xfire annotation exception: Service class cannot be abstract for jsr181 proxy

2007-09-17 Thread ArmenH
Hi, Does anyone have a complete example of jsr181 proxy for external web service? I have two services, one is inside jbi container and the other one is outside. The inside service consumes the external web service. I followed the jsr181 proxy example, but got

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-213) Cannot select Apache Geronimo v1.0 on New Server Runtime dialog.

2007-09-17 Thread Kan Ogawa (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kan Ogawa updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-213: --- Attachment: GD-213.patch Cannot select Apache Geronimo v1.0 on New Server

[jira] Created: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-213) Cannot select Apache Geronimo v1.0 on New Server Runtime dialog.

2007-09-17 Thread Kan Ogawa (JIRA)
Cannot select Apache Geronimo v1.0 on New Server Runtime dialog. Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-213 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-213 Project: Geronimo-Devtools

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-213) Cannot select Apache Geronimo v1.0 on New Server Runtime dialog.

2007-09-17 Thread Kan Ogawa (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kan Ogawa updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-213: --- Patch Info: [Patch Available] Cannot select Apache Geronimo v1.0 on New

[jira] Created: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-214) Fictional deployment of EJB-JAR

2007-09-17 Thread Tomasz Mazan (JIRA)
Fictional deployment of EJB-JAR --- Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-214 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-214 Project: Geronimo-Devtools Issue Type: Bug Components: eclipse-plugin

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-213) Cannot select Apache Geronimo v1.0 on New Server Runtime dialog.

2007-09-17 Thread Kan Ogawa (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kan Ogawa updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-213: --- Attachment: GD-213-ScreenShot-01.jpg Cannot select Apache Geronimo v1.0

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-213) Cannot select Apache Geronimo v1.0 on New Server Runtime dialog.

2007-09-17 Thread Kan Ogawa (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kan Ogawa updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-213: --- Attachment: GD-213-ScreenShot-02.jpg This is screen shot after applying my

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-213) Cannot select Apache Geronimo v1.0 on New Server Runtime dialog.

2007-09-17 Thread Kan Ogawa (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12527981 ] Kan Ogawa commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-213: Sorry, The screen shot in my first comment means

[BUILD] 2.0: Failed for Revision: 576296

2007-09-17 Thread prasad
OpenEJB trunk at 0 Geronimo Revision: 576296 built with tests included See the full build-0400.log file at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/2.0/20070917/build-0400.log [INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources. Downloading: http://download.java.net/maven/1//commons

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2925) Key used for encryption same for all server instances

2007-09-17 Thread Donald Woods (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2925?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12528039 ] Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-2925: +1 Looks good. Are you going to integrate this into

Re: Obscuring passwords in new ways

2007-09-17 Thread Donald Woods
Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote: On 9/15/07, *David Jencks* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sep 15, 2007, at 10:24 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote: David, Thank you for initiating this discussion and also implementing a quick solution too. Matt asked if I

Re: automatic builds with tests

2007-09-17 Thread Donald Woods
+1 Jarek Gawor wrote: I know that at least the 5am build runs with tests on. I would like to change that so that each build always runs with all tests enabled. Some of the tests in testsuite/ directory actaully start the server so if they are successful we should at least know that the server

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-3473) CA Helper app should support submitting Certificate Requests from Internet Explorer

2007-09-17 Thread Vamsavardhana Reddy (JIRA)
CA Helper app should support submitting Certificate Requests from Internet Explorer --- Key: GERONIMO-3473 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3473

What exactly is going into 2.0.2?

2007-09-17 Thread David Jencks
I'm starting to wonder what the goal for 2.0.2 is. I kinda thought that a x.y.z where z 0 was a bugfix-only release of x.y.z-1 but I think some new features are going into 2.0.2... IIUC Vamsi is applying an enhancement to allow specifying work directory per-web- app and donald is

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-2964) Cannot specify the Tomcat work directory for a web application

2007-09-17 Thread Vamsavardhana Reddy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vamsavardhana Reddy updated GERONIMO-2964: -- Attachment: GERONIMO-2964-2.0-w-cons-change.patch Cannot specify the

Re: What exactly is going into 2.0.2?

