Re: Editable files other than .bat and .sh files and CRs LFs

2005-12-03 Thread Bruce Snyder
On 12/2/05, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I thought is was a discussion only about line endings To clarify, I am for using windows line endings in the zip file and unix line endings in the tar.gz file. I am against leaving out some of the files from the distros (i.e., they

Re: [VOTE] Sponsor OpenEJB to become sub-project of Geronimo

2005-12-03 Thread Dain Sundstrom
+1 -dain On Dec 2, 2005, at 11:00 PM, David Blevins wrote: The OpenEJB committers have discussed it and voted to be become a Geronimo sub-project. The incubator proposl is here: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenEjbProposal Please vote if you'd like Geronimo to be the sponsor of

Re: [VOTE] Sponsor OpenEJB to become sub-project of Geronimo

2005-12-03 Thread Jacek Laskowski
David Blevins wrote: [X] +1 = I support the move to sponsor OpenEJB during incubation as a sub-project of Geronimo Jacek

[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-1270) NoClassDefFound exception in JMS Connection Factory portlet

2005-12-03 Thread Joe Bohn (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1270?page=all ] Joe Bohn reassigned GERONIMO-1270: -- Assign To: Joe Bohn NoClassDefFound exception in JMS Connection Factory portlet ---

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-1270) NoClassDefFound exception in JMS Connection Factory portlet

2005-12-03 Thread Joe Bohn (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1270?page=comments#action_12359231 ] Joe Bohn commented on GERONIMO-1270: This looks like basically the same problem as GERONIMO-1262 after I fixed the GBean reference. It is failing because of an

Re: [VOTE] Sponsor OpenEJB to become sub-project of Geronimo

2005-12-03 Thread Davanum Srinivas
+1 from me. On 12/3/05, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The OpenEJB committers have discussed it and voted to be become a Geronimo sub-project. The incubator proposl is here: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenEjbProposal Please vote if you'd like Geronimo to be the sponsor of

Re: [VOTE] Sponsor OpenEJB to become sub-project of Geronimo

2005-12-03 Thread Sachin Patel
+1 On 12/3/05 2:00 AM, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The OpenEJB committers have discussed it and voted to be become a Geronimo sub-project. The incubator proposl is here: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenEjbProposal Please vote if you'd like Geronimo to be the sponsor of

Re: [VOTE] Sponsor OpenEJB to become sub-project of Geronimo

2005-12-03 Thread Kevan Miller
+1On 12/3/05, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The OpenEJB committers have discussed it and voted to be become aGeronimo sub-project.The incubator proposl is here:http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenEjbProposal Please vote if you'd like Geronimo to be the sponsor of OpenEJBduring

Re: Jetty Logging: INFO output

2005-12-03 Thread Aaron Mulder
OK. I tried: java -DDEBUG_VERBOSE=-1 -jar target/geronimo-1.0-SNAPSHOT/bin/server.jar -v and I still get: 11:59:46,130 INFO [/] JSR154 unwrappedDispatchSupported=true 12:00:03,054 INFO [/console-standard] JSR154 unwrappedDispatchSupported=true 12:00:04,639 INFO [/console] JSR154

Re: Who wants to write POP and IMAP transports?

2005-12-03 Thread Bruce Snyder
On 12/2/05, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We still need POP and IMAP transports for our JavaMail implementation. Do any of you have some POP or IMAP client code sitting around, or would you like to write one? I wish I had this code just lying around because there's a fair amount of

Re: Move WritableRepository methods to Repository interface?

2005-12-03 Thread Dain Sundstrom
On Dec 2, 2005, at 8:45 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote: On 12/2/05, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was applying GERONIMO-1227 from Toby and it occurred to me that we may want to simply merge WritableRepository into the Repository interface and add a boolean canWrite() method to the

Re: Who wants to write POP and IMAP transports?

