[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1054?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_40125
]
Jeff Peterson commented on SM-1054:
---
I will work on creating a patch
Port JmsMarshaler from lightweight jms
I've now updated enough of the configs so we can see if we can
assemble them into a server. It would be great if some one else
could take a look at some of the remaining ones, list at the end of
this email. To get your own list of un-cleaned-up configs build g,
fire it up, and run
Sorry for long response time. I will look into your patch as soon as
possible.
Cheers,
Thomas Termin
Vinod Chhabria (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_40120
]
Vinod Chhabria
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-6?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Dillon closed GSHELL-6.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Refactor output and verbosity filters
-
A geronimo installation was detected, however the version could not be
verified warning while adding Geronimo 2.0.1
-
Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-202
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12526399
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-202:
--
What happens if there is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shiva Kumar H R updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-202:
-
Attachment: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-202-temp.patch
Tim,
I am not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shiva Kumar H R reassigned GERONIMODEVTOOLS-202:
Assignee: Tim McConnell
A geronimo installation was
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12526433
]
Jacek Laskowski commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-199:
--
I'd ask you to put a new plugin
The following schema is converted to
xmlns:log=http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/loginconfig-2.0;, but the
server-side=true is not removed from the converted schema. This
results in a failed deployment (error pasted below). Is this expected
behavior?
dep:xml-reference
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3457?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12526459
]
Bhagwath Vadyala commented on GERONIMO-3457:
we are using jdk1.6.0_01.
Drools BRMS issue using
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12526465
]
Tim McConnell commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-199:
Hi Jacek, sorry if I was unclear in my
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12526477
]
Tim McConnell commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-202:
Hi Shiva, I share your concern as well,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim McConnell reassigned GERONIMODEVTOOLS-202:
--
Assignee: Shiva Kumar H R (was: Tim McConnell)
A geronimo
Hi Anita!
When I removed the remote login stuff I wrote some schema conversion
code but left it incomplete when I realized it would have to remove a
reference to a gbean I was removing (JaasLoginService?? I can't quite
remember). My thinking was that if someone was using remote login we
This is excellent...I'll give it a spin today .
On Sep 10, 2007, at 5:03 PM, Paul McMahan wrote:
Recent work on GERONIMO-3413 provides a new admin console with two
main improvements:
- New system modules and 3rd party plugins can dynamically add and
remove their portlets in the admin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12526496
]
Matt Hogstrom commented on GERONIMO-3465:
-
Donald, personally I don't like lots of gorp coming out so I
--- David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Anita!
When I removed the remote login stuff I wrote some schema conversion
code but left it incomplete when I realized it would have to remove a
reference to a gbean I was removing (JaasLoginService?? I can't quite
remember). My
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12526526
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-3465:
Um, how about we discuss it first? :-P I see no need to start
The intent of this thread is to discuss the default log level for the
Geronimo server. I'd like to limit the discussion to the near-term
(e.g. Geronimo 2.0.x). IMO, we need a good overhaul of our logging
code. I'd like to see more structure and consistency in our logging.
However, that's
On Sep 11, 2007, at 1:27 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
The intent of this thread is to discuss the default log level for
the Geronimo server. I'd like to limit the discussion to the near-
term (e.g. Geronimo 2.0.x). IMO, we need a good overhaul of our
logging code. I'd like to see more structure
Folks,
here is some additional docs for the pluggable console.
User's and Developer's guide:
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDEV/pluggable-administration-console.html
Online presentation:
http://cwiki.apache.org/geronimo/pluggable-administration-console.html
Cheers!
Hernan
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12526566
]
Jarek Gawor commented on GERONIMO-3462:
---
Tomek,
I'm still unable to reproduce your result. I created a
Kevan Miller wrote:
The intent of this thread is to discuss the default log level for the
Geronimo server. I'd like to limit the discussion to the near-term (e.g.
