Lars Kühne wrote, On 11/17/2005 10:18 PM:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Lars Kühne wrote, On 11/17/2005 3:19 PM:
On 11/17/05, *Dain Sundstrom* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 Using JIRA for tracking progress of the ORB would be great.
[...] I suggest you create an
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1196?page=all ]
Vamsavardhana Reddy updated GERONIMO-1196:
--
Attachment: GERONIMO-1196-2.patch
GERONIMO-1196.patch prevents the Keystore portlet from using (empty string)
alias when a certificate
Keystore portlet should display certificate finger print before importing
trusted certificates
--
Key: GERONIMO-1199
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1199
Project:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1135?page=comments#action_12357966
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-1135:
---
As of revision 345477, the following plan.xml files have
javax.net.ssl.keystorePassword=... entries
Ok either averaging 4 hours of sleep this week is getting to me or
Alan started speaking another language deceptively like English but
where you agree with people by disagreeing with them. My wife speaks
this language fluently.
On Nov 17, 2005, at 2:18 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
+1 Using
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1166?page=all ]
John Sisson reassigned GERONIMO-1166:
-
Assign To: John Sisson
Enhance Startup scripts to allow process to be launched in background
Yes thanks David, that does help. So technically, could I directly call
validateDD() and get the list of errors? I'm wanting to hook into the
validation framework in Eclipse so that the validation errors appear in
the Problems View prior to deployment.
Sachin.
David Jencks wrote:
On Nov
Kresten, what exactly are you working on? I have some code locally
that implements simple things like ORB.list_initial_services,
string_to_object, etc. I plan to finish this up this weekend and
send a patch.
I'm working on getting infrastructure in place that I can run the
client
I assume it will be the case that the configId declaration in the file
will therefore control which repository location the CAR is installed
in -- so if you change the configId, it changes the install location.
Is that correct?
Here are my issues:
- It's a pretty significant change for the last
None of the links worked for me today:
http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
http://sourceforge.net/geronimo_download_choose.php
Aaron
Any chance that we could post a snapshot driver on the site for download?
Sachin
The current PMCs of both ActiveMQ and ServiceMix have overwhelmingly
voted to become Geronimo sub-projects.
The incubator proposals are here...
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ActiveMqProposal
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ServiceMixProposal
Please vote if you'd like Geronimo to be the
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1195?page=all ]
Joe Bohn updated GERONIMO-1195:
---
Attachment: WelcomePortlet.patch
This patch has one part in common with the patch for GERONIMO-1197 (not yet
applied). The part is
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1195?page=all ]
Joe Bohn updated GERONIMO-1195:
---
Geronimo Info: [Patch Available]
Present a Welcome Portlet with Geronimo information after login
+1!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current PMCs of both ActiveMQ and ServiceMix have overwhelmingly
voted to become Geronimo sub-projects.
The incubator proposals are here...
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ActiveMqProposal
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ServiceMixProposal
Please vote if
+1
On 11/18/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current PMCs of both ActiveMQ and ServiceMix have overwhelmingly
voted to become Geronimo sub-projects.
The incubator proposals are here...
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ActiveMqProposal
This is what I did in the GBuild report code. It has a nested zip
file containing all of the static content for the report, and when it
generates a report is simply unzips the file into the report
directory. You can just swipe the code from there.
-dain
On Nov 17, 2005, at 11:04 PM,
+1 good idea david
+1 add an opt-in flag
-dain
On Nov 17, 2005, at 11:25 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
My only concern is that executing SQL scripts not be the default
behavior for an application. As a developer I generally prefer to be
the master of the SQL and not have the server doing things
If we are the ones copying over the plans, why not have the
deployment code for the module, simply remove passwords from the file
before copying it. Alternatively, we could choose to not copy over
the plan for connectors.
-dain
On Nov 17, 2005, at 11:30 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Note
Wait a sec. We are worried about an administrator that has access to
the console from seeing a password embedded an a configuration file?
