Just a brief reminder... in about 24 hours trunk, branches and tags
will be moved to:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server
--jason
Hi James,
I wants to know the openwire API. And Pls tell me how to create sender
and receiver by using temporary queue.
On 8/22/06, ahamad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Any one can help to tell me that How I can create a Temporary
queue
and how to use this?
See
I think you are right about configId, but as far as I understand the configId's are replaced by moduleId in 1.1 versions of xsd's. In 1.0 it is still configId's which means no change in geronimo-config-1.0.xsd.Now question is where is
geronimo-config-1.1.xsd, the answer is it is removed and
On 8/23/06, ahamad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi James,
I wants to know the openwire API.
Which language? (See the createTemporaryQueue() in CMS or NMS)
And Pls tell me how to create sender
and receiver by using temporary queue.
As I said a temporary queue is just like any other
Hi James,
On 8/23/06, ahamad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi James,
I wants to know the openwire API.
Which language? (See the createTemporaryQueue() in CMS or NMS)
I am working on CMS, So pls tell me how to use temporary queue?
createTemporaryQueue() return the destenation and then how
I don't think we need these excludes anymore.
Its nice to see the server startup with no icky warnings :-)
--jason
On Aug 22, 2006, at 6:53 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
And why are they excluded ? Because those files were not being
installed in G v1.1 either.
Cheers
Prasad
On 8/22/06, Prasad
On 8/23/06, ahamad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi James,
On 8/23/06, ahamad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi James,
I wants to know the openwire API.
Which language? (See the createTemporaryQueue() in CMS or NMS)
I am working on CMS, So pls tell me how to use temporary queue?
As I said
Do you have the activemq-jaas.jar on your classpath?
On 8/23/06, Sepand M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I can't seem to get JAAS working.
I've defined the login.config as shown on the site, but I get the
following error once a connection comes in (the exception is thrown
when lc.login is called
I'm working on replacing the sun orb usage with Yoko (a sub-item of Java
5 ready).
Rick
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
All,
Aaron started a thread back a ways about the 1.2 release. I know that
there has been discussion, interest and some action in getting it on
the table. At this point I'm not
Hi James,
Thanks for the response,
* - It has been said that a temporary queue vanishes along with the
creating client. But I am getting this unwanted privilge of having it
even
after my client ends. How it could be possible?
The Destination object doesn't disappear but you will be
on solaris you cannot easily kill a slave broker when using JDBC Master Slave
-
Key: AMQ-893
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-893
Project: ActiveMQ
Hi James,
Thanks for giveing me the idea, I create request/responce client for AMQ
according to the link which is refered by you. but at the sever(receiver)
side it gives the following error on the broker side whenever
producer.send(request.getJMSReplyTo(), response) statement comes..
INFO
On 8/23/06, Naveen Rawat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi James,
Thanks for the response,
* - It has been said that a temporary queue vanishes along with the
creating client. But I am getting this unwanted privilge of having it
even
after my client ends. How it could be possible?
The
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Aug 11, 2006, at 12:40 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Rick,
I believe what you really want to do is to use the endorsed
directory. This allows you to override the vm implementation of
endorsed specification such as corba
It sounds like your server is sending a response to a client which has
already disconnected.
On 8/23/06, ahamad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi James,
Thanks for giveing me the idea, I create request/responce client for AMQ
according to the link which is refered by you. but at the
Hi James,
We're not keeping it there :).
The Destination objects are like URL classes; they can be attached to
messages or held in client's RAM - the broker can't really go around
every JVM and make sure they don't happen to have a reference to a non
existent destination lying around
The
On 8/23/06, Jerome Camilleri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
My boss (Christophe Loridan) and me (Camilleri Jérôme) sign agreement
(CCLA and CLA) and send them to Apache Fondation the last week.
Great stuff! :)
So now, how submit the Cimero code to the serviceMix project ?
Could you raise a
On 8/23/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hope this is not taken negatively...as it is not meant that way...
Come on, Jeff. Nothing's going to be taken this way. Try it out and be
prepared to fail :P
I think it is worth talking about, especially when we think bootstrap
will go
Jason, is there a way I can retarget my local trees as I have pending changes?On Aug 23, 2006, at 1:59 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:Just a brief reminder... in about 24 hours trunk, branches and tags will be moved to: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server--jason -sachin
Using svn switch --relocate should work...On 8/23/06, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason, is there a way I can retarget my local trees as I have pending changes?On Aug 23, 2006, at 1:59 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Just a brief reminder... in about 24 hours trunk, branches and tags will be
On 8/16/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we should move the top-level trunk, tags and branches to
server/*. This will make the top-level of our repository more
consistent.
