Re: [jira] Created: (GERONIMO-267) NoSuchOperationError on deployment of SSB

2004-07-14 Thread Gianny Damour
On 14/07/2004 6:44 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Message: A new issue has been created in JIRA. - View the issue: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-267 Here is an overview of the issue:

Re: [jira] Created: (GERONIMO-267) NoSuchOperationError on deployment of SSB

2004-07-14 Thread Gianny Damour
On 14/07/2004 9:17 AM, Gianny Damour wrote: org.apache.geronimo.gbean.jmx.NoSuchOperationError: No implementation method: objectName=geronimo.server:J2EEApplication=skeleton/app,J2EEModule=skeleton-ejb.jar,J2EEServer=geronimo,j2eeType=StatelessSessionBean,name=StatelessSession, method=public

Javamail license

2004-07-14 Thread Dain Sundstrom
I know Geir has been working on this, but it popped up on my radar again... I think we have a serous problem with Javamail unless sun is willing to relicense it. The license is here http://java.sun.com/products/javamail/LICENSE.txt I think the biggest problem for us is this section (near the

Re: where to put the axis-geronimo module

2004-07-14 Thread Srinath Perera
Thanks dims, I was worried about hard coded string ... you have fix it :) Srinath Srinath, I have added a incubator-geronimo\modules\axis. Please try the latest CVS and submit patch against CVS from now on :) thanks, dims On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 08:45:09 -0700, David Jencks [EMAIL

Re: Javamail license

2004-07-14 Thread Alex Karasulu
Dain, Don't know for sure but I thought the James folks were working on a java mail implementation. Perhaps its worth checking this out. Noel might be able to elaborate on this. Alex On Tue, 2004-07-13 at 22:56, Dain Sundstrom wrote: I know Geir has been working on this, but it popped up on

Re: Javamail license

2004-07-14 Thread Dain Sundstrom
Nevermind I'm working with Geir on this. We'll get back to you all when we have some more details other then my speculations. -dain On Jul 13, 2004, at 8:09 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: Dain, Don't know for sure but I thought the James folks were working on a java mail implementation. Perhaps

problem starting jetty as GBean stanalone

2004-07-14 Thread Srinath Perera
The code I was using to start jetty stand alone in AaxisGBean failing. It works just few days ago. in the HTTPConnector GBean the port is defined in the super class sp they are not inherited?? may be this has something to done with this but I am still not sure Then I try code to start the Jetty

Re: [jira] Created: (GERONIMO-267) NoSuchOperationError on deployment of SSB

2004-07-14 Thread Gianny Damour
On 14/07/2004 12:09 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: On 14/07/2004 9:17 AM, Gianny Damour wrote: I have just updated the way GBean attribute names are derived: When GBeans are proxied via RawGBeanInvokers, attribute names may start with an upper-case letter. For instance, if a GBean has a method

Re: [jira] Created: (GERONIMO-267) NoSuchOperationError on deployment of SSB

2004-07-14 Thread toby cabot
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 11:01:18AM +1000, Gianny Damour wrote: This was the behavior before my updates and I have restored it. Thanks for the speedy fix Gianny, it seems to work: the exception's no longer being thrown. Regards, Toby

Re: problem starting jetty as GBean stanalone

2004-07-14 Thread Dain Sundstrom
In the future can you start with a fresh email message instead of replying to an existing message on the mailing list. On most email clients if you reply to a message and change the subject it still groups the response with the original thread. BTW this is called thread hijacking.

Re: [jira] Created: (GERONIMO-267) NoSuchOperationError on deployment of SSB

2004-07-14 Thread Dain Sundstrom
On Jul 14, 2004, at 4:47 AM, Gianny Damour wrote: On 14/07/2004 12:09 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: On 14/07/2004 9:17 AM, Gianny Damour wrote: I have just updated the way GBean attribute names are derived: When GBeans are proxied via RawGBeanInvokers, attribute names may start with an upper-case

Testing Maven 1.0

2004-07-14 Thread Jeremy Boynes
Would appreciate it if people can confirm if geronimo builds on different platforms with the new release of maven 1.0 BUILD SUCCESSFUL on Windows XP Pro SP1 java version 1.4.2 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.2-b28) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.2-b28, mixed

Re: Thread pool strategy

2004-07-14 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
On Jul 13, 2004, at 5:39 PM, toby cabot wrote: On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 03:33:35PM -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: Is it really now as in if you don't have to wait for a thread, do it - otherwise return w/ a status indicating now wasn't possible or now as in wait until there's a thread, do it,

RE: Thread pool strategy

2004-07-14 Thread Alan Cabrera
walkDogs() throws Poop; -Original Message- From: Geir Magnusson Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 9:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Thread pool strategy On Jul 13, 2004, at 5:39 PM, toby cabot wrote: On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 03:33:35PM -0400, Geir

Re: Testing Maven 1.0

2004-07-14 Thread Jeremy Boynes
and ... BUILD SUCCESSFUL on Windows XP Pro SP1 java version 1.5.0-beta2 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0-beta2-b51) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0-beta2-b51, mixed mode, sharing)

FW: Commons-Email: (was Javamail license on geronimo-dev)

2004-07-14 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Dain, i forwarded mail to commons-dev, since commons/sandbox/email uses JavaMail from Sun too. -matthias -Original Message- From: Joe Germuska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 9:15 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: Commons-Email: (was Javamail