The admin can deploy applications, which could easily just scan for
passwords in memory or on disk. Anyone with access to this console
is root for
+1
-dain
On Nov 18, 2005, at 8:20 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current PMCs of both ActiveMQ and ServiceMix have
overwhelmingly voted to become Geronimo sub-projects.
The incubator proposals are here...
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ActiveMqProposal
On 11/18/05, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wait a sec. We are worried about an administrator that has access to
the console from seeing a password embedded an a configuration file?
The admin can deploy applications, which could easily just scan for
passwords in memory or on disk.
On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 16:20 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current PMCs of both ActiveMQ and ServiceMix have overwhelmingly
voted to become Geronimo sub-projects.
The incubator proposals are here...
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ActiveMqProposal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote, On 11/18/2005 8:20 AM:
Please vote if you'd like Geronimo to be the sponsor of the projects
during incubation
[X] +1 = I support the move to sponsor ActiveMQ ServiceMix during
incubation as sub-projects of Geronimo
[ ] +0 = I don't mind either way
[ ] -1 = I
The current PMCs of WADI have overwhelmingly voted to become a Geronimo
sub-project.
The incubator proposal is here...
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WadiProposal
Please vote if you'd like Geronimo to be the sponsor of the project
during incubation
[ ] +1 = I support the move to sponsor
+1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current PMCs of both ActiveMQ and ServiceMix have overwhelmingly
voted to become Geronimo sub-projects.
The incubator proposals are here...
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ActiveMqProposal
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ServiceMixProposal
Please vote if
On Nov 17, 2005, at 11:30 PM, David Jencks wrote:
This relies on using the packaging plugin, which builds
configurations and puts them into the local maven repository. As
such, it uses the maven id as the configId: they typically look like
+1
Jeff Genender wrote:
The current PMCs of WADI have overwhelmingly voted to become a
Geronimo sub-project.
The incubator proposal is here...
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WadiProposal
Please vote if you'd like Geronimo to be the sponsor of the project
during incubation
[ ] +1 = I
[ ] +0 = I don't mind either way
ServiceMix folks have not shown much interest in any WS projects at
Apache though I have seen their interest in so many non-Apache WS
projects including Celtix and JAX-WS RI (example see
http://mail-archive.objectweb.org/celtix-dev/2005-08/msg00112.html). I
don't
+1 Excellent news :)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current PMCs of both ActiveMQ and ServiceMix have overwhelmingly
voted to become Geronimo sub-projects.
The incubator proposals are here...
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ActiveMqProposal
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ServiceMixProposal
+1
On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 16:20 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current PMCs of both ActiveMQ and ServiceMix have overwhelmingly
voted to become Geronimo sub-projects.
The incubator proposals are here...
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ActiveMqProposal
On 18 Nov 2005, at 17:50, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
[ ] +0 = I don't mind either way
ServiceMix folks have not shown much interest in any WS projects at
Apache though I have seen their interest in so many non-Apache WS
projects including Celtix and JAX-WS RI (example see
[ ] +1 = I support the move to sponsor ActiveMQ ServiceMix during
incubation as sub-projects of Geronimo
[ ] +0 = I don't mind either way
[ ] -1 = I don't support this move because: ___
+1
There has been some discussion about the need/desire for remote deploy
in V1. I just wanted to point out that it appears that the deployment
from the web console works remotely (with file upload). This surprised
me and several others so I just wanted to make sure people were aware of
it.
+1 from me.
On 11/18/05, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current PMCs of WADI have overwhelmingly voted to become a Geronimo
sub-project.
The incubator proposal is here...
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WadiProposal
Please vote if you'd like Geronimo to be the sponsor of the
I don't believe that pages are every removed... they are just not
liked to anymore. Anyway, I suggest we create an archived page
and just link to it from there.
-dain
On Nov 18, 2005, at 9:52 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I was going to remove the Logo Contest Page from the Wiki unless
I have 2 more patches for the console waiting to be integrated. Can I
get a committer to take a look and hopefully integrate them?
GERONIMO-1197 provides more look and feel enhancements. Most obvious is
the icons for the task list ... but there are also improvements in the
background
+1 to both ideas. For production deployments the DBAs generally don't allow
servers or applications to arbitrarily create databases and tables. For
development / testing this is an improvement that with an opt-in flag would be
excellent.