2005-12-03 Thread Dain Sundstrom
Thanks Bruce! Is anyone one else interested? This is definitely more then a one person job. -dain On Dec 3, 2005, at 9:16 AM, Bruce Snyder wrote: On 12/2/05, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We still need POP and IMAP transports for our JavaMail implementation. Do any of you

Re: Jetty Logging: INFO output

2005-12-03 Thread Aaron Mulder
Further investigation: org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.JSR154Filter.init:69 is: _servletContext.log(JSR154 unwrappedDispatchSupported=+_unwrappedDispatchSupported); and the log call there goes to: org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$Context.log:1134 and the log variable there turns out to be

Re: [VOTE] Sponsor OpenEJB to become sub-project of Geronimo

2005-12-03 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
+1 Regards, Alan David Blevins wrote, On 12/2/2005 11:00 PM: The OpenEJB committers have discussed it and voted to be become a Geronimo sub-project. The incubator proposl is here: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenEjbProposal Please vote if you'd like Geronimo to be the sponsor of

Re: [VOTE] Sponsor OpenEJB to become sub-project of Geronimo

2005-12-03 Thread Aaron Mulder
+1 On 12/3/05, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The OpenEJB committers have discussed it and voted to be become a Geronimo sub-project. The incubator proposl is here: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenEjbProposal Please vote if you'd like Geronimo to be the sponsor of OpenEJB

'new' build should now work

2005-12-03 Thread David Jencks
Following some hints from Brett I investigated using the maven reactor directly and think I've fixed the 'new' build. So, for me, maven -o new builds all the geronimo-related projects I have checked out using the configs/assemblies based build. Please try it and report problems thanks

RE: Who wants to write POP and IMAP transports?

2005-12-03 Thread Rajith Attapattu
I am willing to help. But I may not have the time to do the research and go through all the specs in detail (Unfortunately I can only do stuff at home at night and during weekends) So if Bruce can help me with some pointers and simple documentation I can start looking in to POP3. (sorry not very

RE: Who wants to write POP and IMAP transports?

2005-12-03 Thread Rajith Attapattu
Hey Dain/Bruce, Do we really need to write it ourselves?? The following link includes a few open source implementations of email clients. If we can reuse them, then the effort can be used in some other area. http://java-source.net/open-source/mail-clients Regards, Rajith. -Original

Re: [VOTE] Sponsor OpenEJB to become sub-project of Geronimo

2005-12-03 Thread Matt Hogstrom
+1 David Blevins wrote: The OpenEJB committers have discussed it and voted to be become a Geronimo sub-project. The incubator proposl is here: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenEjbProposal Please vote if you'd like Geronimo to be the sponsor of OpenEJB during incubation [ ] +1 = I

Re: Who wants to write POP and IMAP transports?

2005-12-03 Thread Dain Sundstrom
This is part of our clean room implementation of JavaMail, so any of the mail client just uses JavaMail won't help us. This one looks promising http://java-source.net/open-source/mail- clients/snowmail as it claims that all protocols have been reimplemented from scratch (Mime, POP, SMTP)

Re: Who wants to write POP and IMAP transports?

2005-12-03 Thread Bruce Snyder
On 12/3/05, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is part of our clean room implementation of JavaMail, so any of the mail client just uses JavaMail won't help us. This one looks promising http://java-source.net/open-source/mail- clients/snowmail as it claims that all protocols have

Re: [VOTE] Sponsor OpenEJB to become sub-project of Geronimo

2005-12-03 Thread John Sisson
+1 John David Blevins wrote: The OpenEJB committers have discussed it and voted to be become a Geronimo sub-project. The incubator proposl is here: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenEjbProposal Please vote if you'd like Geronimo to be the sponsor of OpenEJB during incubation [ ]

RE: Who wants to write POP and IMAP transports?

2005-12-03 Thread Rajith Attapattu
I will wait for the breakdown from Bruce and let you guys know on what areas I can help. Looking forward to see the list from Bruce. Rajith. -Original Message- From: Bruce Snyder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2005 3:52 PM To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject:

Re: 'new' build should now work

2005-12-03 Thread Dain Sundstrom
I just did a full rebuild and it worked perfectly :) Thanks David! -dain On Dec 3, 2005, at 10:21 AM, David Jencks wrote: Following some hints from Brett I investigated using the maven reactor directly and think I've fixed the 'new' build. So, for me, maven -o new builds all the

Confluence Setup (was: Re: zones update)

