+1
Donald
On 4/28/10 6:30 AM, Ivan wrote:
Please vote for Geronimo Customized Tomcat 7.0.0.0
Vote will be open for 72 hours.
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Staging repo:
Since those are Tomcat source files, does that really mean we have to
fix their source before we can re-release it?
-Donald
On 4/30/10 1:10 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
-1 (sorry)
There are some files with invalid license headers:
that I see with the 2.1.3 version - but I have the same question about
the need for SNAPSHOT references in artifact-alias entries. This one
not only includes reference for Geronimo 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT but also
2.2.2-SNAPSHOT (which AFAIK doesn't even exist yet).
Joe
On 4/23/10 4:17 PM, Donald
+1
Donald
On 4/28/10 8:35 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to the
newly created bundles components.
This components are versions of external Geronimo dependencies that have
been converted into OSGi jars.
This is a single vote for all
for jpa-tests and references to that from jpa-ear, jpa-ejb, and jpa-war.
Joe
On 4/23/10 4:15 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
I've created a release candidate of a set of plugins that can be
used to upgrade an existing Geronimo 2.1.3, 2.1.4, 2.1.5 or
2.1.6-SNAPSHOT server from OpenJPA 1.x to the new
).
Joe
On 4/23/10 4:17 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
I've created a release candidate of a set of plugins that can be
used to upgrade an existing Geronimo 2.2 or 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT server from
OpenJPA 1.x to the new OpenJPA 2.0.0 release, so users can start
experimenting with a JPA 2.0 certified
+1
Donald
On 4/27/10 1:18 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to
release the 3 Java EE schema xmlbean wrapper jars. These are xmlbean
classes generated from the different J2EE 1.4, Java EE 5, and Java EE 6
schemas. These are used by
Might want to post this to annou...@apache.org too
-Donald
On 4/27/10 9:55 PM, Delos wrote:
The Apache Geronimo project is pleased to announce the available of
Apache Geronimo Eclipse Plugin v2.1.5. It supports Geronimo 2.1.5 server
and Eclipse 3.5.x(Galileo). Besides, GEP 2.1.5 includes
Can you also post this to annou...@apache.org?
-Donald
On 4/13/10 9:53 PM, Rex Wang wrote:
The Apache Geronimo project is pleased to announce the available of
Apache Geronimo v2.1.5 server. This release includes many new features,
improvements, and bug fixes. Please see the detail
Not sure if we need/want a branch, given using the release plugin would
update the branch to a new version and create a tag for M1, while also
having trunk still at 3.0-SNAPSHOT
Here are a few things that came to mind for creating a release -
- Update license/notice files
- Remove snapshot
Looks like infra has upgraded cwiki to Confluence 3.2 and now the
autoexport plugin is broken. Navigation menus are not getting created
and editing templates is broken (see [1].)
[1] http://code.google.com/p/couldit-autoexport/issues/detail?id=27
-Donald
+1 (with jaxb-impl excluded from the vote)
-Donald
On 4/27/10 9:08 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
On 4/27/2010 8:00 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Apr 27, 2010, at 6:27 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
On 4/26/2010 10:32 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
Nice stuff Rick. This obviously took some time to
+1 after jaxb and jstl being removed from the vote.
-Donald
On 4/27/10 10:51 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
+1 (with jaxb-impl excluded from the vote)
-Donald
On 4/27/10 9:08 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
On 4/27/2010 8:00 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Apr 27, 2010, at 6:27 AM, Rick McGuire wrote
Sounds good! Thanks for volunteering.
-Donald
On 4/26/10 5:22 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
We have had a couple of fixes in the 2.2 branch since the Geronimo 2.2
was released. Maybe it's time to release Geronimo 2.2.1 to bring all
the available fixes to Geronimo users.
If everybody agree to
Any thoughts on upgrading MyFaces from 1.2.6 - 1.2.8?
-Donald
On 4/26/10 5:22 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
We have had a couple of fixes in the 2.2 branch since the Geronimo 2.2
was released. Maybe it's time to release Geronimo 2.2.1 to bring all
the available fixes to Geronimo users.
If
Looks like GERONIMO-5148, GERONIMO-5180 and GERONIMO-5258 need to get
applied to 2.2.1 and trunk before we can resolve those issues and mark
2.1.5 as released.