+1 to both
Aaron Mulder wrote:
My only concern is
+1
Jeff Genender wrote:
The current PMCs of WADI have overwhelmingly voted to become a Geronimo
sub-project.
The incubator proposal is here...
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WadiProposal
Please vote if you'd like Geronimo to be the sponsor of the project
during incubation
[ ] +1 = I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeff Genender wrote:
The current PMCs of WADI have overwhelmingly voted to become a Geronimo
sub-project.
Xbean was included in the original concept message; how does
that stand?
- --
#kenP-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini
+1
(I still have a vote right?)
--jason
On Nov 18, 2005, at 8:20 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current PMCs of both ActiveMQ and ServiceMix have
overwhelmingly voted to become Geronimo sub-projects.
The incubator proposals are here...
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ActiveMqProposal
James,
Could we expect any help, in any form, in any of the WS-* projects? i
guess not, from your email it is very clear that the involvement you
think about would be just a drop-in replacement for other things and
not much more. I thought for a few moments that since there is SO much
WS-* focus
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1197?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom reassigned GERONIMO-1197:
---
Assign To: Matt Hogstrom (was: Joe Bohn)
Geronimo Console Look and Feel installement #2 - icons in navigation,
improved images/layout.
On Nov 18, 2005, at 11:05 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On 11/18/05, Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/18/05, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wait a sec. We are worried about an administrator that has
access to
the console from seeing a password embedded an a configuration
Can you add a JIRA for 1.1?
-dain
On Nov 18, 2005, at 11:35 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
+100 on this idea...we need to support multiple instances. This is
going to be key on hosting configuration and developer shared boxes.
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I think anything we do in this area should
On Nov 18, 2005, at 11:42 AM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeff Genender wrote:
The current PMCs of WADI have overwhelmingly voted to become a
Geronimo
sub-project.
Xbean was included in the original concept message; how does
that stand?
We
On 11/18/05, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
(I still have a vote right?)
Yes, you're still a committer and part of the PMC.
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack(u30,D0G)[EMAIL
PROTECTED]5R\F)R=6-E+G-N61ED\!G;6%I;\YC;VT*
);'
The Castor Project
http://www.castor.org/
Apache Geronimo
Sorry, i just get frustrated sometimes with lack of help. There's so
much to do and so little time. I know we have to plan *NOW* for JAXB
2.0 and JAX-WS to be able to get to the next rev of J2EE soon. I hope
some folks here can jump in to WS land and help implement them. When i
saw how closely
I agree with this idea but I'd like to add one more thoughts. I think
that we need to make the sharing of the server configurations also
configurable. A presumed sharing of binaries or configurations is not
always optimal (especially when upgrading from a v1 to a v2 server).
We also need
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1197?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom closed GERONIMO-1197:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Applied new Icons and look and feel. Ncie.
Geronimo Console Look and Feel installement #2 - icons in navigation,
improved
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1195?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom reassigned GERONIMO-1195:
---
Assign To: Matt Hogstrom (was: Joe Bohn)
Present a Welcome Portlet with Geronimo information after login
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1195?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom closed GERONIMO-1195:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Applied patch for more user friendly console welcome page.
Present a Welcome Portlet with Geronimo information after login
I agree that we should remove the logo contest link but I think it would
be great if we kept something on the wiki with the logo gif files so
that folks can pick them up and use them for documentation,
presentations, cross references from other projects, t-shirts, coffee
mugs, etc...
Joe
Hi All,
there is a bunch of new articles about Geronimo security just published
in the confluence site, here is the link.
http://opensource2.atlassian.com/confluence/oss/display/GERONIMO/Security
Still looking for volunteers for covering the following topics
* Architecture
* Administration
*
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1195?page=comments#action_12358020
]
Matt Hogstrom commented on GERONIMO-1195:
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/dev/geronimo/applications svn commit -m GERONIMO-1195
Welcome Page to Admin Console
Sending
I've pulled a list of Open Source projects we include for Geronimo out of
etc/project.properties. You can see them at
http://wiki.apache.org/geronimo/FrontPage/ReleaseManagement.