2007-09-17 Thread Joe Bohn
I agree 2.0.2 should be primarily bug fixes but I don't think it must be limited to only bug fixes. If there are small changes that address customer concerns on security (such as GERONIMO-2925) or usability then I think those can be considered for inclusion. Key is to keep the date Kevan

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-2964) Cannot specify the Tomcat work directory for a web application

2007-09-17 Thread Vamsavardhana Reddy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vamsavardhana Reddy updated GERONIMO-2964: -- Attachment: GERONIMO-2964-2.0.patch Cannot specify the Tomcat work

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-3474) Use released openjpa 1.0.0

2007-09-17 Thread David Jencks (JIRA)
Use released openjpa 1.0.0 -- Key: GERONIMO-3474 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3474 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public (Regular issues) Components:

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-2964) Cannot specify the Tomcat work directory for a web application

2007-09-17 Thread Vamsavardhana Reddy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vamsavardhana Reddy updated GERONIMO-2964: -- Attachment: GERONIMO-2964-trunk.patch Cannot specify the Tomcat work

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-2964) Cannot specify the Tomcat work directory for a web application

2007-09-17 Thread Vamsavardhana Reddy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vamsavardhana Reddy updated GERONIMO-2964: -- Attachment: suid.patch Cannot specify the Tomcat work directory for a web

Re: automatic builds with tests

2007-09-17 Thread Paul McMahan
+1 On Sep 14, 2007, at 4:43 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote: I know that at least the 5am build runs with tests on. I would like to change that so that each build always runs with all tests enabled. Some of the tests in testsuite/ directory actaully start the server so if they are successful we should

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2964) Cannot specify the Tomcat work directory for a web application

2007-09-17 Thread Paul McMahan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12528065 ] Paul McMahan commented on GERONIMO-2964: Vamsi, that error messages looks related to

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-3475) expose thread pool size in config.xml/config-substitutions.properties

2007-09-17 Thread David Jencks (JIRA)
expose thread pool size in config.xml/config-substitutions.properties - Key: GERONIMO-3475 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3475 Project: Geronimo Issue

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2964) Cannot specify the Tomcat work directory for a web application

2007-09-17 Thread Vamsavardhana Reddy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12528080 ] Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-2964: --- Submitted the last comment accidentally and here

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-3476) maybe more flexible auto-bind into global jndi?

2007-09-17 Thread David Jencks (JIRA)
maybe more flexible auto-bind into global jndi? --- Key: GERONIMO-3476 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3476 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: New Feature Security Level:

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2964) Cannot specify the Tomcat work directory for a web application

2007-09-17 Thread Vamsavardhana Reddy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12528088 ] Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-2964: --- Please see the comments above. If you have a

Re: [DISCUSS] Default server log level

2007-09-17 Thread Matt Hogstrom
I'll be the dissenting opinion :) Personally, I don't like INFO as its too verbose and it is not consistent across projects. If we moved it I would prefer WARN rather than INFO but it largely depends on who we feel the largest user population is.. I'm more concerned about people's

Re: [DISCUSS] G 2.0.2 Release plan

2007-09-17 Thread Matt Hogstrom
On Sep 14, 2007, at 2:55 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: All, I think it's time to start rolling out a 2.0.2 release. There have been a number of fixes in response to user issues, since 2.0.1. Time, I think, to make these available in a release. We'd also be able to make use of released versions

Re: What exactly is going into 2.0.2?