-Donald
On 4/21/10 2:52 PM, Ashish Jain wrote:
: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: console
Affects Versions: 2.2, 2.1.5
Reporter: Donald Woods
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 2.1.6, 2.2.1, 3.0
Got feedback from a new Geronimo user (one of our OpenJPA
My +1
Installed plugins using staging repo at -
http://people.apache.org/~dwoods/geronimo/openjpa2/
Built and installed Daytrader 2.1.3 as a EAR from -
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/daytrader/branches/2.1.3/
-Donald
On 4/23/10 4:15 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
I've created
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods reassigned GERONIMO-5259:
--
Assignee: Donald Woods
Annoying access denied security exceptions for oenwebbeans
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods resolved GERONIMO-5259.
Fix Version/s: 3.0
Resolution: Fixed
Committed as r937297.
Published updated 1.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-5259:
---
Affects Version/s: 3.0
(was: 2.2)
Patch Info: [Patch
Jason, I assume you're the owner of some script that is extracting and
copying geronimo/site/trunk/docs/ from svn over to
/www/geronimo.apache.org/ every hour+5 mins? If so, can you fix it, so
the files have g+w set?
Other choice, would be to have infra setup svnpubsub for those files in
svn
+1 Looks good.
-Donald
On 4/22/10 10:38 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Please vote on yoko 1.1, yoko with osgi support. It works enough so an ORB
and HandleDelegate can be bound in jndi. There are no non-classloading
related code changes from previous yoko releases.
Staging repo:
Believe these are okay after second look.
+1
-Donald
On 4/22/10 3:43 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
Here are 3 scripts attached to help checkout, rat:check and build the
tags in the vote.
Can we ignore the following rat:check failures?
geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec-1.0 -
src/main/resources
I've created a release candidate of a set of plugins that can be
used to upgrade an existing Geronimo 2.1.3, 2.1.4, 2.1.5 or
2.1.6-SNAPSHOT server from OpenJPA 1.x to the new OpenJPA 2.0.0 release,
so users can start experimenting with a JPA 2.0 certified codebase.
You can install the plugins by
I've created a release candidate of a set of plugins that can be
used to upgrade an existing Geronimo 2.2 or 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT server from
OpenJPA 1.x to the new OpenJPA 2.0.0 release, so users can start
experimenting with a JPA 2.0 certified codebase.
You can install the plugins by using the
1) Rick, I think the staging repo included below is for the RC2 vote.
Shouldn't it be -
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-007/
2) You hadn't dropped the previous 030 staging files in Nexus yet (from
4/16), so I did that for you.
3) The JPA spec below should be
Yep, quick test looked good.
+1
-Donald
On 4/21/10 2:00 PM, Ashish Jain wrote:
Build went fine, project imports went fine, able to start/stop server,
tested couple of apps with IBM Java5/Java6 with eclipse galileo sr2. My +1.
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Delos dait...@gmail.com
So why not release it as version=1.1 and we'll spin a 1.1.1 if more
updates are required? Not sure why we need to version it as a Milestone
release Is there a TCK required? If so, why not upgrade 2.1.5 or
2.2.1-SNAPSHOT to use the new level and verify it still passes the Java
EE 5 TCKs?
-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7 -
src/test/resources/wmtom.bin
geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8/geronimo-javamail_1.4_provider -
Several files under - src/main/resources/OSGI-INF/providers/
-Donald
On 4/22/10 1:03 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
On 4/22/2010 12:58 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
1) Rick, I think the staging
OK, as long as the old tag is removed, I'm good.
-Donald
On 4/19/10 6:12 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
On 4/16/2010 3:40 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
A little confused here
For JPA, you mentioned jpa_3.0_spec-1.2, but I'm guessing you meant
jpa_2.0_spec-1.2.
Looking at the tags, I see 2
Another tag to cleanup -
geronimo-validation_1.0_spec-1.0.1
-Donald
On 4/19/10 6:12 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
On 4/16/2010 3:40 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
A little confused here
For JPA, you mentioned jpa_3.0_spec-1.2, but I'm guessing you meant
jpa_2.0_spec-1.2.
Looking at the tags
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12859405#action_12859405
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-5259:
Did you create your patch against
A little confused here
For JPA, you mentioned jpa_3.0_spec-1.2, but I'm guessing you meant
jpa_2.0_spec-1.2.