2005-12-03 Thread Jason Dillon
Is there a MySQL database available for Geronimo use? We probably want to use an external RDMBS to back the Confluence setup. I can start with the standalone and we can migrate to an external RDBMS later if there isn't one available right now. Also, unless someone has a better suggestion,

Re: Jetty Logging: INFO output

2005-12-03 Thread Jan Bartel
Aaron, I'm a little confused now. When you used -DDEBUG_VERBOSE on the runline did that change the amount of information that was logged or not? If it *did* suppress a lot of INFO messages, then that indicates that jetty is running with it's own logging mechanism enabled. If it *didn't*, then

Re: 'new' build should now work

2005-12-03 Thread Jason Dillon
Is there a plan/timeline for switching to Maven2? --jason On Dec 3, 2005, at 2:02 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: I just did a full rebuild and it worked perfectly :) Thanks David! -dain On Dec 3, 2005, at 10:21 AM, David Jencks wrote: Following some hints from Brett I investigated using the

Re: 'new' build should now work

2005-12-03 Thread Bruce Snyder
On 12/3/05, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Following some hints from Brett I investigated using the maven reactor directly and think I've fixed the 'new' build. So, for me, maven -o new builds all the geronimo-related projects I have checked out using the configs/assemblies based

Re: Confluence Setup (was: Re: zones update)

2005-12-03 Thread Bruce Snyder
On 12/3/05, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a MySQL database available for Geronimo use? We probably want to use an external RDMBS to back the Confluence setup. I can start with the standalone and we can migrate to an external RDBMS later if there isn't one available right

Re: 'new' build should now work

2005-12-03 Thread Dave Colasurdo
Are we still required to do a traditional maven m:rebuild-all prior to maven -o new? I tried building several times using maven new with latest svn and maven m:fresh-checkout and failed with missing dependencies. Even after flushing my repo and issuing maven new (without -o), I saw the same

Re: Confluence Setup (was: Re: zones update)

2005-12-03 Thread David Blevins
On Dec 3, 2005, at 2:14 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: Is there a MySQL database available for Geronimo use? We probably want to use an external RDMBS to back the Confluence setup. I think it's pretty much vanilla zone with nothing in it really. We got it a month or so ago and haven't done

Re: Confluence Setup (was: Re: zones update)

2005-12-03 Thread Jason Dillon
At the time which I recommended to the Infra list to switch from UseMod to MoinMoin, I did not think that Confluence was going to grow up as fast as it did... or I would have been more inclined to recommend Confluence. But, things change... And I believe that Confluence is really a much

Re: Confluence Setup (was: Re: zones update)

2005-12-03 Thread Jason Dillon
FYI, MoinMoin ain't got nuthin on the latest plugins for Confluence, like the Composition plugin: http://www.randombits.org/display/CONF/Home If you haven't seen these, you really gotta check them out. The tabs and clocking macros turn any ordinary flat wiki page into a dynamic

Re: [VOTE] Sponsor OpenEJB to become sub-project of Geronimo

2005-12-03 Thread Gianny Damour
+1 Gianny David Blevins wrote: The OpenEJB committers have discussed it and voted to be become a Geronimo sub-project. The incubator proposl is here: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenEjbProposal Please vote if you'd like Geronimo to be the sponsor of OpenEJB during incubation [ ]

Re: 'new' build should now work

2005-12-03 Thread David Jencks
On Dec 3, 2005, at 2:20 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote: On 12/3/05, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Following some hints from Brett I investigated using the maven reactor directly and think I've fixed the 'new' build. So, for me, maven -o new builds all the geronimo-related projects I have

Re: 'new' build should now work

2005-12-03 Thread David Jencks
On Dec 3, 2005, at 2:29 PM, Dave Colasurdo wrote: Are we still required to do a traditional maven m:rebuild-all prior to maven -o new? Theoretically no. I tried building several times using maven new with latest svn and maven m:fresh-checkout and failed with missing dependencies. Even

