JBI 1.0 compatibility layer: Offline tool to transform JBI artifacts in OSGi
bundles
Key: SM-1090
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1090
Project:
Deployment bundle for JBI artifacts
---
Key: SM-1091
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1091
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: New Feature
Reporter: Guillaume Nodet
Fix
I was wondering if we should create a separate wiki space for
ServiceMix 4.0 documentation.
Also I need to take a look at how the camel book works: it generates a
pdf from the wiki, so maybe we could do the same...
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog:
NPE - FTP Sender Endpoint
-
Key: SM-1093
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1093
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: Bug
Components: servicemix-ftp
Affects Versions: 3.1.1
do JMS flow in servicemix 3.x can't implement distributed registry?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-jira--Created%3A-%28SM-1066%29-Distributed-registry-tf4489753s12049.html#a13070107
Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-35?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12532577
]
Guillaume Nodet commented on GSHELL-35:
---
Did you see my changes ?
I still use the CommandDescriptor but wrap it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-35?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12532578
]
Guillaume Nodet commented on GSHELL-35:
---
Additional note: the CommandDescriptor is still used but only as a
OpenEJB trunk at 582050
Geronimo Revision: 582086 built with tests included
See the full build-0200.log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20071005/build-0200.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20071005
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
OpenEJB trunk at 582099
Geronimo Revision: 582185 built with tests included
See the full build-0600.log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20071005/build-0600.log
Downloading:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository//org/apache/tomcat/juli/6.0.13/juli
For maintenance updates, I'd like to see 2 weeks or less, given we want users
to be able to download the latest server instance to use...
Maybe we need to start using a running branch for 2.0.x, like we do on the
server and have trunk for new features (like supporting 2.0 deployment plans).
Here is a list of modules deployed in the new framework assembly. Do
we need all of them?
Thanks
Anita
Found 14 modules
+
org.apache.geronimo.configs/geronimo-gbean-deployer/2.1-SNAPSHOT/car
+ org.apache.geronimo.configs/j2ee-security/2.1-SNAPSHOT/car
+
What's the plan for creating a 2.0.2 branch in preparation of closing down the
release?
-Donald
Kevan Miller wrote:
All,
I think it's time to start rolling out a 2.0.2 release. There have been
a number of fixes in response to user issues, since 2.0.1. Time, I
think, to make these available
JettyAJP13Connector in geronimo-jetty6-minimal isn't using
config-substitutions.properties
--
Key: GERONIMO-3505
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3505
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods closed GERONIMO-3505.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 582249 in branches/2.0 (2.0.2-SNAPSHOT)
Also removed
DJencks suggested that this could be because of some erroneous JARs
downloaded during G build. So I tried rebuilding G with a clean m2 repo, and
the built G is now starting successfully. :)
On 10/4/07, Shiva Kumar H R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to start Geronimo built from trunk on a
Thanks to Jareck's URL fix I can build from c:\Documents and
settings/../.m2 repo. I can start the framework and jetty minimal
server. I am getting corrupt jar for both javaee5 servers.
Thanks
Anita
--- Tim McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Prasad, I'm not -- I just successfully built
Thanks again Guillaume.
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
You can instanciate the bean yourself and populate it:
MyImporter myImporter = new MyImporter();
myImporter.setXxx( ... );
beanEndpoint.setBean(myImporter);
On 10/4/07, Gordon Dickens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am writing a
You can instanciate the bean yourself and populate it:
MyImporter myImporter = new MyImporter();
myImporter.setXxx( ... );
beanEndpoint.setBean(myImporter);
On 10/4/07, Gordon Dickens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am writing a JUnit test for a bean service unit. I need to load
I think Kevan was going to do this yesterday but in his sleep
deprived state from Globe trotting he may still be snoozing. I'll
let him whack me on the head if my notice is inconsistent with his
desire as release manager.
We'll create the 2.0.2 branch on Saturday, October 5th around 1000
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3475?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12532671
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-3475:
Discussion on user list -
Wondering why you are not using the Windows Tip in
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDEV/building-apache-geronimo.html that says:
Windows users are strongly encouraged to change the M2 local repository
(the place where dependencies are downloaded) to a shorter path with no
spaces, e.g. C:\.m2. Using a
Interesting to know that G builds successfully even with an m2 repo that
resides in a lengthy pathname with spaces.
And yes G builds successfully for me too on Win-XP (although I have been
using a shorter path E:\m2repo for my m2 repo).