2007-09-17 Thread Paul McMahan
I agree that 2.0.2 should be limited to bug fixes but I think new features are OK as long as they are very low risk and don't cause any backwards compatibility problems. I think when users pick up a x.y.z +1 release they want and expect minimal risk and disruption. Right now GERONIMO-2925

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2964) Cannot specify the Tomcat work directory for a web application

2007-09-17 Thread Vamsavardhana Reddy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12528079 ] Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-2964: --- I have attached three patches this time: 1.

Re: What exactly is going into 2.0.2?

2007-09-17 Thread David Jencks
Speaking of versions I think we should go to openjpa 1.0.0 the trunk build has been broken for a bit since the -r* snapshot openejb was using seems to have disappeared. I'm working on this... david jencks On Sep 17, 2007, at 11:10 AM, Paul McMahan wrote: I agree that 2.0.2 should be

Re: What exactly is going into 2.0.2?

2007-09-17 Thread Vamsavardhana Reddy
On 9/17/07, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I agree that 2.0.2 should be limited to bug fixes but I think new features are OK as long as they are very low risk and don't cause any backwards compatibility problems. I think when users pick up a x.y.z +1 release they want and expect

Re: svn commit: r574694 - in /geronimo/server/trunk: configs/jetty6-deployer/src/main/plan/ configs/jetty6-deployer/src/plan/ configs/tomcat6-deployer/src/main/plan/ configs/tomcat6-deployer/src/plan/

2007-09-17 Thread Paul McMahan
On Sep 14, 2007, at 7:58 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: Heh. Well, I had hopes for Paul's proposal... Sounds like it's still better than where we are now... I was also thinking that it's a step forward, but now it's not clear to me whether moving the spring filter to cxf-deployer would break

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.0.0 (RC3)

2007-09-17 Thread Shiva Kumar H R
+1 Could successfully execute all steps listed in http://cwiki.apache.org/geronimo/java-ee-50-app-development-on-geronimo-simplified-using-eclipse.html Test results and other observations posted in [Discuss] Release Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.0.0 (RC3) thread as per Vamsi's suggestion. - Shiva

Re: [DISCUSS] G 2.0.2 Release plan

2007-09-17 Thread Jay D. McHugh
+1 on the release +1 on Kevan as RM Also, I'd like to help out on TCK testing. I've never done it before but I have sent in my NDA. Matt Hogstrom wrote: On Sep 14, 2007, at 2:55 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: All, I think it's time to start rolling out a 2.0.2 release. There have been a number

[Discuss] Release Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.0.0 (RC3)

2007-09-17 Thread Shiva Kumar H R
Tim, The Install prerequisites section of http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/releases/RC3/Geronimo_Eclipse_Plugin_2.0.0_Instructions-RC3.txt needs following updates: 1) 1 -- Europa (also known as Eclipse 3.3), which is platform specific Need to mention package name as Eclipse Classic to avoid

Re: svn commit: r574694 - in /geronimo/server/trunk: configs/jetty6-deployer/src/main/plan/ configs/jetty6-deployer/src/plan/ configs/tomcat6-deployer/src/main/plan/ configs/tomcat6-deployer/src/plan/

2007-09-17 Thread Jarek Gawor
Paul, In the new admin console, do the web applications (that provide portlets) need to share Spring version/configuration with the Pluto config module? What if each web application had its own Spring jars? Would that work? Moving the Spring filters to cxf-deployer is better from the modularity

Re: What exactly is going into 2.0.2?

2007-09-17 Thread Kevan Miller
I'm moving this to the '[DISCUSS] G 2.0.2 Release Plan' mail thread. --kevan

[jira] Updated: (SM-1054) Port JmsMarshaler from lightweight jms component to servicemix-jms component

2007-09-17 Thread Jeff Peterson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1054?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeff Peterson updated SM-1054: -- Attachment: SM-1054.patch Contributed patch Port JmsMarshaler from lightweight jms component to

Build problem on Trunk

2007-09-17 Thread Vamsavardhana Reddy
I guess I am the only one for now hitting this build error. Anyone else seeing this error? Output from command window posted below.. I am using Sun JDK 1.5.0_12 on WinXP SP2. [INFO] - --- [INFO] Building Geronimo ::

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.0.0 (RC3)

2007-09-17 Thread Tim McConnell
I have successfully deployed and invoked these applications with RC3: -- Daytrader -- calculator-stateless-pojo -- Thanks, Tim McConnell

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.0.0 (RC3)

2007-09-17 Thread Tim McConnell
+1 Tim McConnell wrote: Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.0.0 RC3 (to correspond with the Geronimo 2.0.1 Server release). The deployable zip file is here:

Re: What exactly is going into 2.0.2?