What I'd like to know is what is required for runtime. Please update the Wiki
with that info (just move the
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1087?page=all ]
Dave Colasurdo updated GERONIMO-1087:
-
Geronimo Info: (was: [Patch Available])
Do not checkin these patches.. This will be Dupped to a new JIRA.
Add Tomcat servlets-examples to
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1088?page=all ]
Dave Colasurdo updated GERONIMO-1088:
-
Geronimo Info: (was: [Patch Available])
Do not checkin these patches.. This will be Dupped to a new JIRA
Add Tomcat jsp-examples to geronimo
I've made the necessary changes to move the tomcat examples from the
geronimo repo and have them pre-installed into the generated binary
images as default example applications.
Specifically,
- updated /modules/assembly/project.xml dependencies to find the new wars
- updated
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-796?page=all ]
Joe Bohn closed GERONIMO-796:
-
Thanks Aaron.
Web Server Manager portlet returns error in view mode.
Key: GERONIMO-796
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1064?page=all ]
Joe Bohn closed GERONIMO-1064:
--
Thanks Aaron
WebConnector portlet results in CodeGenerationException when G is configured
for tomcat
On 11/18/05, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In 1.1+ we could change the config store to set the file permissions
on the directories it creates.
How can you do that from Java?
Aaron
On Nov 18, 2005, at 11:05 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On 11/18/05, Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1186?page=all ]
Joe Bohn closed GERONIMO-1186:
--
Thanks Aaron
Illegal argument exception when returning from add listener to display list
in web server page, network listeners portlet
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1169?page=all ]
Joe Bohn closed GERONIMO-1169:
--
Thanks Jacek
Highlight links, clean up some colors
-
Key: GERONIMO-1169
URL:
On Nov 18, 2005, at 2:38 PM, Dave Colasurdo wrote:
I've made the necessary changes to move the tomcat examples from the
geronimo repo and have them pre-installed into the generated binary
images as default example applications.
Specifically,
- updated /modules/assembly/project.xml
Matt,
It looks like the new files didn't get included what was committed.
This results in a long exception as soon as you signon to the console.
The missing parts are in the patch. The modules are
WelcomePortlet.java, welcomeNormal.jsp, welcomeMaximized.jsp,
welcomeHelp.jsp. Can you do
On Nov 18, 2005, at 3:03 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 11/18/05, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In 1.1+ we could change the config store to set the file permissions
on the directories it creates.
How can you do that from Java?
The same way ant does, you exec some platform program :(
It's become apparent recently that some of the elements in our plans
related to classloading are a bit confusing. In particular, there is
an include element that no one is sure what is for and is not used, and
a similarly named import element that is like the parentId, only better
:-). Also
+1
On 11/18/05, Greg Wilkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
[X] +1 = I support the move to sponsor WADI during incubation as
sub-projects of Geronimo
[ ] +0 = I don't mind either way
[ ] -1 = I don't support this move because: ___
It's going
+1
david jencks
On Nov 18, 2005, at 9:29 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
The current PMCs of WADI have overwhelmingly voted to become a
Geronimo sub-project.
The incubator proposal is here...
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WadiProposal
Please vote if you'd like Geronimo to be the sponsor of the
+1
david jencks
On Nov 18, 2005, at 8:20 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current PMCs of both ActiveMQ and ServiceMix have overwhelmingly
voted to become Geronimo sub-projects.
The incubator proposals are here...
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ActiveMqProposal
This sounds great!
Please further split out the data types so they're not all
dependencyType (even though they all have URIs or maven chunks).
Let's have one type where URI means a configID, and a separate type
where URI means an index into the local repository. Maybe they could
just be called
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1037?page=comments#action_12358043
]
Aaron Mulder commented on GERONIMO-1037:
There are a number of screens where you can uninstall things -- I can think of
web, JMS, and ultimately EJB connectors
There is a JIRA issue I re-opened on those classes tags. They are duped
in Tomcat and Jetty. I would like to see them at the web builder level.