On 10/5/07, Anita Kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 5, 2007, at 10:02 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I think Kevan was going to do this yesterday but in his sleep
deprived state from Globe trotting he may still be snoozing. I'll
let him whack me on the head if my notice is inconsistent with his
desire as release manager.
We'll create
Javamail Notification events are supposed to be handled by a dispatcher thread.
---
Key: GERONIMO-3506
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3506
Project:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3475?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods closed GERONIMO-3475.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0.2
Committed revision 582308 in trunk
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3475?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods reassigned GERONIMO-3475:
--
Assignee: Donald Woods (was: David Jencks)
expose thread pool size in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3499?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods closed GERONIMO-3499.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1
2.0.2
Expose
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3499?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods reassigned GERONIMO-3499:
--
Assignee: Donald Woods (was: Lin Sun)
Expose ConnectionTimeout configuration in
Can the following be removed from the JEE5 config.xml files, now that we have
the MEJB fix in?
!-- See GERONIMO-3461 for why this is disabled by default --
gbean load=false name=ejb/mgmt/MEJB/
-Donald
Kevan Miller wrote:
All,
I think it's time to start rolling out a 2.0.2
Expose all TomcatConnector attributes in config.xml
---
Key: GERONIMO-3507
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3507
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Improvement
Security
OpenEJB trunk at 582244
Geronimo Revision: 582274 built with tests included
See the full build-1000.log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20071005/build-1000.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20071005
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods closed GERONIMO-3507.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 582323 in branches/2.0 (2.0.2-SNAPSHOT)
Committed
On Oct 5, 2007, at 5:42 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
Here is a list of modules deployed in the new framework
assembly. Do
we need all of them?
There should be the transformer agent too not sure what happened
to it.
There are 2 kinds of stuff here: stuff that (also) exists in
On Oct 5, 2007, at 8:42 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
What's the plan for creating a 2.0.2 branch in preparation of
closing down the release?
Matt sent a note earlier today, while I was in a jet-lagged impose
slumber... I'll plan on creating a branches/2.0.2 for finalizing
release activity on
On Oct 5, 2007, at 6:33 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
Thanks to Jareck's URL fix I can build from c:\Documents and
settings/../.m2 repo. I can start the framework and jetty minimal
server. I am getting corrupt jar for both javaee5 servers.
I should have mentioned this I guess, I thought
go for it..
Anita
--- Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can the following be removed from the JEE5 config.xml files, now that
we have
the MEJB fix in?
!-- See GERONIMO-3461 for why this is disabled by default
--
gbean load=false name=ejb/mgmt/MEJB/
-Donald
That was the content that was necessary when I first created it a long,
long time ago. I think I had some posts back then about what I thought
was still unnecessary but why it was still included in the assembly.
I'm sure that with some more work we could remove more (and I think
David Jencks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-185?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12532715
]
James E. Ervin commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-185:
-
I was wondering if there has been any
Done.
Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
go for it..
Anita
--- Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can the following be removed from the JEE5 config.xml files, now that
we have
the MEJB fix in?
!-- See GERONIMO-3461 for why this is disabled by default
--
gbean load=false
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12532728
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-2964:
Is all the required work for this in 2.0.2 complete?
Cannot
We've been hitting some errors in the TCK tests that validate mgmt with
MEJB. The main problem was that we were failing the name lookup:
javax.naming.NameNotFoundException: Name
java:openejb/Deployment/MEJBGBean/MEJB/javax.management.j2ee.Management
not found
I thought this was strange
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy closed GERONIMO-2964.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Cannot specify the Tomcat work directory for a web
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12532734
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-3465:
Discussion thread can be found at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-185?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim McConnell updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-185:
---
Affects Version/s: (was: 2.1.x)
2.0.0
Yes. I noticed this once too. I rebuilt all the assemblies and kept going.
I thought it was an aberration then and forgot all about it
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/5/07, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 5, 2007, at 6:33 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
Thanks to Jareck's URL fix I can
Still cannot build branches/2.0 without building OpenEJB first, due to XBean
depends
Key: GERONIMO-3508
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3508
I agree that the way maven is organized helps some...I really like the way
the apache Tomcat products are split up by revision on the main page...it
really makes navigating the page easy.
As for the javadoc I think it is a good idea...I know I've had to dig
through the code to figure out how
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAYTRADER-56?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christopher James Blythe closed DAYTRADER-56.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0
Assignee:
I have finally uploaded a new release condidate.
Please review. I have only modified the root pom to make sure the
jars include the needed files.