Looking at the tags, I see 2 releases of jpa_2.0_spec since I released
the jpa_2.0_spec-1.0 release -
2.0_spec-1.0.1
2.0_spec-1.2
But only the 2.0_spec-1.2 artifacts are in the
I'm copying the last version of the auto-exported content from our
various Confluence spaces over to our geronimo.a.o website right now.
You should be able to reach the docs in about an hour, after the next
www rsync runs.
For Doc links that are -
http://cwiki.apache.org/GOx
you'll be
+1 assuming we pass the TCK.
-Donald
On 4/6/10 9:46 PM, Rex Wang wrote:
Dear All,
I have managed to use maven-release-plugin to make a 2.1.5 release candidate
The tag has been created here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-2.1.5/
The staging repo is
How about under samples/ splitting them into the 3 major themes -
javaee5 - previous samples to show compatibility/migration
javaee6 - new samples using new EE 6 features (like JPA2, EJB 3.1
lite, Servlet 3.0, )
osgi - new samples showing how to use EBA and OSGi
Should we do like the server releases?
The first new major release uses 2 digits and any follow-on maintenance
releases introduce the third digit, like -
2.1, then 2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3,
Bigger question, is what does OSGi want? When we set version ranges
like [1.0,2.0) does having 1.0 vs.
We'll also be upgrading 2.2.1 to use this level of Tomcat, right?
-Donald
On 3/29/10 10:03 PM, Delos wrote:
Thanks all!
Here is the voting result
+1: Ivan, Kevan, Rick
So it has passed voting!
2010/3/30 Rick McGuire rick...@gmail.com mailto:rick...@gmail.com
+1
On
+1 to a milestone release. Would be great to see at least one every
quarter until 3.0 is released.
Would M1 be focused on Aries + available Java EE 6 and OSGi components,
like RFC66, JPA 2.0, Servlet 3.0 preview,
-Donald
On 3/29/10 3:42 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
I'm curious to hear the
Rick, one comment on the geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec changes -
I'm adding the following back in, as the JPA 2.0 Spec suggests using a
provider cache per classloader and even requires implementing a
public void clearCachedProviders()
method to handle flushing the cache.
Otherwise, initial quick
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12847212#action_12847212
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-5178:
General question on discovering
+1
Donald
On 3/16/10 8:53 PM, Ivan wrote:
After resloving some issues, current all the failed cases pass ! So
tx-manager-2.1.4 pass the TCK :-)
2010/3/12 Rex Wang rwo...@gmail.com mailto:rwo...@gmail.com
Thanks, extend anothor 72 hours
2010/3/12 Ivan xhh...@gmail.com
Agree with Kevan's proposed versioning.
-Donald
On 3/16/10 7:36 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Mar 16, 2010, at 6:05 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I'm thinking of porting the work to deal with retrying stuff that didnt work
(GERONIMO-5152) in the tx manager component from trunk back to the 2.1
respectively.
I think we have to use 2.2.1..
2010/3/12 Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org mailto:dwo...@apache.org
+1 to using Genesis 2.0 as this lets us use Nexus to deploy artifacts
(this was discussed in another thread awhile back.)
-1 to requiring Maven 2.2.1, as Genesis 2.0
+1 to using Genesis 2.0 as this lets us use Nexus to deploy artifacts
(this was discussed in another thread awhile back.)
-1 to requiring Maven 2.2.1, as Genesis 2.0 only requires 2.0.10 or later -
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/genesis/tags/genesis-2.0/genesis-default-flava/pom.xml
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12843613#action_12843613
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-5175:
What if you set JRE_HOME correctly?
set
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12843617#action_12843617
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-5178:
Rick, please ping me before changing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12843424#action_12843424
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-5175:
Can you try setting JAVA_HOME
Congrats and welcome aboard!
-Donald
On 3/8/10 8:54 PM, Ivan wrote:
I would like to welcome Forrest aboard, as he recently accepted the
Geronimo PMC invitation to become a committer. His account (xiaming)
was just created, so you should start seeing some commits from him soon.
