ersion 2. But I
>> haven't try it yet with the maven plugin you mention.
>>
>> El vie, 8 ene 2021 a las 7:08, Ivan Junckes Filho ()
>> escribió:
>>
>>> Hello guys, I would like to know if there is a way with
>>> geronimo-openapi-plugin to generate t
Hello guys, I would like to know if there is a way with
geronimo-openapi-plugin to generate the documentation for different classes
in the same status code. I didn't tried different ways, but couldn't make
it work. Any advise on this? Is this supported?
@APIResponse(
name = "badRequest",
+1 thank you for this Romain
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 7:53 AM Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Here is the vote for Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.14.
> Here is the changelog:
>
> 1–4 of 4View in Issue Navigator
>
Hernandez wrote:
> Hi Ivan,
>
> Can you share the version of TomEE you were having this issue?
> I want to double-check if was or not fixed on current master but I
> couldn't reproduce the issue.
>
> El lun., 29 jul. 2019 a las 11:16, Ivan Junckes Filho (<
> ivanjunc...@gm
Ok thanks Romain!
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 1:59 PM Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> More likely refine them to exclude geronimo metrics common. Think it was
> fixed on master though, not sure it got released.
>
> Le lun. 29 juil. 2019 à 18:07, Ivan Junckes Filh
:02 PM Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> Hi Ivan
>
> Looks like a tomee config issue, common module shouldnt be scanned, can
> you check your exclusion list?
>
> Le lun. 29 juil. 2019 à 17:47, Ivan Junckes Filho
> a écrit :
>
>> Hey guys, there is an interesting issue h
Hey guys, there is an interesting issue happening with metrics in tomee.
When I can /metrics in the tomee runnning in my localhost wihout docker I
am able to access /metrics endpoint. But in the environment that I use
docker to run TomEE I get the issue below on calling /metrics.
Anybody can
+1
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 6:57 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 29/04/2019 09:41, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > here is the vote for Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.8. This is mainly for a few
> > fixes/enhancement and to enable CXF to upgrade:
>
t;
> Le lun. 15 avr. 2019 à 20:36, Ivan Junckes Filho
> a écrit :
>
>> Romain I was actually using this docker-compose from JL as reference, but
>> wasn't able to make it work.
>>
>> I will have a look at it again this week, if I have improvement I will
>> let
ile-samples/blob/master/docker-compose.yaml
> - you can need to inline the yaml depending you docker compose
> version/setup, multiline is not always well supported.
>
>
>
> Le ven. 12 avr. 2019 à 22:10, Ivan Junckes Filho a
> écrit :
>
> > Hey guys I am having a
Hey guys I am having a hard time to setup TomEE with OpenTracing 1.0.2 +
Zipkin.
When I send the payload to the zipkin API http://localhost:9411/api/v2/spans,
I keep getting back:
400 - "Expected a JSON_V2 encoded list, but received: JSON_V1"
My payload is:
[
{
"annotations": [
{
+1
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 9:30 AM Daniel Cunha wrote:
> +1
>
>
> Em sex, 29 de mar de 2019 às 08:31, Raymond Auge
> escreveu:
>
>> +1
>>
>> - Ray
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 29, 2019, 04:54 Romain Manni-Bucau,
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> Here is the vote for our microprofile openapi
+1
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 12:32 PM Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Seems we were not generating valid openapi.json in some cases when tags
> were set (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6716)
>
> I propose to run a release tomorrow if there is no objection and pending
>
+1
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 5:32 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 25/02/2019 08:51, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > Here is the vote for our openapi+microprofile integration impl 1.0.6.
> >
> > Staging repo is available
> > at
>
Hi Romain, I would love if the schema changes and the "in" ticket from
openapi are in this M3 release, is that possible?
On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 11:53 AM Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> Hi guys, several users asked for some release in MP land, anything you are
> working on or would like in? I will
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16774079#comment-16774079
]
Ivan Junckes Filho commented on GERONIMO-6695:
--
Do you think this and also
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16773390#comment-16773390
]
Ivan Junckes Filho commented on GERONIMO-6695:
--
Now it works, thanks Romain!