On 10/5/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So Dan Kulp helped me debugging this problem.
It comes from a bug in 2.0.3 version of
On Oct 5, 2007, at 2:55 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I have finally uploaded a new release condidate.
Please review. I have only modified the root pom to make sure the
jars include the needed files.
Great. Thanks Guillaume.
+1
--kevan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12532761
]
Jacek Laskowski commented on GERONIMO-3508:
---
I don't understand - shouldn't m2 resolve the dependency's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12532764
]
Joe Bohn commented on GERONIMO-3508:
I'm not experiencing this same problem. I've been building geornimo 2.0
The tagged revision of the xbean artifacts are only in the OpenEJB svn repo,
which we don't include in our list of repositories to search for
Jacek Laskowski (JIRA) wrote:
[
I'm using Maven 2.0.7, Sun 1.5.0_11 on WinXP with a clean .m2 repo in the
default location.
Will try it on my SUSE box next to see what happens there
Joe Bohn (JIRA) wrote:
[
I'm using maven 2.0.6 (yes, I know I need to upgrade), Sun 1.5.0_11 on
SLES SUSE with a clean .m2 repo. I'm also able to build without
error on OSX 10.4.10 with a clean repo. It's getting that jar from
somewhere because I see it appear in my local repo as I'm building.
Joe
Donald Woods
copy the extensible administration console plugin into the server project
-
Key: GERONIMO-3509
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3509
Project: Geronimo
Thanks Guillaume for following up on this tedious but important task.
Regards,
Alan
On Oct 5, 2007, at 11:55 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I have finally uploaded a new release condidate.
Please review. I have only modified the root pom to make sure the
jars include the needed files.
On
Just tried it on my SLED10 machine (Maven 2.0.6 and Sun 1.5.0_11) and it
failed exactly the same (I'm building from home on RoadRunner without any
connections to the office and without any Maven proxies)
I built on WinXP and SLED10 with the following 2 steps, with the failure
occurring in
I got identical failures on both Mac OS 10.4.10 and CentOS 4.5 (with JDK
of Apple 1.5.0_07 and Sun 1.5.0_11 respectively, and maven 2.0.7 on
both), both of them with clean repositories and on the
org.apache.geronimo.configs:client-corba-yoko:car:2.0.2-SNAPSHOT
dependency as Don has reported.
jaxws-tool client does not include all java ee specs in classpath
-
Key: GERONIMO-3510
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3510
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3510?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jarek Gawor reassigned GERONIMO-3510:
-
Assignee: Jarek Gawor
jaxws-tool client does not include all java ee specs in
On 10/5/07, Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The tagged revision of the xbean artifacts are only in the OpenEJB svn repo,
which we don't include in our list of repositories to search for
Could we add the repo until XBean 3.2's released (it's being voted as
we speak) and openejb
Yeah, I was seeing that too. I was spending too much time rebuilding
all the assemblies so I took a look and found one possible problem.
Just committed a fix that seems to work for me.
Jarek
On 10/5/07, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes. I noticed this once too. I rebuilt all the
--- Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've been hitting some errors in the TCK tests that validate mgmt
with
MEJB. The main problem was that we were failing the name lookup:
javax.naming.NameNotFoundException: Name
Geronimo Revision: 582427 built with tests included
See the full build-2000.log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/2.0/20071005/build-2000.log
Building Geronimo 2.0 at Revision: 582427
[INFO] Scanning for projects...
[INFO
We ought to be able to fix it with exclusions in the openejb
dependencies and hopefully use xbean 3.2 in our release hopefully
next week
david jencks
On Oct 5, 2007, at 3:10 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 10/5/07, Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The tagged revision of the xbean
Yeah, indeed. :)
Thank you!
Vasily
-Original Message-
From: Matt Hogstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 8:48 AM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Moving to TranQL 1.4 ?
Excellent ... I'm finishing some other performance work. When I get
that
Hi Kevan,
Many thanks for taking the time to explain me what I should do. It is
highly appreciated.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 04/10/2007, at 3:15 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Oct 3, 2007, at 10:07 AM, Gianny Damour wrote:
Hi Matt,
Yes: I would like to add this dependency from the Eclipse
So Dan Kulp helped me debugging this problem.
It comes from a bug in 2.0.3 version of maven-source-plugin.
So i will lock it to 2.0.2 and it seems to work.
I will recut a release now
On 10/5/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've tried different things and I can't find a way to
69 matches
Mail list logo
