On Jul 13, 2005, at 3:01 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
I guess that's a vote to remove TranQL from the uberbuild. Does
anyone object?
Not me. Less is more.
geir
Aaron
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
I would suggest Geronimo M4 and HEAD both use the dated release until
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-758?page=comments#action_12315820
]
John Sisson commented on GERONIMO-758:
--
OpenEJB is currently using a different version - 1.0.2-rc4, so we should try to
get these in sync.
Move
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-759?page=comments#action_12315821
]
John Sisson commented on GERONIMO-759:
--
Currently OpenEJB is using a different version, 1.3.1-rc4, so we should try to
get these in sync.
Move
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 09:34:33PM -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Jul 13, 2005, at 4:50 PM, David Blevins wrote:
cvs co -r v2_0_GM4
It's a plain cvs branch, not a tag. You can check in what you need
to get Geronimo 1.0 M4 out the door.
I assume s/cvs/svn and what is the
Hi,
I am trying to build M4 but it fails in
+
| Executing default OpenEJB :: PK Generation :: Builder
| Memory: 63M/96M
+
Attempting to download xmlbeans-maven-plugin-2.0.0-beta1.jar.
12K downloaded
Attempting to
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 09:38:30PM -0700, David Blevins wrote:
cvs co -r v2_0_G1M4
Sorry. There was a file permission problem on a cvs file. Fixed now.
This will get the code for you:
cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/scm/openejb co -r v2_0_G1M4 openejb
Thanks,
David
Move tmporb SNAPSHOT dependency to a dated version in M4 Geronimo OpenEJB
branches
Key: GERONIMO-760
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-760
Project: Geronimo
Type:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-760?page=all ]
John Sisson updated GERONIMO-760:
-
Component: dependencies
Move tmporb SNAPSHOT dependency to a dated version in M4 Geronimo OpenEJB
branches
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Jul 13, 2005, at 3:01 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
I guess that's a vote to remove TranQL from the uberbuild. Does
anyone object?
Not me. Less is more.
Me either. +1 to remove TranQL from the uberbuild.
geir
Aaron
Jacek
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I assume s/cvs/svn and what is the logic behind the branch name?
OpenEJB sources are under CVS control. v2_0_GM4 = OpenEJB 2.0 for
Geronimo M4.
geir
Jacek
I went through the threads on roadmap and features and tied to
collect into one big pile, with some organization and a few that I
thought of on the way. Thanks to anyone that participated thus far,
and hope more people chime in.
1) Yes, some of these are done. (Maven plugins, XMLBeans2)
On Jul 13, 2005, at 2:28 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: geirm
Date: Wed Jul 13 05:21:42 2005
New Revision: 216147
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=216147view=rev
Log:
added news item about JBI/ESB in Geronimo Modified:
geronimo/site/docs/index.html
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, David Blevins wrote:
Yea, my first idea was to simply create a branch from the exact point
the Geronimo M4 QA branch was created. I set aside that checkout so
we could do that if we needed to later.
Sorry, Aaron, you'll have to merge the things you want back in.
Aaron Mulder wrote:
Anyway, do you know how to get CVS to tell you every change that's
been made since the branch point?
Thanks,
Aaron
cvs rdiff -rTAGNAME1 -rTAGNAME2 modulename
Cheers,
Panagiotis
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Panagiotis Astithas wrote:
Aaron Mulder wrote:
Anyway, do you know how to get CVS to tell you every change that's
been made since the branch point?
cvs rdiff -rTAGNAME1 -rTAGNAME2 modulename
Thanks, but I'm actually hoping for something like:
7/1 - ammulder -
Aaron Mulder wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Panagiotis Astithas wrote:
Aaron Mulder wrote:
Anyway, do you know how to get CVS to tell you every change that's
been made since the branch point?
cvs rdiff -rTAGNAME1 -rTAGNAME2 modulename
Thanks, but I'm actually hoping for something
I'll be a good little fishy, as I think this is important. I'm
keeping the following in mind from a recent post by David Jencks as I
go through the list :
I'd like to reemphasize that bringing in new committers with their
code is going to be a lot of work for the existing community. If
On Jul 14, 2005, at 9:06 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
One is the source (.xml) one is the rendered .html.
Have you looked at the two files? There is navigation added
around the content (index.xml) to produce the page itself
(index.html)
Well, I was really
I was chatting with David Blevins on the topic of how we do releases and
how we manage what work is needed to be done for a release and he
suggested I start a Wiki page.