> Open
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16773200#comment-16773200
]
Ivan Junckes Filho commented on GERONIMO-6695:
--
[~romain.manni-bucau] it took me some
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16772350#comment-16772350
]
Ivan Junckes Filho commented on GERONIMO-6695:
--
I am trying to build an example
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ivan Junckes Filho updated GERONIMO-6695:
-
Attachment: image-2019-02-19-18-27-41-292.png
> OpenAPI - Sche
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16772160#comment-16772160
]
Ivan Junckes Filho commented on GERONIMO-6695:
--
[~romain.manni-bucau] this is on master
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ivan Junckes Filho updated GERONIMO-6695:
-
Description:
1 - Name of classes are not user friendly
2 - Internal system
Ivan Junckes Filho created GERONIMO-6695:
Summary: OpenAPI - Schemas are not working properly with a few
issues
Key: GERONIMO-6695
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6695
of TomEE doesn't even show ref or any schema classes.
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 12:12 PM Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> Hi Ivan, no the mapping can need some polishing to become mainstream
> (cause it is not openapi role to reimplement all mappers logic) but the
> annotation mapping is don
/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
>
>
> Le lun. 11 févr. 2019 à 14:23, Ivan Junckes Filho
> a écrit :
>
>> Looks like it is fixed in the master, but when I get the lib and add to
>> tomee it shows some bad behavior with the schemas.
>>
>>
Looks like it is fixed in the master, but when I get the lib and add to
tomee it shows some bad behavior with the schemas.
[image: image.png]
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:09 AM Ivan Junckes Filho
wrote:
> No I didn't, I will have a look. thanks
>
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:08 AM Rom
tps://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-pe
e had to set that for the TCK to pass, but the
> config never reached the final distribution. I did notice that and I’ve
> added it in case a MP app is detected, but it was after M2 was released.
>
> Cheers,
> Roberto
>
> On 8 Feb 2019, at 21:06, Ivan Junckes Filho wrote:
>
>
Hey guys, I think there is an issue with parameters as the "in" property is
required by the spec and is not showing up. This affects swagger-ui as it
doesn't replace uf by the actual value. Anyone aware of this issue?
{
"openapi": "3.0.1",
"paths": {
"/test/{uf}": {
"get": {
velopment/java-ee-8-high-performance
> >
>
>
> Le ven. 8 févr. 2019 à 19:01, Ivan Junckes Filho a
> écrit :
>
> > Interesting, ok thanks Romain.
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 3:29 PM Romain Manni-Bucau >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Ivan,
cation-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
>
>
> Le ven. 8 févr. 2019 à 18:14, Ivan Junckes Filho
> a écrit :
>
>> The @OpenAPIDefinition is not being picked up by the CDI extension
>> because it is only getting InternalApplication instead of picking up my
>> c
The @OpenAPIDefinition is not being picked up by the CDI extension because
it is only getting InternalApplication instead of picking up my custom
Application config. Any ideas why? OpenAPIDefinition configs are therefore
not showing up in the openapi doc.
@OpenAPIDefinition(info =
@Info(
Hey guys, I need help with rest client in TomEE.
I am deploying in the same server 2 apps.
app1 -> Has the client interfaces, but I exclude from the war.
app2 -> Has the client interfaces from app1 in a jar.
I deploy app1 and app2 in the same server and I get the
DuplicateDefinitionException.
Thanks Romain!
On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 2:33 PM Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> The Apache Geronimo team is happy to announce the Apache Geronimo OpenAPI
> 1.0.5
> release.
>
> It brings several fixes in the generated openapi model.
>
> You can more on Apache Geronimo OpenAPI and more generally the
+1 thanks Romain
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 1:38 PM Raymond Auge
wrote:
> +1
>
> - Ray
>
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 9:25 AM Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> As requested last week, here is the Apache Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.5 vote.
>>
>> Staging repo can be found at
>>
;http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
>
>
> Le ven. 25 janv. 2019 à 15:18, Iva
AM Ivan Junckes Filho
wrote:
> Thanks Romain, I will have a look.
>
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 10:41 AM Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
>
>> You can use:
>>
>> void start(@Observes @intiialzed(ApplicationScoped.class) Object event,
>> final GeronimoOpen
Good news, this is not happening in the master. I will close the ticket and
wait for the release.
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 11:16 AM Ivan Junckes Filho
wrote:
> This is the ticket:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2457
>
> This looks like a release blocker in my opinion.
ibucau> | Blog
> > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> > <
> https://www.packtp
ps://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
>
>
> Le mar. 22 janv. 2019 à 15:37, Ivan Junckes Filho
> a écrit :
>
>> I would say if the ex
/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
>
>
> Le mar. 22 janv. 2019 à 14:39, Ivan Junckes Filho
> a écrit :
>
>> Hey guys, I would like some help with an opentracing issue. I am not sure
>> if it was already fixed or not. It was happening on version 1
Hey guys, I would like some help with an opentracing issue. I am not sure
if it was already fixed or not. It was happening on version 1.0.0, current
M1 release of TomEE 8.
