I am very proud to add myself to this mailing list and I hope to be helpful.
Mohammed Nour wrote:
I am very proud to add myself to this mailing list and I hope to be helpful.
.
Welcome :-)
My bad :(
I must admit that this is a side effect that I have not duly considered.
I considered the source and binary compatibility and I missed this
serialization specific incompatibility.
Gianny
On 3/04/2005 6:15 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On 3/22 in revision 158589 the API for Configuration
Welcome aboard! Make sure to hang out at our IRC we as well.
Regards,
Alan
Mohammed Nour wrote:
I am very proud to add myself to this mailing list and I hope to be helpful.
On Apr 1, 2005, at 12:01 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Hiram Chirino wrote:
On Apr 1, 2005, at 4:53 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Mar 31, 2005, at 11:17 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
No, but I worry about just bundling random whatever from outside
the project with our
Feature request : What also would be cool is going in reverse - having
an API to take a (Geronimo|WebSphere|Weblogic|JBoss) (WAR|EAR) and get
the info out for deployment. Would make it easy then for us to support
migration from other platforms...
geir
On Mar 15, 2005, at 4:31 PM, Vincent
Dear John,
The Apache Geronimo PMC has voted to offer you commit status on the
Apache Geronimo project.
Thank you for your participation so far in the project, and we all are
excited to have you as a committer.
Please let us know if you wish to accept this offer.
If you accept, we need the
Welcome
--
Jeremy
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Dear John,
The Apache Geronimo PMC has voted to offer you commit status on the
Apache Geronimo project.
Thank you for your participation so far in the project, and we all are
excited to have you as a committer.
Please let us know if you wish to
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 07:40:26AM -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Apr 1, 2005, at 9:36 AM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
Going back to the original issue of an external project not wishing
to do a release, we want to make it clear that this is something that
we threw together ad hoc, and not
On Apr 4, 2005, at 9:59 AM, David Blevins wrote:
Seems like we are going in circles on this one. Can we reasonable
agree that it isn't practical to hold up a Geronimo release till every
project we have a snapshot depenency on is able to hand us some sort
of official release of their own?
+1
We
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Dear John,
The Apache Geronimo PMC has voted to offer you commit status on the
Apache Geronimo project.
Thank you for your participation so far in the project, and we all are
excited to have you as a committer.
Welcome on board, John! And finally keep posting bugs, but
On Apr 4, 2005, at 2:17 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I personally think this is way way way too early to be worried about
binary compatability between configuration objects build with pervious
releases and builds. Also, are you taking only about the official M1,
M2 and M3 releases or builds from
On Apr 4, 2005, at 2:20 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Apr 4, 2005, at 9:59 AM, David Blevins wrote:
Seems like we are going in circles on this one. Can we reasonable
agree that it isn't practical to hold up a Geronimo release till
every project we have a snapshot depenency on is able to hand us
I tend to agree but, I think that it's a good habit to start getting into.
Regards,
Alan
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I personally think this is way way way too early to be worried about
binary compatability between configuration objects build with pervious
releases and builds. Also, are you taking
On Apr 4, 2005, at 4:45 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 03:10:55PM -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
On Apr 4, 2005, at 2:20 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Apr 4, 2005, at 9:59 AM, David Blevins wrote:
Seems like we are going in circles on this one. Can we reasonable
agree that it
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 11:17:55AM -0700, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
What do you, the community, think about us spending time thinking about
binary compatibility between milestone releases?
I'm inclined to cut the developers a lot of slack given that
Geronimo's way pre-1.0. But it would be good
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 05:37:32PM -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
On Apr 4, 2005, at 4:45 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 03:10:55PM -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Even before we're 1.0, I would expect that our 0.8 and 0.9 stuff
are becoming good enough for some
On Apr 4, 2005, at 5:48 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 03:10:55PM -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
On Apr 4, 2005, at 2:20 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Apr 4, 2005, at 9:59 AM, David Blevins wrote:
Seems like we are going in circles on this one. Can we reasonable
agree that it
18 matches
Mail list logo
