On Jul 31, 2006, at 4:09 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
About a week ago there was a discussion on the OpenEJB mailing list
regarding the TransactionContextManager. In OpenEJB 3 we removed
the use of the TCM from Geronimo and replaced it with just a
javax.transaction.TransactionManager. Thi
On Aug 2, 2006, at 10:53 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I'm working on the Jencks project again and have discovered that
the container managed security and pool partition by-subject
doesn't work oustide of Geronimo since both depend on obtaining the
current caller's subject from ContextManager.
+1
Regards,
Alan
Hiram Chirino wrote:
Some LICENSE file issues were found in the first release candidate of the
4.0.2 build. I have cut and RC 2 of the 4.0.2 build with the fixes
and it's
available here:
http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0.2-RC2/maven1/incubator-activ
I'm working on the Jencks project again and have discovered that the
container managed security and pool partition by-subject doesn't work
oustide of Geronimo since both depend on obtaining the current
caller's subject from ContextManager.getCurrentCaller(), which is a
Geronimo specific cla
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2266?page=all ]
Alan Cabrera updated GERONIMO-2266:
---
Fix Version/s: v1.1.2
(was: 1.1.x)
> FileAuditLoginModule: Does not log failed attempts
> --
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
The memory leak is fixed. Thanks to Kevan for the quick work.
I am going to branch this afternoon at 1500. If you have something in
progress ping me and we'll work it out.
The branch will be branches/1.1.1 and will only be taking bug fixes
and performance regressions (
What about the changes to the Jira that we made a few weeks ago?
Regards,
Alan
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
People have been referring to things requiring votes as
'RTCs'.
Everyone *please* stop using RTC in this manner. RTC is a
development mo
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2266?page=all ]
Alan Cabrera reassigned GERONIMO-2266:
--
Assignee: Alan Cabrera
> FileAuditLoginModule: Does not log failed attempts
> --
>
>
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2266?page=all ]
Vamsavardhana Reddy updated GERONIMO-2266:
--
Fix Version/s: 1.2
Affects Version/s: 1.1.x
1.2
> FileAuditLoginModule: Does not log failed attempts
> ---
FileAuditLoginModule: Does not log failed attempts
--
Key: GERONIMO-2266
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2266
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (
Jason Dillon wrote:
FYI... I've updated to include most of the pages from the main site...
but have not fully converted them. But now you can get a better feel
for how the site might look:
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxSITE/
--jason
Looks really great!
Regards,
Alan
Kevan Miller wrote:
Geronimo community members,
There is a Geronimo BOF being held at LinuxWorld in San Francisco,
later this month. Here are the details that I have:
BOF 15: Apache Geronimo 1.1 - Open Source Application Server
Wednesday, August 16, from 6-7 PM
Moscone Center Room 305
I'll be
APACHE GERONIMO STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2006-08-02 13:03:05 -0400 (Wed, 02 Aug 2006) $]
The current version of this file can be found at:
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/trunk/STATUS
Current version in trunk:
RELEASE SHOW
The id attribute defaults to the xbean tag name
---
Key: XBEAN-34
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-34
Project: XBean
Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 2.6
Rep
Geronimo community members,
There is a Geronimo BOF being held at LinuxWorld in San Francisco,
later this month. Here are the details that I have:
BOF 15: Apache Geronimo 1.1 - Open Source Application Server
Wednesday, August 16, from 6-7 PM
Moscone Center Room 305
I'll be there. Anyone else
Strange - there shouldn't be - anything within the activemq folder
should have the same karma.
On 8/2/06, Nathan Mittler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey James,
Just tried to commit and got the following error:
svn: MKACTIVITY of '/repos/asf/!svn/act/010cd0f707b0': 403 Forbidden (
http://svn.
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-850?page=comments#action_36679 ]
Vadim Pesochinskiy commented on AMQ-850:
Please remember that in addition to removing messages from the buffer
(unacking) you need to make sure that you do
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1277?page=all ]
David Jencks reassigned GERONIMO-1277:
--
Assignee: Jason Dillon (was: David Jencks)
I think jason is implementing this insofar as it is possible within windows
restrictions as part of
I totally missed this email when it came out. This stuff rocks!