2007-09-17 Thread Kevan Miller
On 9/17/07, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Joe, you mentioned TCK and our ability to make 2.0.2 available by 9/21. I have a question for the team about that. I would like to bump Geronimo's version of MyFaces from 1.2.0 to 1.2.1 since that new release contains several bug fixes,

Re: svn commit: r574694 - in /geronimo/server/trunk: configs/jetty6-deployer/src/main/plan/ configs/jetty6-deployer/src/plan/ configs/tomcat6-deployer/src/main/plan/ configs/tomcat6-deployer/src/plan/

2007-09-17 Thread Paul McMahan
On Sep 17, 2007, at 12:48 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote: Paul, In the new admin console, do the web applications (that provide portlets) need to share Spring version/configuration with the Pluto config module? What if each web application had its own Spring jars? Would that work? Actually the

Re: What exactly is going into 2.0.2?

2007-09-17 Thread Joe Bohn
Paul McMahan wrote: Joe, you mentioned TCK and our ability to make 2.0.2 available by 9/21. I have a question for the team about that. I would like to bump Geronimo's version of MyFaces from 1.2.0 to 1.2.1 since that new release contains several bug fixes, some of them actually found and

Re: [Discuss] Release Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.0.0 (RC3)

2007-09-17 Thread Shiva Kumar H R
Some more observations while testing Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.0.0 (RC3): a) When defining a new server, Apache Geronimo v1.2 Server doesn't get listed in the list of available servers. b) Looks like WTP 2.0.1RC2 has solved the problem reported in GERONIMODEVTOOLS-209 if the HelloWorld WAR's

Re: What exactly is going into 2.0.2?

2007-09-17 Thread Kevan Miller
On 9/17/07, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Speaking of versions I think we should go to openjpa 1.0.0 the trunk build has been broken for a bit since the -r* snapshot openejb was using seems to have disappeared. Hmm. A while back, I moved branches/2.0 and trunk to OpenJPA

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-3474) Use released openjpa 1.0.0

2007-09-17 Thread David Jencks (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3474?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Jencks closed GERONIMO-3474. -- Resolution: Fixed kevan did this. Use released openjpa 1.0.0 --

Re: [DISCUSS] G 2.0.2 Release plan

2007-09-17 Thread Kevan Miller
Moved from another mail thread... On 9/17/07, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm starting to wonder what the goal for 2.0.2 is. I kinda thought that a x.y.z where z 0 was a bugfix-only release of x.y.z-1 but I think some new features are going into 2.0.2... IIUC Vamsi is applying an

Re: Build problem on Trunk

2007-09-17 Thread Paul McMahan
On Sep 17, 2007, at 1:35 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote: I guess I am the only one for now hitting this build error. Anyone else seeing this error? Output from command window posted below.. I just rebuilt trunk and didn't see an error using sun javac 1.5.0_07 on osx. Best wishes, Paul

Re: Build problem on Trunk

2007-09-17 Thread Anita Kulshreshtha
This is the error I got from today's trunk on win xp and java 1.5.0_08-b03 - [INFO] [compiler:testCompile] Compiling 16 source files to C:\anita\geronimo\g2.0\modules\geronimo-system\targ et\test-classes [INFO] [ERROR]

Re: What exactly is going into 2.0.2?