--
Ivan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12842895#action_12842895
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-5175:
1) Use the md5/sha1from our download
+1 on adding a forth digit, while maintaining existing 1.1-2.2 server
support in the same GEP 2.2.x.x build, along with some wiki updates
explaining which versions should be used for given server/Eclipse
combinations.
-Donald
On 3/5/10 3:30 AM, Delos wrote:
Hi,
Hopefully, we can make a
Adding a forth digit is an option, but not sure if that is an Eclipse
best practice unless it as a _vDate (maybe Tim would have some
background knowledge of this, as it seems we discussed doing this
several years ago)
For OpenJPA, we had an Eclipse plugin contributed to us, which uses a
new
-1 to a branch per server release (like GEP 2.1.x only works with Server
2.1.x) as this would create a maintenance nightmare, where we would now
have to fix a given bug or add a new feature (or upgrade to a newer
Eclipse level) in 4 branches (1.1, 2.0, 2.1, 2.2) instead of just one.
For 3.0, we
You're already in the geronimo-contributors group on cwiki, which should
give you edit access once you log in.
-Donald
On 3/1/10 1:52 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
I can't edit the geronimo wiki. Can anyone help grant me the confluence
edit access ? My Confluence id is genspr...@gmail.com
Yes, that is what we have done in the past before releasing new versions
of the Java EE 5 specs.
-Donald
On 2/28/10 9:36 PM, Delos wrote:
What does full TCK mean? Does it mean we need to run a full TCK on
Geronimo with el_spec of new version?
2010/3/1 Delos dait...@gmail.com
want to edit is
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Geronimo+2.1.5+Release+Status.
I don't know why.
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org
mailto:dwo...@apache.org wrote:
You're already in the geronimo-contributors group on cwiki, which
/detail?id=317
[3]
http://openjpa.apache.org/builds/2.0.0-beta2/apache-openjpa-2.0.0-beta2/RELEASE-NOTES.html
[4] http://cwiki.apache.org/openjpa/jpa-20-roadmap.html
Thanks,
Donald Woods
Apache OpenJPA PMC
Well, the goal I was thinking about was to eventually use groups for
core + console modules per major function. That way, someone could
easily create a minimal JPA, JMS or EBA server without having to figure
out what are the minimal plugins required. This is a snapshot in time,
so the JPA
will go up
for a release vote later today.
-Donald
On 2/18/10 10:55 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
As part of OPENJPA-1520, we are upgrading our trunk builds to require
Java SE 6 to compile and for runtime. If there is a critical need to
maintain Java SE 5 support for our JPA 2.0 runtime, please speak
that includes the 2.1.2 alias entries?
Joe
Donald Woods wrote:
I've created a third release candidate of a set of plugins that can be
used to upgrade an existing Geronimo 2.1.3, 2.1.4 or 2.1.5-SNAPSHOT
server from OpenJPA 1.x to the new OpenJPA 2.0.0-beta, so users can
start experimenting
Vote passes with four +1 votes from:
Donald Woods, Kevan Miller, Rick McGuire and Joe Bohn
There were no 0 or -1 votes.
-Donald
On 2/5/10 10:55 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
I've created a plugin that can be used to upgrade an existing Geronimo
2.2 or 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT server from OpenJPA 1.x
Vote passes with three +1 PMC votes from:
Donald Woods, Kevan Miller and Joe Bohn
There were no 0 or -1 votes.
-Donald
On 2/12/10 5:28 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
I've created a third release candidate of a set of plugins that can be
used to upgrade an existing Geronimo 2.1.3, 2.1.4 or 2.1.5
As part of OPENJPA-1520, we are upgrading our trunk builds to require
Java SE 6 to compile and for runtime. If there is a critical need to
maintain Java SE 5 support for our JPA 2.0 runtime, please speak-up now!
Thanks,
Donald
after upgrading to openjpa2. Would it be possible to spin a new image
that includes the 2.1.2 alias entries?
Joe
Donald Woods wrote:
I've created a third release candidate of a set of plugins that can be
used to upgrade an existing Geronimo 2.1.3, 2.1.4 or 2.1.5-SNAPSHOT
server from
.* image
after upgrading to openjpa2. Would it be possible to spin a new image
that includes the 2.1.2 alias entries?
