on the deployment status are not issued to
console or log file.
Key: GERONIMO-1962
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1962
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
SingleFileHotDeployer: Messages on the deployment status are not issued to
console or log file.
Key: GERONIMO-1962
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1962
I've made some progress on this and it seems to work OK for basic j2ee
deployments, except for the problem below. It's not pretty but it
does what I need for the time being. If anyone else is interested in
this I could clean it up and post it to the list, and if anyone's got
a tip about the
On Jan 19, 2006, at 12:46 PM, toby cabot wrote:
I've made some progress on this and it seems to work OK for basic j2ee
deployments, except for the problem below. It's not pretty but it
does what I need for the time being. If anyone else is interested in
this I could clean it up and post it
On Nov 4, 2004, at 3:42 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Nov 4, 2004, at 3:07 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
I talked to Jeremy. Our plan for now is that I will check in a
deployer tool that includes the following features:
- everything, when working online (on the same PC as the server)
- package
As Aaron says, this was a quick chat to clarify issues rather than a
shady meeting in smoke filled rooms.
To write up the issue as I see it will take time. I actually have work
to do (being the middle of the work day here) so I said I would write
something up soon.
In the meantime, Aaron has
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 07:48:48PM -0500, Aaron Mulder wrote:
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
So in your off list discussion what features got axed?
^^
Which is exactly why I'm reporting on the conclusions here. I
would appreciate if you
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 07:48:48PM -0500, Aaron Mulder wrote:
On the meta level, I do not appreciate being stuck in the middle,
with Jeremy harassing me to not proceed, and Dain and others harassing me
to proceed. I think the community needs to resolve this issue together.
I'm not
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004, David Blevins wrote:
Yes, but 8 people voted +1 to the proposed deployer so, flame war or
not, this is discussion everyone should be able to participate in.
That is why Jeremy is going to write up his position!!! If you
are trying to suggest that there should be no
David Blevins wrote:
Jeremy has an obligation Dims, Bruce, Dain, Hiram, James, Jailton,
myself, you and the community to vote if he disagrees.
http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]msgNo=9427
On Nov 4, 2004, at 9:01 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
David Blevins wrote:
Jeremy has an obligation Dims, Bruce, Dain, Hiram, James, Jailton,
myself, you and the community to vote if he disagrees.
http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]msgNo=9427
Which links to:
Date: Tue, 26
On Nov 4, 2004, at 3:07 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
I talked to Jeremy. Our plan for now is that I will check in a
deployer tool that includes the following features:
- everything, when working online (on the same PC as the server)
- package and distribute, when working offline (on the same
12 matches
Mail list logo