2007-09-17 Thread Lin Sun
FYI - for 2.0.2, We are looking at moving to newer versions of tranql artifacts which contains a fix for G2188. Hopefully this won't impact tck. Thanks, Lin Kevan Miller wrote: On 9/17/07, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Joe, you mentioned TCK and our ability to make 2.0.2

[BUILD] 2.0: Failed for Revision: 576555

2007-09-17 Thread prasad
OpenEJB trunk at 0 Geronimo Revision: 576555 built with tests skipped See the full build-1400.log file at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/2.0/20070917/build-1400.log [INFO] [resources:testResources] [INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2188) When oracle wrapper is used, commits are not immediately committed to oracle database

2007-09-17 Thread Lin Sun (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12528121 ] Lin Sun commented on GERONIMO-2188: --- Verified this is fixed in tranql connector trunk and oracle vendor wrapper

[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-2188) When oracle wrapper is used, commits are not immediately committed to oracle database

2007-09-17 Thread Lin Sun (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lin Sun reassigned GERONIMO-2188: - Assignee: David Jencks (was: Lin Sun) When oracle wrapper is used, commits are not

Re: svn commit: r574694 - in /geronimo/server/trunk: configs/jetty6-deployer/src/main/plan/ configs/jetty6-deployer/src/plan/ configs/tomcat6-deployer/src/main/plan/ configs/tomcat6-deployer/src/plan/

2007-09-17 Thread Jarek Gawor
On 9/17/07, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Moving the Spring filters to cxf-deployer is better from the modularity point of view (and I'm all for it) but the end results will be the same in this case. I think Kevan's idea might be the best solution here. The end results here

Re: svn commit: r574694 - in /geronimo/server/trunk: configs/jetty6-deployer/src/main/plan/ configs/jetty6-deployer/src/plan/ configs/tomcat6-deployer/src/main/plan/ configs/tomcat6-deployer/src/plan/

2007-09-17 Thread Paul McMahan
On Sep 17, 2007, at 4:15 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote: Moving the filter from web deployer to cxf deployer will have no effect on your app. The application will always end up with the same filter in either setup. It will only work ok, if the filter is in cxf-deployer *and* if you use Tomcat or

[BUILD] Trunk: Failed for Revision: 576583

2007-09-17 Thread prasad
OpenEJB trunk at 0 Geronimo Revision: 576555 built with tests skipped See the full build-1400.log file at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/2.0/20070917/build-1400.log [INFO] [resources:testResources] [INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO

Re: Build problem on Trunk

2007-09-17 Thread Joe Bohn
I updated and built earlier today without any problems. I built rev. 576541 with Sun JDK 1.5.0_11 on OSX 10.4.10 Joe Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote: I guess I am the only one for now hitting this build error. Anyone else seeing this error? Output from command window posted below.. I am using

[BUILD] Trunk: Failed for Revision: 576584

2007-09-17 Thread prasad
OpenEJB trunk at 576572 Geronimo Revision: 576584 built with tests included See the full build-1600.log file at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20070917/build-1600.log [INFO] Surefire report directory: /home/prasad/geronimo/trunk/modules/geronimo-cli/target/surefire-reports

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.0.0 (RC3)

2007-09-17 Thread Tim McConnell
Hi Ted, yes I shall do that now--it never occurred to me that anyone would want to use 1.0 and 1.1 Ted Kirby wrote: From the staging update site, I downloaded and installed a 2.0 tomcat server, started it, brought up the console, and stopped it, with WTP 2.0.1 RC2. I could not download a 1.1

Re: XML Schemas on the site

2007-09-17 Thread Aaron Mulder
The 2.0 page isn't quite right -- the preferred J2EE schemas on the top right should name and point to the Java EE 5 ones, I should think. Thanks, Aaron On 9/17/07, Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've updated the XML Schemas info on the web site for reflect 1.0, 1.1 and 2.0 You

where is the Web application security sample svn repo?