There is a nullpointer happening in OpenTracingFilter and it seems to be
because this injection is null.
@Inject
private
Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
>
>
> Le ven. 18 janv. 2019 à
Cool I will have a look next week. Can you point out which event is it?
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 1:52 PM Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
>
>
>
> Le jeu. 17 janv. 2019 à 16:49, Ivan Junckes Filho
> a écrit :
>
>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:11 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <
>
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
>
>
> Le jeu. 17 janv. 2019 à 14:49, Ivan Junckes Filho
> a écrit :
>
>> Hey guys, I was trying to make the openapi document generated by
>> geronimo-openapi to work with swagger-ui. The
Hey guys, I was trying to make the openapi document generated by
geronimo-openapi to work with swagger-ui. The issue is I can't execute
requests from swagger-ui in the endpoints generated (metrics, health,
openapi) by TomEE as they don't have a @ApiResponse annotation and
swagger-ui doesn't
ue you are soeaking about? Or did you find another case - i
> know with some ioc lib proxies can swallow annotation but i guess you
> tested on tomee so it should be fine?
>
> Le mer. 9 janv. 2019 18:38, Ivan Junckes Filho a
> écrit :
>
>> Hey Romain, when you say info are y
+1
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 3:03 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 09/01/2019 14:17, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > Here is the annouced vote for our microprofile aggregator project. Here
> > are the fixed issues:
> >
> > P T Key
+1
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 3:02 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 09/01/2019 14:09, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > We already have a few fixes which can be blocker for some users so i'd
> > like to release our MP openapi impl. Here are the
Hey Romain, when you say info are you talking about the annotations below?
I was planning to open an issue to have that information in the open api
document. Is this the same issue?
@OpenAPIDefinition(info = @Info(title = "App Name", version = "1.0"))
On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 7:47 AM Romain
t and 2. guide
> you earlier and avoid to ask you to rework the pr probably. Wdyt?
>
> Romain
>
>
> Le mar. 8 janv. 2019 18:56, Ivan Junckes Filho a
> écrit :
>
>> Hey Romain, I see your comments with feedback in the PR I opened, thank
>> you for that. I had
Hey Romain, I see your comments with feedback in the PR I opened, thank you
for that. I had a busy weekend and couldn't reply immediately.
https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/4
But I saw also in the PR that there were some conflicts and the change was
incorporated in the master
FYI I opened a PR on geronimo to fix the issue with text/html.
https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/4
Postman was working because it used */* and the implementation was properly
handling it, but not handling text/html.
On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 2:34 PM Ivan Junckes Filho
wrote:
>
Ivan Junckes Filho created GERONIMO-6670:
Summary: Content-type text/html is returning error on /open
Key: GERONIMO-6670
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6670
Project
+1
On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 6:30 PM Mark Struberg wrote:
> +1
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> > Am 02.01.2019 um 16:10 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau >:
> >
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > as mentionned here is the vote fore Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.3 to ensure we
> don't need jackson when using it
> >
> > The staging
+1
On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 6:39 PM Mark Struberg wrote:
> +1
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> > Am 02.01.2019 um 16:18 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau >:
> >
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > As mentionned here is the vote for Geronimo Metrics 1.0.2 to ensure
> sigar extension does not register twice the same
e lib.
>
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 10:25 AM Ivan Junckes Filho >
> wrote:
>
> > The goal for this is to implement Microprofile Specifications. So what
> the
> > Microprofile community decides is important and needs to be followed. Of
> > course everyone has a v
; | Book
> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
>
>
> Le ven. 30 nov. 2018 à 17:11, Ivan Junckes Filho
> a écrit :
>
>> This is against the spec as well, yaml is required and must always be
>> default. Do we really wan
tps://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
>
>
> Le ven. 30 nov. 2018 à 16:51, Ivan Junckes Filho
> a écrit :
>
>> @Romain Manni-Bucau not sure I understood you.
>> Are you saying you
m decides, we need to make
> > it work as the specification says. Then iterate from there.
> > In my opinion this is a big problem that makes us strongly incompatible
> > with the standard.
