[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-734?page=comments#action_36230 ]
Janet Cooper commented on AMQ-734:
--
(using active-mq-snapshot-30-may / linux)
Some comments:
Given a network of brokers in a demand forwarding environment: Broker A +
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-736?page=comments#action_36231 ]
Danielius Jurna commented on AMQ-736:
-
The problem is not in the broker, but in JournalMessageStore. Whet
JoiurnalMessageStore is performing checkpoint, consumers doesn't
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-736?page=all ]
Danielius Jurna updated AMQ-736:
Attachment: slowConsumer.patch
Broker is not delivering all messages to slow consumer
--
On 6/4/06, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In addition I think we should go against the PMC-only rule from the voting
document and allow +1 and -1 from non-pmc committers to count.
+1
Let's take this as an example. As we haven't discussed it yet, it
seems to me that such a change
+1 to the suggested meaning of +1 votes
+1 to the suggestion of *all* committers voting
regards
Jan
Kevan Miller wrote:
I'd like to request a change to the RTC process being used by Geronimo
(or at least I'm requesting a relaxation of Ken's interpretation of the
RTC process).
In Ken's
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2074?page=all ]
Gianny Damour updated GERONIMO-2074:
Attachment: GERONIMO-2074.patch
I have just fixed two problems in TranQL related to prefetch group
transformation of EJB-QL returning entities,
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2074?page=comments#action_12414638
]
Gianny Damour commented on GERONIMO-2074:
-
Matt, could you please confirm that it indeed increases the performance?
CMP Issues two selects for each CMP bean read
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2071?page=all ]
Anita Kulshreshtha updated GERONIMO-2071:
-
Attachment: configs.log
My xmlbeans pom is also autogenerated. I think(?) because the local tranql pom
has been flagged as invalid, maven
Hi All...
I've been struggling too long trying to building G, but all my tries failed. I got a fresh copy of r411545 and got the following error while trying to build it
http://rifers.org/paste/show/877
I talked with djencks on IRC and he ask me to try building TrnaQl and OEJB separatly and
On Jun 4, 2006, at 6:58 AM, Mohammed Nour wrote:Hi All... I've been struggling too long trying to building G, but all my tries failed. I got a fresh copy of r411545 and got the following error while trying to build it http://rifers.org/paste/show/877 I talked with djencks on IRC and he ask me
On 6/3/06, John Sisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Agree that we need to discuss getting the process relaxed officially
with Ken's approval.
That struck me - why would we await Ken's approval if there were 3x+1
votes from PMC members? Wouldn't it be enough? Just curious...
John
Jacek
--
[m2] stax dependencies are all wrong
Key: GERONIMO-2082
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2082
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Security: public (Regular issues)
Versions: 1.2
Reporter: David Jencks
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2082?page=all ]
David Jencks updated GERONIMO-2082:
---
Attachment: xmlbeans-maven-plugin-2.0.1-SNAPSHOT.jar
xbean-2.0.0.pom
geronimo-no-stax.diff
Corrected xmlbeans maven
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2082?page=all ]
David Jencks updated GERONIMO-2082:
---
Attachment: openejb-no-stax.diff
openejb patch to remove stax dependencies
[m2] stax dependencies are all wrong
I was trying to make a minor change to the new top-level pom.xml, and
I am getting this error:
snip
subversion/libsvn_client/commit.c:873: (apr_err=175002)
svn: Commit failed (details follow):
subversion/libsvn_ra_dav/util.c:296: (apr_err=175002)
svn: MKACTIVITY of
Use howl-logger-1.0.1-1.jar
---
Key: GERONIMO-2083
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2083
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Security: public (Regular issues)
Components: dependencies
Versions: 1.1
Reporter:
Right now the groupIds in the m2 build are
org.apache.geronimo.modules for the jar files
org.apache.geronimo.configs for the car files
I think these are both bad. First of all, due to our recent
renaming, the configs should if anything get the modules name :-).
More important, I think at
Mohammad,
I was having the same issue you were just the other day. I got it to
work by doing the following:
maven -Dmaven.test.skip -Dmaven.itest.skip
David Jencks wrote:
On Jun 4, 2006, at 6:58 AM, Mohammed Nour wrote:
Hi All...
I've been struggling too long
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 6/3/06, John Sisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Agree that we need to discuss getting the process relaxed officially
with Ken's approval.
That struck me - why would we await Ken's approval if there were 3x+1
votes from PMC members? Wouldn't it be enough? Just
I started thinking about how we can be sure we get everything we want
out of the dead-1.2 branch, and committed a file that I hope will
help. Starting with
svn log -r358492:HEAD all_changes.log
I arranged each commit on a single line starting with Not Merged
You can see what you (or
Point well taken as that certainly could bubble up as a problem if one person was elevated above
other in the group.
John Sisson wrote:
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
John Sisson wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
On 6/2/06, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Having done two releases I have some
inline..
--- David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right now the groupIds in the m2 build are
org.apache.geronimo.modules for the jar files
org.apache.geronimo.configs for the car files
I think these are both bad. First of all, due to our recent
renaming, the configs should if
Gianny,
I applied your changes to fix the double execution. It looks like the modifications you made
overall improved performance by about 10% (from 1445 to 1591). However, I still see the double
execution of the SQL for the Quote bean. So we can still eek out some extra performance. The
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2074?page=comments#action_12414685
]
Matt Hogstrom commented on GERONIMO-2074:
-
Gianny,
I applied your changes to fix the double execution. It looks like the
modifications you made overall improved
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1411?page=comments#action_12414689
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-1411:
ported to 1.1 from dead-1.2 in rev 411661
ported to trunk in rev 411663
servlet 2.3 context-param elements are not
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1411?page=all ]
David Jencks updated GERONIMO-1411:
---
Fix Version: 1.1
1.2
(was: 1.x)
set fix versions
servlet 2.3 context-param elements are not converted properly
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1440?page=all ]
David Jencks updated GERONIMO-1440:
---
Fix Version: 1.1
This was merged into 1.1 in rev 407589
JAASJettyRealm not shared enough
Key:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1473?page=comments#action_12414696
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-1473:
ported to new 1.2 in rev 411682.
ApplicationPolicyConfigurationManager doesn't clear permissions on startup
28 matches
Mail list logo