2007-09-17 Thread toby cabot
Hi Folks, I'm playing around with application security in Geronimo and found the Web application security sample[1]. It's helpful, thanks! I needed to make a few changes to get it to work with 2.0, so I'm curious if I can check it out of subversion somewhere and use svn to make a patch for you

[jira] Created: (SM-1057) SoapWriter use default suboptimal Content-Transfer-Encoding

2007-09-17 Thread Tomasz Wysocki (JIRA)
SoapWriter use default suboptimal Content-Transfer-Encoding --- Key: SM-1057 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1057 Project: ServiceMix Issue Type: Improvement

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.0.0 (RC3)

2007-09-17 Thread Ted Kirby
From the staging update site, I downloaded and installed a 2.0 tomcat server, started it, brought up the console, and stopped it, with WTP 2.0.1 RC2. I could not download a 1.1 server. Tim, can you put the 1.0 and 1.1 runtimes on the staging site? I presume they'll also be on the production

Re: What exactly is going into 2.0.2?

2007-09-17 Thread Paul McMahan
On Sep 17, 2007, at 1:49 PM, Joe Bohn wrote: Paul McMahan wrote: Joe, you mentioned TCK and our ability to make 2.0.2 available by 9/21. I have a question for the team about that. I would like to bump Geronimo's version of MyFaces from 1.2.0 to 1.2.1 since that new release contains

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-213) Cannot select Apache Geronimo v1.0 on New Server Runtime dialog.

2007-09-17 Thread Kan Ogawa (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12528196 ] Kan Ogawa commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-213: I'm very sorry, On other pc environment, this is

[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-3439) geronimo-openejb-2.0.xsd not packaged under schema directory!

2007-09-17 Thread Jarek Gawor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jarek Gawor reassigned GERONIMO-3439: - Assignee: Jarek Gawor geronimo-openejb-2.0.xsd not packaged under schema directory!

Re: XML Schemas on the site

2007-09-17 Thread Jarek Gawor
Yes, that's right. I updated the schema files to point to Java EE ones. Jarek On 9/17/07, Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The 2.0 page isn't quite right -- the preferred J2EE schemas on the top right should name and point to the Java EE 5 ones, I should think. Thanks, Aaron On

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-213) Cannot select Apache Geronimo v1.0 on New Server Runtime dialog.

2007-09-17 Thread Tim McConnell (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tim McConnell closed GERONIMODEVTOOLS-213. -- Resolution: Fixed Closed per Kan's instructions Cannot select

[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMO-3439) geronimo-openejb-2.0.xsd not packaged under schema directory!

2007-09-17 Thread Jarek Gawor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jarek Gawor resolved GERONIMO-3439. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.0.2 Fix committed to trunk (r. 576663) and

Re: [DISCUSS] Move J2G from sandbox to devtools

2007-09-17 Thread Jason Warner
Donald, It seems no one is opposed to this idea. We're you going to make this change soon? Thanks, Jason Warner On 9/13/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 to move it ... I agree with the other comments on lazy consensus. On Sep 12, 2007, at 10:21 AM, Donald Woods wrote:

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-2925) Key used for encryption same for all server instances

2007-09-17 Thread David Jencks (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2925?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Jencks closed GERONIMO-2925. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.1 2.0.2 Patch (with cleanup

[BUILD] Trunk: Failed for Revision: 576668

2007-09-17 Thread prasad
OpenEJB trunk at 0 Geronimo Revision: 576668 built with tests included See the full build-2200.log file at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20070917/build-2200.log [WARNING] Unable to get resource 'ognl:ognl:jar:2.6.9' from repository apache-incubator (http://people.apache.org

[BUILD] 2.0: Failed for Revision: 576667

2007-09-17 Thread prasad
OpenEJB trunk at 0 Geronimo Revision: 576667 built with tests included See the full build-2200.log file at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/2.0/20070917/build-2200.log [INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] [car:prepare-plan] [INFO] Generated: /home/prasad