I seem to have missed it. Here's my +1 for purely historical purposes.
(sorry Jason for having you kept
On 8/23/06, Rakesh Midha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you are right about configId, but as far as I understand the
configId's are replaced by moduleId in 1.1 versions of xsd's. In 1.0 it is
still configId's which means no change in geronimo-config-1.0.xsd.
Now question is where is
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 8/23/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hope this is not taken negatively...as it is not meant that way...
Come on, Jeff. Nothing's going to be taken this way. Try it out and be
prepared to fail :P
Well...sometimes we need to be careful how we word
On 8/22/06, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The best practices/guidelines should not be strict dogma -- common
sense should prevail. It's communication that's important, not
process.
The statements above are what should really prevail from this
conversation. I agree with this sentiment
On 8/23/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we can officially end this
thread now since all parties are very pleased with the end result ;-)
I personally am. Thanks for your patience!
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.laskowski.net.pl
+1 for CTR which I believe is accurately summarized in its most common
manifestation by Kevan's #1.
Joe
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Aug 22, 2006, at 7:02 PM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Apache Geronimo has been operating mostly under the
I think that the code should remain in Geronimo proper as there may be many plugin sites and this
sounds like its core to plugins and Geronimo.
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I'm not convinced.
First, i'm not sure it will make it in 1.1.1, and then, we would not be
able
to easily release new
-1 on adding it to 1.1.1. Put it in 1.1.2. 1.1.1 has been delayed for a few
weeks for minor changes.
Jason Dillon wrote:
On Aug 22, 2006, at 4:12 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
On 8/23/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Its probably not going to go into 1.1.1 unless you have it done
I think you can call it. If in the future you want a clear end date just tag it with a 72-hour
completion when calling the vote. Or whatever time period is appropriate.
Jason Dillon wrote:
This vote has been running for 3+ days now:
+1: matt, djencks, prasad, jacek, joe, paul, chris,
JBoss Deployer fails when uninstalling / reinstalling Service Assemblies
Key: SM-552
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-552
Project: ServiceMix
Issue
Jason,
Works like a charm!
Thanks
Mark
Jason Dillon wrote:
I implemented the conditional in traditional ant fashion using targets
and condition. Lemme know if this works.
--jason
On Aug 22, 2006, at 8:16 PM, Mark DeLaFranier wrote:
Jason,
Under Windows Ant needs:
exec
+1 Allow changes
Thanks
Anita
--- Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you can call it. If in the future you want a clear end date
just tag it with a 72-hour
completion when calling the vote. Or whatever time period is
appropriate.
Jason Dillon wrote:
This vote has been
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-829?page=all ]
james strachan resolved AMQ-829.
Resolution: Fixed
Done - we log using INFO level logging whenever a transport fails and
reconnection starts
use some INFO level logging in failover:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Blevins wrote:
But the lazy consensus cut off you mention is something to think
about.
That sort of model has been used before successfully. IIRC,
it was as part of the 'controversial issues are RTC' part of
CTR. In other words, rather
I do not use bootstrap. As long as the car-maven-plugin is available
from a repo, just using mvn from the top directory works! I have added
openejb2 to the default profile.
I just do checkout geronimo, checkout openejb2 and
mvn
I build specs separately if needed.
Thanks
Anita
Hi James,
I don't, but I'm running off of an assembly build and I have
apache-activemq-4.1-incubator-SNAPSHOT.jar on the class path. I've
also confirmed that the classes not found (such as GroupPrincipal) are
in the mentioned jar.
- Sepand
On 8/23/06, James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One other thing I should add:
I am currently running using the provided activemq script and the main
method provided in activemq.console.Main.
A few days ago, I ran the same code using my own main method and
without the activemq script and it ran perfectly.
Any thoughts?
On 8/23/06, Sepand M
From a purely discussion perspective I'm in favor of a change. I'm not sure a total shift to CTR
is appropriate but I'm not particularly opposed to it either. I don't think the development model
itself is the issue. The major issue that we've been dealing with is the community dynamics and
JBohn pointed out I had RTC as my last statement...I meant CTR
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
From a purely discussion perspective I'm in favor of a change. I'm not
sure a total shift to CTR is appropriate but I'm not particularly
opposed to it either. I don't think the development model itself is
You will need to configure the surefire (testing) plugin to fork your
tests into a new vm and set the endorsed dir for that new vm. The
first is easy but the second will be difficult. First off the docs
for the sure fire plugin can be found here
So I've started to make these changes, but it looks like we may have to use URL's in the interface, unless anyone else has any other suggestions due to the problems dain mentioned with using URLs. Taking the EARConfigBuilder for example... ideally I'd like to push out the code that traverses
Please welcome David Blevins as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC. David recently accepted the
invitation to join the PMC. David is part of the OpenEJB project that we depend on so heavily and
that is joining Apache as an Incubator project. David is also a great mentor and community
Welcome David!!!