Joe
Donald Woods wrote:
I've created a third release candidate of a set of plugins that can be
used to upgrade an existing Geronimo 2.1.3, 2.1.4 or 2.1.5-SNAPSHOT
Vote passes with three +1 votes:
Donald Woods, Rick McGuire, Kevan Miller
There were no 0 or -1 votes.
-Donald
On 2/9/10 10:11 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
To support the upcoming OpenWebBeans milestone release, I would like to
release candidate 3 of a Beta of the Java Contexts and Dependency
Well, the openjpa2 plugin XML is hosted off of our geronimo.apache.org
space and the artifacts are staged in the Apache Nexus repo, so not sure
why you are seeing connection refused. Maybe the Nexus server was down
for quick maintenance (which seems to happen every night...)
-Donald
On 2/12/10
8, 2010, at 9:58 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
I've created a second release candidate of a set of plugins that can be
used to upgrade an existing Geronimo 2.1.3, 2.1.4 or 2.1.5-SNAPSHOT
server from OpenJPA 1.x to the new OpenJPA 2.0.0-beta, so users can
start experimenting with a JPA 2.0 certified
As Kevan pointed out, the uber *-source-release.tar/zip files are
missing for the parent pom, so I'll spin another release to fix that.
-Donald
On 2/8/10 9:58 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
I've created a second release candidate of a set of plugins that can be
used to upgrade an existing Geronimo
Still would like to see a couple more votes on this before I close and
release it tonight.
-Donald
On 2/9/10 10:11 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
To support the upcoming OpenWebBeans milestone release, I would like to
release candidate 3 of a Beta of the Java Contexts and Dependency
Injection
for the actual artifacts.
Also, before you can try building the source code, you'll need to have
built a 2.2 Server locally first, otherwise the build will more than
likely fail, as I have never gotten a CAR to build w/o building the
prereq server level locally first
-Donald
On 2/5/10 10:55 PM, Donald
I've created a third release candidate of a set of plugins that can be
used to upgrade an existing Geronimo 2.1.3, 2.1.4 or 2.1.5-SNAPSHOT
server from OpenJPA 1.x to the new OpenJPA 2.0.0-beta, so users can
start experimenting with a JPA 2.0 certified codebase.
You can install the plugins by
+1 Updates look good.
-Donald
On 2/11/10 9:36 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
OK. Looks good now.
Here's my +1. Give this an additional 72 hours. Since artifacts were
changed. Would be best for Donald and Ivan to vote on your updates.
Also, will be waiting on TCK results.
--kevan
On Feb
Vote passes with 6 +1 votes from the following:
Donald Woods, Rick McGuire, Kevan Miller,
David Blevins, Jay McHugh and David Jencks
There were no 0 or -1 votes.
Thanks,
Donald
On 2/8/10 10:36 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
To support the upcoming OpenWebBeans milestone release and as a prereq
implementations and use them.
Do we have any contacts at sun that could assure us that the values in
the sun implementation happen to be correct?
I imagine this applies also to the el 1.o spec although I haven't
located the javadoc for that.
thanks
david jencks
On Feb 8, 2010, at 7:48 PM, Donald
The vote passes with 5 +1 votes from:
Donald Woods, Hai Hong Xu Ivan, Rick McGuire,
Kevan Miller and Jay McHugh
There were no 0 or -1 votes.
Thanks,
Donald
On 2/8/10 10:48 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
To support the upcoming OpenWebBeans milestone release and as a prereq
for the geronimo
Vote passes with the following voting +1:
Donald Woods, Rick McGuire, Kevan Miller, David Blevins,
Jay McHugh and David Jencks
There were no 0 or -1 votes.
-Donald
On 2/3/10 10:36 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
To support the upcoming OpenWebBeans milestone release, I would like to
release
+1
Passed mvn rat:check
Was able to build it from the tag.
JAR file has the required Notice/License files.
I didn't perform any TCK testing on it.
-Donald
On 2/9/10 1:05 AM, Delos wrote:
Hi, I'd like to release v1.0.2 of the EL（Expression Language）1.0 Spec
API. Ivan has run the signature
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5036?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-5036:
---
Component/s: JVM-compatibility
Affects Version/s: 2.1.4
Fix Version/s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods resolved GERONIMO-5121.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.0
Rick applied the patches and I have created
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-4946:
---
Affects Version/s: 2.2.1
2.1.5
2.1.3
, David Jencks wrote:
On Feb 8, 2010, at 8:00 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
To support the upcoming OpenWebBeans milestone release, I would like to
release candidate 2 of a Beta of the Java Contexts and Dependency
Injection (JCDI) JSR-299 Spec API.