Re: 'new' build should now work

2005-12-03 Thread Dain Sundstrom
Hopefully we can be on maven 2 for geronimo 1.1, but we need to get valid maven 2 poms for every all of our dependencies. We are tracking the progress here: http://wiki.apache.org/geronimo/Maven2Conversion -dain On Dec 3, 2005, at 2:15 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: Is there a plan/timeline

Re: 'new' build should now work

2005-12-03 Thread Jason Dillon
Is this a hard requirement to switch? You can still use the existing maven1 repo in legacy mode to pull any artifacts that do not already exist in the maven2 repo. --jason On Dec 3, 2005, at 3:11 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: Hopefully we can be on maven 2 for geronimo 1.1, but we need to

Re: 'new' build should now work

2005-12-03 Thread Dain Sundstrom
They simply don't work unless they are valid poms. The transitive dependency system basically forces all of the poms to be valid. Trust me, we have discussed every possible hack for this and came to the conclusion we just need to bite the bullet and fix all the poms. -dain On Dec 3,

Re: Who wants to write POP and IMAP transports?

2005-12-03 Thread Bruce Snyder
On 12/3/05, Rajith Attapattu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do we really need to write it ourselves?? The following link includes a few open source implementations of email clients. If we can reuse them, then the effort can be used in some other area.

Re: Confluence Setup (was: Re: zones update)

2005-12-03 Thread Jason Dillon
Anyone know what smtp server is available in our zone that will relay? Need one for Confluence email notifications. --jason On Dec 3, 2005, at 2:32 PM, David Blevins wrote: On Dec 3, 2005, at 2:14 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: Is there a MySQL database available for Geronimo use? We probably

Re: Jetty Logging: INFO output

2005-12-03 Thread Aaron Mulder
Jan, I don't think DEBUG_VERBOSE made much of a difference, but I had already squashed most of the Jetty INFO output by setting specific classes to WARN in our log4j.properties, so I'm not sure how obvious it would have been. It's definitely the case that the messages are going to Log4j, and it

Plugin installation problems

2005-12-03 Thread David Jencks
We've been seeing severe plugin installation problems in the gbuild build; it looks like the plugins built in (the equivalent of )new1 are not available for use in (the equivalent of) new4 or new5. After looking at some maven plugin plugin jelly code I think this might be because

RE: Who wants to write POP and IMAP transports?

2005-12-03 Thread Rajith Attapattu
Thanks Bruce for the update and so we are back at square one. I will try to look at the POP3 side as much as I can and I may need some help. I will start today on reading the specs. Rajith. -Original Message- From: Bruce Snyder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, December 03,

RE: Who wants to write POP and IMAP transports?

2005-12-03 Thread Rajith Attapattu
I guess we can later move it to it's own sub-project so other Apache users can use it as a standalone library. Just so that they don't go through the same trouble we are experiencing. -Original Message- From: Rajith Attapattu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2005

Re: Who wants to write POP and IMAP transports?

2005-12-03 Thread Bruce Snyder
On 12/3/05, Rajith Attapattu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Bruce for the update and so we are back at square one. I will try to look at the POP3 side as much as I can and I may need some help. Great! If we run into issues we can put our heads together. I will start today on reading the

Re: Who wants to write POP and IMAP transports?

2005-12-03 Thread Bruce Snyder
On 12/3/05, Rajith Attapattu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I guess we can later move it to it's own sub-project so other Apache users can use it as a standalone library. Just so that they don't go through the same trouble we are experiencing. Yes, absolutely. The goal is to offer implementations

Re: Who wants to write POP and IMAP transports?

2005-12-03 Thread Dain Sundstrom
On Dec 3, 2005, at 4:11 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote: - SnowMail: Doesn't make use of JavaMail (big problem!) so everything is very proprietary; it doesn't speak IMAP at all Actually I think it is better that SnotMail doesn't use JavaMail at all. The mean they have a working POP implementation

Re: Jetty Logging: INFO output

2005-12-03 Thread Jan Bartel
Aaron, Cool. If you've got log4j configured then the DEBUG_VERBOSE won't have had any effect. We will be doing a release anyway for a couple of small things in the next day or two. Will let you know when it's done. BTW: what is happening with the JSR77 stuff for the webconsole that we were