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Please welcome David Blevins as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC.
David recently accepted the invitation to join the PMC. David is part
of the OpenEJB project that we depend on so heavily and that is joining
Apache as an Incubator project. David
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Please welcome David Blevins as the newest member of the Geronimo
PMC. David recently accepted the invitation to join the PMC. David
is part of the OpenEJB project that we depend on so heavily and that
is joining Apache as an Incubator project. David is also a great
congrats and welcome!On Aug 23, 2006, at 1:41 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:Please welcome David Blevins as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC. David recently accepted the invitation to join the PMC. David is part of the OpenEJB project that we depend on so heavily and that is joining Apache as an
Congrats, David!
--kevan
On Aug 23, 2006, at 1:41 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Please welcome David Blevins as the newest member of the Geronimo
PMC. David recently accepted the invitation to join the PMC.
David is part of the OpenEJB project that we depend on so heavily
and that is joining
Congrats David!
On 8/23/06, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please welcome David Blevins as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC. David
recently accepted the
invitation to join the PMC. David is part of the OpenEJB project that we
depend on so heavily and
that is joining Apache as
congratulations David!
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Please welcome David Blevins as the newest member of the Geronimo
PMC. David recently accepted the invitation to join the PMC. David
is part of the OpenEJB project that we depend on so heavily and that
is joining Apache as an Incubator project.
The cwiki inidicates that we can build projects for eclipse using the m2
build with the following command:
mvn -o eclipse:eclipse
However, when I attempt to do this I get the error below. Has anybody
been successful in building the eclipse projects using M2?
[INFO] Searching repository
Way to go David!!!
Joe
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Please welcome David Blevins as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC.
David recently accepted the invitation to join the PMC. David is part
of the OpenEJB project that we depend on so heavily and that is joining
Apache as an Incubator project.
Congrats David!
Cheers!
Hernan
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Please welcome David Blevins as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC.
David recently accepted the invitation to join the PMC. David is part
of the OpenEJB project that we depend on so heavily and that is joining
Apache as an Incubator
The -o switch tells mvn not to attempt to download any plugins or
dependencies, using only whatever is in your local repository. If this is
your first time running the eclipse:eclipse goal then the necessary plugin
won't be present.
Try running 'mvn eclipse:eclipse' (i.e., no '-o' switch).
Thanks Ian. I did attempt to run it both on-line as well as off-line.
Either way I get the same result. Do you see something different?
Joe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The -o switch tells mvn not to attempt to download any plugins or
dependencies, using only whatever is in your local
Joe,
Delete your ~/.m2/repository/org/apache/maven/plugins directory. The
error you encountered usually means you have a corrupted meta tags.
This solution usually does teh trick for me.
Jeff
Joe Bohn wrote:
Thanks Ian. I did attempt to run it both on-line as well as off-line.
Either way
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-892?page=comments#action_36831 ]
Bruce Snyder commented on AMQ-892:
--
The JMX RMI port can be set in ActiveMQ 4.x using the JMX system properties.
See the [How can I monitor ActiveMQ?
MessageExchangeImpl.toString() converts message content to DOMSource
Key: SM-553
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-553
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: Bug
Hello,
I've had a few discussion with Guillaume on WSi Compliance and Servicemix
for SOAP based endpoints.
I've build a project to test services for WSi compliance however like it was
mention in the message below it fails, and I get an error about a missing
soap header found on a non-soap header
Thanks Jeff. That did the trick for me too!!!
Joe
Jeff Genender wrote:
Joe,
Delete your ~/.m2/repository/org/apache/maven/plugins directory. The
error you encountered usually means you have a corrupted meta tags.
This solution usually does teh trick for me.
Jeff
Joe Bohn wrote:
Thanks
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-892?page=comments#action_36832 ]
John Heitmann commented on AMQ-892:
---
There are at least 2 unfortunate issues with the out-of-the-box 1.5 JMX config:
the rmi registry isn't able to use a secure
Good idea, especially if I don't have to write it :-)
thanks
david jencks
On Aug 22, 2006, at 11:06 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
The car-maven-plugin is used as part of the geronimo build in G 1.2.