So I have started a wiki page that will hopefully open discussion on the
Geronimo development and release process and gather
beginApology
Sorry for sending this from Notes as the formatting gets
a bit screwed up. But, me non-Notes e-mail has been acting screwy
and I wanted to get this on the list.
/beginApology
Not sure what is being voted on but I'll say up front
that I'm not a
commiter but very interested in a
On Jul 14, 2005, at 10:10 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was chatting with David Blevins on the topic of how we do
releases and
how we manage what work is needed to be done for a release and he
suggested I start a Wiki page.
So I have started a wiki page that will hopefully open discussion
What about tranql-connector? Is there any reason to keep that on
a SNAPSHOT?
Thanks,
Aaron
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
tranql-1.0-20050713 has been posted to dist.codehaus.org
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Can we get a non-snapshot release of that, maybe
I am working on JSR-237 and Thomas Muller did also show some interest in
contributing on that. I was planning to release it by early Q4 (I plan to
invest my upto 8 hours a week), Please let me know if this schedule would cause
a problem. Whenever i am ready with implementation I dont know
Sounds like a neat idea.
Regards,
Alan
On 7/11/2005 6:22 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this statement correct.. The var directory intended for holding data
specific to a particular Geronimo instance and not intended to be shared
by multiple instances of geronimo?
If I wanted to run two
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-735?page=comments#action_12315850
]
Alan Cabrera commented on GERONIMO-735:
---
Nice idea. Please do not put it into M4.
Openejb container is burdened with several transport specific items
Please vote for the disposition of the IBM web console:
[ ] Add to geronimo/incubator/ibm-web-console; add full committers
[ ] Add to geronimo/incubator/ibm-web-console; restricted committers
[ ] Add to geronimo/trunk/applications/web-console; full committers
[ ] Send to Apache incubator
[ ]
I think it is, cvs history -r branchname -u username
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 09:24 -0400, Aaron Mulder wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Panagiotis Astithas wrote:
Aaron Mulder wrote:
Anyway, do you know how to get CVS to tell you every change that's
been made since the branch point?
Shoot, I should have included that:
[ ] Add to geronimo/incubator/ibm-web-console; add full committers
[ ] Add to geronimo/incubator/ibm-web-console; restricted committers
[ ] Add to geronimo/sandbox/web-console; patches not committers
[ ] Add to geronimo/trunk/applications/web-console; full
Is there a Jira issue filed for this?
Regards,
Alan
On 7/14/2005 9:21 AM, Tyagi, Rahul wrote:
I am working on JSR-237 and Thomas Muller did also show some interest in
contributing on that. I was planning to release it by early Q4 (I plan to
invest my upto 8 hours a week), Please let me
[ ] Add to geronimo/incubator/ibm-web-console; add full committers
[ ] Add to geronimo/incubator/ibm-web-console; restricted committers
[+1] Add to geronimo/sandbox/web-console; patches not committers
[ ] Add to geronimo/trunk/applications/web-console; full committers
[ ] Send to Apache incubator
On 7/12/2005 6:38 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Jul 12, 2005, at 5:47 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
+1 to accept new folks from these contrib as regular committers (we
can have a public vote once we get list of people from these 2
companies)
-1. Thats not fair to
could you please not call it incubator? It's not and it's
confusing. I also think that we should be a little clearer on the
guidelines for dealing with the options below (like the ongoing
conversation).
On Jul 14, 2005, at 1:07 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Please vote for the disposition of
On 7/12/2005 6:45 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
I hardly knew any of you...yet i supported as much as i could even
during the early stages. same thing am doing with beehive/wsrp4j/muse
(anything that as a ws component whether they are destined for ws pmc
or not). remember, this is an open-source
No...Do i need to?
-Original Message-
From: Alan D. Cabrera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 12:45 PM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Roadmap Checkpoint
Is there a Jira issue filed for this?
Regards,
Alan
On 7/14/2005 9:21 AM, Tyagi, Rahul wrote:
I
On 7/14/2005 10:44 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Shoot, I should have included that:
[ ] Add to geronimo/incubator/ibm-web-console; add full committers
[X] Add to geronimo/incubator/ibm-web-console; restricted committers
[ ] Add to geronimo/sandbox/web-console; patches not committers
[ ] Add to
Options including geronimo/incubator/ibm-web-console mean add a
directory called incubator next to trunk in Geronimo SVN and add the
donation to a new subdirectory of that.
Options including Send to Apache incubator mean add a new project to
incubator.apache.org.