Geronimo 2.0.x). IMO, we need a good overhaul of our logging code. I'd
like to see more structure and consistency in our logging.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Joe Bohn resolved GERONIMO-3401.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1
This issue has been resolved by disabling
I don't mind if INFO is the default log level. It would be nice if we
can also change it
1. during Geronimo startup.
2. during runtime.
Possible ?
Cheers
Prasad
On 9/11/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The intent of this thread is to discuss the default log level for the
Geronimo
Are you refering to console output or what is captured in the log file?
--jason
-Original Message-
From: Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:27:20
To:Geronimo Dev dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] Default server log level
The intent of this thread is
I think we have an acceptable solution for this whole CXF/Spring
issue. First, CXF will continue to be configured with Spring as
before. Second, all web applications will now get an automatic
hidden-classes filtering for Spring classes and resources. That
should enable applications to have their
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12526626
]
Tomasz Mazan commented on GERONIMO-3462:
Jarek
Thanks for your instruction. I'll try to implement your
On Sep 11, 2007, at 1:43 PM, Paul McMahan wrote:
On Sep 11, 2007, at 1:27 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
The intent of this thread is to discuss the default log level for
the Geronimo server. I'd like to limit the discussion to the near-
term (e.g. Geronimo 2.0.x). IMO, we need a good overhaul of
On Sep 11, 2007, at 5:05 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Are you refering to console output or what is captured in the log
file?
Heh. Come on, read my mind... :-P
I'm referring to the log FILE. I'm fine with our current CONSOLE
behavior...
--kevan
On Sep 11, 2007, at 5:05 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Sep 11, 2007, at 5:05 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Are you refering to console output or what is captured in the log
file?
Heh. Come on, read my mind... :-P
Um, ya... :-P
I'm referring to the log FILE. I'm fine with our current CONSOLE
This is kick ass awesome... :-)
--jason
On Sep 10, 2007, at 5:03 PM, Paul McMahan wrote:
Recent work on GERONIMO-3413 provides a new admin console with two
main improvements:
- New system modules and 3rd party plugins can dynamically add
and remove their portlets in the admin console
-
The whole debate was a huge fiasco, and unfortunately the one that
screams the most and makes up the best stories win, not necessarily what
is best for the community or the product.
I had no choice but to follow what was going on. I'm not sure what is
going to happen to this code base at this
On Sep 11, 2007, at 5:37 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
I think we have an acceptable solution for this whole CXF/Spring
issue. First, CXF will continue to be configured with Spring as
before. Second, all web applications will now get an automatic
hidden-classes filtering for Spring classes and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller resolved GERONIMO-3265.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0.x)
2.1
Thanks Filip for your continuing support of the Geronimo project, and
of course for the important contributions you make to the Tomcat
project. It must be frustrating to take a step back when so much
progress has been made. But you did the right thing for the
community and I'm confident
I agree, that changing the file logging level to INFO is more usable for the
majority of our users.
-Donald
Kevan Miller wrote:
The intent of this thread is to discuss the default log level for the
Geronimo server. I'd like to limit the discussion to the near-term (e.g.
Geronimo 2.0.x).
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12526661
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-2964:
The way I verified that the original patch broke backwards
Tim, how is the 2.0.0 plugin updates coming?
Do you have an outlook for when we'll be ready for another RC vote?
-Donald
Kevan Miller wrote:
Hey Tim,
Apologies for my slow review of the Eclipse plugin. Reviewing the binary
distribution, it looks like we are missing license and notice
Can you update this thread with a notice that this vote has been canceled and
another will be started, given there has been several JIRAs fixed in the 2.0.0
branch since this vote started?
-Donald
Tim McConnell wrote:
Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the Geronimo Eclipse Plugin
I very much favor and endorse changing the file logging level to INFO.
Ted Kirby
On 9/11/07, Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree, that changing the file logging level to INFO is more usable for the
majority of our users.
-Donald
Kevan Miller wrote:
The intent of this thread is
42 matches
Mail list logo