David Jencks wrote:
It's become apparent recently that some of the elements in our plans
related to classloading are a bit confusing. In
On Nov 18, 2005, at 3:58 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
This sounds great!
Please further split out the data types so they're not all
dependencyType (even though they all have URIs or maven chunks).
Let's have one type where URI means a configID, and a separate type
where URI means an index into the
On Nov 18, 2005, at 4:05 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
There is a JIRA issue I re-opened on those classes tags. They are
duped in Tomcat and Jetty. I would like to see them at the web
builder level.
I noticed they were missing from the generic schema. My local changes
use the same group
Yes! ;-)
David Jencks wrote:
On Nov 18, 2005, at 4:05 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
There is a JIRA issue I re-opened on those classes tags. They are
duped in Tomcat and Jetty. I would like to see them at the web
builder level.
I noticed they were missing from the generic schema. My local
On 11/18/05, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dain has a plan that I hope he will explain soon that should make all
of these elements identical in form, name, and function. Dependency is
what maven calls them and I don't see a strong reason to change their
name.
If there's a plan on the
On Nov 18, 2005, at 4:17 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 11/18/05, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dain has a plan that I hope he will explain soon that should make all
of these elements identical in form, name, and function. Dependency
is
what maven calls them and I don't see a strong
On Nov 18, 2005, at 4:24 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Nov 18, 2005, at 4:17 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 11/18/05, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dain has a plan that I hope he will explain soon that should make
all
of these elements identical in form, name, and function.
Dependency
+1
Gianny
Jeff Genender wrote:
The current PMCs of WADI have overwhelmingly voted to become a
Geronimo sub-project.
The incubator proposal is here...
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WadiProposal
Please vote if you'd like Geronimo to be the sponsor of the project
during incubation
[ ]
Dear Epiq team,
Could we get icon-size images of an open and closed lock, using a
similar lock to what's on the login page, but with just a white or
transparent background? I'd like to have locked and unlocked
icons for security stuff that requires special authentication to
view/change.
Thanks,
HotDeployer gets IllegalStateExceptions during a non-hot deploy deploy of an app
Key: GERONIMO-1200
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1200
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1200?page=all ]
Kevan Miller updated GERONIMO-1200:
---
Geronimo Info: [Patch Available]
HotDeployer gets IllegalStateExceptions during a non-hot deploy deploy of an
app
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1200?page=all ]
Kevan Miller updated GERONIMO-1200:
---
Attachment: HotDeploy.patch
Works for me...
HotDeployer gets IllegalStateExceptions during a non-hot deploy deploy of an
app
Hi Aaron,
I had asked the Epiq team for an icon for the security items in the task
list (either a lock or key). They sent me a lock icon today (closed).
I've attached the icon to this note ... so here's one of the two icons
you are looking for.
Joe
Aaron Mulder wrote:
Dear Epiq team,
All our login modules implement login() incorrectly
---
Key: GERONIMO-1201
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1201
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Components: security
Versions: 1.0-M5
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1201?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder resolved GERONIMO-1201:
Resolution: Fixed
Revision 345629
All our login modules implement login() incorrectly
---
All,
I'd really like to have a group of interested and available people to
review security-related changes to Geronimo. And by this I mean,
features dealing with SSL, security realms, storing files with
passwords, showing passwords in the console, establishing procedures
for locking down the
SQL Login Module support for server Database Pools
--
Key: GERONIMO-1202
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1202
Project: Geronimo
Type: Improvement
Components: security
Versions: 1.0-M5
I'd be happy to be a part of this.
Jeff
Aaron Mulder wrote:
All,
I'd really like to have a group of interested and available people to
review security-related changes to Geronimo. And by this I mean,
features dealing with SSL, security realms, storing files with
passwords, showing passwords
Hi,
We have deployed the adventure builder in geronimo.
But the issue that we are getting is CheckoutHTMLAction
Exception: (404) Not Found - Error.
The Stack trace is
(404)Not Found
at
org.apache.axis.transport.http.HTTPSender.readFromSocket(HTTPSender.java:744)
at
92 matches
Mail list logo