-David
On Jul 25, 2006, at 3:34 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
I had been wanting to use Confluence as the primary Geronimo
website for a while now... and finally just went and created proof
of concept that it might actually work...
Make kaha DB file size configurable
---
Key: AMQ-857
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-857
Project: ActiveMQ
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: Broker
Affects Versions: 4.0.2, 4
Ok. So from what I've read, we're trying to separate the authorization
part from the SSL socket and let the broker handle it.
This sounds great. It would take more work (not so great since I have
a deadline), but it would be a "proper" solution.
From what I know of JAAS, the subject/principals fu
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2030?page=all ]
David Jencks reassigned GERONIMO-2030:
--
Assignee: David Jencks
> Allow WebServiceBuilder determine if there are WebServices to be deployed
>
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2255?page=comments#action_12425397
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-2255:
I agree that adding these dependencies in this way is a bad idea. I think the
correct approach is to allow t
Hey James,
Just tried to commit and got the following error:
svn: MKACTIVITY of '/repos/asf/!svn/act/010cd0f707b0': 403 Forbidden (
http://svn.apache.org)
Is there some special permission that I need for submitting to that folder?
On 8/2/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8
I'm confused by the descriptions of this approach, and don't
understand what is being proposed. I would separate the steps of
1. validating the client certificate based on the presented
certificate chain, which in my experience can be done by the standard
truststore implementation that com
+1
david jencks
On Aug 1, 2006, at 9:14 AM, Brian McCallister wrote:
I'd like to start the ball rolling to have ActiveMQ graduate to a
top level project at Apache.
The original intent was to become a sub-project of Geronimo, but I
think that this would be a disservice to ActiveMQ, which i
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2219?page=comments#action_12425390
]
Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-2219:
FYI, I will do this when I get back to Cali on friday... sorry have not had
time to apply after the super spee
FYI... I've updated to include most of the pages from the main
site... but have not fully converted them. But now you can get a
better feel for how the site might look:
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxSITE/
--jason
I was not volunteering... :-P
But maybe if I have some time and feel like hacking something
together I will...
--jason
On Aug 2, 2006, at 2:37 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Aug 2, 2006, at 2:01 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
On Aug 2, 2006, at 12:11 PM, David Blevins wrote:
I was just looking i
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-854?page=all ]
Nathan Mittler reopened AMQ-854:
going to submit a snapshot of the documentation to
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/activemq/site/cms
> Update to activemq-cpp source to
On Aug 2, 2006, at 2:01 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
On Aug 2, 2006, at 12:11 PM, David Blevins wrote:
I was just looking into that. I already send a report every
monday of unassigned JIRAs that contain patches. If i could get a
list of the votes too, I should be able to cook up something.
U
On Aug 2, 2006, at 1:53 PM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
People have been referring to things requiring votes as
'RTCs'.
Everyone *please* stop using RTC in this manner. RTC is a
development model; what it and CTR are concerned with are
patches. Please call them patches. Changes are patch
On Aug 2, 2006, at 12:11 PM, David Blevins wrote:
I was just looking into that. I already send a report every monday
of unassigned JIRAs that contain patches. If i could get a list of
the votes too, I should be able to cook up something.
Unfortunately you can not tell which are PMC votes..
I agree. I'd prefer something that is directly integrated with JIRA
rather than adding an additional file that must be maintained (and
therefore is more likely to contain errors).
Joe
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Fine...I prefer a field in JIRA so I can execute a single query. I'll
assume the patc
I would rather see the community use JIRA to manage information of
this nature.
I don't think that using the STATUS file is a good idea... at least
not for Geronimo and its projects.
The RTC issue type was added to help with some of this, but from
recent experience I've seen that no one i
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-509?page=all ]
Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-509.
Resolution: Fixed
Author: gnodet
Date: Wed Aug 2 13:06:38 2006
New Revision: 428124
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=428124&view=rev
Log:
SM-509: add mt
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2264?page=comments#action_12425366
]
Matt Hogstrom commented on GERONIMO-2264:
-
Transmitting file data ...
Committed revision 428127.