Re: 'new' build should now work

2005-12-03 Thread Sachin Patel
Hi David, I just tried this and ran into the following error... multiproject:install-callback: [echo] Running car:install for System Database Configuration for the J2EE Server BUILD FAILED File.. /Users/sppatel/geronimo/geronimo/maven.xml Element... maven:reactor Line.. 58

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-1277) Change group-id to org.apache.geronimo

2005-12-03 Thread Dain Sundstrom (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1277?page=all ] Dain Sundstrom updated GERONIMO-1277: - Fix Version: 1.1 (was: 1.0) There is no point in making this change right now. All plans will have to change regardless to

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-1283) Demo Application Broken

2005-12-03 Thread Aaron Mulder (JIRA)
Demo Application Broken --- Key: GERONIMO-1283 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1283 Project: Geronimo Type: Bug Components: sample apps Versions: 1.0-M5 Reporter: Aaron Mulder Assigned to: David Jencks

Re: Jetty Logging: INFO output

2005-12-03 Thread Aaron Mulder
On 12/3/05, Jan Bartel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We will be doing a release anyway for a couple of small things in the next day or two. Will let you know when it's done. Great! BTW: what is happening with the JSR77 stuff for the webconsole that we were discussing? I think Joe was looking at

Re: 'new' build should now work

2005-12-03 Thread Sachin Patel
Ran with the -e flag, and here is the full stacktrace... http://people.apache.org/~sppatel/builderror.txt Note the error... Caused by: org.apache.geronimo.common.DeploymentException: Module file does not exist: /Users/sppatel/maven_repo/tranql/rars/tran

[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMO-1284) Set default console log level to INFO

2005-12-03 Thread Aaron Mulder (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1284?page=all ] Aaron Mulder resolved GERONIMO-1284: Resolution: Fixed Revision 353802 Set default console log level to INFO - Key: GERONIMO-1284

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-1284) Set default console log level to INFO

2005-12-03 Thread Aaron Mulder (JIRA)
Set default console log level to INFO - Key: GERONIMO-1284 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1284 Project: Geronimo Type: Improvement Components: startup/shutdown Versions: 1.0-M5 Reporter: Aaron

Startup Log Level Now INFO

2005-12-03 Thread Aaron Mulder
All, I got rid of most of our INFO output and set the console log level to INFO. It should look pretty much the same as before, which is to say, the progress bar should still be uninterrupted and there shouldn't be any output to speak of during startup or shutdown unless something goes wrong.

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-1285) Deployer does not list all modules that have been stopped

2005-12-03 Thread Aaron Mulder (JIRA)
Deployer does not list all modules that have been stopped - Key: GERONIMO-1285 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1285 Project: Geronimo Type: Bug Components: deployment Versions: 1.0-M5

Re: Jetty Logging: INFO output

2005-12-03 Thread Joe Bohn
Aaron Mulder wrote: On 12/3/05, Jan Bartel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We will be doing a release anyway for a couple of small things in the next day or two. Will let you know when it's done. Great! BTW: what is happening with the JSR77 stuff for the webconsole that we were discussing?

Re: Confluence Setup

2005-12-03 Thread Jason Dillon
Okay, its up: http://geronimo.zones.apache.org I did some initial setup, but there isn't really any content on here just yet. Right now its using the embedded HSQL db that comes with Confluence standalone. I will switch this to an external once I can resolve how to get one

Re: 'new' build should now work

2005-12-03 Thread Sachin Patel
Strange. Building tranql didn't help. In my local repo I only have... tranql-connector-derby-client-xa-1.0.rar But the exception refers to ...-1.1.rar and tranql_connector_version is set to 1.1-SNAPSHOT I've run clean, built both online and offline. Any ideas how I can get 1.1? On 12/3/05

Re: Confluence Setup

2005-12-03 Thread Bruce Snyder
On 12/3/05, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Okay, its up: http://geronimo.zones.apache.org I did some initial setup, but there isn't really any content on here just yet. Right now its using the embedded HSQL db that comes with Confluence standalone. I will switch this to an