This plugin is also very usefull to build Geronimo plugins targeted
to G 1.1,
but has recently
On Aug 22, 2006, at 3:20 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Aug 22, 2006, at 11:09 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
JPA Integration (Open JPA / Cayenne) (I think Dain or Blevins ?)
I'm just helping with the global jndi part of JPA.
I'm starting to work on the container managed persistence support .
Geronimo is considering a change to its review and commit policies.
As a subproject, I think we should discuss how we would like to
handle reviewing code and when it should be committed. So...
How do you think we should handle this process?
What rules-of-thumb should we use to guide
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-553?page=comments#action_36833 ]
Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-553:
Thanks for the feedback.
While I acknowledge the problems for the DEBUG level and returning null,
you should note that for
Congratulations David!
-dain
On Aug 23, 2006, at 10:41 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Please welcome David Blevins as the newest member of the Geronimo
PMC. David recently accepted the invitation to join the PMC.
David is part of the OpenEJB project that we depend on so heavily
and that is
On Aug 23, 2006, at 11:59 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Aug 22, 2006, at 3:20 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Aug 22, 2006, at 11:09 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
JPA Integration (Open JPA / Cayenne) (I think Dain or Blevins ?)
I'm just helping with the global jndi part of JPA.
I'm starting to
Ok. Here's an update:
I have started with a clean build and found the least changes that
will cause problems.
I will give an outline of all of my steps:
Clean checkout: svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/activemq/trunk
in the trunk DIR: mvn -Dmaven.test.skip=true install
in the
On 8/23/06, Rodent of Unusual Size [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Apache Geronimo has been operating mostly under the
Review-Then-Commit model for a couple of months now,
and I think the issues the change was intended to
highlight have been .. well,
Wecome back, Eric !
I have the following stuff in your test
HttpEndpoint provider = new HttpEndpoint();
provider.setService(new QName(urn:provider, http));
provider.setEndpoint(provider);
//provider.setTargetService(new QName(urn:test, echo));
On 8/23/06, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please welcome David Blevins as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC. David
recently accepted the
invitation to join the PMC. David is part of the OpenEJB project that we
depend on so heavily and
that is joining Apache as an Incubator
Sorry, GMail shortcut messed me up, redoing:
in the trunk DIR: mvn -Dmaven.test.skip=true install
in the trunk/assembly/target DIR: tar -xvf
apache-activemq-4.1-incubator-SNAPSHOT.tar.gz
in the trunk/assembly/target/apache-activemq-4.1-incubator-SNAPSHOT DIR:
* changed conf/activemq.xml, added:
On 8/23/06, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm starting to work on the container managed persistence support .
Could you elaborate a bit more?
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.laskowski.net.pl
On 8/23/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joe,
Delete your ~/.m2/repository/org/apache/maven/plugins directory. The
error you encountered usually means you have a corrupted meta tags.
This solution usually does teh trick for me.
It did for me, too, but it's weird. I think it may
Deployment problem when one SU ina SA fail to deploy. Other SU may not be
properly shutdown.
-
Key: SM-554
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-554
Hey Jacek,
When its happened to me its been because the pom or jar only
partially download or some other such bad behavior. Since this simple
fix makes it work I've not looked any further. I don't see anyway the
bootstrap could be causing this since the bootstrap is simply
deleting the
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-553?page=comments#action_36834 ]
Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-553:
Author: gnodet
Date: Wed Aug 23 12:26:29 2006
New Revision: 434130
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=434130view=rev
On 8/23/06, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I've started to make these changes, but it looks like we may have to use
URL's in the interface, unless anyone else has any other suggestions due to
the problems dain mentioned with using URLs. Taking the EARConfigBuilder
for example...
On Aug 23, 2006, at 9:53 AM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
On 8/23/06, Rakesh Midha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you are right about configId, but as far as I understand the
configId's are replaced by moduleId in 1.1 versions of xsd's. In
1.0 it is
still configId's which means no change in
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-554?page=all ]
Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-554.
Fix Version/s: 3.0-M3
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
Author: gnodet
Date: Wed Aug 23 12:34:54 2006
New Revision: 434135
URL:
On 8/23/06, Bill Dudney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Jacek,
When its happened to me its been because the pom or jar only
partially download or some other such bad behavior. Since this simple
fix makes it work I've not looked any further. I don't see anyway the
bootstrap could be causing this
On Aug 23, 2006, at 3:22 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 8/23/06, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm starting to work on the container managed persistence support .