> Created branches/1.1.1 to start release
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2264?page=comments#action_12425364
]
Matt Hogstrom commented on GERONIMO-2264:
-
svn commit -m "GERONIMO-2264 Updated versions to 1.1.2-SNAPSHOT in branches/1.1"
Sending1.1/etc/expli
Upgrade to use the new commons-modeler-2.0 release
--
Key: GERONIMO-2265
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2265
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: New Feature
Security Level:
Support mtom and attachments
Key: SM-509
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-509
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: servicemix-jsr181
Reporter: Guillaume N
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2063?page=all ]
Ted Kirby updated GERONIMO-2063:
Attachment: G2063-openejb211.patch
i manually start j2ee-corba before magicgball.
The problem here is that on second start, the POA already exists.
this is b
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2134?page=all ]
Kevan Miller reassigned GERONIMO-2134:
--
Assignee: Kevan Miller
> Shutdown error in ConfigurationClassLoader on Java 5
>
>
>
Hi,
On 8/2/06, ngcutura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hmmm... It didn't cross my mind but yes, indeed, it is possible.
We may supply a fake truststore that would return 'true' for any certificate
submitted for authentication and then perform real authentication after
connection setup. We would t
Created branches/1.1.1 to start release process
---
Key: GERONIMO-2264
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2264
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Task
Security Level: public (Regul
On Aug 2, 2006, at 12:06 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Fine...I prefer a field in JIRA so I can execute a single query.
I'll assume the patches are in JIRA anyway and its a great place
for comments too :)
I was just looking into that. I already send a report every monday
of unassigned JIRAs
On Aug 2, 2006, at 3:06 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:Fine...I prefer a field in JIRA so I can execute a single query. I'll assume the patches are in JIRA anyway and its a great place for comments too :)+1Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-Hash: SHA1People have been referrin
Fine...I prefer a field in JIRA so I can execute a single query. I'll assume the patches are in
JIRA anyway and its a great place for comments too :)
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
People have been referring to things requiring votes as
'RTCs'.
Ev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> How will non-committers get their patches added to the status file?
By a committer.
- --
#kenP-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/
Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/
"Mille
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2134?page=all ]
Kevan Miller resolved GERONIMO-2134.
Fix Version/s: 1.2
Resolution: Fixed
I tracked down the src for 1.5.0_07. There was a change in the
ObjectInputStream implementation for 1.5.
How will non-committers get their patches added to the status file?
-dain
On Aug 2, 2006, at 10:53 AM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
People have been referring to things requiring votes as
'RTCs'.
Everyone *please* stop using RTC in this manner.
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2063?page=comments#action_12425311
]
Ted Kirby commented on GERONIMO-2063:
-
If j2ee-corba is not started before magicgball, the start, stop, start of
magicball gives:
13:52:45,531 ERROR [IORS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
People have been referring to things requiring votes as
'RTCs'.
Everyone *please* stop using RTC in this manner. RTC is a
development model; what it and CTR are concerned with are
patches. Please call them patches. Changes are patches;
RTC and CTR
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2134?page=comments#action_12425301
]
Aaron Mulder commented on GERONIMO-2134:
I see the problem on JDK 1.5.0_07 on Linux (SuSE 10.1 with the default 1.5
JDK). I do not see the problem on
I just tried on a fresh install of Geronimo-Jetty-J2EE-1.1 on Linux
(SuSE 10.1) with JDK 1.5.0_07 (the one SuSE distributes) and I get the
ERROR. I don't know how to tell if my JVM has a class leak error or
not, but I'll try to check if you know.
In any case, eliminating the message is fine for
On Aug 2, 2006, at 10:39 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Most of the remaining issues marked for 1.1.1 seem to have been fixed
for 1.1.1 but are still open pending different solutions for 1.2.
There is one big exception -- an ERROR during shutdown on Java 5. It
would be great if someone could look at
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2134?page=comments#action_12425273
]
Joe Bohn commented on GERONIMO-2134:
Are there any special activities required while geronimo is active to prodiuce
this error? I brought the server up u
James,
Thanks for this – we’re still struggling to get this work and thus prove the
concept of producing and consuming large message/files.