Re: 'new' build should now work

2005-12-03 Thread Dave Colasurdo
I hit the same error. After manually pulling down the tranql rar, I got further but died with a different missing dependency ( IIRC it was activemq 3.2.1)... Building via maven rebuild-all and then executing maven new is a temporary workaround.. Suspect new is missing a few of the recently

Re: Confluence Setup

2005-12-03 Thread Jason Dillon
Hrm... Well... ASF Infra does not seem to happy about this. I just asked them if there was a smtp server I could use for notifications and basically got jumped on... *whimper* I got smacked for using 100m for the install too... er, so I'm not sure how long this instance will actually be

Re: Statistics Management and Jetty/Tomcat

2005-12-03 Thread Joe Bohn
Jan Bartel wrote: Aaron, The package to look at with viewCVS at sourceforge is here: http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/jetty/Jetty/extra/jsr77/src/org/mortbay/jetty/servlet/jsr77/ The JSR77 stuff is instrumented by inserting an o.m.j.s.jsr77.Jsr77Filter in front of each servlet

Re: Confluence Setup

2005-12-03 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Jason, I made it very clear that infra@ has not blessed a confluence install: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.geronimo.devel/17450/ And asking folks to engage on the infra@ list: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.geronimo.devel/17370

Re: Confluence Setup

2005-12-03 Thread Jason Dillon
Hey, thanks for the links. I will take a peek. --jason On Dec 3, 2005, at 9:04 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: Jason, I made it very clear that infra@ has not blessed a confluence install: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.geronimo.devel/17450/ And asking folks to engage on the infra@

Re: Confluence Setup

2005-12-03 Thread Bruce Snyder
On 12/3/05, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hrm... Well... ASF Infra does not seem to happy about this. I just asked them if there was a smtp server I could use for notifications and basically got jumped on... *whimper* You can't say you weren't warned ;-). I got smacked for using

Re: Confluence Setup

2005-12-03 Thread Jason Dillon
Hrm... I'd love to subscribe to infra@ except my @apache.org email is going into the void... nothing sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] is ever delivered to the address in my .forward :-( So until I get that resolved I can't really use that address. I'm reading some links to gmane archives on the

Re: Confluence Setup

2005-12-03 Thread Bruce Snyder
On 12/3/05, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hrm... I'd love to subscribe to infra@ except my @apache.org email is going into the void... nothing sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] is ever delivered to the address in my .forward :-( Yeah, mine does that too, so I use an ezmlm trick to subscribe

Re: Confluence Setup

2005-12-03 Thread Davanum Srinivas
FYI, there are over 200 emails debating about pros and cons on the infra@ mailing list. Situation is not black and white as is being painted :( -- dims On 12/4/05, Bruce Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12/3/05, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hrm... I'd love to subscribe to infra@

Re: Confluence Setup

2005-12-03 Thread John Sisson
My understanding of the situation with the Infra folks is that it was acknowledged by Atlassian that Confluence can have some stability issues if Confluence were slashdotted and they will have to address that. Once Atlassian have that fixed the potential problem it would be more likely that

Re: Statistics Management and Jetty/Tomcat

2005-12-03 Thread Greg Wilkins
Joe Bohn wrote: That's correct. In fact, at the moment I'm just trying to get a more generic management implementation of the container stats in the style of the JSR77 stats ... but I'm not really looking for the JSR77 servlet stats right now. You mentioned in another note that you were

files in var/config directory

2005-12-03 Thread John Sisson
On the user list Erin suggested (see mail below) that some of the files in the var/config directory be renamed. * Does renaming the files make less sense now that users can instruct Geronimo to use a specific config file (instead of the default config.xml file) by setting the

Re: Confluence Setup

2005-12-03 Thread Jason Dillon
Um.. well... I'm still setting up what the Geronimo site 'could' be like w/Confluence on our zone. :-\ --jason On Dec 3, 2005, at 9:11 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote: On 12/3/05, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hrm... Well... ASF Infra does not seem to happy about this. I just asked them

Re: files in var/config directory

2005-12-03 Thread Bruce Snyder
On 12/3/05, John Sisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On the user list Erin suggested (see mail below) that some of the files in the var/config directory be renamed. * Does renaming the files make less sense now that users can instruct Geronimo to use a specific config file (instead of the default