I'm open to a new name for the
On 7/14/2005 10:58 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
All,
I've updated the Geronimo and OpenEJB branches such that:
- Geronimo builds version 1.0-M4-SNAPSHOT
- OpenEJB builds version 2.0-G1M4-SNAPSHOT
- The Geronimo uberbuild uses the OpenEJB G1M4 branch
- The Geronimo uberbuild does not check
I am deeply sorry to post this here but all my attempts to
unsubscribe from all Genonimo mailing list have failed. I tried the
usual path and also tried the instructions that the list server sent
to me. I even emailed [EMAIL PROTECTED] and got no
response. My return path is Return-path:
I usually nail them very fast...
what is the address you wish to have unsubscribed, and which lists?
geir
On Jul 14, 2005, at 2:36 PM, Eric Knapp wrote:
I am deeply sorry to post this here but all my attempts to
unsubscribe from all Genonimo mailing list have failed. I tried the
usual
To answer myself, I would be OK going more than one way:
[-1] Add to geronimo/incubator/ibm-web-console; add full committers
[+1] Add to geronimo/incubator/ibm-web-console; restricted committers
[+1] Add to geronimo/sandbox/web-console; patches not committers
[-1] Add to
[+1] Add to geronimo/incubator/ibm-web-console; add full committers
[+1] Add to geronimo/incubator/ibm-web-console; restricted committers
[+1] Add to geronimo/trunk/applications/web-console; full committers
[+0] Send to Apache incubator
[+0] Other (please specify)
On 7/12/05, Bruce Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After rereading this entire discussion, I'm still not sure that we've
provided the requested guidance to the original reqeust that started
this thread. What's more, given the debate that has taken place, I'm
not sure that there's a consensus in
[ ] Add to geronimo/incubator/ibm-web-console; add full committers
[+1] Add to geronimo/incubator/ibm-web-console; restricted committers
[ ] Add to geronimo/sandbox/web-console; patches not committers
[ ] Add to geronimo/trunk/applications/web-console; full committers
[ ] Send to Apache incubator
Sorry - to take a stab at your original question, it is
essentially the same console you downloaded from Gluecode (I assume there
must have been changes to update it to the current Geronimo, though
perhaps that has not been done yet). As for straight to Geronimo or
through the incubator,
[ ] Add to geronimo/incubator/ibm-web-console; add full committers
[+1] Add to geronimo/incubator/ibm-web-console; restricted committers
[ ] Add to geronimo/sandbox/web-console; patches not committers
[ ] Add to geronimo/trunk/applications/web-console; full committers
[ ] Send to Apache
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-758?page=all ]
John Sisson reassigned GERONIMO-758:
Assign To: John Sisson
Move geronimo_spec_activation version from 1.0.2-SNAPSHOT to a formal version
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-759?page=all ]
John Sisson reassigned GERONIMO-759:
Assign To: John Sisson
Move geronimo_spec_javamail version from 1.3.1-SNAPSHOT to a formal version
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-717?page=comments#action_12315881
]
Aaron Mulder commented on GERONIMO-717:
---
Jeremy, I didn't fully follow your comment, but perhaps we should change the
name of this bug to reflect the problem you're
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-718?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder closed GERONIMO-718:
-
Resolution: Invalid
Closed by request of submitter
Assembly Plugin using 1.0-SNAPSHOT
--
Key:
Transient failures during full rebuild (OOM?)
-
Key: GERONIMO-761
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-761
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Components: buildsystem
Versions: 1.0-M3
Reporter: Aaron
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-747?page=all ]
John Sisson resolved GERONIMO-747:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Changes committed to M4 branch rev 219148 and HEAD rev 219147.
Remove ews dependency
-
Key:
[+1] Add to geronimo/incubator/ibm-web-console; add full committers
[+1] Add to geronimo/incubator/ibm-web-console; restricted committers
[+1] Add to geronimo/trunk/applications/web-console; full committers
Thanks
Srinath
Improve manageability by adding a web based management console
--
Key: GERONIMO-762
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-762
Project: Geronimo
Type: New Feature
Components: management
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-762?page=all ]
David Klavon updated GERONIMO-762:
--
Attachment: console.zip
Donation of code from IBM
Improve manageability by adding a web based management console
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-758?page=comments#action_12315889
]
John Sisson commented on GERONIMO-758:
--
The geronimo_spec_activation_version property is set in OpenEJB's
etc/project.properties, but it doesn't seem to be used.
55 matches
Mail list logo