Note: This release depends upon 3 other votes
Seems that the tag is somehow missing the changes from r907919 and
907920 (upgrade to el_2.2-1.0-beta), even though the tag was created as
r907921 using the maven release plugin
Will spin a RC3 tonight to fix the tag.
-Donald
On 2/8/10 11:00 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
To support
To support the upcoming OpenWebBeans milestone release, I would like to
release candidate 3 of a Beta of the Java Contexts and Dependency
Injection (JCDI) JSR-299 Spec API.
Note: This release depends upon 3 other votes in progress:
geronimo-el_2.2_spec-1.0-beta
+1
The tag now matches the expected svn code level (el_2.2 reference is fixed.)
Passes mvn rat:check
Was able to build from source tag.
No TCK testing performed.
-Donald
On 2/9/10 10:11 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
To support the upcoming OpenWebBeans milestone release, I would like to
release
I've created a second release candidate of a set of plugins that can be
used to upgrade an existing Geronimo 2.1.3, 2.1.4 or 2.1.5-SNAPSHOT
server from OpenJPA 1.x to the new OpenJPA 2.0.0-beta, so users can
start experimenting with a JPA 2.0 certified codebase.
I just updated the hosted
:13,511 INFO [Runtime] Starting OpenJPA 2.0.0-beta
2010-02-08 10:01:13,572 INFO [JDBC] Using dictionary class
org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.sql.DerbyDictionary.
-Donald
On 2/8/10 9:58 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
I've created a second release candidate of a set of plugins that can be
used to upgrade
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods reassigned GERONIMO-5132:
--
Assignee: Donald Woods (was: Ashish Jain)
In debug mode Properties file login
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-5132:
---
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
Affects Version/s: 3.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-5132:
---
Component/s: security
In debug mode Properties file login module reurns loginsucceeded
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods resolved GERONIMO-5132.
Resolution: Fixed
applied to 2.1.5-SNAPSHOT, 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT and 3.0-SNAPSHOT
In debug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12830973#action_12830973
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-4983:
Patch applied to 2.1.5-SNAPSHOT, 2.2.1
Same plugin metadata issues as with the original 2.1.3-beta plugin that
I fixed in RC2, so canceling this vote and will spin another with
corrected metadata
-Donald
On 2/5/10 10:55 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
I've created a plugin that can be used to upgrade an existing Geronimo
2.2 or 2.2.1
server and using geronimo.sh stop right
after the plugin was installed, everything is working fine now.
-Donald
On 2/8/10 1:09 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
Same plugin metadata issues as with the original 2.1.3-beta plugin that
I fixed in RC2, so canceling this vote and will spin another with
corrected
Yes, I'll try to get to it tonight.
-Donald
On 2/8/10 3:01 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Feb 4, 2010, at 2:02 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
Hi Donald;
I have created a new jira issue and attached patches related with
geronimo_jcdi and geronimo_atinject. Those patches satisfie David
Jencks
and see that OpenJPA was being used -
2010-02-08 16:51:39,117 INFO [Runtime] Starting OpenJPA 2.0.0-beta
2010-02-08 16:51:39,117 INFO [JDBC] Using dictionary class
org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.sql.DerbyDictionary.
-Donald
On 2/5/10 10:55 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
I've created a plugin that can
Should the NOTICE file include W3C and OMG notices? Are those left in
there from prior releases (when we had a common Notice file for all
specs) and need to be removed and a new RC created?
I was able to build from the tagged source and the mvn rat:check passed,
but would like to see unnecessary
To support the upcoming OpenWebBeans milestone release and as a prereq
for the geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec-1.0-beta release, I would like to release
a Beta of the EL 2.2 Spec API.
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-004/
Source tag:
Will spin a RC2 to fix the NOTICE file issues, like we found in the
el_1.0 spec
-Donald
On 2/8/10 10:10 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
To support the upcoming OpenWebBeans milestone release and as a prereq
for the geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec-1.0-beta release, I would like to release
a Beta of the EL
101 - 200 of 2942 matches
Mail list logo