Could you elaborate a bit more?
jta 1.1 spec is in the jee5 specs branch
I'm adding stuff to and near the transaction
I don't really see why it should be in the 1.1 branch for the following reasons: * it's a m2 plugin and can not be part of the 1.1 release procedure, at least for the reason that it depends on the artifacts being published on a m2 repo, which will
obviously not be the case when releasing
Right, I understand the concerns about using URLs. The point I was trying to make was there isn't a nice clean way to do this. Or at least I couldn't think of a way. The builders won't be able to purely rely on the DeployableModule interface for resolving and processing a module wether its a
I'm able to use ibiblio to install the Directory plugin which has
loads of dependencies. But maybe this has one more than that one.
You could try putting a small delay between downloads in the
PluginInstallerGBean if you think that would help.
I did have trouble with ibiblio once when I
On Aug 22, 2006, at 6:56 PM, David Blevins wrote:
I'd be more inclined to talk about what we want to apply it to and
how.
More thoughts on the where and how topic.
So far my thoughts on how; review to your satisfaction and +1, 72
hour cut off.
As far as where
I'm inclined to say
Btw, the PluginInstallerGBean is unable to download snapshots artifacts.The problem is that when snapshots are deployed to a m2 repo,you don't have a jar named -SNAPSHOT, but rather timestamped jars,where the last one is given in the
maven-metadata.xml in the -SNAPSHOTdirectory (not the one in
Oversight. The Maven guys have suggested that they have some code we
could reuse to execute the downloads, but I've never been able to beat
it out of them. It would be nice to switch over to theirs, but in the
mean time, it should be easy enought o add the SNAPSHOT support to our
download code.
On Aug 23, 2006, at 12:56 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I don't really see why it should be in the 1.1 branch for the
following reasons:
First off... the plugin is to support G 1.1
* it's a m2 plugin and can not be part of the 1.1 release
procedure, at least for the
reason that it
Just a correction
On Aug 23, 2006, at 1:14 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Aug 22, 2006, at 6:56 PM, David Blevins wrote:
I'd be more inclined to talk about what we want to apply it to and
how.
More thoughts on the where and how topic.
So far my thoughts on how; review to your
I would totally agree with you if maven allows you to release something whichis dependant on a snapshot (even a plugin). Which unfortunately is not the case ...Btw, a non snapshot release of genesis would be nice, because i'd like to
ask for a release of xbean (which is now dependant on
Looks like the bits to configure surefire are fine, except you'd want
to change the value of somedir.
I recommend that you use the dependency plugin in your module's pom
to download and install the needed jars to be placed into the
endorsed dir (which will end up in the modules
On 8/23/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Aug 23, 2006, at 12:56 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: I don't really see why it should be in the 1.1 branch for the following reasons:First off... the plugin is to support G 1.1
I have to agree with you on this point. * it's a m2 plugin and can
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-553?page=all ]
Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-553.
Fix Version/s: 3.0-M3
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
Author: gnodet
Date: Wed Aug 23 12:46:18 2006
New Revision: 434140
URL:
Hi!
Is there any chance someone can give me a rough estimate of when this issue
can be looked at. I would really appreciate if someone reviewed the patch
and told me if there are issues with it. Right now I have time to resolve
them. Thanks.
- Vadim.
--
View this message in context:
Dain pointed out that we don't want to unpack the dependencies...
so the goal should be copy, not unpack, as in:
{code:xml}
plugin
groupIdorg.codehaus.mojo/groupId
artifactIddependency-maven-plugin/artifactId
executions
execution
On Aug 23, 2006, at 1:44 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Btw, a non snapshot release of genesis would be nice, because i'd
like to
ask for a release of xbean (which is now dependant on genesis)
Yes I know... though Genesis depends on a few maven plugins that are
SNAPSHOTS to get around bugs in
Done.http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2351On 8/23/06, Aaron Mulder
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oversight.The Maven guys have suggested that they have some code wecould reuse to execute the downloads, but I've never been able to beatit out of them.It would be nice to switch over to
On 8/23/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Done.
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2351
Too bad none of the Maven guys are included in the Geronimo group for
JIRA, we could just assign it to one of them.
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack(u30,D0G)[EMAIL
We can easily change that :-)
--jason
On Aug 23, 2006, at 3:05 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
On 8/23/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Done.
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2351
Too bad none of the Maven guys are included in the Geronimo group for
JIRA, we could just
Just a brief reminder... around 12:00AM PST (about 8 hours from now)
trunk, branches and tags will be moved to:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server
--jason
Okay, I'm going to call this vote now. One extra +1 from Anita since
my last email brings the tally to:
+1: matt*, djencks*, prasad, jacek*, joe, paul, chris, gianny*,
sachin*, john*, alan*, kevan*, jason, anita
+100: dain
15 +1 (including dain's) which
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
