler improvement, I think WarConverterService returning
InputStream is more common for user to use. If we need, we can make use of
it and write the bytes from inputStream into a file in Geronimo. What's
your opinion?
Vote passes with 5 +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes.
Thanks,
Donald
On 1/25/10 12:52 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
Hi, I'd like to release v1.0 of the Bean Validation Spec API, now that
we have it passing the Bean Validation 1.0 TCK signature tests.
Staging repo:
Delos,
I'm not sure I understand what you are saying. Nothing in Geronimo
needs to generate this webbundle url. It's the user that will have to
construct the right url to deploy a war file using the osgi api
(BundleContext.installBundle()).
If the user is deploying a war file using the deployer
Hi Donald,
When posting vote results, can you please tally the votes, i.e. who
voted.
Thanks,
Craig
On Jan 28, 2010, at 8:02 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Vote passes with 5 +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes.
Thanks,
Donald
On 1/25/10 12:52 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
Hi, I'd like to release v1.0
In case we want to do something similar for Geronimo
http://openejb.apache.org/ejb-31-roadmap.html
Here's the entire wikipage content:
--
{swizzlejira}
#set( $jira =
Vote passed with 5 +1 votes:
Kevan Miller, Jay McHugh, David Jencks, Rick McGuire, Donald Woods
There were no 0 or -1 votes.
The artifacts have been promoted in Nexus to the release repo.
-Donald
On 1/28/10 11:57 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
Hi Donald,
When posting vote results, can you
Geronimo Revision: 904093 built with tests included
See the full build-0900.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100128/build-0900.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100128/unit-test
+1
Built fine and passed RAT.
Jay
Delos wrote:
Hi All,
Forrest and I work together and prepared a release candidate of Geronimo
Samples 2.2 for your
review and vote.
This is the second independent release of samples for Geronimo. Besides some
bug fixes,
in this release,
Sure - we always appreciate the help. I verified that the CLA is
listed and added Vanessa as a geronimo contributor for the doc.
Joe
chi runhua wrote:
Could anyone with the administrator privilege help with this request?
I am sure that the community welcomes all kinds of contribution
I just verified the CLA and added you to the geronimo contributor group.
Looking forward to your contributions!
Joe
Di Hu wrote:
Hello,
My user name on Geronimo Wiki is: *carol h*
I would like to use this account to edit Geronimo doc. Thank you!
-- Forwarded message
+1
Jay
Delos wrote:
Hi everyone,
Please review and vote on the release of the Geronimo Eclipse Plugin
2.2 *RC3*. Compared to RC2, RC3 contains source code packages, checksum
and signature files for you to review.
You can verify the integrity of the files with KEYS
from
Re-enable Single Sign On for G2.2 with Tomcat
-
Key: GERONIMO-5052
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5052
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular
OK. I got it. I'm curious about the scenario when user can deploy a WAR with
BundleContext.installBundle()? Is it included in the programming model of
Aries?
Thanks!
2010/1/29 Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com
Delos,
I'm not sure I understand what you are saying. Nothing in Geronimo
needs to
Thanks for your comments.
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 9:48 PM, Juergen Weber webe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
people who'd use Geronimo as a JEE application server (the vast majority,
as
I see it) might not want to be bothered by OSGI dialogues.
So, I'd vote for
3. hide all OSGI features from
I see. Thanks, Donald
2010/1/28 Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org
BTW - Don't forget to update the versions in trunk before releasing the
artifacts, as trunk is still using version=2.2.0 (and really, the
versions should have been updated right after the 2.2.0 branch was
created)
-Donald
Hi all,
The vote has passed with the following result :
+1: David Jencks, Kevan Miller, Ivan, Donald Woods, Jay D. McHugh
I will promote the artifacts to the central repo.
Thanks for vote to pass!
--
Best Regards,
Delos
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5052?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chi Runhua updated GERONIMO-5052:
-
Description:
When configuring SSO within config.xml for G2.2-tomcat, following exception
hi,
I think it is a good time to stop calling j2ee in our new Geronimo.
There are a lot of places using this term, such as plugin project names,
artifact names, j2eeType...
So which one is more appropriate, javaee or jee?
Any thoughts?
--
Lei Wang (Rex)
rwonly AT apache.org
Hi,
The Geronimo samples 2.2 is going to release, the doc needs update
accordingly. So please help authorize me the right to be able to update the
docs for Geronimo 2.2. thanks!
Forrest
The id I use to sign CLA is Ming Xia, my mail box is forres...@gmail.com
Thanks,
Forrest
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Forrest Xia forres...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The Geronimo samples 2.2 is going to release, the doc needs update
accordingly. So please help authorize me the right to be
Hi,
Before the CDDL license issue is clarified (GERONIMO-4938), shall we
create geronimo-schema-javaee6 in TCK svn first ?
If no objection, I would go on to create it.
--
Ivan
Good idea if following concerns are addressed:
1, This might break some user's existing deployment plan.
2, Doc and Example need update as well after such a change.
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Rex Wang rwo...@gmail.com wrote:
hi,
I think it is a good time to stop calling j2ee in our
30 matches
Mail list logo