>
>
> +1
>
> El vie., 30 nov. 2018 a las 5:44, Ivan Junckes Filho (&l
he message, please log on GitHub and use the
> URL above to go to the specific comment.
>
> For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
> us...@infra.apache.org
>
>
> > Issue @Gauge Accept: application/json
> > ---
t; If you wanted to explicitly request a YAML response, I'd expect one of
> >>> these to work:
> >>>
> >>> Accept: application/x-yaml
> >>> Accept: text/yaml
> >>>
> >>> I'd expect a Content-Type header on the response to iden
of
>> the core of microprofile (and hopefully will never be) so no reason to
>> import a lib (which can be heavy and potentially with vulnerabilities +
>> work for the users to maintain it) for that.
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibu
werx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
>
>
>
Hey guys, I think I found a bug in OpenAPI implementation.
The spec says:
"The default format of the /openapi endpoint is YAML."
But when I try to access /openapi it returns JSON by default.
This is not correct.
Also how can I access yaml if it is not default?
Hello guys, I did a change on Geronimo Metrics.
https://github.com/apache/geronimo-metrics/pull/2
geronimo-metrics, as you are aware, is a library used in TomEE.
I am wondering how can I write a test for my change. Writing a test in
TomEE for this is very simple, but writing a test in geronimo I
zonProvider.
>
> The fix should be just to replace one with another. Let me try it and test.
>
> Cheers,
> Roberto
>
> On 23 Nov 2018, at 12:06, Ivan Junckes Filho
> wrote:
>
> I was using the current master.
>
> 1.1.9
>
> I will try to use the version Romai
Hi Ivan
> >
> > Do you use tomee 8 with johnzon 1.1.10? Works well on this one normally
> if johnzon defaults are not broken. On tomee 7 you need to add jsonb ;)
> >
> > Le jeu. 22 nov. 2018 21:51, Ivan Junckes Filho <mailto:ivanjunc...@gmail.com>> a écrit :
> &
Also there are a lot of properties being returned on that payload that are
not needed like rate1, rate5... etc.
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 6:26 PM Ivan Junckes Filho
wrote:
> The issue with the TCK is because meter in the spec expects fifteenMinRate
> instead of fifteenMinuteRate.
>
>
The issue with the TCK is because meter in the spec expects fifteenMinRate
instead of fifteenMinuteRate.
Same apply for the other properties like fiveMin..oneMin..
@JsonbProperty("fifteenMinRate") is probably being ignored.
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 5:46 PM Ivan Junckes Filho
wro
Ivan Junckes Filho created GERONIMO-6658:
Summary: Issue @Gauge Accept: application/json
Key: GERONIMO-6658
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6658
Project: Geronimo
me know.
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 7:59 PM Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> Hi Ivan
>
> It is a bug in tomee scanning I think
>
>
> Le mer. 21 nov. 2018 21:35, Ivan Junckes Filho a
> écrit :
>
> > Hey guys, I was writing an example of metrics gauge (WIP).
> >
Hey guys, I was writing an example of metrics gauge (WIP).
https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/213
And I found a bug when trying access a gauge with "Accept:
application/json".
Just to let you know that I will work on a fix for this:
21-Nov-2018 17:24:08.811 WARNING [http-nio-8080-exec-4]
wrote:
> Hello Ivan Junckes Filho,
> https://www.morebeer.com/category/kit-week.html?ref=2C
>
> Cheers
>
> Mike Albrecht
> Customer Service Representative
> MoreFlavor! Inc.
> 1-800-600-0033
>
> On Tue, Nov 20 at 3:28 AM , Ivan Junckes Filho
> wrote:
> Hey Ce
Hey Cesar, I was able to make it work with my example. Take a look there
I found a bug with geronimo-metrics-1.0.0 throwing a null pointer when the
app metric is not found instead of returning a blank page. I am not sure if
it happens in master. I will be looking into it.
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at
Hey guys, I also had the same issue here.
The application metrics do not work. Base and Vendor metrics are fine.
I am troubleshooting to see if I can find the issue. I will let you know if
I find something.
Please if you already had the chance to look into this let me know.
On Tue, Oct 16,
+1
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 8:02 AM Roberto Cortez wrote:
> +1
>
> On 30 Sep 2018, at 16:38, Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> To enable BVal and TomEE releases, I'd like to release our validation spec
> bundle.
>
> Here is the staging repo:
>
77 matches
Mail list logo
