The JBI spec mandates that all properties on JMS message are valid java
identifiers
Key: SM-403
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-403
Project: ServiceMix
Type: Bug
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-398?page=all ]
Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-398:
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: Guillaume Nodet
Author: gnodet
Date: Sun Apr 16 10:27:33 2006
New Revision: 394518
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-397?page=comments#action_36057 ]
Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-397:
Changing this behavior at this point would break compatibility.
As a workaround, you should define the targetInterfaceName attribute of
Actually, my first pass was an ExtendedDeploymentManager defining a
distribute method taking such an additional parameter. I drop this idea
to implement this one because I wanted to stick to the JSR88 API.
Thanks,
Gianny
Aaron Mulder wrote:
OK. A little cheesy to set the flag, do the
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1859?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder resolved GERONIMO-1859:
Resolution: Fixed
Should be able to pass a JAR when deploying a service
-
Key:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1778?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder resolved GERONIMO-1778:
Resolution: Fixed
Commits that shoud be merged from HEAD to 1.1
-
Key: GERONIMO-1778
Yeah, but I don't think having a bunch of extra flags where you need
to cast the DeploymentManager to some implementation class and then
set the flags and then let it go back to being a DeploymentManager
really counts as sticking to the JSR-88 API. You might as well just
put some methods in the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: ammulder
Date: Sat Apr 15 23:35:09 2006
New Revision: 394439
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=394439view=rev
Log:
Services can be deployed with a JAR and plan, or a plan in the JAR at
META-INF/geronimo-service.xml (GERONIMO-1859)
Improvements to
Don't save enhanced classes, cglib is going to remove support for saving
classes.
-
Key: GERONIMO-1863
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1863
Project: Geronimo
Type:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1863?page=all ]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-1863:
--
Resolution: Fixed
fixed in rev 394442
Don't save enhanced classes, cglib is going to remove support for saving
classes.
On 4/16/06, Gianny Damour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have refactored DeploymentContext to easily add support for in-place
deployment of services (in a few words InPlaceEARContext has been
removed and DeploymentContext delegates to two distinct strategies).
Aaron, if you plan to work on
Actually, I hooked it in during my last commit; so, you can give it a
shoot now.
Thanks,
Gianny
Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 4/16/06, Gianny Damour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have refactored DeploymentContext to easily add support for in-place
deployment of services (in a few words
The j2ee-security configuration imports only rmi-naming
configuration. What about j2ee-server configuration?
Thanks
Anita
--- Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 11, 2006, at 11:41 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 4/11/06, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In 1.1, I
On Apr 16, 2006, at 9:20 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
The j2ee-security configuration imports only rmi-naming
configuration. What about j2ee-server configuration?
I think calling the server side security config j2ee-security might
be misleading; perhaps we should call it
Folks on this list seem pretty busy working through jira issues and the
like for the release. I'm moving this over to the user list... maybe
someone there has been there, done that with this Tapestry/Geronimo
integration.
Thanks...
Bryan Noll wrote:
Hello...
I'm having some issues
Folks on this dev list seem pretty busy working through jira issues and
the like for the release. I'm moving this over to the user list...
maybe someone there has been there, done that with this
Tapestry/Geronimo integration.
Thanks...
Bryan Noll wrote:
Hello...
I'm having some issues
16 matches
Mail list logo