Could you be so kind as to provide a more complete working example of
producing/consuming messages via JMS Streams. I really would to get some buy
in on us
log "Endpoint connection to JMS broker failed: ..." on error level
--
Key: AMQ-856
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-856
Project: ActiveMQ
Issue Type: Wish
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-94?page=comments#action_12425252
]
Lin Sun commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-94:
-
Thanks for the quick comments. Could you explain a bit more on "Running
SchemaConversionUtil on 1.1 p
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-94?page=comments#action_12425247
]
Sachin Patel commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-94:
--
If you need something immediatley, as a workaround this can be implemented on
your end insid
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2251?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom reassigned GERONIMO-2251:
---
Assignee: John Sisson
> Add Proxy variables to geronimo.bat & geronimo.sh
> -
>
>
cannot run jar or ear from within eclipse
-
Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-94
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-94
Project: Geronimo-Devtools
Issue Type: Bug
Components: eclip
Most of the remaining issues marked for 1.1.1 seem to have been fixed
for 1.1.1 but are still open pending different solutions for 1.2.
There is one big exception -- an ERROR during shutdown on Java 5. It
would be great if someone could look at that before the branch. I've
been trying hard to c
The memory leak is fixed. Thanks to Kevan for the quick work.
I am going to branch this afternoon at 1500. If you have something in progress ping me and we'll
work it out.
The branch will be branches/1.1.1 and will only be taking bug fixes and performance regressions
(tracked by JIRA.). Al
On 8/2/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Did you ever get this resolved?
No, I just stopped trying. Should the car-maven-plugin be fully
working and able to insert the META-INF/geronimo-plugin.xml files now?
If so, I'll give it another shot. If we haven't fixed the problem
that it d
Did you ever get this resolved?
--jason
On Jul 31, 2006, at 9:04 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
So I tried on a different machine today.
If I specify no version number for car-maven-plugin in the POM, I get:
[ERROR] BUILD ERROR
[INFO]
-
Does this exist on trunk too?
--jason
On Aug 1, 2006, at 5:46 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: kevan
Date: Tue Aug 1 17:46:09 2006
New Revision: 427826
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=427826&view=rev
Log:
GERONIMO-2204 I'm reverting the original change associated with
this Jira.
I have checked in the change to the SU packaging MOJO so that all the
libraries are bundled under lib, there was a problem with the
servicemix-components pom.xml since servicemix-core was not marked scope
provided so I changed that - however since the SU uses classes from
servicemix-core I had t
The manve tooling now does all the packaging for SA and SU's :
see
http://www.servicemix.org/site/working-with-service-units.html
http://www.servicemix.org/site/working-with-service-assemblies.html
The problem with the xbean classpath has been discussed a little, and I
think we are trying to
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I've just seen a problem though.
I though the maven-jbi-plugin would embed jar dependencies in the service
unit, but it does not seem to be the case.
Let's say I have a multiproject build containing a jar, a SU and a SA.
If the code inside the SU depends on the jar, I wo
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2263?page=comments#action_12425217
]
Sachin Patel commented on GERONIMO-2263:
I was not able to reproduce this, could you provide a test case or additional
information? Did you modify the
Nice work Kevan. I got Liferay enterprise to run fine now ;-)
Jeff
Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Jul 31, 2006, at 10:45 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>
>> Concur...blocked.
>>
>> Aaron Mulder wrote:
>>> Jeff just noted that Liferay seems to take an abnormal amount of
>>> memory to run.
>>> I just rede
Redeploy application from console
-
Key: GERONIMO-2263
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2263
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Componen
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-508?page=comments#action_36675 ]
Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-508:
English is not my native language, but may this word be spell differently in
english and american ?
I see
http://diction
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2118?page=all ]
Krishnakumar B updated GERONIMO-2118:
-
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
Affects Version/s: 1.1.1
1.2
(was: 1.1)
Updated to patch
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2118?page=all ]
Krishnakumar B updated GERONIMO-2118:
-
Attachment: ConsoleDeploymentCheck-2118.patch
Using console when i deploy an application and it throws Exception when
starting the GBeans the cons
76 matches
Mail list logo
