@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [wadi-dev] Re: [Geronimo] Clustering
James Strachan wrote:
On 19 Dec 2005, at 14:14, Jules Gosnell wrote:
James Strachan wrote:
On 19 Dec 2005, at 11:53, Jules Gosnell wrote:
, whether there is other suitable Geronimo
PROTECTED] Cc: wadi-dev@incubator.apache.org
mailto:wadi-dev@incubator.apache.org; dev@geronimo.apache.org mailto:
dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: [wadi-dev] Re: [Geronimo] Clustering James Strachan wrote:
On 19 Dec 2005, at 14:14, Jules Gosnell wrote: James Strachan wrote:
On 19 Dec 2005
mailto:wadi-dev@incubator.apache.org
mailto:wadi-dev@incubator.apache.org; dev@geronimo.apache.org
mailto:dev@geronimo.apache.org
mailto: dev@geronimo.apache.org
mailto:dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [wadi-dev] Re: [Geronimo] Clustering
James Strachan
mailto: dev@geronimo.apache.org mailto:dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [wadi-dev] Re: [Geronimo] Clustering James Strachan wrote:
On 19 Dec 2005, at 14:14, Jules Gosnell wrote: James Strachan wrote:
On 19 Dec 2005, at 11:53, Jules Gosnell wrote: , whether there is other
PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: wadi-dev@incubator.apache.org
mailto:wadi-dev@incubator.apache.org; dev@geronimo.apache.org
mailto:dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [wadi-dev] Re: [Geronimo] Clustering
James Strachan wrote:
On 19 Dec 2005, at 14:14, Jules
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: wadi-dev@incubator.apache.org
mailto:wadi-dev@incubator.apache.org; dev@geronimo.apache.org
mailto:dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [wadi-dev] Re: [Geronimo] Clustering
James Strachan wrote:
On 19 Dec 2005, at 14:14, Jules
[mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 9:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: wadi-dev@incubator.apache.org mailto:wadi-dev@incubator.apache.org
; dev@geronimo.apache.org mailto:dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: [wadi-dev] Re
Hmm, again we have stopped the discussion :). Lets get it started again.
So can we all come to some agreement (with more discussion)on which direction we might be taking !!
Like merging ActiveCluster and WADI or getting best of both worlds ?
And also if we can define expectations/requirments
James Strachan wrote:
On 19 Dec 2005, at 14:14, Jules Gosnell wrote:
James Strachan wrote:
On 19 Dec 2005, at 11:53, Jules Gosnell wrote:
, whether there is other suitable Geronimo or ASF-licensed code
available, or whether we will need to write our own WADI-
autodiscovery classes.
On 19 Dec 2005, at 14:54, Jules Gosnell wrote:
James Strachan wrote:
On 19 Dec 2005, at 14:14, Jules Gosnell wrote:
James Strachan wrote:
On 19 Dec 2005, at 11:53, Jules Gosnell wrote:
, whether there is other suitable Geronimo or ASF-licensed
code available, or whether we will need to
James Strachan wrote:
On 19 Dec 2005, at 14:54, Jules Gosnell wrote:
James Strachan wrote:
On 19 Dec 2005, at 14:14, Jules Gosnell wrote:
James Strachan wrote:
On 19 Dec 2005, at 11:53, Jules Gosnell wrote:
, whether there is other suitable Geronimo or ASF-licensed
code available,
On 19 Dec 2005, at 17:25, Jules Gosnell wrote:
James Strachan wrote:
On 19 Dec 2005, at 14:54, Jules Gosnell wrote:
James Strachan wrote:
On 19 Dec 2005, at 14:14, Jules Gosnell wrote:
James Strachan wrote:
On 19 Dec 2005, at 11:53, Jules Gosnell wrote:
, whether there is other suitable
James Strachan wrote:
On 19 Dec 2005, at 17:25, Jules Gosnell wrote:
James Strachan wrote:
On 19 Dec 2005, at 14:54, Jules Gosnell wrote:
James Strachan wrote:
On 19 Dec 2005, at 14:14, Jules Gosnell wrote:
James Strachan wrote:
On 19 Dec 2005, at 11:53, Jules Gosnell wrote:
,
13 matches
Mail list logo
